Expert predicts ‘Monsoon Britain’

Guest post by Paul Homewood

Prof. Stuart Lane

h/t Robuk

A study, by Professor Stuart Lane of Durham University back in 2008, appears to have been remarkably percipient. Written just after the extremely wet summer of 2007, the study suggests that, far from summers in the UK becoming drier as most climate models predict, they are likely to become wetter.

Lane makes the following points.

  • The wetter weather in 2007, and which he forecasts will continue to be the pattern, is the result of the movement of the jet stream onto a more southerly track. (This, of course, is exactly what happened in 2012).
  • The period 1960-90 was an unusually dry one, especially compared to the 19th and early 20thC.
  • Three-quarters of our flood records start in the flood-poor period that began in the 1960’s. As a result, the frequency of flooding has been underestimated, leading to building on flood plains, etc.
  • Examining seasonal rainfall data and river flow patterns back to 1753, suggests many other “flood-rich periods” in the past which are comparable to now.
  • We have forgotten “just how normal flooding is in the UK”.
  • Linking heavier rainfall to global warming was wrong.

News Release

Last summer was the second wettest on record and experts who have studied rainfall and river flow patterns over 250 years say we must prepare for worse to come. Professor Stuart Lane, from Durham University’s new Institute of Hazard and Risk, says that after about 30 to 40 less eventful years, we seem to be entering a ‘flood-rich’ period. More flooding is likely over a number of decades.

Prof. Lane, who publishes his research in the current edition of the academic journal Geography, set out to examine the wet summer of 2007 in the light of climate change. His work shows that some of the links made between the summer 2007 floods and climate change were wrong. Our current predictions of climate change for summer should result in weather patterns that were the exact opposite of what actually happened in 2007. The British summer is a product of the UK’s weather conveyor belt and the progress of the Circumpolar Vortex or ‘jet stream’. This determines whether we have high or low pressure systems over the UK. Usually the jet stream weakens and moves northwards during spring and into summer. This move signals the change from our winter-spring cyclonic weather to more stable weather during the summer. High pressure systems extend from the south allowing warm air to give us our British summer.

In 2007, the jet stream stayed well south of its normal position for June and July, causing low pressure systems to track over the UK, becoming slow moving as they did so. This has happened in summer before, but not to the same degree. Prof. Lane shows that the British summer can often be very wet – about ten per cent of summers are wetter than a normal winter. What we don’t know is whether climate change will make this happen more in the future.

However, in looking at longer rainfall and river flow records, Prof. Lane shows that we have forgotten just how normal flooding in the UK is. He looked at seasonal rainfall and river flow patterns dating back to 1753 which suggest fluctuations between very wet and very dry periods, each lasting for a few years at a time, but also very long periods of a few decades that can be particularly wet or particularly dry. In terms of river flooding, the period since the early 1960s and until the late 1990s appears to be relatively flood free, especially when compared with some periods in the late 19th century and early 20th Century.

As a result of analysing rainfall and river flow patterns, Prof. Lane believes that the UK is entering a flood rich period that we haven’t seen for a number of decades. He said: “We entered a generally flood-poor period in the 1960s, earlier in some parts of the country, later in others. This does not mean there was no flooding, just that there was much less than before the 1960s and what we are seeing now. This has lowered our own awareness of flood risk in the UK. This has made it easier to go on building on floodplains. It has also helped us to believe that we can manage flooding without too much cost, simply because there was not that much flooding to manage.” He added: “We have also not been good at recognising just how flood-prone we can be. More than three-quarters of our flood records start in the flood-poor period that begins in the 1960s. This matters because we set our flood protection in terms of return periods – the average number of years between floods of a given size. We have probably under-estimated the frequency of flooding, which is now happening, as it did before the 1960s, much more often that we are used to. “The problem is that many of our decisions over what development to allow and what defences to build rely upon a good estimate of these return periods.

The government estimates that 2.1 million properties and 5 million people are at risk of flooding. In his review of the summer floods Sir Michael Pitt was wise to say that flooding should be given the same priority as terrorism.” Professor Lane concluded: “We are now having to learn to live with levels of flooding that are beyond most people’s living memory, something that most of us have forgotten how to do.”

Flooding is one of the issues covered by the Institute of Hazard and Risk Research at Durham University where Prof. Lane is a resident expert. The IHRR, which launches this week, is a new and unique interdisciplinary research institute committed to delivering fundamental research on hazards and risks and to harness this knowledge to inform global policy. It aims to improve human responses to both age-old hazards such as volcanoes, earthquakes, landslides and floods as well as the new and uncertain risks of climate change, surveillance, terror and emerging technologies. Prof. Lane’s research is funded by the Willis Research Network, an innovative collaboration between universities worldwide and the insurance industry, and The UK Research Councils’ Rural Economy and Land Use Programme.

http://www.dur.ac.uk/news/newsitem/?itemno=6468

Perhaps Julia Slingo should read this paper.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

83 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mike Bromley the Canucklehead back in Kurdistan but actually in Switzerland
January 27, 2013 12:48 pm

What part of “FLOODPLAIN” was not immediately clear? They didn’t call it a “droughtplain” or a “builder’s paradise”, did they. All the climate change-panicked pundits should just take a remedial course in geomorphology in order to cement the variability of the climate in their noggins.

Patrick Hrushowy
January 27, 2013 12:51 pm

Is it possible that a similar shift in the jet stream track has altered percipitation patterns on the west coast of North America? And follows the same kind of shift between wet and dry?

Ian W
January 27, 2013 12:52 pm

One has to congratulate the warmists that the use of the term ‘climate change’ is now automatically associated in ones head with Anthropogenic Global Warming. So this study appears to make no mention of AGW but by using the term ‘climate change’ it is implied. Agenda 21 Newspeak.
The Great Famine of 1315-1322 was caused by continual rain at the end of the Medieval Warm Period as the Earth cooled into the Little Ice Age. We may be at a similar point now as we exit the 20th century warm period into a cooler period. If it becomes a minimum to the depth of the Maunder minimum then the Institute of Hazard and Risk Research will have plenty to do.

January 27, 2013 12:54 pm

It seems from the summary an excellent piece of work, but prediction based on perceived past patterns without understanding the underlying causes isn’t science. Which is not to say his prediction won’t prove correct.

Pingo
January 27, 2013 1:00 pm

Don’t expect the beeb to report this!

January 27, 2013 1:06 pm

I wonder how much rain fell in Britain in 1315 during The Wolf Minimum, which was also the start of The Great Famine and The Little Ice Age?

Dragon's Hunab
January 27, 2013 1:10 pm

Interesting story, but it really won’t matter what the content is. Anytime there’s a change in the weather (READ: Always) the AGW people will say it verifies global warming. And it’s still a climate prediction and as susceptible to error as any other.

January 27, 2013 1:15 pm

It simply astounds me that in our thousands of years of living experience we are so easily seduced from or are so ignorant of our past and lessons so freely available.

January 27, 2013 1:16 pm

English long term summer temperatures have been remarkably consistent
For 350 years the average Central England summer temperatures were showing no increase whatsoever oscillating between 14 and 16.5 degrees C, with a zero trend.
During the same 350 year period the winters have warmed up by a meager 1 degree C.
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/MidSummer-MidWinter.htm

pat
January 27, 2013 1:26 pm

what to make of this, anthony?
26 Jan: Sydney Morning Herald: AFP: Cities affecting weather in faraway places: study
Heat from large cities alters local streams of high-altitude winds, potentially affecting weather in locations thousands of kilometres away, researchers say.
The findings could explain a long-running puzzle in climate change – why some regions in the northern hemisphere are strangely experiencing warmer winters than computer models have forecast…
This phenomenon, known as the “urban heat island”, has been known for years, but until now has mainly been thought to affect only city dwellers, especially in summer heatwaves.
But a team of scientists in the United States, using a computer model of the atmosphere, point to impacts that go much further than expected.
The high concentration of heat rises into jet-stream winds and widens their flow, transporting heat – as much as 1C – to places far away…
The effect on global temperatures, though, is negligible, accounting for an average warming worldwide of just 0.01C…
The study appears in the journal Nature Climate Change.
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/weather/cities-affecting-weather-in-faraway-places-study-20130128-2dfk9.html

January 27, 2013 1:31 pm

Mike Bromley the Canucklehead back in Kurdistan but actually in Switzerland says:
January 27, 2013 at 12:48 pm.
Geomorphology (from Greek: γῆ, ge, “earth”; μορφή, morfé, “form”; and λόγος, logos, “study”) is the scientific study of landforms and the processes that shape them.(wiki) While all information is useful, I’m not clear how a knowledge of Geomorphology is directly pertinent to understanding the variability of climate. (no snark intended).
It’s also of interest to note that, certainly in Europe, the years directly after the end of the Napoleonic Wars were notable for very wet weather, with famine and food shortages rampant throughout Europe. This would have been about the time when the LIA started to change into a warming period. Could it be that heavy precipitation is one of the signals of a change in climate ? I am a bear of very little brain on this, so would appreciate a heavyweight view.

john robertson
January 27, 2013 1:33 pm

Who made the decision to ignore floods from before 1960?
I thought England had records back to the 1300s, of conditions inside the boroughs.
Basing public policy on a history of floods cut off at 1960 defies all logic,do I misunderstand?

GeoLurking
January 27, 2013 1:40 pm

Per Strandberg (@LittleIceAge) says:
January 27, 2013 at 1:06 pm
I wonder how much rain fell in Britain in 1315 during The Wolf Minimum, which was also the start of The Great Famine and The Little Ice Age?

1314 A.D. In 1314 [in England], it rained almost ten months continually, but during July and August, the rains were incessant. The husbandmen [farmers] could not get in the small crop they had on the ground, and what they got in, the yield from it was very small. Hence there was a grievous famine in 1315 that lasted two years and from it most mortal dysentery. So that it was drudgery on the surviving to bury the dead. Cattle and beasts being corrupted by the grass whereon they fed and then died; hence people dreaded eating their flesh. Only horseflesh was a delicate dish. The poor stole fat cats to eat.

“A Chronological Listing of Early Weather Events 6th Edition” James A. Marusek (2010)
http://www.breadandbutterscience.com/Weather.pdf

DaveG
January 27, 2013 1:41 pm

I own a beautiful Stone cottage just below Harlech Castle in Gwynedd North Wales The castle walls used to be feet away from Cardigan Bay.The sea originally came much closer to Harlech than in modern times, and a water-gate and a long flight of steps leads down from the castle to the former shore, which allowed the castle to be resupplied by sea during sieges. over the years the sea level dropped leaving the Castle high and dry, miles from the bay and its beaches.
UNESCO considers Harlech to be one of “the finest examples of late 13th century and early 14th century military architecture in Europe”
Here is my Dilemma do I sell the cottage or rise it up in sticks to avoid the ocean in rush from the predictions and the coming end times???
Sarc off.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlech_Castle
http://www.castlewales.com/harlech.html

January 27, 2013 1:44 pm

“This has lowered our own awareness of flood risk in the UK.”
First, you can bet there were old grouches who remembered wetter times, saying “Don’t build there.” Second, there were slick builders saying, “I have a charming lot for you to build your dream cottage upon.”
The buyer beware. Keep your awareness high.

lemiere jacques
January 27, 2013 1:50 pm

causality?
god…
someone will be right for sure.
You should try to predict who predicted right.

Philip
January 27, 2013 1:57 pm

Difficult to make sense of the recent fuss over UK rainfall and flooding, and well done to Paul Homewood for continuing to highlight the issue.
Presumably the facts are according to the UK rainfall data on the Met Office site? A small increasing trend since 1800. A larger increase since 1960, but comparable to increases seen over several periods since 1800. An increase in winter rainfall during 1850-1950, but nothing obviously different since then. Google easily turns up a credible study of UK flooding published in 2002, concluding no obvious trends.
But the Met Office press releases largely concentrate on the increasing period from 1960 without bothering to point out the longer term behavior! These press releases seem designed to mislead, I can’t think how else to interpret them. I tell you, if I lived in Tunbridge Wells I would be well and truly disgusted, and I would certainly insist on my money back (if only I could).

January 27, 2013 1:57 pm

pat says:
January 27, 2013 at 1:26 pm
This phenomenon, known as the “urban heat island”………The high concentration of heat rises into jet-stream winds and widens their flow….
Not certain about the large cities, but I think there is no doubt that the northern latitudes volcanic eruptions do that:
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/NH.htm

John West
January 27, 2013 2:11 pm

Sydney Morning Herald: (via pat)
” transporting heat – as much as 1C – to places far away…The effect on global temperatures, though, is negligible, accounting for an average warming worldwide of just 0.01C…
Yes, averaged over the entire surface it (and UHI effect in general) is negligible, too bad we don’t measure temperature that way; we measure at the effect and then pretend we don’t.

Truthseeker
January 27, 2013 2:17 pm

“We have forgotten “just how normal flooding is in the UK”.”
I think that alarmism relies on some sort of collective Alzheimer’s, where the inconvenient past is forgotten …

Steve B
January 27, 2013 2:21 pm

pat says:
January 27, 2013 at 1:26 pm
what to make of this, anthony?
26 Jan: Sydney Morning Herald: AFP: Cities affecting weather in faraway places: study
Heat from large cities alters local streams of high-altitude winds, potentially affecting weather in locations thousands of kilometres away, researchers say.
The findings could explain a long-running puzzle in climate change – why some regions in the northern hemisphere are strangely experiencing warmer winters than computer models have forecast…
This phenomenon, known as the “urban heat island”, has been known for years, but until now has mainly been thought to affect only city dwellers, especially in summer heatwaves.
But a team of scientists in the United States, using a computer model of the atmosphere, point to impacts that go much further than expected.”
Read that last sentence. Computer Model says it all. Who programmed it and what parameters did they use.

January 27, 2013 2:23 pm

Pat:
But a team of scientists in the United States, using a computer model of the atmosphere, point to impacts that go much further than expected.
The high concentration of heat rises into jet-stream winds and widens their flow, transporting heat – as much as 1C – to places far away…
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Yet another MODEL. Where are the measurements to demonstrate this “model”?
Models of models of models – does no one actually measure anything anymore?
As an engineer we used to do flood frequency calculations then go out in the field to look for flood evidence at the levels we predicted to check our calculations. Doesn’t anyone leave the office anymore?

David
January 27, 2013 2:29 pm

Wetter but not monsoon? As I understand it a monsoon can only happen on a large landmass when the interior heats and convection sucks in wet maritime air.

Latitude
January 27, 2013 2:30 pm

This has made it easier to go on building on floodplains
==================
swampland in Florida

1 2 3 4