Oh Noes! The clock of doom is stuck again, global warming blamed

doomsday_clock-296x300[1]One has to wonder about the relevancy of this non-working prop clock in this day and age. Maybe they should update it to an iPad play list that is about to end for it to be more relevant to the younger generation? /sarc. On the plus side, it makes sense that the clock is stuck in time, since there hasn’t been any global warming in 16 years. Of course, the laughable Richard Somerville doesn’t see it that way, indicating in the PR that “climate disruption” is “now unavoidable”. Well then, if it is “unavoidable” why is it that we need to do something about it again? Do they even read their own press releases?

Doomsday Clock remains at five minutes to midnight

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: It is Now 5 Minutes to Midnight

CHICAGO — January 14, 2013 — The politics of economic recovery have distracted world leaders from the long-term threats that face humanity, specifically the dangers presented by climate change and nuclear weapons, observed the Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, as it announced today that the minute hand of its Doomsday Clock will remain at five minutes to midnight. “2012 was a year in which global problems pressed forward, but too many of its citizens stood back.”

The last time the Doomsday Clock minute hand moved was in January 2012, when the Clock’s hand was moved forward one minute, from six to five minutes before midnight.

In an unusual move, Board members directly addressed US President Barack Obama in an open letter published today by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. In that letter they applaud the president’s recent actions to gain ratification of New START and to strengthen the nuclear security regime. They also acknowledge the steps the president took to “nudge the country along a more rational energy path,” providing support for wind and other renewable energy sources and strengthening fuel-efficiency standards.

And yet, the letter continues, “2012 was the hottest year on record in the contiguous United States, marked by devastating drought and brutal storms. These extreme events are exactly what climate models predict for an atmosphere laden with greenhouse gases. 2012 was a year of unrealized opportunity to reduce nuclear stockpiles, to lower the immediacy of destruction from weapons on alert, and to control the spread of fissile materials and keep nuclear terrorism at bay. 2012 was a year in which — one year after the partial meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station — the Japanese nation continued to be at the earliest stages of what will be a costly and long recovery.”

Robert Socolow, Chair of the Science and Security Board, noted, “We have as much hope for Obama’s second term in office as we did in 2010, when we moved back the hand of the Clock after his first year in office. This is the year for U.S. leadership in slowing climate change and setting a path toward a world without nuclear weapons.”

“Among the recommendations for meeting the challenges,” said board member Lynn Eden of Stanford University, “are to diminish the role of nuclear weapons by explicitly aiming to cut US deployed nuclear warheads to under 1,000.”

Nuclear expert Alexander Glaser, of Princeton University, focused on the need “to stop all new production and eliminate existing stocks of separated fissile material, both civilian and military, worldwide. It is the ultimate protection against nuclear terrorism and supports nuclear disarmament.”

Board member Richard Somerville, of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, called on President Obama to make a priority of climate change in recognition of the gravity of the climate threat. He noted, “You have the ability to educate and inspire the United States to launch an ambitious response that will achieve progress on an energy strategy for the nation. You can introduce reforms to the patchwork of federal subsidies, taxes, and other incentives, to encourage reductions in US greenhouse gas emissions.”

Recognizing that global warming is a worldwide challenge, the board encouraged President Obama to “partner with other world leaders to forge the comprehensive global response that the climate threat demands, based on equity and cooperation across countries. A global solution will only be within reach if the United States commits to doing its fair share, investing at home and globally to reduce climate change by curbing greenhouse gas emissions while building resilience in the face of the climate disruption that is now unavoidable.”

HOW THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK DECISION WAS MADE

The January 14, 2013 Doomsday Clock decision followed an international symposium held November 29, 2012, at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 100 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC. The Science and Security Board of the Chicago-based Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, in consultation with the Governing Board and the Board of Sponsors, which includes 18 Nobel Laureates, reviewed the implications of recent events and trends for the future of humanity with input from other experts on nuclear weapons, nuclear energy, climate change, and emerging threats. The Clock hand has been moved 20 times over the past 65 years, since its appearance in 1947 on the first cover of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

Click HERE for the Science and Security Board’s announcement and letter to President Obama.

Click HERE for the full program for the November 29th symposium.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

59 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
john robertson
January 16, 2013 8:40 am

Well what else can one expect of seriously underemployed atomic scientists?
The ones that want real work have moved to China and India, all thats left are the activists and chair warmers.

more soylent green!
January 16, 2013 8:44 am

I thought the doomsday clock ran down on December 21, 2012? Wrong clock? Or did they just rewind it?

Kelvin Vaughan
January 16, 2013 8:48 am

Lots of scientists are just computers. GIGO!

arthur4563
January 16, 2013 9:04 am

Reminds me of the widespread belief that the Earth would end back in the late 19th Century in America. The accepted prognosticator even provided an exact time and day. So large numbers of believers went out to meet their fate at the appointed hour and were disappointed (?) to see
that nothing happened. Still some continued to believe : doomsday had just been rescheduled, that’s all. Everything old (and stupid) is new again. New generation, new batch of gullible souls

January 16, 2013 9:04 am

Doesn’t look like they’re bending over to kiss their butts goodbye; so they don’t believe their own cry of doom. Just another cry of wolf to frighten us peons and peasantry back to our hovels.

Kelvin Vaughan
January 16, 2013 9:09 am

To quote the BBC:
” anyone who tells you definitively what next week’s weather will be like is whistling in the wind.”
.http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/features/20998895

oldfossil
January 16, 2013 9:12 am

When in danger or in doubt,
Run in circles, scream and shout.

Mark and two Cats
January 16, 2013 9:29 am

The clock shall always hover a tick or two shy of doom as a reminder of Permanent Revolution.
Trotsky would have loved AGW.

Bruce Cobb
January 16, 2013 9:37 am

H. L. Mencken said it best: “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”
These “scientists” with their doomsday clock should be ashamed.

January 16, 2013 10:05 am

How are these scientists relevant anymore? Are they just trying to grab a headline in the hopes of free publicity? Oh, wait…..

johnbuk
January 16, 2013 10:07 am

Steve Jones said,
“They will be in a right pickle once the clock is moved to one minute to midnight. I wonder if they have thought of that?”
I suspect the previous times will be adjusted accordingly.

GlynnMhor
January 16, 2013 10:13 am

Does this take into account Daylight Savings? Or the time in Newfoundland?

D.J. Hawkins
January 16, 2013 10:19 am

oldfossil says:
January 16, 2013 at 9:12 am
When in danger or in doubt,
Run in circles, scream and shout.

As I learned it:
“When in doubt,
Scream and shout,
Wave your arms,
And run about.”
A motto for sceptics: “Don’t just do something, stand there!” Actually, it probably should be imprinted on politicians using electro-shock therapy or whatever (A Clockwork Orange?). The first impulse to addressing public “concerns” shouldn’t be to empty the public purse. I think I’ll die of rapture if I ever hear some politico say “You know, this isn’t something the legislature/council/Congress needs to waste it’s time addressing.”

beesaman
January 16, 2013 10:23 am

All this warns me about is research grants drying up!

rogerknights
January 16, 2013 10:24 am

Slippery Dickory Clock

H.R.
January 16, 2013 10:26 am

Even a broken Doomsday Clock is right once, eh?

rogerknights
January 16, 2013 10:49 am

Board member Richard Somerville, of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, called on President Obama to make a priority of climate change in recognition of the gravity of the climate threat. He noted, “You have the ability to educate and inspire the United States to launch an ambitious response that will achieve progress on an energy strategy for the nation. You can introduce reforms to the patchwork of federal subsidies, taxes, and other incentives, to encourage reductions in US greenhouse gas emissions.”

He’s suggesting that we follow in the footsteps of pathfinders like Spain, Germany, and Britain. But those pioneers all have arrows in their backs.

David L.
January 16, 2013 10:57 am

The Doomsday Clock is just an example of Zeno’s dichotomy paradox. It philosophically can never hit midnight.

January 16, 2013 11:35 am

Nothing like presenting the scare as though it’s up close and personal. It will always be some small number just before midnight. Sooner or later the general public will get annoyed enough to chuck them AND their clock out the flippin’ window.

tadchem
January 16, 2013 11:42 am

The BAS-turds have been using the Doomsday Clock as a rhetorical device and a (not tired) theatrical gimmick since 1947 when the threat of global nuclear warfare was first dreamt up.
Since the START treaty was signed (1991) the possibility of global annihilation has diminished, but the risk of regional atomic conflicts has increased (Israel/Iran, N. Korea/S. Korea, India/Pakistan).
But the BAS is dedicated to scaring the whole world, not just one half of a continent.
It seems the only global-scale alarm anyone can ring lately is the climate.

January 16, 2013 11:52 am

I don’t know what is the most frightening prospect, the Doomsday Clock or end of the Mayan Calendar.
Oh, but wait! The end of the Mayan Calendar has already happened.

AndyG55
January 16, 2013 1:12 pm

5 minutes to midday..
still 12 hours 5 minutes to go. sweet !!!

DaveG
January 16, 2013 1:15 pm

The tick tock of the warmist Doomsday Clock is music to my ear – One tick closer to their unholy demise!

Rpercifield
January 16, 2013 1:17 pm

If the climate disruption is “unavoidable”, the clock should be either set, running and counting down to our doom (i.e. 12/21/2012 oops that has already passed). Or it should be at High Noon and counting all of the bonus time that we have due to a delay of the inevitable destruction of all life as we know it. This worthless clock hasn’t been correct since its inception. Even a stopped 12 hour analog clock is right twice a day. It is time for this worthless endeavor to visit that other circular object the trash can.

Billy Liar
January 16, 2013 3:25 pm

What an irrelevance. How can the glacial pace (excuse the pun) of climate change possibly compare to the threat of worldwide nuclear war as it existed in the Cold War?
The ‘Atomic Scientists’ need to update their name too.