Global Warming?……. It was warmer in Sydney in 1790

Australia has recently experienced a hot summer leading to calls of “global warming did”, but its actually been cooler than the time when the first convicts arrived in Australia back in 1790

Craig Kelly
Craig Kelly – Member for Hughes, New South Wales

Guest post by Craig Kelly MP

It’s been a scorcher. With the mercury soaring to 42.3 C in Sydney last week and the city in meltdown, the papers screamed, “This is climate change. It is here. It is real.” Even the taxpayer funded Climate Commission could not hide their excitement declaring, “it was hotter than before” and that “climate change” was responsible for the “unprecedented” extreme heat Sydneysiders were experiencing.

And with the satellites unable to detect any global warming for the last 16 years, and the IPCC computer modelled predictions failing to come to fruition, Labor Government ministers were quick to exploit the situation to claim the “extreme heat” was evidence of why the Carbon Tax was needed to “do the right thing by our children”. Yet they failed to detail how, when, or by how much (even to the nearest 0.0001 °C) that the Carbon Tax would change the temperature.

But I wonder if any of these people actually knew that Sydney’s so-called ‘record hot day’ on Tuesday 8th Jan this year, that had them screaming “Global Warming”, was actually COOLER than the weather experienced by the convicts of the First Fleet in Sydney way back in the summer of 1790/91 ?  

observatory_hill_sydney
Observatory Hill Sydney – photo by A. Watts

For while the mercury peaked at 42.3 C  last Tuesday at Observatory Hill in Sydney – more than 222 years ago at 1.00pm on the 27th Dec 1790 (measured at a location just stones-throw from Observatory Hill) the mercury hit 108.5 F (42.5 C) before peaking at 109 F (42.8 C) at 2.20pm.

The extreme heat of Sydney’s summer of 1790/91 is detailed by Watkins Tench (1758 –1833) in his book  ‘A Complete Account of the Settlement at Port Jackson’ published in 1793. (Available to download from the internet for free, here).

Watkins Tench was British marine officer whom accompanied 88 male and 20 female convicts on the First Fleet ship the Charlotte which arrived in Botany Bay 20th January 1788. Watkins then stayed in Sydney until December 1791 when we sailed home to Britain and later went on to fight in the Napoleonic Wars where after a naval battle he was taken prisoner by the French and imprisoned on a ship in Brest Harbor.

Of Sydney’s weather of 27th December 1790, when the mercury hit 42.8 C (109 F), half a degree Celsius higher than last Tuesday, Tench wrote; “it felt like the blast of a heated oven”. But the extreme heat wasn’t restricted to the 27th Dec 1790. The following day the temperature again surpassed the old 100 Fahrenheit mark, hitting 40.3C (104.5 F) at 12.30pm.

And later that same summer, in February 1791, the temperature in Sydney was recorded at 42.2 C (108 F). Tench commented;

“But even this heat [of 27th Dec 1790] was judged to be far exceeded in the latter end of the following February, when the north-west wind again set in, and blew with great violence for three days. At Sydney, it [the temperature] fell short by one degree of what I have just recorded [109F]: but at Rose Hill, [modern day Parramatta] it was allowed, by every person, to surpass all that they had before felt, either there, or in any other part of the world. Unluckily they had no thermometer to ascertain its precise height.”

Tench also speculated on the cause of the extreme heat of the summer of 1790/91, and he didn’t blame global warming, coal mining, or failure to pay homage to a pagan god. Tench deduced;

“Were I asked the cause of this intolerable heat, I should not hesitate to pronounce, that it was occasioned by the wind blowing over immense deserts, which, I doubt not, exist in a north-west direction from Port Jackson, and not from fires kindled by the natives.”

Now global warming devotees may be sceptical of Tench’s records. After all, scepticism is a healthy thing. They may even seek to deny Tench’s measurements and have them purged from our history, sent down a memory hole – as the global warming texts & prophesies deem it heresy for it to have been warmer in Sydney way back in summer of 1790/91 than it is in the ‘unprecedented’ extreme heat of Sydney’s ‘globally warmed’ summer of 2012/13.

However, Tench’s meteorological recordings were undertaken following strict scientific procedure using a “large thermometer” made by Ramsden, England’s leading scientific instrument maker of the day. Tench also left a message for those that might seek to question the accuracy of the records;

“This remark I feel necessary, as there were methods used by some persons in the colony, both for estimating the degree of heat, and for ascertaining the cause of its production, which I deem equally unfair and unphilosophical. The thermometer, whence my observations were constantly made, was hung in the open air, in a southern aspect, never reached by the rays of the sun, at the distance of several feet above the ground.”

It also worth noting that in 1790, Sydney (population 1,715) was still surrounded by mostly natural bushland, where modern day Observatory Hill in Sydney (population 4,627,000) is now surrounded by the concrete, steel and glass of a modern city, not to mention the tens of thousands of air-conditioners pumping out hot air into the surrounding streets, nor the 160,000 cars & trucks that cross the Sydney Harbor Bridge daily and pass within 100 meters of Observatory Hill.

Further, the contemporaneous notes of the day concur with the empirical measurements. Lieutenant-Governor David Collins (1756-1810), in his book ‘An Account of the English Colony in New South Wales’ published in 1798 also commented on the incredible effect of the extreme heat of 1790/91 summer on the local wildlife:

“Fresh water was indeed everywhere very scarce, most of the streams or runs about the cove being dried up. At Rose Hill [Parammatta], the heat on the tenth and eleventh of the month, on which days at Sydney the thermometer stood in the shade at 105°F [40.6°C], was so excessive (being much increased by the fires in the adjoining woods), that immense numbers of the large fox bat were seen hanging at the boughs of trees, and dropping into the water… during the excessive heat many dropped dead while on the wing… In several parts of the harbour the ground was covered with different sorts of small birds, some dead, and others gasping for water.”

Tench also recorded the effects of the extreme heat of Feb 1791;

“An immense flight of bats, driven before the wind, covered all the trees around the settlement, whence they every moment dropped dead, or in a dying state, unable longer to endure the burning state of the atmosphere. Nor did the perroquettes, [parrots] though tropical birds, bear it better; the ground was strewed with them in the same condition as the bats.”

And even Governor Arthur Philip noted the effects of the extreme heat of the summer of 1790/91;

“from the numbers [of dead bats] that fell into the brook at Rose Hill [Parramatta], the water was tainted for several days, and it was supposed that more than twenty thousand of them were seen within the space of one mile.”

Yet 222 years later, reports of the mass death of birds and bats are more like to come from those sliced & diced by industrial steel wind turbines, than the heat.

Finally, Watkins Tench concluded on ‘climate change’ in Sydney back in 1790’s;

“My other remarks on the climate [of Sydney] will be short; it is changeable beyond any other I ever heard of”

Fortunately for the convicts and settlers of the new colony, Governor Arthur Philip and later Governors didn’t believe they could change that with a new tax.

===============================================================

Addendum from Anthony: Readers may also find my investigation into the thermometer at Observatory hill interesting: Sydney’s historic weather station: 150 meters makes all the difference.

Note also the current placement of the BoM weather station at Observatory Hill is surrounded by heat sinks. Here are my photos from June 2010.

DSCN0103 DSCN0104 DSCN0101 DSCN0102

Click for a larger image

Note how the BoM thermometer shelter is completely surrounded by urban heat sinks and wind breaks.

A 1972 study by meteorologists Rosea Kemp and John Armstrong found that since 1918 Sydney’s average annual maximum temperature, as recorded at the new site, was 0.7 degrees warmer than the average at the old site. Winter averages were up 1.6 degrees.

The old thermometer shelter at the observatory is the pyramid shaped slatted object at the left side of this photo:

DSCN0113

It was more exposed to the breezes of the bay than the current location.

UPDATE: Reader kalsel3294 notes support for drought and high temperatures from 1789-1796 in the peer reviewed literature:

A quick search found this research regarding the South Asian monsoon noting the great drought in India of 1790 to 1796, noting also how the reduction in rainfall in 1789 preceded by a year droughts in “Australia, Mexico, the Atlantic Islands and southern Africa” A High-Resolution Millennial Record of the South Asian Monsoon …

http://bprc.osu.edu/Icecore/LGT00-3.pdf

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
191 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim
January 14, 2013 10:56 am

Cold kills birds too! We have purple martins that return from Brazil to Minnesota to nest at our lake cabin each year. March of 2007 was very warm and the martins who depend entirely on insects for food came back too early. Most of our colony was wiped out when snow storms hit in April. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/special-reports/2007-apr-cold-event.html It took a couple of years for the population to recover. Birds are pretty tough though- yesterday I saw a robin eating frozen crab apples and it was 4 degrees F.

MarkW
January 14, 2013 10:56 am

“Perhaps Mosher believes those dead parrots were just resting ”
Why does this remind me of a classic Monty Python skit?

January 14, 2013 11:18 am

Kelvin Vaughan says January 14, 2013 at 8:22 am
Now we are producing a lot more heat than back then and in a temperature inversion it will hang around at low levels.

Inversion?
Definition follows
– – – – – – – – –
Inversion (meteorology)
A temperature inversion is a meteorological phenomenon in which air temperature increases with height for some distance above the ground, as opposed to the normal decrease in temperature with height [i.e. normal is *warmer at ground level* and cooler aloft].
– – – – – – – – –
So … how does “producing a lot more heat” at ground level generate/contribute to an inversion?
Reiterating again, warm at ground level is the norm, the ‘inversion’ is the anomaly with warm air aloft capping the cooler air (and possible contaminates) below … ‘mixing’ will not occur between the low and cool air and the warmer air aloft during an inversion … adding sunlight will reverse this to normal conditions i.e. warm at the ground and cooler aloft …
.

Dale
January 14, 2013 11:30 am

Craig Kelly, a great Australian Federal Pollie who stood up in Parliament and had this to say about the Ginger Witch’s Carbon Tax:
http://galileomovement.com.au/blog/?p=158

Duster
January 14, 2013 11:46 am

Jim says:
January 14, 2013 at 10:56 am
Cold kills birds too! …

There’s a historic diary from the Gold Rush in California that recounts an extremely cold event in the Sierras – at Johnsville IIRC – at an elevation of about 5100 feet. The traveler, and his horse, sheltered in an empty cabin overnight due to the cold. When he went to sleep there were numerous small birds perching on joists below the roof. He was awakened by little frozen corpses falling on him.

Jimbo
January 14, 2013 11:47 am

For while the mercury peaked at 42.3 C last Tuesday at Observatory Hill in Sydney – more than 222 years ago at 1.00pm on the 27th Dec 1790 (measured at a location just stones-throw from Observatory Hill) the mercury hit 108.5 F (42.5 C) before peaking at 109 F (42.8 C) at 2.20pm.

Would stripping out the urban heat island effect have made it even cooler?

doug s
January 14, 2013 11:58 am

Latitude says:
January 14, 2013 at 7:50 am
Leif Svalgaard says:
January 14, 2013 at 7:02 am
Weather is not climate
===========================
so which is it that we’re trying to control?
Answer: The people

January 14, 2013 12:07 pm

Heat sinks wouldn’t have mattered on Friday and Saturday. Where I live t Newcastle we got 40 and 44 degrees and it was like standing in front of a giant hairdryer with the north westerly blowing. On Saturday afternoon the southerly came in and the temp dropped 20C in about 1 hour. What a change.

Sean
January 14, 2013 12:08 pm

Australia has come a long way since 1790 – they started out with crooks being the requirement for joining their general population and now they have crooks being the basis for membership in their government.

Jimbo
January 14, 2013 12:09 pm

Two can play silly record hot/cold games. Global cooling is here and it’s real. /sarc

It’s A Cold Snap! Record Chilly Temperatures Blanket Los Angeles
http://www.myfoxla.com/story/20581147/its-a-cold-snap-record-chilly-temperatures-blanket-los-angeles

Record Cold Threatens China’s Food Supply, Could Sow Riots
http://www.valuewalk.com/2013/01/record-cold-threatens-chinas-food-supply-could-sow-riots/

Record cold kills more than 100 in India
http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2013/01/04/cold-weather-india-deaths/1809315/

Record cold snap grips Korean Peninsula
http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2013/01/03/67/0302000000AEN20130103005900315F.HTML

The Leif put it “Weather is not climate”
Australia is a land of extremes with droughts, floods and heatwaves coming naturally.
http://home.iprimus.com.au/foo7/droughthistory.html
http://australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/natural-disasters

Peter Newnam
January 14, 2013 12:10 pm

Heatwaves in Australia
Australia has a long history of heatwaves. The worst recorded heatwave was in 1939 when 438 people died. This heatwave affected South Australia, Victoria and New South Wales.
Heatwaves have accounted for more deaths in Australia than any other climatic event. Some of the worst heatwaves on record are below:
January 1896 – 437 people died
January 1908 – 246 people died
February 1921 – 147 people died
January 1927 – 130 people died
January 1939 – 438 people died
February 1959 – 105 people died
January 1973 – 26 people died
February 1981 – 15 people died
February 1993 – 17 people died
February 2004 – 12 people died.
The highest temperature in Australia was 50.7°C at Oodnadatta in South Australia in 1960.
Marble Bar in Western Australia holds the record for the longest days in a row when the temperature was above 37.8°C (100.04ºF) for 160 days in 1923-24.
The hottest day in Sydney was set in 1939 when it got to 45.3°C (113.54ºF).
http://www.ema.gov.au/www/ema/schools.nsf/Page/Learn_AboutHeatwaves_InMyBackyard_InMyBackyard

Ian Cooper
January 14, 2013 12:11 pm

Comments by David Ross regarding Mega Ninos etc in the last millenium and in particular those of the late 18th century bring to mind annecdotal evidence of another strong El Nino of that period. In the austral spring of 1769 Captian Cook on the Endeavour made his first sighting of New Zealand. He arrived at a harbour he named Poverty Bay near the eastern most tip of the North Island, after awhile there he travelled south until he encountered the infamous Nor’ West winds that cross the Lower North Island (L.N.I.) and turn northerly through the strait that still bears his name. During heightened El Nino years the prevailing west-NW flow across New Zealand is squeezed and can periods of gale force winds off the east coast of the L.N.I. Cook deemed the sea conditions he met there harsh enough to force him to turn north again at a cape he named ‘Turnagain.’
After travelling up the east coast through the Cormandel Penninsula and the famous Bay of Islands on the leeward side of the North Island Cook once again came face to face with the formidable force of the “roaring forties” as he attempted to pass over North Cape at the top of the Island around Christmas of 1769. It took the Endeavour days to move out of the Pacific and into the Tasman Sea. After that he steered well clear of the treacherous west coast, the site of scores of ship wrecks since then.
The fact of the strong Nor Westers in November over the L.N.I. and the continuing strong westerlies over the top of the island at Christmas has all of the hallmarks of a very strong El Nino that year, very reminiscent of the ‘bad el Nino’ of 1982-83 experienced here in N.Z. with a prolonged east coast drought on both major islands, and the disastorous bush-fire season in parts of Australia.
Ian Cooper

Crispin in Waterloo
January 14, 2013 12:15 pm

It is fascinating to me that the rainfall cycle in Southern Africa’s summer rainfall region, which is lunar in origin (apparently) at 18.6 years, happens to coincide with this passage of time. Above there is a contributor’s reference droughts in 1790. That is 1790 + 18.6 x 12 cycles = 2013 and that happens to be where we are now.
Interesting, not so?
It appears to be the case that the Australian droughts might also appear in a 18.6 year cycle with ‘big wets’ in between. To detect these cycles in the presence of all the other ‘weather’ going on and to accept Lief’s maxim that weather is not climate, and that we are assessing climate here, a time series analysis must be used to support my hunch.
Take all the rainfall records and divide the whole thing into into 18, then 18.1, 18.2 (etc) year segments and past the numbers on top of each other. If you get a sine wave appearing out of what might look like mud for any or all years, you are on track to locating the lunar component of climate in Australia.
If you do this for Cape Town it is a 10 year cycle with a very clear sine wave function – 400 years of data is available. It has its own climate region outside the summer rainfall area of Southern Africa. No one knows why. How about that!
Sorry for the temps, Aus, but it was predictable.

FrankK
January 14, 2013 12:28 pm

Interesting article.
Here are a few more statistics. This is not to take away from the tragedy of lost homes. But as some old time bush residents have said – this is Australia and high temps have always been part of Australia climate and bush fires can always be expected.
The maximum recorded temp in Sydney is 45.7 C on Tuesday 8th of January 1913 according to an Australian newspaper report.
It was also 49.7 C at Menindee on 10 Jan 1939 and 48.7 C at Euston on the same day all in NSW
Maximum temperature Australia wide was in South Australia at Oodnadatta at 50.7 C 52 years ago even though the BOM have trumpeted that they have found it necessary to put an extra color in their temperature area charts to account for 50 C temps recently.On most days they have published a “scary” bright red map of Australia with not actual temps but computer generated predictions.
And as expected our “beloved” ABC were excitedly announcing a special program to look at how climate change was now causing the current heatwave and how temperatures could rise up to 6 C in future blah blah etc. i.e the usual drivel.

January 14, 2013 12:29 pm

Peter Newnam says:
January 14, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Heatwaves in Australia
Given the current heatwave is being contributed to the delay in the arrival of the monsoons, thus allowing increased surface heating in the inland areas, how many of the heatwaves listed can be associated with similar monsoonal delays?

January 14, 2013 12:31 pm

Sorry, should read “being attributed”

Jimbo
January 14, 2013 12:31 pm

Just found this.

The Sydney Morning Herald – Jan 9, 1939
“Heat Wave.
Half Continent Suffers.
116 Degrees at Richmond.”
http://tinyurl.com/bdzoav8

The Milwaukee Journal – Jan 9, 1939
“Heat Wave Spreads Death in Australia
Melbourne…..with the thermometer registering up to 109.6 degrees. Elsewhere in the state the temperature varied from 100 to 116 degrees.”
http://tinyurl.com/badbfvo

January 14, 2013 12:34 pm

Tench and Dawes were certainly reliable and painstaking officers, and careful about instrumentation.
Just ask Watkin Tench’s best known and most recent editor, a man curiously quiet on the subject the horror El Ninos of the late 18th century: Tim Flannery. Yep, that Tim Flannery.

FrankK
January 14, 2013 12:35 pm

Incidentally the last few days in Sydney max temps has been in the early twenties and I’ve put on a jacket to go walking at sunrise.

Phil
January 14, 2013 12:39 pm

Jimbo says on January 14, 2013 at 11:47 am

Would stripping out the urban heat island effect have made it even cooler?

When comparing a temperature measurement in a large urban area today to the same or very close location 226 years before, I would think the cumulative UHI would be on the order of several degrees C. Simply observe that there are often temperature differences of that magnitude when driving into or out of a large urban area from/to the surrounding countryside. I am not aware of any studies that have tried to quantify the UHI accumulated over centuries in the large urban areas that populate the Earth today, but I think the difference between the urban and surrounding less urban temperatures gives a good order-of-magnitude estimate. See UHI is real, in Reno at least.

tgmccoy
January 14, 2013 12:52 pm

Hey, history is the enemy of the righteous true believer. No one should look back as they might
learn something..

LazyTeenager
January 14, 2013 1:07 pm

Craig says
Now global warming devotees may be sceptical of Tench’s records. After all, scepticism is a healthy thing. They may even seek to deny Tench’s measurements and have them purged from our history, sent down a memory hole
———-
You are BSing Craig.
But amusing to see that you are the one, right on queue, to run with the now cliched “it was hot 200 years ago so its perfectly normal and happens all the time” routine.
So back to thermometers. Anyone with a clue would know that thermometers were pretty accurate way back then. The real question for reliability is siting and stevenson screens. Don’t know if they were used at that time.
However record Sydney temperatures are not a crux for global warming. But maybe the fact that the whole of the Australian continent is affected by record temperatures is more important. And the frequency of such events is even more important over time if trends are to be assessed.

DCA
January 14, 2013 1:20 pm

Mosher,
So you’re saying that the temperature in 1790 could have been even higher due to calibration issues?
Since the UHI in 1790 was less than it is today then the natural temperture more likely to be even higher yet.

DCA
January 14, 2013 1:23 pm

Of course I mean “higher” than the recent high.

pete
January 14, 2013 1:39 pm

The most interesting part of the article was the description of the cause of the heat: hot winds coming in from the desert areas. This is exactly what caused the recent 40+ degree day in Sydney, so it is evidence that there is nothing unique about the weather pattern we have experienced (an unusual or rare event, sure, but not unique). Regardless of temperature, then, we are not in uncharted climatic waters. I’ll leave Mosher to argue decimal points and other irrelevancies as per usual.
BTW there was hysteria over the weekend, as our beloved Bureau of Meteorology issued a forecast for parts of Sydney of 45 degrees for Saturday. The actual temperature was 36 degrees in those areas (and a balmy 25 degrees for much of the day in my location; i believe it went slightly above 30 for about an hour at most)), with the BOM ‘surprised’ by ‘stronger than expected’ coastal winds that negated the hot desert winds they had been focusing on. No matter though it generated the necessary headlines…