WUWT-TV's answer to Al Gore's 'Dirty Weather Report' is ON THE AIR

Welcome, for the next 24 hours, WUWT will be bringing you the counterpoint to Al Gore’s claim that “dirty energy=dirty weather” which you can watch over here.

To watch WUWT-TV live see below:

[ustreamlive 12560352 w=480 h=302]

You can watch live in the window above by pressing the PLAY icon, or you can click the link to USTREAM directly:  USTREAM direct link

Some notes:

1. I cannot remove the advertising, the cost to do this channel without it, given the potential number of viewer hours that could occur (along with overages) was too big of a financial risk for me. Please make do. perhaps we’ll get there for the next time, donations accepted.

2. In a few days, the source video clips will be posted on YouTube.

3. During live interviews, we will take selected questions submitted in comments below.

4. Please share this link to this post widely, on blogs, on facebook, with friends. Help get our view count up.

5. Press release on the event is here.

6. Schedule follows.

WUWT-TV Schedule November 14th & 15th

ALL TIMES BELOW are Pacific Standard Time but MAY CHANGE DURING THE LIVE BROADCAST if Presenters go short/long or we have technical difficulties.

To convert these times to your time zone, click to open this time zone converter tool.

For a mapped time zone (thx ‘aquix’) see: http://www.timezonecheck.com/

Recordings will be made available a few days after the broadcast.

Schedule:

Senator James Inhofe (recorded intro) 5:00 PST Nov 14 Intro – whats next?
Dr. Pat Michaels (live) 5:10 PST Nov 14 Lukewarmers, Hotheads & Flatliners
Bob Tisdale (video) 6PM PST Nov 14 Sea Surface Temperatures/ENSO
Chris Horner (live) 7PM PST Nov 14 Political angle, FOIA
Dr. Ryan Maue (live) 8PM PST Nov 14 Hurricanes
Steve Mosher & Tom Fuller (live) 9PM PST Nov 14 Climategate
Dr. David Evans (live) 10PM PST Nov 14 The Skeptics Case
Burt Rutan (recorded) 11PM PST Nov 14 Engineer’s perspective
Pete Garcia (movie intro, recorded) 12AM PST Nov 15 Feature movie
The Boy who Cried Warming (movie)
The Boy who Cried Warming (movie)
John Coleman, KUSI-TV (intro, recorded) 1:30AM PST Nov 15
John Coleman Special Pt1 (recorded) TV special on AGW Pt1
John Coleman Special Pt2 (recorded) 2:30AM PST Nov 15 TV special on AGW Pt2
Dr. Sebastian Lüning (recorded) 3:30AM PST Nov15 The Sun as Climate Driver
Mike Smith, CCM (recorded) 4:30AM PST Nov15 Extreme Weather events
Marc Morano (recorded) 5:00AM PST Nov15 The Politics of Alarmism
Dr. Ross McKittrick (recorded) 6AM PST Nov15 Energy. Pollution, Economics
Dr. Richard Lindzen (live) 7AM PST Nov15 Bait and Switch Aspects of the Global Warming Issue
Christopher Monckton (live) 8AM PST Nov15 Climate Sensitivity
Andrew Montford (live) 9AM PST Nov15 The Hockey Stick/28Gate
Dr. Roy Spencer (live) 10AM PST Nov15 What Causes Climate Change?
Steve McIntyre (live) 11AM PST Nov15 The Climate Year in Review: a new focus on extremes
Dr. Tim Ball (live) 12PM PST Nov15 Warming – A deception?
Joe Bastardi (live) 1PM PST Nov15 Forecasting extremes
Joe D’Aleo (live) 1:30PM PST Nov15 Extreme weather & Sandy
John Kehr (live) 2PM PST Nov15 The Inconvenient Skeptic
Harold Ambler (live) 3PM PST Nov15 Ignoring Weather History
Maurizo Morabito (live) 3:30PM PST Nov15 BBC’s Twenty Eight Gate
Donna Laframboise (live) 4PM PST Nov15 The IPCC – Unreliable & Untrustworthy
Anthony Watts & Evan Jones (live) 5PM PST Nov15 Update on the surfacestations project and Watts et al paper.
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

308 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
S Basinger
November 16, 2012 2:05 pm

WUWT-TV had much better content but the production value wasn’t nearly as good as Gore TV. I’m shocked, personally, given how many $billions the skeptics have at their fingertips as opposed to the poor CAGW folks who clearly don’t have $millions to drop on a slick 24 hour propaganda webstream.
Oh wait.

Editor
November 16, 2012 2:39 pm

GailCombs says: “Agreed, but the darn sound kept cutting out so I am looking forward to watching the presentation on U-tube.”
What a coincidence! I’ve already uploaded Parts 1 & 2 of my presentation:
http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2012/11/16/the-natural-warming-of-the-global-oceans-videos-parts-1-2/
Regards

November 16, 2012 2:54 pm

For fun, I was considering the proposition that each of the viewers of WUWT-TV and Gore-TV might belong to 1 of 2 populations:
X = population with a mean view time of 1 hr. (Watchers)
Y = population with a mean view time of T minutes. (Bots + thrashers)
Let T = average view time for the Y population.
Let TV = Total Views in 24 hours.
Let CV = Current Views average over 24 hr.
CV = X + Y
TV = 24* (X + Y*60/T)
Solution:
X = CV*(60/(60-T)) – TV*(T/(24*(60-T)))
Y = CV – X
TV(WUWT) = 16,690 (what I remembered seeing. I could be wrong.)
CV(WUWT) = 550 is my guess at an average in a range of 420-670 from personal observation. Until we have something better.
TV(Gore) = 15.7 million (from mfo 02:28 prev. thread) . I cannot confirm that, but Reg. Blank above reports about million at 2.25 hours, about 10% into it.
CV(Gore) = 9000 TV=300K, 1.5 hr;
= 11200 TV=500K, 1.9 hr.
= 12100 TV “close to a million” at 2.25 hr. from Reg. Blank above.
Shortly after this the CV counter was taken down. So we will have to guess this by exploring a range of possible values. An important constraint here is that the three observation points give a mean view time of only 3 minutes (approx.).
Frac_TV_X = Fraction of TV that can come from X population (1 hr mean) views.
Frac_TV_X = X*24/TV
First, WUWT-TV: (TV=16690, CV=550)
If T=0.16, X=550, Y=0.4, Frac_TV_X = 0.790
If T=1, X=548, Y=2, Frac_TV_X= 0.787
If T=10, X=521, Y=29, Frac_TV_X = 0.749
So 74-79% of the TV (total views) are coming from the population views with a mean 1 hr.
Now Gore-TV: (TV = 15.7 million)
If CV = 36000 (3 times highest known value)
If T=0.16; X=34347; Y=1653; Frac_TV_X=0.053
If T=1; X=25523; Y=10477; Frac_TV_X=0.039
If T=2; X=14684; Y=21316; Frac_TV_X=0.022
If T=3; X=3465; Y=32535; Frac_TV_X=0.005
T>4 is not possible.
If CV=24000, T=0.16; X=22315; Y=1685; Frac_TV_X=0.034
If CV=50000, T=0.16; X=48385; Y=1615; Frac_TV_X=0.074
If CV=100000, T=0.16; X=98518; Y=1482; Frac_TV_X=0.151
Note: T=0.16 represents a viewer that is opening the stream and shutting it down in a 10 second loop. With T=0.16, X = watchers, Y = ‘bots.’
Conclusion: X is tightly coupled with the estimate for CV. But the fraction of total views from 1-hr Watchers is illuminating. The Frac_TV_X (= 1hr people views / total views) is highest for high CV and low T. For CV = 36000 (3 time higher than any reported in the first two hours) only 5% of the total views were from “watchers”, 95% from bots. We have to use CV=100,000 (8 times higher than max observed), to reach a point where even 15% of total views could be from a population with a 1 hr mean view. At least 85% of total views were bots cycling every 10 seconds.

November 16, 2012 3:28 pm

Mr. Rasey, your idea of “fun” looks like math to me.
I’ve got a better idea. Let’s just smooth the data. There is something wrong with a viewer that only stayed on WUWT for 10 minutes, so let’s bump them up, say, another 20 minutes to make them more in line with the data we like, i.e., the “real” viewers. Then take that number and apply it to the people who weren’t on the internet at all, but had a WUWT viewer nearby.
OMG, half the world watches WUWT!! It’s worse than we thought!!
/sarc

johanna
November 16, 2012 3:37 pm

Well, it seems that GoreBore viewers are mostly either bots or people with an attention span of about three minutes. Either one works for me. : )
I think the most important outcome is that 24 hours’ worth of content which can be re-used has been generated. For example, David Evans’ brilliant tutorial is a wonderful teaching aid, both in terms of content and presentation. The same can be said of several others.
It also provides a snapshot in history. Maurizio’s coup, just a few days old, narrated by him in compelling terms; Anthony and Evan explaining the evolution of what will be a landmark paper; several presentations which summarise “the story so far” on various issues.
The fact that the UCS representative was unimpressed by any of it is a good sign. Kenji was the perfect standard-bearer for that organisation, especially its Ethics Committee, which he should be appointed to immediately. I don’t think that sleeping through meetings will be any problem – on the contrary, it would be an advantage.
An outstanding achievement.

bcbrowser
November 16, 2012 4:44 pm

Just adding to the many voices above. Thank you Anthony for the hard work. If these guys ever win it wouldn’t be the first time some dogmatic “prophet” defeated reason and plunged the society into years of misery.

TonyM
November 16, 2012 7:27 pm

Well done Anthony, congratulations. What a herculean effort!
Best wishes from down under Oz.

Kev-in-Uk
November 17, 2012 7:01 am

Re possible TV efforts – I hope a good streaming source can be found without excessive ads?
I’m not really up to speed with the techy stuff – but can a skype ‘stream’ be picked up by several (hundred?) viewers at once? conference calling if you will? The return stream would only need to be audio from the audience to enable them to ask questions (though typed comments might be easier?) I dunno, is there not some cheap ‘platform’ out there in cyber space for this purpose?
I am quite keen to see some form of open video style/based debate/presentations if possible. The quality doesn’t need to be goresque (or should that be gory!) but enough for us to ‘get together’ and thrash through some stuff? What do you think? Is anything like this possible?

1 11 12 13
Verified by MonsterInsights