Bipolar disorder – as in the Arctic, the Antarctic sea ice extent is affected by wind, unless of course it's 'climate change'

From the “no matter what happens it is climate change” department. So, according to this, when the Arctic loses ice it is due to climate change ‘global warming’ when the Antarctic gains ice it is due to ‘climate change’ and is just as bad. WUWT readers may recall that a few years ago NASA concluded that wind patterns were a major factor in Arctic sea ice loss, pushing the mobile sea ice further south where it melted. Here’s their press release form 2007. Now from the British Antarctic Survey  and NASA JPL comes a similar but opposite conclusion for the Antarctic.

I’ve downloaded the time lapse and converted it to YouTube for everybody’s benefit since all the folks at BAS offer is an FTP link with this press release that few will visit. See the video I inserted below.

Why Antarctic sea ice cover has increased under the effects of climate change

The first direct evidence that marked changes to Antarctic sea ice drift have occurred over the last 20 years, in response to changing winds, is published this week in the journal Nature Geoscience. Scientists from NERC’s British Antarctic Survey (BAS) and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena California explain why, unlike the dramatic losses reported in the Arctic, the Antarctic sea ice cover has increased under the effects of climate change (they neglected to mention natural variation here – Anthony).

Maps created by JPL using over 5 million individual daily ice motion measurements captured over a period of 19 years by four US Defense Meteorological satellites show, for the first time, the long-term changes in sea ice drift around Antarctica.

Lead author, Dr Paul Holland of BAS says: “Until now these changes in ice drift were only speculated upon, using computer models of Antarctic winds. This study of direct satellite observations shows the complexity of climate change. The total Antarctic sea-ice cover is increasing slowly, but individual regions are actually experiencing much larger gains and losses that are almost offsetting each other overall. We now know that these regional changes are caused by changes in the winds, which in turn affect the ice cover through changes in both ice drift and air temperature. The changes in ice drift also suggest large changes in the ocean surrounding Antarctica, which is very sensitive to the cold and salty water produced by sea-ice growth.”

“Sea ice is constantly on the move; around Antarctica the ice is blown away from the continent by strong northward winds. Since 1992 this ice drift has changed. In some areas the export of ice away from Antarctica has doubled, while in others it has decreased significantly.”

Sea ice plays a key role in the global environment – reflecting heat from the sun and providing a habitat for marine life. At both poles sea ice cover is at its minimum during late summer. However, during the winter freeze in Antarctica this ice cover expands to an area roughly twice the size of Europe. Ranging in thickness from less than a metre to several metres, the ice insulates the warm ocean from the frigid atmosphere above.

The new research also helps explain why observed changes in the amount of sea-ice cover are so different in the two Polar Regions. The Arctic has experienced dramatic ice losses in recent decades while the overall ice extent in the Antarctic has increased slightly. However, this small Antarctic increase is actually the result of much larger regional increases and decreases, which are now shown to be caused by wind-driven changes. In places, increased northward winds have caused the sea-ice cover to expand outwards from Antarctica. The Arctic Ocean is surrounded by land, so changed winds cannot cause Arctic ice to expand in the same way.

Dr Ron Kwok, JPL says, “The Antarctic sea ice cover interacts with the global climate system very differently than that of the Arctic, and these results highlight the sensitivity of the Antarctic ice coverage to changes in the strength of the winds around the continent.”

There has been contrasting climate change observed across the Antarctic in recent decades. The Antarctic Peninsula has warmed as much as anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere, while East Antarctica has shown little change or even a small cooling around the coast. The new research improves understanding of present and future climate change. It is important to distinguish between the Antarctic Ice Sheet – glacial ice – which is losing volume, and Antarctic sea ice – frozen seawater – which is expanding.

###

This research was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

The paper ‘Wind-driven trends in Antarctic sea ice motion’ by Paul R. Holland of British Antarctic Survey and Ron Kwok of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California, USA is published in Nature Geoscience this week.

Issued by British Antarctic Survey

h/t to WUWT reader “Forrest”

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

181 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Monty
November 16, 2012 4:25 am

[snip. Content-free flaming trolling. Zero science, 100% insults. — mod.]

Monty
November 16, 2012 5:29 am

Sorry, I should also have included RDC11 in that list of nonsense. There are probably other people I’ve missed too. Apologies if I have.

pochas
November 16, 2012 6:28 am

Monty says:
November 16, 2012 at 5:29 am
“Sorry, I should also have included RDC11 in that list of nonsense. There are probably other people I’ve missed too. Apologies if I have.”
No apology necessary, Monty. We all enjoy nonsense. That’s why we’re here! 🙂

JJ
November 16, 2012 7:15 am

Monty says:
Wow! Now I get some feeling what it must be like to be an evolutionary biologist trying to talk to creationists.

Rather the other way around. You are the religionist here. You are the one who makes illiogical, fallacious arguments and fails to address the science. Instead of dealing with the science (which you clearly do not understand) you call names, make ad hominem attacks, make appeals to authority, make ad hoc arguements – all called back over your shoulder as you run away. This post of yours being a fine example.
Meanwhile, IPCC still says this:
Sea ice is projected to shrink in both the Arctic and Antarctic under all SRES scenarios.
And, as shown by the research that is the topic of this post, that still isn’t happening. Just like so many of the AGW predictions …
There is not enough time to begin to correct some of the nonsense written by D Boehm, stefanthedenier and JJ.
At some point, you tire of having your hat handed to you, huh? Or was it having your ass handed to you?
Oh wait. Same thing.

RDCII
November 18, 2012 2:16 am

Sigh
Monty, you didn’t even manage to get my signature right. It’s RDC I as In iceberg, I as in iceberg. Your reading comprehension hits a new low. You have responded In no way to anything I’ve said, which means your input is pretty much plugging your ears and saying “I can’t hear you, so I must be right!”
It would be interesting having a conversation with you, Monty, but first you have to figure out what a conversation means. In the meantime, you continue to represent your side accurately, and therefore continue to be useful.
Thanks, Monty! 🙂
RDCII

TomR,Worc,MA
November 18, 2012 4:45 pm

Anyone else catch that Monty referred to Richard Lindzen as “Dick Lindzen?
In my mind that could either mean that he knows him personally, or that it is just a sophmoric “dick” joke.
I know which one I think is more likely.

1 6 7 8