
The results of ICEsat measurements are in for Antarctica, and it seems those claims of ice mass loss in Antarctica have melted now that a continent wide tally has been made. This was presented in the SCAR ISMASS Workshop in Portland, OR, July 14, 2012 and was added to NASA’s Technical Reports server on September 7th, 2012. H/T to WUWT reader “Brad”. What’s interesting (besides the result) is that the report was prepared by Jay Zwally, whose “ice free Arctic by the end of summer 2012” prediction is about to be tested in 12 days. It also puts the kibosh on GRACE studies that suggested a net loss in Antarctica. Note there’s the mention of the “climate warming, consistent with model predictions” at the end of the report. They’d say the same thing if ICEsat had measured loss instead of gain, because as we’ve seen before, almost everything is consistent with warming and models no matter which direction it goes.
Here’s the video presentation. The report abstract follows.
Mass Balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet 1992-2008 from ERS and ICESat: Gains exceed losses – Presented by Jay Zwally, NASA Goddard, USA ISMASS 2012 is an activity of the renewed SCAR/IASC ISMASS expert group, which focuses on the mass balance of ice-sheets and their contribution to sea level changes. The workshop is sponsored by ICSU, SCAR, IASC, WCRP, IGS, and IACS with support from CliC and APECS. Video recording and editing provided by Kristin Poinar, Mai Winstrup, and Jenny Baeseman
Mass Gains of the Antarctic Ice Sheet Exceed Losses
Zwally, H. Jay; Li, Jun; Robbins, John; Saba, Jack L.; Yi, Donghui; Brenner, Anita; Bromwich, David
Abstract:
During 2003 to 2008, the mass gain of the Antarctic ice sheet from snow accumulation exceeded the mass loss from ice discharge by 49 Gt/yr (2.5% of input), as derived from ICESat laser measurements of elevation change. The net gain (86 Gt/yr) over the West Antarctic (WA) and East Antarctic ice sheets (WA and EA) is essentially unchanged from revised results for 1992 to 2001 from ERS radar altimetry.
Imbalances in individual drainage systems (DS) are large (-68% to +103% of input), as are temporal changes (-39% to +44%). The recent 90 Gt/yr loss from three DS (Pine Island, Thwaites-Smith, and Marie-Bryd Coast) of WA exceeds the earlier 61 Gt/yr loss, consistent with reports of accelerating ice flow and dynamic thinning. Similarly, the recent 24 Gt/yr loss from three DS in the Antarctic Peninsula (AP) is consistent with glacier accelerations following breakup of the Larsen B and other ice shelves. In contrast, net increases in the five other DS of WA and AP and three of the 16 DS in East Antarctica (EA) exceed the increased losses.
Alternate interpretations of the mass changes driven by accumulation variations are given using results from atmospheric-model re-analysis and a parameterization based on 5% change in accumulation per degree of observed surface temperature change. A slow increase in snowfall with climate warming, consistent with model predictions, may be offsetting increased dynamic losses.
Click to View PDF File [PDF Size: 256 KB]
Looks like “Skeptical Science” will have to update their reliance on the “Cophagen Diagnosis” as well as their claim of “Antarctica is losing land ice as a whole, and these losses are accelerating quickly.”:
===================================================
Figure 2: Estimates of Total Antarctic Land Ice Changes and approximate sea level contributions using many different measurement techniques. Adapted from The Copenhagen Diagnosis. (CH= Chen et al. 2006, WH= Wingham et al. 2006, R= Rignot et al. 2008b, CZ= Cazenave et al. 2009 and V=Velicogna 2009)
Estimates of recent changes in Antarctic land ice (Figure 2) range from losing 100 Gt/year to over 300 Gt/year. Because 360 Gt/year represents an annual sea level rise of 1 mm/year, recent estimates indicate a contribution of between 0.27 mm/year and 0.83 mm/year coming from Antarctica. There is of course uncertainty in the estimations methods but multiple different types of measurement techniques (explained here) all show the same thing, Antarctica is losing land ice as a whole, and these losses are accelerating quickly.
======================================================
I’m glad that’s finally settled.
Related articles
- RC’s Dr. Eric Steig boreholes himself on Antarctica (wattsupwiththat.com)
- GRACE’s warts – new peer reviewed paper suggests errors and adjustments may be large
- West Antarctic ice sheet may not be losing ice as fast as once thought – GRACE readings overestimated
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

I propose that you do a piece on Arctic temperatures. Any increases have only been in the WINTER for decades!
Following up on previous comment: Any temperature/humidity increase in Antarctic precipitation would mostly occur near the coast, where the offshore winds are strongest. A potential mass increase might be nullified by wind ablation. Another related question is the effect of wind drag on the ice shelves.
Ed_B says: ”Unfortunately, your style of making assertions grates on my nerves”
mate, English is not my first, or second language, sorry. Probably half of the visitors English is not their first language. Few make a comment, most only read the comments. You are lucky for not being able to see yourself with their eyes. As a bigot, you are making an issue about your success for learning your mother’s tongue. Bravo!
2] the truth doesn’t care what I like, or what you like. I was pointing out, people not to waste time on empty talk – lots of real proofs exist. If you like empty talk, it’s your choice and I respect that. People interested in the truth; they simplify and get correct results. Piling up lots of irrelevant; is for muddying / smokescreen to avoid the truth. Bigots are very small percentage of the population – that’s what makes the world a beautiful place. P.s if it was written in perfect Oxford English, you would have hated it even more; because of your ‘truth-phobia” Cheers
barry says:
Don’t worry about Smokey, he’ll just keep posting that linear graph of less than half the data, that manages to turn out a negative trend, and claim that Envisat’s mean sea level product is superior to anything else. There’s nothing anyone can do about that.
Here’s a much longer graph, then:
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Sea_Level_Holgate.jpg
Explain that. Co2 was a lot less a century ago.
Ok, I know this is about the Antarctic, but the Arctic thread is closed. THIS is what happens when there is so little ice left for polar bears to hunt on. (video)
“Starving female polar bear challenges male for food”
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/13/13830880-warming-sign-in-the-arctic-starving-female-polar-bear-challenges-male-for-food?lite
The female bear didn’t have a chance, of course, and she is nothing but skin and bones. But she was desperate for food for herself and her cub. Seems her other cub had already died, and most likely her remaining cub will die also. And probably herself, as well. I know some don’t care as long as we can get at the oil, but that video is heartbreaking.
From Richard Carlson on September 13, 2012 at 8:42 pm:
What I know is not only is this one incident among a population of several tens of thousands of polar bears,
But more likely is the female was injured or otherwise ill and couldn’t hunt herself, not that there was a shortage of food.
Certainly this singular incident is unimaginably tragic, to those unfamiliar with the inherent brutality of Nature.
But as it’ll be many generations of polar bears until the Arctic sea ice can recover and provide them with sufficient food, if a shortage of food is indeed an endemic problem,
Then the humane solution is for humans to freely hunt down and kill the excess polar bears, until their remaining numbers can be supported by the available food supply.
Let the culling begin.
Nice information friends thanks for inform