NASA's 7 minutes of terror tonight – more than a curiosity

UPDATE: Touchdown confirmed! Congratulations NASA JPL! First image received. See below.

========================================

I thought I”d take a minute to advise you that some real science and engineering that will be see from NASA tonight rather than the politically motivated science from scientist turned arrested activist Dr. James Hansen in the latest NASA GISS claim distributed via AP’s compliant repeater, Seth Borenstein. On the plus side, Seth at least gave a voice to the other side.

Readers may recall I photographed and wrote about the Curiosity exhibit at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum last year:

Experts at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory ( JPL ) share the challenges of Curiosity’s rover final 7 minutes to landing on the surface of Mars on the 5th of August,2012 ( 10:31 US Pacific time) . Watch the video below, well worth your time.

Curiosity is a Mars rover launched by NASA on November 26, 2011. Currently en route to the planet, it is scheduled to land in Gale Crater on August 5, 2012 ( US Pacific time) . The rover’s objectives include searching for past or present life, studying the Martian climate, studying Martian geology, and collecting data for a future manned mission to Mars. It will explore Mars for 2 years.

Curiosity’s landing Times in regarding time travel zones:

Aug 5, 2012 10:31 p.m. US Pacific

Aug 6, 2012 1:31 a.m. US Eastern

Aug 6, 2012 3:31 p.m. Hobart – Australia

Aug 6, 2012 5:31 a.m Universal (UTC)

Curiosity cost: A cool US$2.5 billion

Cool stuff Bonus (Mars Science Laboratory) such as interactive experiences can be found in:

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/participate/

NASA official site:

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/index.html

NASA-TV coverage starts two hours before landing. http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html (h/t to Ric Werme)

UPDATE: Touchdown confirmed! Congratulations NASA! First image received. Will post as soon as I have something to show you.

UPDATE2 self explanatory

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

182 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brian H
August 9, 2012 5:40 am

P.S.

Ian says:
August 5, 2012 at 7:56 pm

I will explain why I am so confidant in the eventual outcome tomorrow.

It’s ‘confident’. There is a word ‘confidante’, but that’s a person. Duh-dum!

Brian H
August 9, 2012 5:48 am

The worst part of the NASA coverage and event was the occasional prolonged interview of/commentary from Holdren, Obama’s Eugenics Advisor. What a puffed-up repulsive putz!

Brian H
August 9, 2012 5:57 am

Policy Guy says:
August 5, 2012 at 11:00 pm
OK it was a great moment, but I didn’t see any diversity in the control room. What a stupid gaff!!
The NASA Administrator was the only non-white person I saw in this entire presentation.
Is there any Q why NASA is treated so terribly in this administration’s budget?

Ugh. The main spokesperson on TV thru the whole event was Asian.
And it’s “gaffe”, unless you’re landing fish.
“L”

Brian H
August 9, 2012 6:05 am

Stephen Rasey says:
August 5, 2012 at 11:56 pm
They landed with 0.14 kg of fuel remaining.

I heard one engineer apologizing for being so conservative in his fuel estimates and safety margins to another. There were over 130 out of 300+ kg. remaining, I think he said, when the descent stage cut loose and took off a few kms away to crash. That may have cost payload!

Brian H
August 9, 2012 6:24 am

Blade says:
August 6, 2012 at 2:31 am

I found the NASA TV in HD on YouTube. You can see what I was looking at here. It appears for the first time at 0:44 seconds in. It looks like they are names on the nameplates (not station ID’s). So most likely it is a very short name.

Very clear at 2:56. “Fuk Li”

Brian H
August 9, 2012 6:30 am

kadaka (KD Knoebel) says:
August 6, 2012 at 4:21 am

Give me a few days and I could get a good start collecting names for the petition to demand NASA makes all their probes biodegradable. Humans have already screwed up this planet beyond repair, why should NASA be allowed to wreck others as well?

You post some weird stuff from time to time … but just what bios are supposed to be doing the degrading on Mars? Actually, they go to great lengths to try to exclude every single microbe from the probes to avoid “contaminating” the planet. After all, signs of ‘crobes are the main target of investigation. No point in “salting the mine” to fool yourself!

Editor
August 11, 2012 10:19 am

Mosher gave me a heap of abuse upthread for suggesting that testing might improve the odds of success of a landing on another planet, saying testing was pretty useless because the Martian conditions were so different, and the Martian atmosphere was so much thinner than the Earth’s:

here is some background. you dont know what you are talking about you have never worked building a complex system. you dont understand that you test subsystems and “scale” testing is very limited and in this case almost useless since it doesnt address any unknowns.

So I was greatly amused today to find the following headline regarding the in-atmosphere testing of NASA’s lunar lander:

NASA’s Morpheus lander crash lands, explodes

The spider-like spacecraft called Morpheus was on a test flight at Cape Canaveral when it tilted, crashed to the ground and erupted in flames.

I guess NASA didn’t get the Mosher memo about the futility of testing landers in the Earth’s atmosphere if they are going to be used in a thinner atmosphere, or even in a vacuum …
w.

1 6 7 8