Using leaf veins to hindcast climate

Leaf lamina. The leaf architecture probably ar...
Leaf lamina. The leaf architecture probably arose multiple times in the plant lineage (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

From the University of California – Los Angeles

Hacking code of leaf vein architecture solves mysteries, allows predictions of past climate

UCLA life scientists have discovered new laws that determine the construction of leaf vein systems as leaves grow and evolve. These easy-to-apply mathematical rules can now be used to better predict the climates of the past using the fossil record.

The research, published May 15 in the journal Nature Communications, has a range of fundamental implications for global ecology and allows researchers to estimate original leaf sizes from just a fragment of a leaf. This will improve scientists’ prediction and interpretation of climate in the deep past from leaf fossils.

Leaf veins are of tremendous importance in a plant’s life, providing the nutrients and water that leaves need to conduct photosynthesis and supporting them in capturing sunlight. Leaf size is also of great importance for plants’ adaptation to their environment, with smaller leaves being found in drier, sunnier places.

However, little has been known about what determines the architecture of leaf veins. Mathematical linkages between leaf vein systems and leaf size have the potential to explain important natural patterns. The new UCLA research focused on these linkages for plant species distributed around the globe.

“We found extremely strong, developmentally based scaling of leaf size and venation that has remained unnoticed until now,” said Lawren Sack, a UCLA professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and lead author of the research.

How does the structure of leaf vein systems depend on leaf size? Sack and members of his laboratory observed striking patterns in several studies of just a few species. Leaf vein systems are made up of major veins (the first three branching “orders,” which are large and visible to the naked eye) and minor veins, (the mesh embedded within the leaf, which makes up most of the vein length).

Federally funded by the National Science Foundation, the team of Sack, UCLA graduate student Christine Scoffoni, three UCLA undergraduate researchers and colleagues at other U.S. institutions measured hundreds of plant species worldwide using computer tools to focus on high-resolution images of leaves that were chemically treated and stained to allow sharp visualization of the veins.

The team discovered predictable relationships that hold across different leaves throughout the globe. Larger leaves had their major veins spaced further apart according to a clear mathematical equation, regardless of other variations in their structure (like cell size and surface hairiness) or physiological activities (like photosynthesis and respiration), Sack said.

“This scaling of leaf size and major veins has strong implications and can potentially explain many observed patterns, such as why leaves tend to be smaller in drier habitats, why flowering plants have evolved to dominate the world today, and how to best predict climates of the past,” he said.

These leaf vein relationships can explain, at a global scale, the most famous biogeographical trend in plant form: the predomination of small leaves in drier and more exposed habitats. This global pattern was noted as far back as the ancient Greeks (by Theophrastus of Lesbos) and by explorers and scientists ever since. The classical explanation for why small leaves are more common in dry areas was that smaller leaves are coated by a thinner layer of still air and can therefore cool faster and prevent overheating. This would certainly be an advantage when leaves are in hot, dry environments, but it doesn’t explain why smaller leaves are found in cool, dry places too, Sack noted.

Last year, Scoffoni and Sack proposed that small leaves tend to have their major veins packed closely together, providing drought tolerance. That research, published in the journal Plant Physiology, pointed to an advantage for improving water transport during drought. To survive, leaves must open the stomatal pores on their surfaces to capture carbon dioxide, but this causes water to evaporate out of the leaves. The water must be replaced through the leaf veins, which pull up water through the stem and root from the soil. This drives a tension in the leaf vein “xylem pipes,” and if the soil becomes too dry, air can be sucked into the pipes, causing blockage.

The team had found, using computer simulations and detailed experiments on a range of plant species, that because smaller leaves have major veins that are packed closer together — a higher major vein length per leaf area — they had more “superhighways” for water transport. The greater number of major veins in smaller leaves provides drought tolerance by routing water around blockages during drought.

This explanation is strongly supported by the team’s new discovery of a striking global trend: higher major vein length per leaf area in smaller leaves.

The Nature Communications research provides a new ability to estimate leaf size from a leaf fragment and to better estimate past climate from fossil deposits that are rich in leaf fragments. Because of the very strong tendency for smaller leaves to have higher major vein length per leaf area, one can use a simple equation to estimate leaf size from fragments.

Major vein length per leaf area can be measured by anyone willing to look closely at the large and small leaves around them.

“We encourage anyone to grab a big and a small leaf from trees on the street and see for yourself that the major veins are larger and spaced further apart in the larger leaf,” Scoffoni said.

Because leaf size is used by paleobiologists to “hindcast” the rainfall experienced when those fossil plants were alive and to determine the type of ecosystem in which they existed, the ability to estimate intact leaf size from fragmentary remains will be very useful for estimates of climate and biodiversity in the fossil record, Sack said.

The research also points to a new explanation for why leaf vein evolution allowed flowering plants to take over tens of millions of years ago from earlier evolved groups, such as cycads, conifers and ferns. Because, with few exceptions, only flowering plants have densely packed minor veins, and these allow a high photosynthetic rate — providing water to keep the leaf cells hydrated and nutrients to fuel photosynthesis — flowering plants can achieve much higher photosynthetic rates than earlier evolved groups, Sack said.

The UCLA team’s new research also showed that the major and minor vein systems in the leaf evolve independently and that the relationship between these systems differs depending on life size.

“While the major veins show close relationships with leaf size, becoming more spaced apart and larger in diameter in larger leaves, the minor veins are independent of leaf size and their numbers can be high in small leaves or large leaves,” Sack said. “This uniquely gives flowering plants the ability to make large or small leaves with a wide range of photosynthetic rates. The ability of the flowering plants to achieve high minor-vein length per area across a wide range of leaf sizes allows them to adapt to a much wider range of habitats — from shade to sun, from wet to dry, from warm to cold — than any other plant group, helping them to become the dominant plants today.”

The strength of the mathematical linkage of leaf veins with leaf size across diverse species raises the question of cause.

The UCLA team explains that these patterns arise from the fact of a shared script or “program” for leaf expansion and the formation of leaf veins. The team reviewed the past 50 years of studies of isolated plant species and found striking commonalities across species in their leaf development.

“Leaves develop in two stages,” Sack said. “First, the tiny budding leaf expands slightly and slowly, and then it starts a distinct, rapid growth stage and expands to its final size.”

The major veins form during the first, slow phase of leaf growth, and their numbers are complete before the rapid expansion phase, he said. During the rapid expansion phase, those major veins are pushed apart, and can simply extend and thicken to match the leaf expansion. Minor veins can continue to be initiated in between the major veins during the rapid phase, as the growing leaf can continue to lay down new branching strands of minor veins.

In the final, mature leaf, it is possible for minor veins to be spaced closely, even in a large leaf where the major veins would be spaced apart.

“The generality of the development program is striking,” Sack said, “It’s consistent with the fact that different plant species share important vein development genes — and the global scaling patterns of leaf vein structure with leaf size emerge in consequence.”

These vein trends, confirmed with high-resolution measurements, are “obvious everywhere under our noses,” Sack and Scoffoni said.

Why had these trends escaped notice until now?

“This is the time for plants,” Sack said. “It’s amazing what is waiting to be discovered in plant biology. It seems limitless right now. The previous century is known for exciting discoveries in physics and molecular biology, but this century belongs to plant biology. Especially given the centrality of plants for food and biosphere sustainability, more attention is being focused, and the more people look, the more fundamental discoveries will be made.”

###

UCLA is California’s largest university, with an enrollment of nearly 38,000 undergraduate and graduate students. The UCLA College of Letters and Science and the university’s 11 professional schools feature renowned faculty and offer 337 degree programs and majors. UCLA is a national and international leader in the breadth and quality of its academic, research, health care, cultural, continuing education and athletic programs. Six alumni and five faculty have been awarded the Nobel Prize.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
102 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tadchem
May 24, 2012 9:51 am

It struck me that they are still locked in on “using computer simulations.”
The obvious relationship they are overlooking is that the variation of vein density with water availability and the variation of leaf area with water availability are the same.
This suggests that the total number of veins per leaf is set when the leaf is formed, and remains unchanging as the leaf grows. The availability of water merely controls the final size to which the leaf can grow.
This is an easy hypothesis to test *experimentally*, by controlling the water availability for specific individual plants of a selection of species over consecutive years. Greenhouse-grown trees would be good – simply measure the average area of a leaf for each tree and vary the water regiment from year to year.
If you want to you could also determine the vein density distribution for the leaves at the same time.

Zeke
May 24, 2012 10:15 am

Certainly Dr. Sack is making an important contribution to the subject of evolutionary ecology and paleo climatology. To support these important scientific endeavors, it would be quite simple to dig up all the high BTU coal in Illinois, and provide Dr. Sack and his undergraduates all the fossil leaf fragments they could possibly want.
We’ll make sure they get just a little fragment of each leaf, and plenty of brand new computers to model the rest of the leaf structure with, to their heart’s content.
Boxes of fossilized leaves in all states of preservation could be delivered to his door daily, and Illinois could again enjoy a real economy with energy, jobs, and industry, instead of drying up and blowing away.

May 24, 2012 10:24 am

“We encourage anyone to grab a big and a small leaf from trees on the street and see for yourself that the major veins are larger and spaced further apart in the larger leaf.”
Right. And both leaves are from the exact same environment, with the same temperature, humidity and so forth. There might be some useful environmental information in leaf structures, but teasing out that information presumably suffers from all the same challenges as dendro. Namely, all the other factors (besides temperature) that affect plant growth: precipitation, soil condition, predation, humidity, nutrients, age of the particular plant, etc. Also, it will be necessary to carefully select appropriate species consistently across time to be able to say anything about the differential growth rates across time.
Anyway, some interesting observations about vein structure and lots of good science that can be done purely on the basis of structural biology. Less clear whether this can be applied with rigor to past climate, and particularly to past temperature reconstructions.

Eyal Porat
May 24, 2012 10:26 am

Isn’t “prediction of past climate” an oximoron?

Crispin in Waterloo
May 24, 2012 10:36 am

Wilde
Plant stomata are already a better proxy for past CO2 variability than ice cores and generally show much higher CO2 variations than do the ice cores.
As long as the recording and / or interpretation of plant data is not corrupted by warmist prejudices this new research could well prove useful.
++++++++++++++
I am with you on that one. What would be great is to use veins and pores to calculate the CO2 and the local temperature and rainfall estimate. There may be very interesting in and out-of-sync relationships over time.

Latitude
May 24, 2012 10:43 am

Mr Lynn says:
May 24, 2012 at 7:20 am
Certainly some of the academic press releases Anthony posts here deserve a bit of ridicule (e.g. the street-lamp insect one), but not this one, I think
=======================================
They found nothing……
“This would certainly be an advantage when leaves are in hot, dry environments, but it doesn’t explain why smaller leaves are found in cool, dry places too, Sack noted.”

George E. Smith;
May 24, 2012 10:54 am

“”””” Using leaf veins to hindcast climate
Posted on May 24, 2012by Anthony Watts
Leaf lamina. The leaf architecture probably arose multiple times in the plant lineage (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
From the University of California – Los Angeles
Hacking code of leaf vein architecture solves mysteries, allows predictions of past climate
UCLA life scientists have discovered new laws that determine the construction of leaf vein systems as leaves grow and evolve. These easy-to-apply mathematical rules can now be used to better predict the climates of the past using the fossil record. “””””
Why not just read a history book; that will tell you what the past was, so you don’t have to PREdict it.
HEY !! it’s the FUTURE that we need to predict.

Gary Swift
May 24, 2012 11:07 am

Interesting. So, since the leaf vein pattern responds to precipitation, where tree rings respond to many things, perhaps you could use the leaves to remove the moisture noise from the treemometer temperature + moisture record?

Billy
May 24, 2012 11:40 am

Do academics ever go outdoors? I see no uniformity in plant leaves. A lush, well grown large leafed plant can found a short distance from a dried up little runt plant. Variations in soil type, nutrients, water, temperature and sun exposure are everywhere. It appears to me that there is a wide variation in leaves every year.

phlogiston
May 24, 2012 12:04 pm

The team discovered predictable relationships that hold across different leaves throughout the globe. Larger leaves had their major veins spaced further apart according to a clear mathematical equation, regardless of other variations in their structure (like cell size and surface hairiness) or physiological activities (like photosynthesis and respiration), Sack said.
This suggests quite simple genetic control of leaf structure, based on a scaling function – how much growth happens between the veins. So all leaves have a similar number of veins, the difference in size is just a difference in inflation between the veins. For instance, draw a leaf, veins and all, on the surface of an inflated balloon. Then blow it up some more, and you will get the structure of a big leaf. This kind of inflation is quite a common way of changing size in organisms, there is one gene somewhere determining this inflation.

thelastdemocrat
May 24, 2012 12:43 pm

Please give ideas for science-fair projects. The study apparently says you can predict overall leaf size by a fragment. Also, you could predict something about the plant’s environment – although this is not clear – along a riverbed or creekbed, you would have more well-watered plants in a zone that was relatively dry.
How could leaf vein density be easily measured by schoolkids? Could you scan a leaf, and blow up a region to be easily measured by a ruler, or an e-ruler? You could have kids gather a few leaves, scan them, enter them in computer, blow up a region of th eleaf, measure vein length in the portion of leaf, then determine/”predict” which fragment came from which leaf. Or maybe guess which came from reliably dry or wet terrain?
Sounds OK? Any other ideas?

Steve Tabor
May 24, 2012 12:45 pm

Aside from the various factors affecting leaf condition that have been mentioned in these comments (water use, sunny or shady side, mineral availability, humidity, etc. — not just temperature), there is always a problem in geohistory with transport and location of deposition. For a long time the Carboniferous was thought of as “The Age of Swamps”, simply because the rocks where it was first studied were swamp rocks with coal and swamp plants and amphibians. But how much of the land surface was swamps and how much was something else? 10%, 1%, 1/10,000 of 1%? All we know is that the lowland areas were great for deposition. It was subsequently found that large glaciers also existed at the same time as the swamps, as is the condition today.
And of course entire landscapes have been eroded away, more and more the farther back you go. We see only a small part of what existed in geologic history.
In deposition, the non-swamp, non-marine, non-lakebed and non-river plain areas are underrepresented. High mountains and hill country are hardly ever represented in the fossil record. How far have the leaves been transported, and where did they come from? Hard to know. So how do we relate the leaf characteristics to whatever micro- or regional climate they are expected to represent? And what can we then say about any ecosystem that may have been upstream or upwind, or how many different ecosystems (all climate-dependent) there actually were at the time? At present there are something like seventeen in our state of California, thirteen in Arizona, seven (?) in Virginia.
What interests me about this and other similar blogs is the quality of the skepticism that commenters bring to these types of allegations and proposals. Commenters seem to have a well-honed set of bull**** detectors, a very encouraging thing. Anthony should be proud. The presenters of the study should be reading this so they’ll know how to design their experiments, or if their experiments are even feasible.

Mark
May 24, 2012 1:51 pm

ferd berple says:
The paper ignores that there are 3 forms of photosynthesis employed by plants, depending on the conditions they are adapted to. C3, C4, and CAM
It is believed that C4 and CAM evolved later than C3, as they are better suited to low CO2 environments and for most of the past 600 million years CO2 was much higher than at present. C3 works best in high CO2 environments (most plants are C3) which may explain why adding CO2 to greenhouses improves plant production.

It would be interesting to know how these processes differ at the genetic level and if the differences are in chloroplast or nuclear DNA.
Apparently there are plants which are C3/CAM or C4/CAM. Is a C3/C4 or C3/C4/CAM plant possible? (Especially considering that polyploidy is fairly common in plants.)

May 24, 2012 1:55 pm

This article gives the best credibility to tea leaf reading. I was told that the accuracy in tarot cards reading has increased by 30%. On the other hand, my reliable crystal ball says: they have found another way, to keep the propaganda on the front pages; with another stupidity / I hope is not on the taxpayer’s expense…? Connecting the big / small constant climatic changes with the phony GLOBAL warming, is the mother of all lies. If it wasn’t demand for bullshine – they wouldn’t have being producing it. I.e. demand for bullshine controls the supply = blame yourself suckers!!!

Ally E.
May 24, 2012 2:10 pm

There are a few above who responded much as I did along the “This is brilliant” line. I’m glad I’m not alone. 🙂
I’m not assuming that this mob are pushing the CAGW idea, they could actually be after information. IF they come the “It’s worse than we thought” line THEN I will dismiss them as just after funding. Until then, this is something interesting.
Not all science is bunkum and some scientists are looking to see what’s there to refute the nonsense. I’m not ready to slam them yet.

George Steiner
May 24, 2012 2:30 pm

Chicken entrails are even better.

May 24, 2012 3:29 pm

Latitude says:
May 24, 2012 at 10:43 am
They found nothing……
“This would certainly be an advantage when leaves are in hot, dry environments, but it doesn’t explain why smaller leaves are found in cool, dry places too, Sack noted.”

The point of research is not to answer all questions, but to raise new ones.
/Mr Lynn

G. Karst
May 24, 2012 4:02 pm

Gary Swift says:
May 24, 2012 at 11:07 am
Interesting. So, since the leaf vein pattern responds to precipitation, where tree rings respond to many things, perhaps you could use the leaves to remove the moisture noise from the treemometer temperature + moisture record?

I agree, the more linked data that can be measured from the same tree, should allow for a better proxy. ie tree ring + stomata count + leaf development should provide better calibration of any proxy calculation, correcting for variables to the same tree. Let not throw babies out with the dirty bathwater. GK

May 24, 2012 5:04 pm

Ally E says:
Sorry Ally-nothing brilliant anywhere in this report.

May 24, 2012 5:59 pm

Sick trees have smaller leaves.

May 24, 2012 9:02 pm

On one tree, different branches have leaves with different veins. Some are exposed to the eastern sunlight – others on the top of the trees – not all leaves are on the outside branches – they all have different veins on. If you go from one branch to another side of the tree; was any GLOBAL warming, or GLOBAL cooling in those few minutes…? Must have being, if they say so. Or can they recognize if the fertilized leaf was from inside or outside branch?
If the next tree has better mulch, or roots closer to the gully, to get more moisture, than the tree 10feet away’ they have different texture veins. See what kind of educators are brainwashing the kids in universities = cloning more idiots of themselves…

Sleepalot
May 25, 2012 1:34 am

Perhaps those guys ought to visit Kew Gardens, where trees from around the world are grown side by side.

Don Keiller
May 25, 2012 6:43 am

there are certainly “facultative” CAM plants, like Mesembryanthenum crystallinum (iceplant) which starts off as C3, but if you dehydrate or water with salt water will convert to CAM.
(I did some research on them way back). Many desert plants are CAM, but will produce short-lived C3 leaves in the brief periods it rains.
There are also C3/C4 intermediates.

anengineer
May 25, 2012 11:25 am

Temperature predictions are based on the assumption that leaves are smaller at higher temperature. Bet there are other factors, like the availability of moisture, that also influence this. just like tree rings.

Tim Clark
May 25, 2012 3:53 pm

So, is the vein length preresponsive to dry conditions or post? As a plant physiologist, let me state:
bigger leaves are a result of better growing conditions, not an indicator of plant adaptability. i say bullshit on the suppositions in this study.