Using leaf veins to hindcast climate

Leaf lamina. The leaf architecture probably ar...
Leaf lamina. The leaf architecture probably arose multiple times in the plant lineage (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

From the University of California – Los Angeles

Hacking code of leaf vein architecture solves mysteries, allows predictions of past climate

UCLA life scientists have discovered new laws that determine the construction of leaf vein systems as leaves grow and evolve. These easy-to-apply mathematical rules can now be used to better predict the climates of the past using the fossil record.

The research, published May 15 in the journal Nature Communications, has a range of fundamental implications for global ecology and allows researchers to estimate original leaf sizes from just a fragment of a leaf. This will improve scientists’ prediction and interpretation of climate in the deep past from leaf fossils.

Leaf veins are of tremendous importance in a plant’s life, providing the nutrients and water that leaves need to conduct photosynthesis and supporting them in capturing sunlight. Leaf size is also of great importance for plants’ adaptation to their environment, with smaller leaves being found in drier, sunnier places.

However, little has been known about what determines the architecture of leaf veins. Mathematical linkages between leaf vein systems and leaf size have the potential to explain important natural patterns. The new UCLA research focused on these linkages for plant species distributed around the globe.

“We found extremely strong, developmentally based scaling of leaf size and venation that has remained unnoticed until now,” said Lawren Sack, a UCLA professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and lead author of the research.

How does the structure of leaf vein systems depend on leaf size? Sack and members of his laboratory observed striking patterns in several studies of just a few species. Leaf vein systems are made up of major veins (the first three branching “orders,” which are large and visible to the naked eye) and minor veins, (the mesh embedded within the leaf, which makes up most of the vein length).

Federally funded by the National Science Foundation, the team of Sack, UCLA graduate student Christine Scoffoni, three UCLA undergraduate researchers and colleagues at other U.S. institutions measured hundreds of plant species worldwide using computer tools to focus on high-resolution images of leaves that were chemically treated and stained to allow sharp visualization of the veins.

The team discovered predictable relationships that hold across different leaves throughout the globe. Larger leaves had their major veins spaced further apart according to a clear mathematical equation, regardless of other variations in their structure (like cell size and surface hairiness) or physiological activities (like photosynthesis and respiration), Sack said.

“This scaling of leaf size and major veins has strong implications and can potentially explain many observed patterns, such as why leaves tend to be smaller in drier habitats, why flowering plants have evolved to dominate the world today, and how to best predict climates of the past,” he said.

These leaf vein relationships can explain, at a global scale, the most famous biogeographical trend in plant form: the predomination of small leaves in drier and more exposed habitats. This global pattern was noted as far back as the ancient Greeks (by Theophrastus of Lesbos) and by explorers and scientists ever since. The classical explanation for why small leaves are more common in dry areas was that smaller leaves are coated by a thinner layer of still air and can therefore cool faster and prevent overheating. This would certainly be an advantage when leaves are in hot, dry environments, but it doesn’t explain why smaller leaves are found in cool, dry places too, Sack noted.

Last year, Scoffoni and Sack proposed that small leaves tend to have their major veins packed closely together, providing drought tolerance. That research, published in the journal Plant Physiology, pointed to an advantage for improving water transport during drought. To survive, leaves must open the stomatal pores on their surfaces to capture carbon dioxide, but this causes water to evaporate out of the leaves. The water must be replaced through the leaf veins, which pull up water through the stem and root from the soil. This drives a tension in the leaf vein “xylem pipes,” and if the soil becomes too dry, air can be sucked into the pipes, causing blockage.

The team had found, using computer simulations and detailed experiments on a range of plant species, that because smaller leaves have major veins that are packed closer together — a higher major vein length per leaf area — they had more “superhighways” for water transport. The greater number of major veins in smaller leaves provides drought tolerance by routing water around blockages during drought.

This explanation is strongly supported by the team’s new discovery of a striking global trend: higher major vein length per leaf area in smaller leaves.

The Nature Communications research provides a new ability to estimate leaf size from a leaf fragment and to better estimate past climate from fossil deposits that are rich in leaf fragments. Because of the very strong tendency for smaller leaves to have higher major vein length per leaf area, one can use a simple equation to estimate leaf size from fragments.

Major vein length per leaf area can be measured by anyone willing to look closely at the large and small leaves around them.

“We encourage anyone to grab a big and a small leaf from trees on the street and see for yourself that the major veins are larger and spaced further apart in the larger leaf,” Scoffoni said.

Because leaf size is used by paleobiologists to “hindcast” the rainfall experienced when those fossil plants were alive and to determine the type of ecosystem in which they existed, the ability to estimate intact leaf size from fragmentary remains will be very useful for estimates of climate and biodiversity in the fossil record, Sack said.

The research also points to a new explanation for why leaf vein evolution allowed flowering plants to take over tens of millions of years ago from earlier evolved groups, such as cycads, conifers and ferns. Because, with few exceptions, only flowering plants have densely packed minor veins, and these allow a high photosynthetic rate — providing water to keep the leaf cells hydrated and nutrients to fuel photosynthesis — flowering plants can achieve much higher photosynthetic rates than earlier evolved groups, Sack said.

The UCLA team’s new research also showed that the major and minor vein systems in the leaf evolve independently and that the relationship between these systems differs depending on life size.

“While the major veins show close relationships with leaf size, becoming more spaced apart and larger in diameter in larger leaves, the minor veins are independent of leaf size and their numbers can be high in small leaves or large leaves,” Sack said. “This uniquely gives flowering plants the ability to make large or small leaves with a wide range of photosynthetic rates. The ability of the flowering plants to achieve high minor-vein length per area across a wide range of leaf sizes allows them to adapt to a much wider range of habitats — from shade to sun, from wet to dry, from warm to cold — than any other plant group, helping them to become the dominant plants today.”

The strength of the mathematical linkage of leaf veins with leaf size across diverse species raises the question of cause.

The UCLA team explains that these patterns arise from the fact of a shared script or “program” for leaf expansion and the formation of leaf veins. The team reviewed the past 50 years of studies of isolated plant species and found striking commonalities across species in their leaf development.

“Leaves develop in two stages,” Sack said. “First, the tiny budding leaf expands slightly and slowly, and then it starts a distinct, rapid growth stage and expands to its final size.”

The major veins form during the first, slow phase of leaf growth, and their numbers are complete before the rapid expansion phase, he said. During the rapid expansion phase, those major veins are pushed apart, and can simply extend and thicken to match the leaf expansion. Minor veins can continue to be initiated in between the major veins during the rapid phase, as the growing leaf can continue to lay down new branching strands of minor veins.

In the final, mature leaf, it is possible for minor veins to be spaced closely, even in a large leaf where the major veins would be spaced apart.

“The generality of the development program is striking,” Sack said, “It’s consistent with the fact that different plant species share important vein development genes — and the global scaling patterns of leaf vein structure with leaf size emerge in consequence.”

These vein trends, confirmed with high-resolution measurements, are “obvious everywhere under our noses,” Sack and Scoffoni said.

Why had these trends escaped notice until now?

“This is the time for plants,” Sack said. “It’s amazing what is waiting to be discovered in plant biology. It seems limitless right now. The previous century is known for exciting discoveries in physics and molecular biology, but this century belongs to plant biology. Especially given the centrality of plants for food and biosphere sustainability, more attention is being focused, and the more people look, the more fundamental discoveries will be made.”

###

UCLA is California’s largest university, with an enrollment of nearly 38,000 undergraduate and graduate students. The UCLA College of Letters and Science and the university’s 11 professional schools feature renowned faculty and offer 337 degree programs and majors. UCLA is a national and international leader in the breadth and quality of its academic, research, health care, cultural, continuing education and athletic programs. Six alumni and five faculty have been awarded the Nobel Prize.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

102 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Mackey
May 24, 2012 7:08 am

It’s not that plants evolve and change over time is it?

wws
May 24, 2012 7:08 am

Reading through, here’s what the research comes down to: leaves growing in areas with high water availability don’t need to bother with water transport so much, so their veins are streamlined and relatively far apart.
Leaves growing in dry areas need to put great effort into their water transport support systems, so the veins are densely packed and in great numbers.
Streamlined, low demand water transport systems allow for relatively large leaves. Densely packed, high demand water transport requires smaller leaf size to be effective.
Nice model, but come on – pretty bleedin’ obvious. Form follows function.
and I predict any climate hindcasting that comes from this rather simple observation is going to have a very high bogosity content.

Kevin Kilty
May 24, 2012 7:10 am

The water must be replaced through the leaf veins, which pull up water through the stem and root from the soil. This drives a tension in the leaf vein “xylem pipes,” and if the soil becomes too dry, air can be sucked into the pipes, causing blockage.

OK, stop right here. I know our main focus around these parts is climate, but, if fluid in the plant structure were under any reasonable amount of tension, then plants could not stand rigidly and vapor bubbles would form in the network of capillaries. Moreover, how could plants move water from the soil to a height over 10 meters or so, since that would involve a tension greater than one atmosphere?

May 24, 2012 7:20 am

I haven’t read the paper, but fail to see the problem some commenters have with this study. Finding mathematical ways of describing the relationships between leaf size and vein growth seems a legitimate pursuit, and certainly paleontologists are always interested in new clues toward reconstructing (“predicting” is the wrong word) ancient climatic conditions, whether micro, local, or regional. Obviously one would not rely solely on leaf structure.
Certainly some of the academic press releases Anthony posts here deserve a bit of ridicule (e.g. the street-lamp insect one), but not this one, I think.
/Mr Lynn

theduke
May 24, 2012 7:30 am

Forgive my cynicism but how long before the next study using leaf samples proves that the MWP didn’t happen?
I wonder if leaf samples from that era even exist?
“Dr. Sack: Dr. Mann on line 2.”

ferd berple
May 24, 2012 7:32 am

The paper ignores that there are 3 forms of photosynthesis employed by plants, depending on the conditions they are adapted to. C3, C4, and CAM
It is believed that C4 and CAM evolved later than C3, as they are better suited to low CO2 environments and for most of the past 600 million years CO2 was much higher than at present. C3 works best in high CO2 environments (most plants are C3) which may explain why adding CO2 to greenhouses improves plant production.
If climate science is correct, then the ice ages are a result of low CO2 and adding CO2 to the atmosphere is helping to prevent global cooling as we had 60 years ago and thus helping prevent the next ice age.
Adding CO2 to the atmosphere is clearly increasing plant growth, and all the farmers of the world should be paying $$ to everyone filling up at the gas pumps these days, in recognition for all the free fertilizer we are providing them.

Jaye Bass
May 24, 2012 7:34 am

Think L systems

May 24, 2012 7:37 am

This is all very nice and I am sure will prove useful in its paleo applications. It would seem that not only have we always known many of these things and just needed to get the scaling business properly accounted for but it is very much like structural geology. The rule of thumb goes the minor structures mirror the major structures. Once again we see then nature has used sensible scaling techniques to conserve all kinds of things. We must be careful however, not to over play the idea. Like fractals, wonderful, useful tool, that needs to be applied with common sense.

May 24, 2012 7:38 am

Why had these trends escaped notice until now?
Because none of them though to ask a gardener.

Don Keiller
May 24, 2012 7:42 am

So what’s new here?
Stomatal density has a well characterised inverse relationship with CO2 concentration and has been used to estimate (not “predict”!) past CO2 levels.
E.g.
McElwain, J.C., Mayle, F.E. and Beerling, D.J. 2002. Stomatal evidence for a decline in atmospheric CO2 concentration during the Younger Dryas stadial: a comparison with Antarctic ice core records. Journal of Quaternary Science 17: 21-29.
Wagner, F., Bohncke, S.J.P., Dilcher, D.L., Kurschner, W.M., van Geel, B. and Visscher, H. 1999. Century-scale shifts in early Holocene atmospheric CO2 concentration. Science 284: 1971-1973.

May 24, 2012 7:44 am

Brilliant. 🙂

Tenuk
May 24, 2012 7:44 am

This could be a useful tool to help understand past global climate if fossil leaves are common enough and cover large geographic spreads. However, I’m not sure this is the case and wrong assumption about climate could easily be made – just like happens with the thermometer record.

theduke
May 24, 2012 7:49 am

I’m with levelgaze. Why do scientists have to torture the language so? How does one “predict” the past? You can “uncover” the past or “develop an understanding” of it or perhaps “discover” climatological conditions in the past but you can’t “predict’ the past.
The truth is that they really can’t predict the climate (or weather, if you will) three months out, and yet they use words to create the impression that they are some kind of modern soothsayers.

DJ
May 24, 2012 7:55 am

Goody. Another way of using trees to make hockey sticks.
Now, we’ll be able to tell from this season’s maple leaf what the climate was like last year. Better yet, any portion of any leaf, from any portion of the tree (healthy or not, shaded or sunny, under the canopy or top of the canopy). No more fears of “cherry picked” data.
What I do see is a terrific advancement for software developers to incorporate a new algorithm into the fractals for animation. Software for fur, wind and water have made tremendous strides towards realism, now another jump for plants. But hindcasting climate??
I see weeds in their theory.

JDN
May 24, 2012 7:58 am

This being a Nature article, we should immediately try to falsify it. Don’t you people remember all the other science-like Nature articles that turned out to make assumptions that were entirely too generous. My bet is that plants do what they like and don’t actually adhere to rigid laws.

John F. Hultquist
May 24, 2012 8:00 am

And this explains the co-location of wine-grapes (large leaves) and olives (small leaves) in a dry-summer sub-tropical climate (aka a Mediterranean climate) . . .
Oh, wait! I’ll have to get back to you on this.

Luther Wu
May 24, 2012 8:01 am

Lonnie E. Schubert says:
May 24, 2012 at 5:24 am
My thoughts (observations and emotions) are like the comments above. Mixed–excited, yet cautious and skeptical.
____________________
I found myself with the same set of reactions.
The state of modern “science” has turned me into a cynic.

Greg R.
May 24, 2012 8:06 am

This just seems – silly. It is like advertising a non-stop flight from San Diego to Hawaii and thinking it novel! All I can say is “DUH!”
OF COURSE the major veins in smaller leaves are packed closer together… the leaf is smaller! …And to think that we (the US taxpayer) paid for this study.
I bet – just maybe – that if these researchers looked hard enough, they would “discover” that the “major veins” in an african spiny mouse are packed closer together than those same “major veins” in an african elephant – yet they both inhabit the exact same biome and neither are indicative of the savannah’s climate – present, past, or future.

May 24, 2012 8:16 am

Developmentally based scaling of leaf venation architecture explains global ecological patterns Lawren Sack et al. Nature Communications 3, #837 doi:10.1038/ncomms1835
I thought science was based on validating hypotheses. How can this hindcasting model be validated?

Olen
May 24, 2012 8:16 am

The strength of the mathematical linkage of leaf veins with leaf size across diverse species raises the question of cause.
Their enthusiasm is obvious but, maybe they should run this by a couple of mathematicians.
They should not wander into unknown territory without proper support.

Ged
May 24, 2012 8:17 am

Different species of plants have different leaf shapes and leaf vein patterns. Are they assuming that plants followed the same principles throughout all time for vein patterns, when they don’t between species?
I am flabbergasted. It’s cool research, but being derailed by climate silliness.

ozspeaksup
May 24, 2012 8:22 am

yeah, and then theres plenty of evidence seeds from the same plant grown with variations in soil fertilizer and water all have HUGE differences.
too much calcium iron or not enough makes a massive difference,
and then
ages past had les carbon so plants would have struggled bet that gets bypassed, this seems another carbon furphy in the making..
an adelaide news did a story on nature mag today.
called it the respected? journal, I had a big laugh/

smilesooner
May 24, 2012 9:06 am

As well as others, I am not sure how original or surprising this finding is. I recently read a fascinating book on the underlying law governing many such patterns in life.
“Design in Nature: How the Constructal Law Governs Evolution in Biology, Physics, Technology, and Social Organization” by Adrian Bejan and J. Peder Zane is the book. The first author is an engineer, specializing in thermodynamics, and has written a number of more technical books. This was my first introduction to the ideas, which seem obvious in retrospect. Essentially, life and even existence, is all about flow. This law is why we see so many of the same patterns in nature – riverbeds, branches of trees, root systems, city streets etc. I would highly recommend the book.
Interestingly, Bejan stresses that human beings are part of nature – an idea that will resonate with a lot of people here. We are not some mysterious plague visited upon the universe – we belong here as much as any other feature of nature. Humanity’s design efforts are all part of the design of nature. But Bejan believes design comes from physical laws – not a grand designer, to be clear.

jorgekafkazar
May 24, 2012 9:16 am

wsbriggs says: “Watch the next few weeks, they’ll suddenly discover that the world was a drier/wetter/hotter/colder place than they thought. Pick the change that most supports, “It’s worse than we thought.””
And unprecedented, too. Not to mention robust.

May 24, 2012 9:21 am

While such a discovery may seem insignificant to the non-scientist and trivial to the non-biologist, it must be quite a windfall to botanists who study leaves for a living. Congratulations!
Analogously we all share the same circulatory system, with named major arteries and veins, while capillary count depends on muscle mass. –AGF