Using leaf veins to hindcast climate

Leaf lamina. The leaf architecture probably ar...
Leaf lamina. The leaf architecture probably arose multiple times in the plant lineage (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

From the University of California – Los Angeles

Hacking code of leaf vein architecture solves mysteries, allows predictions of past climate

UCLA life scientists have discovered new laws that determine the construction of leaf vein systems as leaves grow and evolve. These easy-to-apply mathematical rules can now be used to better predict the climates of the past using the fossil record.

The research, published May 15 in the journal Nature Communications, has a range of fundamental implications for global ecology and allows researchers to estimate original leaf sizes from just a fragment of a leaf. This will improve scientists’ prediction and interpretation of climate in the deep past from leaf fossils.

Leaf veins are of tremendous importance in a plant’s life, providing the nutrients and water that leaves need to conduct photosynthesis and supporting them in capturing sunlight. Leaf size is also of great importance for plants’ adaptation to their environment, with smaller leaves being found in drier, sunnier places.

However, little has been known about what determines the architecture of leaf veins. Mathematical linkages between leaf vein systems and leaf size have the potential to explain important natural patterns. The new UCLA research focused on these linkages for plant species distributed around the globe.

“We found extremely strong, developmentally based scaling of leaf size and venation that has remained unnoticed until now,” said Lawren Sack, a UCLA professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and lead author of the research.

How does the structure of leaf vein systems depend on leaf size? Sack and members of his laboratory observed striking patterns in several studies of just a few species. Leaf vein systems are made up of major veins (the first three branching “orders,” which are large and visible to the naked eye) and minor veins, (the mesh embedded within the leaf, which makes up most of the vein length).

Federally funded by the National Science Foundation, the team of Sack, UCLA graduate student Christine Scoffoni, three UCLA undergraduate researchers and colleagues at other U.S. institutions measured hundreds of plant species worldwide using computer tools to focus on high-resolution images of leaves that were chemically treated and stained to allow sharp visualization of the veins.

The team discovered predictable relationships that hold across different leaves throughout the globe. Larger leaves had their major veins spaced further apart according to a clear mathematical equation, regardless of other variations in their structure (like cell size and surface hairiness) or physiological activities (like photosynthesis and respiration), Sack said.

“This scaling of leaf size and major veins has strong implications and can potentially explain many observed patterns, such as why leaves tend to be smaller in drier habitats, why flowering plants have evolved to dominate the world today, and how to best predict climates of the past,” he said.

These leaf vein relationships can explain, at a global scale, the most famous biogeographical trend in plant form: the predomination of small leaves in drier and more exposed habitats. This global pattern was noted as far back as the ancient Greeks (by Theophrastus of Lesbos) and by explorers and scientists ever since. The classical explanation for why small leaves are more common in dry areas was that smaller leaves are coated by a thinner layer of still air and can therefore cool faster and prevent overheating. This would certainly be an advantage when leaves are in hot, dry environments, but it doesn’t explain why smaller leaves are found in cool, dry places too, Sack noted.

Last year, Scoffoni and Sack proposed that small leaves tend to have their major veins packed closely together, providing drought tolerance. That research, published in the journal Plant Physiology, pointed to an advantage for improving water transport during drought. To survive, leaves must open the stomatal pores on their surfaces to capture carbon dioxide, but this causes water to evaporate out of the leaves. The water must be replaced through the leaf veins, which pull up water through the stem and root from the soil. This drives a tension in the leaf vein “xylem pipes,” and if the soil becomes too dry, air can be sucked into the pipes, causing blockage.

The team had found, using computer simulations and detailed experiments on a range of plant species, that because smaller leaves have major veins that are packed closer together — a higher major vein length per leaf area — they had more “superhighways” for water transport. The greater number of major veins in smaller leaves provides drought tolerance by routing water around blockages during drought.

This explanation is strongly supported by the team’s new discovery of a striking global trend: higher major vein length per leaf area in smaller leaves.

The Nature Communications research provides a new ability to estimate leaf size from a leaf fragment and to better estimate past climate from fossil deposits that are rich in leaf fragments. Because of the very strong tendency for smaller leaves to have higher major vein length per leaf area, one can use a simple equation to estimate leaf size from fragments.

Major vein length per leaf area can be measured by anyone willing to look closely at the large and small leaves around them.

“We encourage anyone to grab a big and a small leaf from trees on the street and see for yourself that the major veins are larger and spaced further apart in the larger leaf,” Scoffoni said.

Because leaf size is used by paleobiologists to “hindcast” the rainfall experienced when those fossil plants were alive and to determine the type of ecosystem in which they existed, the ability to estimate intact leaf size from fragmentary remains will be very useful for estimates of climate and biodiversity in the fossil record, Sack said.

The research also points to a new explanation for why leaf vein evolution allowed flowering plants to take over tens of millions of years ago from earlier evolved groups, such as cycads, conifers and ferns. Because, with few exceptions, only flowering plants have densely packed minor veins, and these allow a high photosynthetic rate — providing water to keep the leaf cells hydrated and nutrients to fuel photosynthesis — flowering plants can achieve much higher photosynthetic rates than earlier evolved groups, Sack said.

The UCLA team’s new research also showed that the major and minor vein systems in the leaf evolve independently and that the relationship between these systems differs depending on life size.

“While the major veins show close relationships with leaf size, becoming more spaced apart and larger in diameter in larger leaves, the minor veins are independent of leaf size and their numbers can be high in small leaves or large leaves,” Sack said. “This uniquely gives flowering plants the ability to make large or small leaves with a wide range of photosynthetic rates. The ability of the flowering plants to achieve high minor-vein length per area across a wide range of leaf sizes allows them to adapt to a much wider range of habitats — from shade to sun, from wet to dry, from warm to cold — than any other plant group, helping them to become the dominant plants today.”

The strength of the mathematical linkage of leaf veins with leaf size across diverse species raises the question of cause.

The UCLA team explains that these patterns arise from the fact of a shared script or “program” for leaf expansion and the formation of leaf veins. The team reviewed the past 50 years of studies of isolated plant species and found striking commonalities across species in their leaf development.

“Leaves develop in two stages,” Sack said. “First, the tiny budding leaf expands slightly and slowly, and then it starts a distinct, rapid growth stage and expands to its final size.”

The major veins form during the first, slow phase of leaf growth, and their numbers are complete before the rapid expansion phase, he said. During the rapid expansion phase, those major veins are pushed apart, and can simply extend and thicken to match the leaf expansion. Minor veins can continue to be initiated in between the major veins during the rapid phase, as the growing leaf can continue to lay down new branching strands of minor veins.

In the final, mature leaf, it is possible for minor veins to be spaced closely, even in a large leaf where the major veins would be spaced apart.

“The generality of the development program is striking,” Sack said, “It’s consistent with the fact that different plant species share important vein development genes — and the global scaling patterns of leaf vein structure with leaf size emerge in consequence.”

These vein trends, confirmed with high-resolution measurements, are “obvious everywhere under our noses,” Sack and Scoffoni said.

Why had these trends escaped notice until now?

“This is the time for plants,” Sack said. “It’s amazing what is waiting to be discovered in plant biology. It seems limitless right now. The previous century is known for exciting discoveries in physics and molecular biology, but this century belongs to plant biology. Especially given the centrality of plants for food and biosphere sustainability, more attention is being focused, and the more people look, the more fundamental discoveries will be made.”

###

UCLA is California’s largest university, with an enrollment of nearly 38,000 undergraduate and graduate students. The UCLA College of Letters and Science and the university’s 11 professional schools feature renowned faculty and offer 337 degree programs and majors. UCLA is a national and international leader in the breadth and quality of its academic, research, health care, cultural, continuing education and athletic programs. Six alumni and five faculty have been awarded the Nobel Prize.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
102 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
May 24, 2012 4:55 am

Bigger animals have bigger spaces between bones. By measuring the gap between two ribs you can get a pretty good sense of the animal’s size.
Bigger leaves have bigger “leaf bones”. Sort of a no-brainer. The leaf needs to have a fairly consistent number of veins overall, so the spacing has to be closer in a small leaf.

LevelGaze
May 24, 2012 5:06 am

Umm… How exactly do you predict the past?
Or am I dead and have gone to an alternative universe?

David
May 24, 2012 5:13 am

“This will improve scientists’ prediction and interpretation of climate in the deep past from leaf fossils.”
Strange words to use’ “prediction” and “interpretation”, instead of “improving our UNDERSTANDING of past climate”. One does not “predict” the past. However, if one is looking for a particular result, then one can look for (cherry pick) from a data set, and find the “predicted” answer. So, how many factors make a tree ring grow, or a leaf also for that matter?

durango12
May 24, 2012 5:22 am

99% hype

May 24, 2012 5:24 am

My thoughts (observations and emotions) are like the comments above. Mixed–excited, yet cautious and skeptical. It is hard to get past the sense behind the writing that the authors are primarily excited that they have something they think justifies their time and money spent, but also justification for continuing funding. Well, one has to pay the bills. I’m okay with that, but it does seem the climate factor is what really excites them. The pool of possible grants gets much larger for plant-climate research. The pool must be much smaller for basic plant-biology research. Perhaps we shall see. Mostly, it may be practical, as they suggest, but I doubt we gain significant insight to the past. The rocks tell us most of what we can know, and the geologists have been doing that for many decades already.

Stephen Wilde
May 24, 2012 5:35 am

Plant stomata are already a better proxy for past CO2 variability than ice cores and generally show much higher CO2 variations than do the ice cores.
As long as the recording and / or interpretation of plant data is not corrupted by warmist prejudices this new research could well prove useful.

Ted Swart
May 24, 2012 5:35 am

Somewhat more scientific than trying to use tree rings as proxies for past temperatures. Nevertheless, overly optimistic in terms of using the leaves to get a handle on past climate. The fact that tree veins behave like fractals should hardly be a surprise. Being able to infer leaf sizes from the veins in leaf fragments may possible prove to be useful in some way — particularly with respect to the fossil record.

michael hart
May 24, 2012 5:36 am

Good that researchers are at least thinking about these sort of things, but developmental biology is still fiendishly complex. Attributing observations to genetics or environment or both is not a new problem that is going to be resolved any time soon, if ever.

Dave
May 24, 2012 5:37 am

A proxy accurate to 0.001 degrees C I’m sure…

Jim Strom
May 24, 2012 5:40 am

Good work and admirable theorizing, but I suspect it’s early times for this line of thought. In particular, there are likely quite a few confounding factors. For example, it is common to find mature leaves of widely varying sizes on the same plant, and to find nearby plants of the same species producing leaves of varying sizes when growing in different conditions, for example, in sun vs. shade. Effects such as this could lead to mistaken conclusions about historical climate–if, say, the small leaves in a given area tended to decay before they became fossilized.

jack morrow
May 24, 2012 5:46 am

Just another way to get taxpayer grants. Like someone mentioned , nothing new here ,cactus plants are a good example how plants cope with dry conditions. These “new scientists” must sit around all day trying to come up with a new way to keep their jobs. We’ve got lots of Kudzu here in the Southern states with big leaves that they could pick and study and maybe get rid of some of the plants–no everyone knows you can’t kill kudzu.

Andrew Greenfield
May 24, 2012 5:50 am

OT but is true that Heartland will not be holding any more ICCC conferences? (Its sad, but there is probably no need anymore for skeptic conferences as majorities everywhere are onto the scam and are skeptical and growing every year Ie a none issue). Anyway why doesnt WUWT organize a last one next year to put the final nail in the coffin of AGW LOL

wsbriggs
May 24, 2012 5:51 am

Watch the next few weeks, they’ll suddenly discover that the world was a drier/wetter/hotter/colder place than they thought. Pick the change that most supports, “It’s worse than we thought.”

cbrtxus
May 24, 2012 6:05 am

That’s all very interesting. How much did that project cost us? Considering the fact that the United States cannot balance its budget, is this research the sort of thing that we should be throwing money at? My mom used to tell me that we save money a penny at a time. Of course today with government, that would have to be a hundred thousand dollars at a time.

Chris B
May 24, 2012 6:06 am

Another opportunity to fabricate a Hockey stick? Were there deciduous trees in Yamal?

Bill H
May 24, 2012 6:11 am

This is your life line…Oh I’m sorry… I thought that was your palm….
Climate is science reduced to gypsy liberal arts…….. or was it that way all along?

Bill H
May 24, 2012 6:14 am

Ally E. says:
May 24, 2012 at 1:19 am
This is brilliant. It will be fascinating to apply this to fossils. One of those “But of course!” moments when once stated, it makes perfect sense. I look forward to reading what discoveries can be found on this basis.
—————————————————————
let me gaze into my crystal ball…..

Bill H
May 24, 2012 6:20 am

I wonder if anyone told these folks that a plant will respond to its current environment and conditions at the time it formed? as with all plant life…. just wondering….

Latitude
May 24, 2012 6:23 am

“”The research also points to a new explanation for why leaf vein evolution allowed flowering plants to take over tens of millions of years ago from earlier evolved groups, such as cycads, conifers and ferns””.
===============================================
because Co2 levels went from limiting to not limiting
================================================
“”flowering plants can achieve much higher photosynthetic rates than earlier evolved groups,””
===============================================
they need carbon
============================================
“”but it doesn’t explain why smaller leaves are found in cool, dry places too, Sack noted.”””
=====================================
so you proved nothing, wasted time and money
…publish or perish

D.R. Williams
May 24, 2012 6:26 am

Was a time when “predict” referred to something that had not yet happened. Perhaps the team needs an etymologist?

Owen in GA
May 24, 2012 6:29 am

Well, this is nice. It looks as though we have a way to determine the moisture part of the plant growth equation now. Of course I didn’t see much quantification of the effect, so there is no calibration that says major vein density X equals soil moisture level Y. If we really want to take microclimatic effects out of the treemometer equations we will need a pile of fossilized leaves from the tree to be piled neatly in undisturbed chronological order underneath it. Then we can correct ring width for corresponding moisture limiting factors and finally construct the perfect hockey stick that won’t break during slapshots. (partial /sarc – I can’t help myself)
I guess what I am saying is this is interesting, but since the above scenario is improbable since most leaves that fall under the tree will simply decompose and the fact that most of the cores are from very long lived conifers (not covered by this study), this doesn’t do anything for the “climate debates”. As John Marshall stated well above, the leaves that fossilize tend to be well away from the tree that produced them anyway. We could say that the region around whatever ancient lake collected these leaves into these fossil caches had an average climate based on a large statistical sampling of leaves in any given layer. Microclimatic effects could still dominate though as it is possible that all the leaves came from the same copse of trees that just happened to drop their leaves into the same stream to be carried to the lake. In fact, it could be the only stand of trees for a hundred miles or more that happens to be in an area that gets just a little more rain due to geography. So, it is interesting but not really a boon or bane for the team.

Paul Marko
May 24, 2012 6:36 am

I grabed my ‘Trees and Shrubs of New Mexico’ by Jack L. Carter and noticed we had everything from gymnosperms, oaks, cactus and a multitude of broadleaf species including canyon grapes.
Now, what was that climate again?

Pamela Gray
May 24, 2012 6:37 am

One would have to be careful not to interpret the oasis environment in which the leaf fossil was found as being representative of the surrounding desert. GISS warms up the Arctic by making this mistake in reverse.

juanslayton
May 24, 2012 6:44 am

gopal panicker: at the extreme we have cacti with no leaves
I read somewhere that cactus spines are modified leaves.

ChE
May 24, 2012 7:01 am

“The previous century is known for exciting discoveries in physics and molecular biology, but this century belongs to plant biology.”
Cue the beer garden scene from “Cabaret”.