Supreme irony: wind farms can cause atmospheric warming, finds a new study

NOTE: An update has been added below, using the press release that came out today after the news stories yesterday.

While ironic that something designed to reduce CO2 emissions (and presumably warming)is actually producing warming around it, this isn’t really any big surprise. Orchardists and vineyard operators in California have been using motor driven wind turbines to elevate local temperatures to save crops from frost for over half a century. What is different here is the scale of nighttime warming, large enough to be visible on MODIS satellite imagery thanks to large scale wind farms.

Large scale wind turbine farm in the Oklahoma panhandle. I had just visited a USHCN climate monitoring station about 2 miles downwind when I took this photo in December of 2008.

Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. and associates have been doing research along these lines for quite some time, and has this summary on some recent research.

From Louise Gray in the Telegraph:

Wind farms can cause climate change, according to new research, that shows for the first time the new technology is already pushing up temperatures.

Usually at night the air closer to the ground becomes colder when the sun goes down and the earth cools. But on huge wind farms the motion of the turbines mixes the air higher in the atmosphere that is warmer, pushing up the overall temperature.

Satellite data over a large area in Texas, that is now covered by four of the world’s largest wind farms, found that over a decade the local temperature went up by almost 1C as more turbines are built. This could have long term effects on wildlife living in the immediate areas of larger wind farms. It could also affect regional weather patterns as warmer areas affect the formation of cloud and even wind speeds.

Full story here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/9234715/Wind-farms-can-cause-climate-change-finds-new-study.html

Here’s the paper:

Zhou, Liming, Yuhong Tian, Somnath Baidya Roy, Chris Thorncroft, Lance F. Bosart and Yuanlong Hu 2012: Impacts of wind farms on land surface temperature. Nature Climate Chnage. doi:10.1038/nclimate1505

And the abstract (bold mine):

The wind industry in the United States has experienced a remarkably rapid expansion of capacity in recent years and this fast growth is expected to continue in the future. While converting wind’s kinetic energy into electricity, wind turbines modify surface–atmosphere exchanges and the transfer of energy, momentum, mass and moisture within the atmosphere. These changes, if spatially large enough, may have noticeable impacts on local to regional weather and climate.

Here we present observational evidence for such impacts based on analyses of satellite data for the period of 2003–2011 over a region in west-central Texas, where four of the world’s largest wind farms are located. Our results show a significant warming trend of up to 0.72 °C per decade, particularly at night-time, over wind farms relative to nearby non-wind-farm regions. We attribute this warming primarily to wind farms as its spatial pattern and magnitude couples very well with the geographic distribution of wind turbines.

h/t to WUWT reader Andrew Kissling

=====================================================

UPDATE: 4/30/12:30PM PST  The press release came out this morning, including this image:

Temperature Differences near Wind Farms

This graph shows the night-time land surface temperature differences near wind farms between 2010 and 2013. Credit: Liming Zhou et al., Nature Climate Change

Here’s the PR:

National Science Foundation

Scientists find night-warming effect over large wind farms in Texas

Wind turbines interact with atmospheric boundary layer near the surface

IMAGE:Wind farms are numerous in parts of Texas; scientists report new results on their effects.Click here for more information.

Large wind farms in certain areas in the United States appear to affect local land surface temperatures, according to a paper published today in the journal Nature Climate Change.

The study, led by Liming Zhou, an atmospheric scientist at the State University of New York- (SUNY) Albany, provides insights about the possible effects of wind farms.

The results could be important for developing efficient adaptation and management strategies to ensure long-term sustainability of wind power.

“This study indicates that land surface temperatures have warmed in the vicinity of large wind farms in west-central Texas, especially at night,” says Anjuli Bamzai, program director in the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences, which funded the research.

“The observations and analyses are for a relatively short period, but raise important issues that deserve attention as we move toward an era of rapid growth in wind farms in our quest for alternate energy sources.”

IMAGE:This graph shows the night-time land surface temperature differences near wind farms between 2010 and 2013.Click here for more information.

Considerable research has linked the carbon dioxide produced by burning fossil fuels with rising global temperatures.

Consequently, many nations are moving toward cleaner sources of renewable energy such as wind turbines. Generating wind power creates no emissions, uses no water and is likely “green.”

“We need to better understand the system with observations, and better describe and model the complex processes involved, to predict how wind farms may affect future weather and climate,” said Zhou.

There have been a growing number of studies of wind farm effects on weather and climate, primarily using numerical models due to the lack of observations over wind farms.

As numerical models are computationally intensive and have uncertainties in simulating regional and local weather and climate, said Zhou, remote sensing is likely the most efficient and effective way to study wind farm effects over larger spatial and longer temporal scales.

To understand the potential impact of wind farms on local weather and climate, Zhou’s team analyzed satellite-derived land surface temperatures from regions around large wind farms in Texas for the period 2003-2011.

The researchers found a night-time warming effect over wind farms of up to 0.72 degrees Celsius per decade over the nine-year-period in which data were collected.

Because the spatial pattern of warming mirrors the geographic distribution of wind turbines, the scientists attribute the warming primarily to wind farms.

The year-to-year land surface temperature over wind farms shows a persistent upward trend from 2003 to 2011, consistent with the increasing number of operational wind turbines with time.

IMAGE:Wind farms dot the horizon in Lubbock County and other Texas areas.Click here for more information.

“This warming effect is most likely caused by the turbulence in turbine wakes acting like fans to pull down warmer near-surface air from higher altitudes at night,” said Somnath Baidya Roy of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, a co-author of the paper.

While the warming effect reported is local and small compared to the strong background year-to-year land surface temperature variation, the authors believe that this work draws attention to an important scientific issue that requires further investigation.

“The estimated warming trends only apply to the study region and to the study period, and thus should not be interpolated into other regions, globally or over longer periods,” Zhou said. “For a given wind farm, once there are no new wind turbines added, the warming effect may reach a stable level.”

The study represents a first step in exploring the potential of using satellite data to quantify the possible effects of the development of big wind farms on weather and climate, said Chris Thorncroft of SUNY-Albany, a co-author of the paper.

“We’re expanding this approach to other wind farms,” said Thorncroft, “and building models to understand the physical processes and mechanisms driving the interactions of wind turbines and the atmosphere boundary layer near the surface.”

###

Other authors of the paper include Lance Bosart at SUNY-Albany, Yuhong Tian of NOAA, and Yuanlong Hu at Terra-Gen Power LLC in San Diego, Calif.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
189 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tokyoboy
April 30, 2012 12:11 am

No doubt warming is a good thing for both human and ecological systems.

David Jones
April 30, 2012 12:16 am

The Law of Unintended Consequences strikes again!!

April 30, 2012 12:17 am

Uh…..no, I just can’t say it. Too coarse to be snip-proof. Truly, nothing is sacred any more. The causation has flipped.

Tony Mach
April 30, 2012 12:18 am

I wonder with regards to the UHI effect if high-rise buildings could lead to turbulences – and therefore too to the mixing of warmer air from higher up. This could be another contribution to the UHI.

April 30, 2012 12:24 am

If you dig a lot of big holes in a small area and fill them full of concrete, won’t this cause a sort of mini-UHI effect?

April 30, 2012 12:32 am

Reblogged this on Johnsono ne'Blog'as and commented:
Vėjo turbinos šiltina klimatą

MB
April 30, 2012 12:34 am

OMG 1C warmer! And we all know how utterly devastating 1C is. My goodness, it is a wonder that Texas is not under water by now, what with the huge increase in temperature it is suffering from. That must be why there is no Coral Reef in Texas. It’s too hot.

JustMEinT Musings
April 30, 2012 12:36 am

I am following the comments at the Telegraph article…… OM goodness there are so many green activists there, all wanting and pushing for green clean alternate energy sources including nuclear…… they are dumb and deaf to any who disagree

bulaman
April 30, 2012 12:38 am

From 2010.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1251721/Pictured-The-stunning-micro-climate-sea-fog-created-Britains-windfarms.html
Air mixing making fog.. oh what about the albedo? Positive or negative feedbacks?

April 30, 2012 12:40 am

Lets save the world from warming by making it warmer!!!! Go Green! [/sarc]
Well i guess it is time to admit not only is their favorite tech not worth the wind that powers it, but now it accomplishes the exact thing it was meant to prevent. How wrong can they become in this debate?

Rob Schneider
April 30, 2012 12:42 am

Is this not caused by the basic thermo effect of heat being created whenever there is a conversion of one type of energy to another? Windmills convert kinetic energy to electricity. I would presume all power generation systems, e.g. coal, gas, etc. also has local heating effect?

prjindigo
April 30, 2012 12:46 am

Trees affect the local temperature at night as well, its a common enough problem with ANY kind of ground clutter. This has likely had input into UHI. Just another application of the law of thermodynamics.

eljay
April 30, 2012 12:49 am

This is both tragic & funny at the same time – Shakespeare would have a ball with this material.

wayne
April 30, 2012 12:55 am

That’s a no brainer. I commented on that very subject over a year ago here on a post showing offshore windmills streaming clouds behind. Then just speculating. They create turbulence breaking the smooth surface skin laminar flow which increases soil evaporation. Dry soil does get hotter, and where will you mostly see this excess in energy manifest itself… during the cooler nightime temperatures. Don’t have to be a rocket scientist to connect those dots.
Windmills are destructive in every respect.

AB
April 30, 2012 12:55 am

This phenomenon has been known for some time but at last it’s getting traction. When we submitted against this wind farm we raised the issue of wind turbines dessicating the native forest in the area and increasing the likelihood of a catastrophic fire, we were ignored.

AB
April 30, 2012 12:56 am

http://palmerstonnorth.blogspot.com/
sorry missed the website.

Andrew
April 30, 2012 1:00 am

The paper is pay-walled so difficult to see to what extentthe observed effects impact maximum (daytime) temperature readings. But potentially very important finding since the results would seem to require that the definition of the ‘urban heat island’ (UHI) now be extended well beyond the perimeter of the surbubs and the airports…
And as the study also points-out – teh same effect is also observed in grape-growing regions which use horizontal windmills (ie. helicopters) to mix air in order to elevate ground temperatures.
Presumably maximum temperatures during short winter days will be similarly affected ie. artifically increased…?
Perhaps now time to simply accept that the land-based record has been, and increasingly is, corrupted to the point of no utility in measuring temperature change? Too many confounding/ corrupting variables in data recording, data creation (interpolation) and data analysis.
Time to assign the land-based records to the category of science fiction. The satellites are demonstrably far more dependable and far less prone to man-made sources of ‘error’.

Luther Wu
April 30, 2012 1:10 am

I’m not too sure about this. The turbines are removing energy from the wind, not adding energy as in the California growers example. The turbines would be causing local effects of mixing of the layers, to be sure. If satellite data reveals increased local temps, they may be on to something.
Still, the paper makes me think that there might be something to the oft- quoted “one butterfly” example derived from Chaos Theory… all of those locally missing wing beats from churned birds, you see.

JoeH
April 30, 2012 1:12 am

I have ceased to be surprised, I begin to wonder is there anything that AGW devotion doesn’t make worse than the problem it was supposed to solve. Reading the comments on the Telegraph site it also seems that the true believers are becoming even more dogmatic, they allow for no argument that might upset their belief that wind technology can be anything other short of wonderful. The emperor’s clothes are now openly styled and worn by warmists.

P. Solar
April 30, 2012 1:22 am

From Louise Gray in the Telegraph:
>>
Wind farms can cause climate change, according to new research, that shows for the first time the new technology is already pushing up temperatures.
>>
A localised heating effect is NOT a change in climate. If anyone thinks that then we’d better stop bitching about UHI .
Nuclear power plants warm the local rivers and this may legitimately be called an effect on the local environment , it is not “climate change”.

Adam Gallon
April 30, 2012 1:22 am

Will we see a sudden increase in the number of weather stations being relocated into these wind-subsidy farms’ footprint & GISS doing a spot of “backdating”? 😉

artwest
April 30, 2012 1:31 am

Surprised that Louise “cut n’ paste any old press release from Greenpeace/WWF” Gray regurgitated something this critical. Guess she didn’t even read it – just saw “peer review” and “wind farms” and assumed it was straightforward alarmist stuff.

wikeroy
April 30, 2012 1:38 am

It is hillarious! Try Thorium instead.

P. Solar
April 30, 2012 1:38 am

>>
While ironic that something designed to reduce CO2 emissions (and presumably warming)is actually producing warming around it, this isn’t really any big surprise.
>>
Wind turbines are designed to produce renewable energy. That is their function and always has been. Anyone thinking they well reduce global CO2 is probably beyond help.
The fact that they cause localised warming is indeed not surprising. Just about any technique producing or consuming hundreds of MW of power will produce localised warming.
Coal plants give of huge amounts of steam from their cooling towers: huge installations designed to dump heat into the local atmosphere. Nuclear plant does the same thing into local water ways or coastal waters.
Both those effects are much larger than the warming caused by the turbulence of wind mills. Classical power generation is only about 35% efficient, the rest ending up as heat. For a 1GW nuclear plant that’s about 650MW of localise heating 24/7 .
So the article is correct, it’s no surprise that large scale power generation causes local warming. Why then is it worth an article?
If localised heating is supposed to be an “issue” maybe this would be a plus wind generators. If not, it’s a just a badly thought out bash at wind generation.

richard verney
April 30, 2012 1:40 am

This story is being carried in some of the UK press (The Daily Mail and The Daily Telegraph).
I am sceptical about the study although it would not surprise me that at a local level, a windfarm could have some impact on its immediate environment. It is obviously altering the natural windflow. There have also been some reports suggesting that windfarms may be reducing the average wind speed.
Whether this local impact has any significant bearing on global levels is, of course, a very different matter.
We now know that windfarms do not to any significant degree reduce CO2 levels (if for no other reason that they require almost 100% back up with conventional power generation). They therefore fail at their primary aim. It would be a lovely irony if there is merit in this study and they actually add to global warming.
Hopefully, this study will add to the weight of evidence calling for a re-think on windfarms.

1 2 3 8