Oh noes! Global Warming has driven Europe's Mountain Plants to Migrate 2.7 m Upwards in 7 Years

The precision, down to a tenth of a meter, calculated by the University of Grenada in their press release below is simply stunning. I wonder what the error bars are on 2.7 meters over seven years of the study? And, how does one filter out seasonal weather effects over such a short time span? Inquiring minds want to know.

Androsa
Photo (provided by the press release) of a succulent mountain plant, Androsace vitaliana tragically relocated 2.7 meters due to global warming. Turns out it is easy to grow in your garden

Here’s the main points:

  • Vascular plants have moved 2.7 m upwards, which might lead to the extinction of high-mountain species.
  • While species diversity in summits of temperate-boreal regions has increased, it has declined in Mediterranean regions.
  • Such are the results obtained from a study published in Science, where University of Granada researchers participated.

Researchers at the University of Granada Department of Botanic have participated in an international study that has confirmed that global warming is causing plants to migrate to higher altitudes. The study –recently published in Science analyzed species diversity shifts in 66 summits of 17 European ranges between 2001 and 2008.

In the Iberian Peninsula, two target regions were selected in the Pyrenees (Ordesa) and Sierra Nevada (Granada). Researchers found that the species under study had migrated an average of 2.7m upwards. “This finding confirms the hypothesis that a rise in temperatures drives Alpine flora to migrate upwards. As a result, rival species are threatened by competitors, which are migrating to higher altitudes. These changes pose a threat to high-mountain ecosystems in the long and medium term” the authors state.

Boreal-Temperate and Mediterranean Summits

The study also reveals an average increase of 8% in the number of species growing in summits of European mountains. However, such increase is not general, as of the 66 peaks in boreal and temperate areas, the majority revealed an increase in species diversity, while 8 out of the 14 summits in the Mediterranean area revealed a decline in the number of species represented.

Furthermore, the study revealed that species diversity has changed more significantly at low elevation sites –at the upper limit of the forest or an equivalent altitude– in the Mediterranean region than in other regions.

In Mediterranean mountains (Sierra Nevada, Corsica, Central Apennines and Crete), the rise in temperatures is causing a decline in annual average rainfall, which results in longer summer droughts. Consequently, temperature rise and droughts pose a threat to unique endemic species.

The mountains that present the most significant shifts in species diversity are Mediterranean mountains –located in Southern Europe–, where climate is different to that of the rest of Europe. In general, moist-soil species are more vulnerable to climate change, though high-mountain endemic species are also affected.”For example, in Sierra Nevada, the observation plots revealed a decrease in the number of emblematic species such as Androsacevitalianasubsp. Nevadensis and Plantagonivalisy Artemisia granatensis”, the University of Granada professor, Joaquín Molero Mesa, explains.

Another Sampling Site

Sierra Nevada has very special characteristics, as it is the only mountain range in the Iberian Peninsula that has Mediterranean climate from top to the hill foot. Consequently, the research group coordinated by professor Molero Mesa –with the special collaboration of Mª Rosa Fernández Calzado– placed another sampling site (four summits located at an elevation above 2500m high) in 2005. The purpose was to increase the sample size and obtain more reliable results. In two years, a comparative study of the results obtained in the first and second study will be conducted.

Thus, Sierra Nevada is the only mountain range with two target regions under observation. The research group is coordinated with the Observatorio de Cambio Global de Sierra Nevada, and has established –in collaboration with a research group from Morocco– another target region in the high Western Atlas, where observation plots and thermometers will be installed next summer. The purpose of this action is to better understand climate and species variations in the most vulnerable environment: the Mediterranean region.

This study is part of the Project GLORIA (The Global Observation Research Initiative in Alpine Environments) initiated in Europe in 2000 and which has spread worldwide.

Recent Plant Diversity Changes on Europe’s Mountain Peaks. Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.1219033

=================================================

I often wonder if the act of studying these plants doesn’t account for some of the changes, such as tracking seeds around in the mud on your shoes, etc.

The plant in the photo with the press release, Androsace vitaliana turns out it is easy to grow in your garden. So it follows that I’m not too worried about this news.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

93 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mwhite
April 25, 2012 10:55 am

It’s amazing how these alpine type plants do so well in the back garden, even at sea level.

mwhite
April 25, 2012 11:00 am

http://www.agreengarden.com/plants/androsace-mathildae.asp
“alpine : Plant which needs at least a few hours a day of solar light.
The Androsace mathildae is surely a rustic plant, it’s possible to grow it in the garden year round.”

kbray in california
April 25, 2012 11:01 am

I cannot even fathom how a plant is sensitive enough to the air temperature difference that is 2.7 meters away from it… you have to be kidding me…
Plants can tolerate a wide temperature spread even during the course of 24 hours.
This implied lack of tolerance is hard to believe. Nature is highly resilient to changes.
2.7 meters… how many degrees of temperature is that exactly.?

Jenn Oates
April 25, 2012 11:01 am

The comments here are golden.
No, platinum. 🙂

Allencic
April 25, 2012 11:05 am

I’m pretty sure that plate tectonics is causing the Himalaya to be pushed higher. Will very slow climate change be able to keep up with rising mountains? Even if plants range higher maybe they’ll still be farther from the summit. Sarc.

Shevva
April 25, 2012 11:08 am

Looking at the web site it looks like they like a lot of field trips around the wrold, great work if you can get it and all you have to do is believe, truely believe……….even though when you think about it Billions of year old planet and you can work out plants more 2.7m in 7 years, think i’ll wait for the DvD.

MarkW
April 25, 2012 11:12 am

2.7m is 7 years? At that rate, the plants will reach the summit in what? 5000 years?

April 25, 2012 11:17 am

Another utterly useless study with a completely absurd conclusion, this hardy/half hardy annual (rockery plant) prefers plenty of drainage and locates in the wild accordingly, and as you know rocks and the drainage on mountain peaks are constantly changing and being reorganized due to erosion etc..
Androsace L. (syn. Douglasia, Vitaliana) – rock jasmine.
They Disliking dry or wet heavy soils, it does best in full sun, set in buried stones and free sandy loam mixed with pebbles and heath soil. Runners and seeds. Alps, Pyrenees and Sierras of Spain.
http://lh5.ggpht.com/-blHGq9DjcTg/TU72_7cTQ8I/AAAAAAAAFz4/w4d3pJXpOIg/Androsace%252520vitaliana-Rizzoni-100624-04.jpg
http://lh5.ggpht.com/-92hflwBK-7o/TUsJMlefPgI/AAAAAAAAFcM/Ji0wUJFARXY/Androsace%252520vitaliana-ColRod-100622-02.jpg

Richard Keen
April 25, 2012 11:31 am

Fifty years ago I lived in Philadelphia at an elevation of 120 feet, now, due to a need for a change of climate, I live in Colorado at 8950 feet at the same latitude. So, thanks to climate change, my habitat has been driven (in a 1966 Plymouth) upwards 8830 feet in 50 years. That’s 2.7 km – Kilometers, not meters! At that rate in another 50 years my habitat will be driven higher than any point in Colorado and beyond the range of the Plymouth. At that point, to avoid extinction, my options will be reduced to:
1. move to the Hindu Kush or Tienshan mountains.
2. live in a stratospheric balloon
3. skip off to a beach in Costa Rica and not worry about it
Perhaps I should get a grant from NSF’s Office of Climate Research Anaslysis Programs (OoCRAP) to study this further.

April 25, 2012 11:43 am

They would do well to study the Pinsapo tree. It only exists in mountain areas of Morocco and Southern Spain, that signifies that the two populations were once united down at sea level during an ice-age, and have since retreated to become isolated in mountainous areas. A tremendous ordeal for the species but still they survive.

Joe Public
April 25, 2012 11:54 am

This research seems to be a prime candidate for an Ignobel Award.

Sean
April 25, 2012 12:04 pm

Researchers at the University of Junk Science confirmed that professor Joaquín Molero Mesa is an idiot.

April 25, 2012 12:05 pm

Gary Pearse beat me to it. Does anybody suppose that seeds caught in the boots of ascending researchers could have an effect? It’s happenning in Antarctica. They do not consider this. Nor do they consider the effect of rising CO2 in extending the range of plants.

April 25, 2012 12:05 pm

Do they have temperature data for these mountainsides for at least 30 years?

Kevin Garrett
April 25, 2012 12:06 pm

Of course increasing global temperatures are causing these regional changes. Of course there is no mention of regional changes in temperature in the press release. I am sure, like those magical studies of tree rings, the plant migration could have nothing to do with precipitation, ambient RH, increasing CO2, no, only global warming. You can be sure the error bars squash their little 2.7m signal, too. They would have been better off if they had changed their units to mm, that would seem more impressive.

April 25, 2012 12:07 pm

Oh noes! Global Warming has driven Europe’s Mountain Plants to Migrate 2.7 m Upwards in 7 Years
As long as their roots remain in contact with the ground, I don’t see a problem…

polistra
April 25, 2012 12:14 pm

If I noticed that dandelions had spread 8 feet farther into my lawn, I wouldn’t think of temperature; I’d think of wind and bees.

John T
April 25, 2012 12:19 pm

“Plants to Migrate 2.7 m Upwards in 7 Years”
Thank Goodness!
For a while there I thought they might be overcome by the rising oceans.

Brian R
April 25, 2012 12:20 pm

I can’t help but wonder what the temperature difference is between two points on a mountain side separated by only 9 feet.

polistra
April 25, 2012 12:20 pm

Also: Their website map showed some activity in this part of the US. I followed the links to see if there was anything worth checking/debunking, but there isn’t. The supposed activity and measurement didn’t exist. The American part of the website shows one meeting in 2005, with some plans to do activities later, but nothing happened after that. (Or if it did happen, it didn’t get written up after 2005.)

jayhd
April 25, 2012 12:20 pm

Reading this certainly makes me feel better. Having read on WUWT a number of really stupid studies with ridiculous BS global warming conclusions published by researchers from American universities, I was beginning to believe the U.S. universities were giving away advanced degrees to any idiot that came along. This study shows that the U.S. is not alone in doing so.

climatereason
Editor
April 25, 2012 12:42 pm

I wonder if these plants were around in Roman times. If they were, where did they migrate to as the glacier line was often above the mountain?
http://climateaudit.org/2006/08/07/green-alps-1/
tonyb

Wellington
April 25, 2012 12:46 pm

Anthony: There is a typo in the opening sentence, “Grenada” -> “Granada”.

Mike M
April 25, 2012 12:48 pm

But what about mountains at higher latitudes that now present a new location for this species that it didn’t have at the cooler temperatures? More warmth and more CO2 = more plant life on earth.

KnR
April 25, 2012 12:51 pm

marchesarosa do they have good plant location data for the last thirty years , the new presence of a plant now does not mean it could not have been there in the past and they gone only to return .
A reminder that the AGW scare research bucket is still deep and well filled and that there are of plenty of researches happy to dip into it.
One hallmark of the death of AGW will be that you will still get these studies but the links to ‘climate doom’ will be gone and actual consideration of what has happened will be done .