From the University of Nebraska-Lincoln . Tom Nelson quipped earlier today that he hadn’t noticed any pygmy horses near the equator where it is warmer.
Study: Evolution of earliest horses driven by climate change
New research offers evidence of rising temperatures’ effects on body size

When Sifrhippus, the earliest known horse, first appeared in the forests of North America more than 50 million years ago, it would not have been mistaken for a Clydesdale. It weighed in at around 12 pounds — and it was destined to get much smaller over the ensuing millennia.
Sifrhippus lived during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, a 175,000-year interval of time some 56 million years ago in which average global temperatures rose by about 10 degrees Fahrenheit, caused by the release of vast amounts of carbon into the atmosphere and oceans.
About a third of mammal species responded with significant reduction in size during the PETM, some by as much as one-half. Sifrhippus shrank by about 30 percent to the size of a small house cat (about 8.5 pounds) in the PETM’s first 130,000 years and then rebounded to about 15 pounds in the final 45,000 years of the PETM.
Scientists have assumed that rising temperatures or high concentrations of carbon dioxide primarily caused the phenomenon in mammals during this period, and new research led by Ross Secord of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Jonathan Bloch of the Florida Museum of Natural History at the University of Florida in Gainesville offers new evidence of the cause-and-effect relationship between temperature and body size. Their findings also offer clues to what might happen to animals in the near future from global warming.
In a paper to be published in the Feb. 24 issue of the international journal Science, Secord, Bloch and colleagues used measurements and geochemical composition of fossil mammal teeth to document a progressive decrease in Sifrhippus‘ body size that correlates very closely to temperature change over a 130,000-year span.
Bloch, associate curator of vertebrate paleontology at the Florida Museum of Natural History, said multiple trails led to the discovery.
One was the fossils themselves, recovered from the Cabin Fork area of the southern Bighorn Basin near Worland, Wyo. Stephen Chester, then an undergraduate student at Florida, now an anthropology Ph.D. candidate at Yale and a co-author on the paper, had the task of measuring the horses’ teeth. What he found when he plotted them through time caught Bloch and Secord by surprise.
“He pointed out that the first horses in the section were much larger than those later on,” Bloch recalled. “I thought something had to be wrong, but he was right — and the pattern became more robust as we collected more fossils.”
A postdoctoral researcher in Bloch’s lab for the first year of the project, Secord performed the geochemical analysis of the oxygen isotopes in the teeth. What he found provided an even bigger surprise.
“It was absolutely startling when Ross pulled up the first oxygen isotope data,” Bloch said. “We looked at the curve and we realized that it was exactly the same pattern that we were seeing with the horse body size.
“For the first time, going back into deep time — going back tens of millions of years — we were able to show that indeed temperature was causing essentially a one-to-one shift in body size within this lineage of horse. Because it’s over a long enough time, you can argue very strongly that what you’re looking at is natural selection and evolution — that it’s actually corresponding to the shift in temperature and driving the evolution of these horses.”
Secord, who came to UNL in 2008 as an assistant professor of Earth and atmospheric sciences and curator of vertebrate paleontology at the University of Nebraska State Museum, said the finding raises important questions about how plants and animals will respond to rapid change in the not-too-distant future.
“This has implications, potentially, for what we might expect to see over the next century or two, at least with some of the climate models that are predicting that we will see warming of as much as 4 degrees Centigrade (7 degrees Fahrenheit) over the next 100 years,” he said.
Those predictions are based largely on the 40 percent increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels (from 280 to 392 parts per million) since the start of the Industrial Revolution in the mid-19th century.
Ornithologists, Secord said, have already started to notice that there may be a decrease in body size among birds.
“One of the issues here is that warming (during the PETM) happened much slower, over 10,000 to 20,000 years to get 10 degrees hotter, whereas now we’re expecting it to happen over a century or two,” Secord said. “So there’s a big difference in scale and one of the questions is, ‘Are we going to see the same kind of response?’ Are animals going to be able to keep up and readjust their body sizes over the next couple of centuries?”
Increased temperatures are not the only change animals will have to adapt to, Secord said. Greenhouse experiments show that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide lowers the nutritional content of plants, which he said could have been a secondary driver of dwarfism during the PETM.
Other co-authors on the paper are Doug M. Boyer of Brooklyn College, Aaron R. Wood of the Florida Museum of Natural History, Scott L. Wing of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Mary J. Kraus of the University of Colorado-Boulder, Francesca A. McInerny of Northwestern University, and John Krigbaum of the University of Florida.
The research was funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, with additional support from UNL.
This study is horse sh**. Pun totally intended.
“Ornithologists, Secord said, have already started to notice that there may be a decrease in body size among birds.”
Is that because the smaller ones can fly more rapidly through the blades of the windmills?
“One of the issues here is that warming (during the PETM) happened much slower, over 10,000 to 20,000 years to get 10 degrees hotter, whereas now we’re expecting it to happen over a century or two,” Secord said. “So there’s a big difference in scale and one of the questions is, ‘Are we going to see the same kind of response?’ Are animals going to be able to keep up and readjust their body sizes over the next couple of centuries?”
Secord must have skipped the classes that dealt with Natural Selection.
If smaller animals are better adapted to warmer temperatures, it doesn’t mean larger animals are less able to survive warmer temperatures. Just that they can’t compete with smaller animals. So larger animals will handle warmer temperatures just fine until the smaller animals come along, however long that takes.
Tom G(ologist) says:
February 24, 2012 at 12:10 pm
http://suspectterrane.blogspot.com/
—–
Oh, I forgot to say cool website. I love the geology / paleohistory stuff so I’ll stop in every now and again.
In Africa we have the stunted Masai, the huge Pygmys, the average sized people of the West African tropics. What the hell has heat got to do with it? Furthermore, Africa has the greatest human genetic diversity of any continent. Why doesn’t heat point them in the direction of shrinkage? Hutus should be Pygmys.
I don’t suppose other factors like food and terrain have anything to do with this horse sh** study?
Awful paper, debunked easily by two links.
These show that during history temperatures declined while the horses grew bigger.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/horses/horse_evol.html
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1b/65_Myr_Climate_Change.png
Why are the tropics so bereft of life? Why are their creatures so tiny? Just look at the elephants and rhinos. It is a travesty and we must cool the Earth and reduce co2 in order to encourage biodiversity and larger animals in Sweden.
Please add below to previous post. (incomplete)
Yet any increases in temperatures show no evidence it stalled the continued growth of the evloution of the horse. One of the very few species known that has actually increased in size over millions of years during a long cooling period. Many dinosaurs, early birds, reptiles, insects, ocean life and first mammals were much bigger than nowadays. (during times of much warmer climates)
Pamela, get with the program. They now predict everything dontcha know. It has become a religion and thus unfalsifiable.
““It was absolutely startling when Ross pulled up the first oxygen isotope data,” Bloch said. “We looked at the curve and we realized that it was exactly the same pattern that we were seeing with the horse body size….”
Dating these horsetooth thermometer fossils in successive order across a 130,000 year period and making sure the horses were of comparable ages at time of death and preservation must have been a real challenge.
Gleick in his dreary film posted at the top of WUWT…reckons that with proper ‘education’
“we can do for climate change what we’ve done for Evolution.”
This seems to be a new Warmist smear tactic.
But isn’t it fascinating then that none of the people who have posted above, most of whom are AGW skeptics, appear to hold Creationist viewpoints?
Warmism really is clutching at straws now.
In my experience AGW believers are the ones would most benefit from education on evolution.
I commonly come across AGWers who ‘believe; in evolution (natural selection) but don’t understand it.
They think evolution is deterministic consistent with their deterministic ‘progressive’ politics, which of course it is not.
The error that Secord made, which I noted above, is also quite common.
High temperatures probably had little to do with the reduced size of mammals during this period. The most likely cause was the increase in surface gravitation at that time. This is explained at http://www.dinoextinct.com, click on ‘The Gravity Theory of Mass Extinction’ to view a PDF summary of the theory.
The largest dinosaurs of the Mesozoic, the sauropods, existed primarily in near-equatorial regions of Pangea where temperatures were higher than they are today.
They think evolution is deterministic exactly as climate is deterministic. Of course climate influences evolution. Any environment change does that. And there is a maximal limit imposed by environment temperature, because the surface tends to grow as square of the radius, and the volume as the cube of the radius. And the generated thermal energy is proportional with the volume, while the dissipated one is proportional with the surface. Apparently TRex didn’t know much of those, or didn’t care much.
What do you want to bet that another third got LARGER and the last third stay about the same?
Prey animals often get smaller in response to predation (as predators eat the larger ones and the smaller ones hide better or more easily). In some cases, once large enough, they can get larger as that makes them harder for all but big predators to take down. Animals on islands often shrink in response to food pressures. Any chance the continents where rearranging then?…
Oh, and does the increase in size of humans from about 3 feet to about 6 feet over the last few million years mean that the globe is more frozen now? How about the increase from about 4 feet 9 inchs or so to 6 feet 3 inches in the last several hundred years, so that must mean we’re positively frozen by now…
Sheesh… I wonder if “Advanced Fiction and Creative Writing” are now required courses for a B.S. degree in BS…
I often double-check the data in these kind of papers because it often does not match the proposition being advanced. In many cases, the data says the opposite conclusion should have been reached. In this case, however, it does seem to match up.
They measured the molar size of the horse fossils, which are exceedingly small at one third of a square centimetre. This should have a very large error margin. How do you measure fossil teeth width to the nearest 1 hundreth of a millimetre as they have done.
And their dating technique has some problems in that the larger, earlier horse are not dated exactly so the timeline could be extended back a few hundred thousand years probably. In addition, they squeezed the middle of the dating, so that 15 metres of soil/rock accumulation happens over just 15,000 years while over the whole 450,000 year timeframe, there is only 76 metres of accumulation. I don’t know if that is realistic. It wouldn’t change the result that much, just that the times could be off some.
Otherwise, here is your horse molar size versus time over the PETM.
http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/9695/horsesatpetm.png
re post by: Bill Illis says: February 23, 2012 at 5:05 pm
Bill, I believe recent research has found grasses existed as far back as 60 to 70 million years ago, and was grazed on by some dinosaurs.
What equine ancestors actually ate, however, is still a totally valid question. Even today while horses do survive primarily on grass, and are very picky eaters compared to cows, sheep, goats, etc., they will eat and nibble on a surprising number of other things. I had horses for many years and had no clue about the variety of things they’ll eat, without harm, if they have access to it.
Mine used to actually love to eat the fuzz off large poison ivy roots!! Fortunately I don’t react much to poison ivy, but there were several times where I got patches of it when the oil was transferred from one of my horse’s muzzles to my arm and even cheek once. They’ll entirely strip the big roots of fuzz, and kill the largest/oldest poison ivy plants that way. They don’t touch the leaves any to speak of, so they won’t get rid of all the ivy unfortunately. They’ll also kill any very young willow – they like to eat all the tiny new leaves and even several inches of the young tender new branch tips. They’ll also nibble a little at maple tree bark although usually not enough to harm mature trees (no idea if they’d kill very young ones like they do willows). I guess maple syrup tastes good to them too!
Even more bizarre, they will absolutely snarf up every single black locust tree seed pod that falls to the ground. When it was that time of year and seed pods were dropping, the second I let them out each day, mine would charge out and race each other down to the small locust grove in the pasture and promptly gobble up every single pod they could find.
Not so surprising, if you happen to have any apple or peach trees within their reach, you’re not likely to get any ripe fruit yourself – the horses will get every one the minute it’s close to ripe, and even knock the tree trunk or branches to get fruit to fall that is out of their reach (and they will rear up as high as they can to get the fruit). If the horse isn’t used to being in a pasture that has an apple tree(s), you’ll likely wind up with a bit of tummy ache/colic the first year from them eating apples while they’re still green (e.g., before they’re quite ripe enough).
So who knows what ancient equine ancestors actually survived on.
I’d like to know how these researchers manage to explain that global warming caused mammals to get smaller, while dinosaurs were getting larger and larger.
re post by: Mike McMillan says: February 23, 2012 at 5:31 pm
Yes, we’ll all ride tall in the saddle while keeping our feet planted firmly on the ground. 😉
Ah, now, let’s not forget folks – when we are speaking of the poor desperate birds shrinking from eeee-vil anthropogenic global warming, at the same time we must not fail to note that they are getting bigger in western USA because of that nasty global warming!
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/10/31/the-incredible-story-of-bigger-shrinking-birds-courtesy-of-global-climate-change/
re post by: Tom Harley says: February 23, 2012 at 7:55 pm
And those little Roman donkey sized horses were incredibly strong like ants! They were able to gallop around with approx. 400 Lbs of rider in armor. So heavy that cranes had to be used to hoist the rider up into or back out of the saddle no less.
re post by: Bill Parsons says: February 24, 2012 at 10:00 am
Bill, do you have a link to the source for your quote? I’d like to read & bookmark it…
“Humans may be much shorter if global warming continues, according to the latest study.”
http://www.thestatecolumn.com/articles/2012/02/25/scientists-global-warming-could-shorten-human-presence-on-earth/
Must be reliable, as Wiki has used the blog as a reference in at least one article.
Try this:
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2011/10/hothouse-earth/kunzig-text
Of course, National Geographic links this to anthopogenic global warming – (e.g.) it happened (at least) once before, so it can happen again… and this time, we humans will cause it to happen. Perhaps you’ll agree with me that the paragraph in question nevertheless gets the order right: the heat of the warming world releases methane-bearing compounds that will (so they say) induce the hothouse.
Sure. The same thing happened in the 18th Century, and Jonathan Swift documented the effect: The Lilliputians were small enough to stand on the palm of his hand; the Brobningnagians could wade through the oceans to nearby islands. And the horses learned to talk…
Natural selection and mutation work in amazing ways.