WUWT search engine issues and site update

Image representing Google as depicted in Crunc...
Image via CrunchBase

This post over on Scottish Sceptic’s website (below) points to a problem that WUWT has with search engines. One big issue he raises is that I can’t edit meta tags in the website header, but then again, I’ve had a clue that hasn’t mattered for a couple of years now, from the WordPress forum:

It’s not possible to edit meta tags on WordPress.com blogs.

Moreover Google does not use the keywords meta tag in web ranking – Monday, September 21, 2009

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html

=================================================================

WUWT – page 35 when searching for “global warming”

Following some comments on WUWT about the “+1″ scheme to boost ratings, I first joined the scheme, then decided to do it the old fashioned way and click on the WUWT link when searching for “global warming”.

So, imagine my surprise when I found WUWT on …

PAGE 35

Yes, that is right! WUWT was on page 35 … I had to double check to make sure it was right because it was behind the GWPF, behind climate audit, behind unrealclimate, behind the IPCC behind sites that none of us have ever heard of.

  • So, why was it on page 35 of the google results?
  • Why having clicked on it just once, did it move (via another PC on another URL) to page 34?
  • And, why when I checked the page, was there not a single meta-tag telling the google search engine this site had anything or wanted anything to do with global warming?

The simple answer given the ease by which I escalated the ranking by a single click is that no one ever clicks on a WUWT page when they search for global warming. And before everyone starts point to google bias, obviously, no one trusts the top ranking sites (they are mostly paid for … or promoted due to google’s own politics) but whilst it is quite possible WUWT has a lower ranking than it should, I think there is much more to this and quite a lot has nothing to do with Google and so I have a few suggestions:

  • I have to be honest, and say that I don’t think Anthony Watts has a clue about publicising his site particularly for search engines. E.g. he doesn’t even mention global warming as a search term in the meta tabs telling search engines which words and phrases characterise the site. That just screams out that he doesn’t exactly make his site google friendly and it’s not surprising that it is so lowly rated.
  • Sceptics most probably do not use Google to find the site. If we don’t search on google, how is google supposed to know that people want to find that site when they search?
  • And yes, Google hates WUWT … and more than likely is actively trying to repress the site. OK, we have to accept that, so we have to work together to try to reverse this.

What can be done

1. Search for global warming and click on the WUWT site.

Go to google and enter “global warming”. Then click the last number at the bottom to go to pages 10, then 19, etc. until you reach page 35 3435.

(Addendum: the next WUWT page is around page 70 of google results!!)

Then start going backwards until you find an entry for any page linked to wattsupwiththat.com and then click it.

Repeat prescription every day!

2. Add a link to wattsupwiththat.com

Where ever and when ever add a link.

3. Join the “+1 scheme

Join the scheme and then find the WUWT pages and press the +1 button

==================================================================

He makes some good points that would make a good new year’s resolution – help spread the word. There is one thing I can do, and that is make a change to the header image to remove the masthead statement and place it into the first lines of text. I’ve made that change today to see if it helps.

As always, my sincerest thanks in advance to everyone who helps support this website in words and deeds.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
190 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
January 3, 2012 12:49 am

Why has WUWT rating gone DOWN from 5 to zero??
Why are people getting “block all wattsupwiththat.com” results??
And what is master of internet fast games Wm Connolley doing now he cannot exercise at WP his 2-minute reverts, deletions, etc any longer??
Inquiring minds would like to know.

January 3, 2012 12:57 am

ah, looks like it’s being sorted, that’ll teach me to skip comments

Pooh, Dixie
January 3, 2012 7:54 am

Consult the WordPress guidance first (Walter H. Schneider, January 1, 2012 at 8:48 am). If more is wanted, then perhaps
Kent, Peter. Search engine optimization for dummies(r), 3rd edition, Indianapolis, IN : Wiley Pub., Inc., 2008.

Jeff in Calgary
January 3, 2012 8:02 am

This morning, on google.ca, it is up to page 22 (from 28 yesterday). Clicked on it again.

Andrew
January 3, 2012 8:48 am

This morning I googled Watts up with Thongs…and congratulations Anthony you were number one out of 63,000,000…
I hope this site doesn’t crash with the influx of spelling challenged perverts…
There is actually a point here…I think…don’t you want people to find you when they are not looking for you…rather than when they are…right?
We are talking marketing people…and this is key…when somebody googles Al Gore thong…they might see this site…but when they google Pachauri thong…well Amazon will probably be number 1…word

January 3, 2012 12:03 pm

Many people told you before Anthony. IT’S YOUR POST TITLES! I found you on Giggle page 38 with some article about that “global warming” will cool down and the Swedes attacking the Danes across the ice. (Forgot the POST TITLE now, but it had “global warming” in it.) You have GOT to gear your titles to those concepts or words you want to be found for! As simple as that! Your titles like “I’ve been Lenfesteyed”, may be really cute for the regulars, but who in the world searching for “global warming” or “CO2” or “climate change” will ever use that word!? Stop being cute and design your titles with better catch-words! Sorry, hate to spell it out like this, but that’s how it works! I’ve used it for years on my sites! Not that I trust Giggle any, but I know how they work! How about “Global Warming poet causes high tides in Mainstream Media for WATTSUPWITHTHAT.COM” I am not saying that that is what you should have called it, but it sure would garner hits at least. Maybe no visits from watermelons, but perhaps from the undecided! You have to gear towards the undecided, IF you want to reach them! Business without advertising is like smiling at a pretty girl in the dark! Happy New Year!

Ruhroh
January 3, 2012 4:42 pm

Page 30 today for me.
RR

Walter
January 3, 2012 9:20 pm

Just appeared 1/2 way down page 1 for me.

Jeff in Calgary
January 4, 2012 10:34 am

Page 20 on googlel.ca now (up from page 22 on Tuesday and 28 on Monday).
Clicked on it again.

Ruhroh
January 4, 2012 11:09 am

Page 24 on US (California) google.com this AM.
Surging in searching…
RR

Ruhroh
January 5, 2012 1:44 pm

Whoops, fell back to page 39 on California Google.com
Major backslide in one day.
Plenty of really old stuff getting higher placement than WUWT…
RR

Ruhroh
January 6, 2012 12:13 pm

Resurgent to search page 30 today.
Highly Dynamic, your website is…
RR

January 13, 2012 6:40 am

I just did a Google Search for “Global Warming” and WUWT showed up at the bottom of page 1.
REPLY: Then my change to the format of the blog appears to have had an impact, thanks – Anthony

January 19, 2012 4:07 pm

On Jan. 18, with my IP address, Google Ranks for these searches:
Global Warming _____ 11 _ Page 2, #1
“Climate Change”________ Page 35.
Climate Change__________ Page 35.
Worlds most viewed web site _ 8 _Page 1
Watts ______________ 10 _ Page 1
CAGW _____________ 5 _ Page 1 (first about Cat. Antro. Global Warming)
sea level rise ___________ Page 12.
ocean acidification____33 _ Page 4
eschenbach__________8 _ Page 1
IPCC_______________49 _ Page 5
climategate __________2 _ Page 1 (after wikipedia)
climate ________________ Page 37
Medieval warm period __3 _ Page 1
Little Ice Age ________ 22 _ Page 3

1 6 7 8