D'Aleo on ozone hole: "It is very likely to have been there forever"

Ozone holes in Antarctic and Arctic relate to cold rebounds from warming events

By Joseph D’Aleo, Weatherbell.com

The ozone hole above the Antarctic has reached its maximum extent for the year, revealing a gouge in the protective atmospheric layer that rivals the size of North America, scientists have announced.

image

Spanning about 9.7 million square miles (25 million square kilometers), the ozone hole over the South Pole reached its maximum annual size on Sept. 14, 2011, coming in as the fifth largest on record. The largest Antarctic ozone hole ever recorded occurred in 2006, at a size of 10.6 million square miles (27.5 million square km), a size documented by NASA’s Earth-observing Aura satellite.

The Antarctic ozone hole was first discovered in the late 1970s by the first satellite mission that could measure ozone, a spacecraft called POES and run by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The hole has continued to grow steadily during the 1980s and 90s, though since early 2000 the growth reportedly leveled off. Even so scientists have seen large variability in its size from year to year.

On the Earth’s surface, ozone is a pollutant, but in the stratosphere it forms a protective layer that reflects ultraviolet radiation back out into space, protecting us from the damaging UV rays. Years with large ozone holes are now more associated with very cold winters over Antarctica and high polar winds that prevent the mixing of ozone-rich air outside of the polar circulation with the ozone-depleted air inside, the scientists say.

There is a lot of year to year variability, in 2007, the ozone hole shrunk 30% from the record setting 2006 winter.

image

The record setting ozone hole in 2006 (animating here).

image

In 2007, it was said: “Although the hole is somewhat smaller than usual, we cannot conclude from this that the ozone layer is recovering already,” said Ronald van der A, a senior project scientist at the Royal Dutch Meteorological Institute in the Netherlands.

This year, the ozone region over Antarctica dropped 30.5 million tons, compared to the record-setting 2006 loss of 44.1 million tons. Van der A said natural variations in temperature and atmospheric changes are responsible for the decrease in ozone loss, and is not indicative of a long-term healing.

“This year’s (2007) ozone hole was less centered on the South Pole as in other years, which allowed it to mix with warmer air,” van der A said. Because ozone depletes at temperatures colder than -108 degrees Fahrenheit (-78 degrees Celsius), the warm air helped protect the thin layer about 16 miles (25 kilometers) above our heads.  As winter arrives, a vortex of winds develops around the pole and isolates the polar stratosphere. When temperatures drop below -78C (-109F), thin clouds form of ice, nitric acid, and sulphuric acid mixtures. Chemical reactions on the surfaces of ice crystals in the clouds release active forms of CFCs. Ozone depletion begins, and the ozone “hole” appears.

Over the course of two to three months, approximately 50% of the total column amount of ozone in the atmosphere disappears. At some levels, the losses approach 90%. This has come to be called the Antarctic ozone hole. In spring, temperatures begin to rise, the ice evaporates, and the ozone layer starts to recover.

Intense cold in the upper atmosphere of the Arctic last winter activated ozone-depleting chemicals and produced the first significant ozone hole ever recorded over the high northern regions, scientists reported in the journal Nature.

image

This year, for the first time scientists also found a depletion of ozone above the Arctic that resembled its South Pole counterpart. “For the first time, sufficient loss occurred to reasonably be described as an Arctic ozone hole,” the researchers wrote.

It was related to a rebound cooling of the polar stratosphere and upper troposphere. Notice the December and early January warmth and VERY NEGATIVE AO and the pop of the AO and rapid cooling starting in January.

image

The Antarctic after a record negative polar warming, turned colder in mid to late winter (starting in late August).

image

Also note the scientists mentioning the sulfuric acid mixture’s role in the ozone destruction. Sulfate aerosols are associated with volcanism and the recent high latitude volcanoes in Alaska, Iceland and Chile may have contributed to the blocking (warming). Like a pendulum, a swing to one state, can result in a rebound to the opposite extreme very obvious in the arctic.

The data shows a lot of variability and no real trends after the Montreal protocol banned CFCs. The models had predicted a partial recovery by now. Later scientists adjusted their models and pronounced the recovery would take decades. It may be just another failed alarmist prediction.

Remember we first found the ozone hole when satellites that measure ozone were first available and processed (1985).  It is very likely to have been there forever, varying year to year and decade to decade as solar cycles and volcanic events affected high latitude winter vortex strength. PDF.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

109 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 21, 2011 4:43 pm

Is the Ozone Trend Panel still in existence? This was the team led by Susan Solomon that trumped-up this nonsense about declining ozone levels of 4% between 1962 and 1979. The not-so-publicized trend, however was a 4% INCREASE between 1970 and 1986.
The fact is there is 22,779 times more chlorine produced by seawater and soils than that produced from man-made CFCs. The ozone hole gets big every fall and small every spring. It’s a predictable cycle.

Editor
October 21, 2011 5:47 pm

Further to my comments above:
“Rapid descent of mesospheric air into the stratospheric polar vortex”
“Wind fields from a numerical simulation are used to give a detailed Lagrangian picture of air flow in the middle atmosphere of the southern hemisphere in winter and early spring 1991. Trajectories for many thousands of air particles exhibit rapid descent of mesospheric air into the stratospheric polar vortex, revealing its organizing and structure‐preserving properties. Results are used to account for measurements of low methane concentrations in the vortex made by the HALOE instrument on board the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite. ”
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1993/93GL01104.shtml
“As mesospheric air has a different chemical composition in comparison to stratospheric air, it is important to know how much air is descending from the mesosphere into the stratospheric polar vortex for a quantitative understanding of stratospheric chemistry. Due to reactions taking place in the thermosphere and upper mesosphere, mesospheric air is enhanced in reactive nitrogen compounds (e.g. Solomon et al., 1985), which can effect ozone (e.g. Konopka et al., 2006).”
“Any descent of mesospheric air into the stratosphere will consequently lead to a change in the correlation between ozone and long lived tracers. The effect of dynamical processes on the correlation between trace gases has been considered in some studies of ozone depletion (e.g. Muller et al., 2001). Changes in correlations have also been used to study denitrification inside the polar vortices (e.g. Fahey et al., 1990). Kondo et al. (1999) andWetzel et al. (2002) were able to show that their observed anomalous correlation between N2O and NOy inside the polar vortex in February and March 1997 was indeed mainly caused by dynamical effects.”
“Downward transport of mesospheric air is, therefore, an important phenomenon which has a significant impact on the chemical composition of the polar stratosphere and is important in studies of ozone depletion as well (e.g. Konopka et al., 2006).”
http://www.atmos-chem-phys.org/6/267/2006/acp-6-267-2006.pdf

Editor
October 21, 2011 6:07 pm

jimmi_the_dalek
What percentage of the “Ozone Hole” do you think is caused by anthropogenic CFC emissions versus natural variables?

sean2829
October 22, 2011 2:00 pm

To LazyTeenager,
This statemen is incorrect “The chemistry of the breakdown of ozone needs halogen atoms and the only way to get that is from CFCs. The scientist didn’t just pull this out of there a…es. A whole lot of research went into what was causing it and why.”
Ozone will break down on its own without the help of halogens just as it always has. If you leave pure ozone in a bottle for a period of time, it will break down to O2 over time. Cl is a catalyst for it’s breakdown but there are others such as NOx, SOx, and oxygen compounds that affect the breakdown as well. (I know this from discussion with a very a reliable source.)

Gail Combs
October 23, 2011 7:07 pm

kramer says:
October 20, 2011 at 10:34 am
Stephen Wilde says:
Probably never any need to have invoked CFCs as a causative agent in the first place.
I wouldn’t be surprised if there was some globalist, ‘interdependence’ and equity reasoning for banning CFCs…
______________________________________________________
Dow Chemicals patent on CFCs ran out and the replacement was oh so much more expensive… ERRrr profitable.
Never mind my co-workers who were burned due to the shift from CFCs to the flammable aerosol propellant propane. It caused one of the filling lines to blow up. No one ever bothers to keep track of the human casualties in these types of political moves.

MFKBoulder
October 24, 2011 7:38 am

Waht a lousy papaer ist contradicting itself:
“The Antarctic ozone hole was first discovered in the late 1970s by the first satellite mission that could measure ozone, ”


“Remember we first found the ozone hole when satellites that measure ozone were first available and processed (1985). ”
And both is not correct: the ozone hole was detectd 1985 by terrestial observation (like in 1957 where Dobson found a sprin minimum which was approx twice as high as the ozone hole of the 8os).
Your “paper” would have been rejected at my university as a thrid year paper due to lack of quality.

November 20, 2011 12:48 pm

In 1953, my former Professor Dr. Hans-Karl Paetzold observed a so-called ozone hole over the European Alps. He published his results in the Zeitschrift fuer Meteorologie in 1955 (or 56). Some of his results are also used in a book chapter by Paetzold and Regener published in the Handbuch der Physik (edited by Fluegge) in 1957. Paetzold related this ozone hole to dynamic reasons. His explanation was ignored during several decades.
In a contribution, Ozone Depletion and the Climate System, by Pyle and Solomon (2005), however, it is stated that “dynamics is important, along with chemistry”.
Honni soit qui mal y pense.

1 3 4 5