The Birds, now occupying near you

I wonder if the Hitchcock estate and/or the current copyright holder might want a piece of this action? The whole green movement has gone occupy crazy lately, which I suppose is a reflection of the failure of the movement as they write “Modern environmentalism has failed”. So it seems the strategy now is “if you can’t beat ’em, sit on them until they are annoyed enough to do something about it”.

This was on local über green activist Dr. Mark Stemen’s Facebook page.

Yeah, that looks attractive, that’ll pack ’em in. Color optional I suppose.

But it does give a view on the mindset. Like the last dark poster with the mask for the parking garage protest, these misguided kids think these sorts of images are attractive advertising. Maybe for Goths and Alfred Hitchcock fans, though I doubt the Hitchcock fans would stay long.

They have a website: http://deepgreenresistance.org/ where they claim the goal is to basically shut down modern industrial society:

The strategy of Deep Green Resistance starts by acknowledging the dire circumstances that industrial civilization has created for life on this planet. And that these circumstances should be met with solutions that match the scale of the problems.

This is a vast undertaking but it needs to be said: it can be done. Industrial civilization can be stopped.

And as I read more, I find their view on climate:

Furthermore, as intense climate change takes over, ecological remediation through perennial polycultures and forest replanting will become impossible. The heat and drought will turn forests into net carbon emitters, as northern forests die from heat, pests, and disease, and then burn in continent-wide fires that will make early twenty-first century conflagrations look minor.5 Even intact pastures won’t survive the temperature extremes as carbon is literally baked out of remaining agricultural soils.

Resource wars between nuclear states will break out. War between the US and Russia is less likely than it was in the Cold War, but ascending superpowers like China will want their piece of the global resource pie. Nuclear powers such as India and Pakistan will be densely populated and ecologically precarious; climate change will dry up major rivers previously fed by melting glaciers, and hundreds of millions of people in South Asia will live bare meters above sea level. With few resources to equip and field a mechanized army or air force, nuclear strikes will seem an increasingly effective action for desperate states.

But if a runaway greenhouse effect could be avoided, many areas could be able to recover rapidly. A return to perennial polycultures, implemented by autonomous communities, could help reverse the greenhouse effect. The oceans would look better quickly, aided by a reduction in industrial fishing and the end of the synthetic fertilizer runoff that creates so many dead zones now.

I think they’ve been occupying a bong too long.

Goals

The ultimate goal of the primary resistance movement in this scenario is simply a living planet—a planet not just living, but in recovery, growing more alive and more diverse year after year. A planet on which humans live in equitable and sustainable communities without exploiting the planet or each other.

Given our current state of emergency, this translates into a more immediate goal, which is at the heart of this movement’s grand strategy:

Goal 1: To disrupt and dismantle industrial civilization; to thereby remove the ability of the powerful to exploit the marginalized and destroy the planet.

This movement’s second goal both depends on and assists the first:

Goal 2: To defend and rebuild just, sustainable, and autonomous human communities, and, as part of that, to assist in the recovery of the land.

To accomplish these goals requires several broad strategies involving large numbers of people in many different organizations, both aboveground and underground. The primary strategies needed in this theoretical scenario include the following:

Strategy A: Engage in direct militant actions against industrial infrastructure, especially energy infrastructure.

Strategy B: Aid and participate in ongoing social and ecological justice struggles; promote equality and undermine exploitation by those in power.

Strategy C: Defend the land and prevent the expansion of industrial logging, mining, construction, and so on, such that more intact land and species will remain when civilization does collapse.

Strategy D: Build and mobilize resistance organizations that will support the above activities, including decentralized training, recruitment, logistical support, and so on.

Strategy E: Rebuild a sustainable subsistence base for human societies (including perennial polycultures for food) and localized, democratic communities that uphold human rights.

It is sad these folks have become so brainwashed that they think the planet is dying and the only choice left is some sort of organized resistance. They have apparently just dismissed all of the good things that the ecological movement has produced, such as improving our air and water since the 60’s as if it never happened.

In the meantime, our own local “Occupy Chico” is having a “huge” impact.

Photo from KPAY-radio Matt Ray

This whole “occupy” thing is just a blip, and because it has no focus, nobody really pays much attention to it. When the next scheduled event comes up in city plaza, they’ll be asked to move, and they probably won’t, and then we’ll have the usual downward spiral for these sorts of things where the end game is “occupy jail”.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

138 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DirkH
October 13, 2011 11:47 am

Roy says:
October 13, 2011 at 11:09 am
“Did George Soros lose billions and get bailed out by the tax-payer? ”
You don’t need to bail out Soros during a crisis. He THRIVES in crises; he brought the pound down in 1992 and the Thai Baht in 1997. I’m sure he made a ton of money in 2007/2008; it was a well-announced crash. You sell, you buy your stuff back later. Or go outright short.

More Soylent Green!
October 13, 2011 12:32 pm

Roy says:
October 13, 2011 at 11:09 am
More Soylent Green! says:
October 13, 2011 at 8:43 am
They are only against big money that doesn’t support progressive causes. Are they protesting George Soros and his various storefront groups? Protesting the undue influence of public employees unions and their incestuous relationship certain politicians?
Did George Soros lose billions and get bailed out by the tax-payer?
Most seem to be in favor of personal bailouts. They’re as upset that they didn’t bet a bailout as they are upset that the banks did. And they aren’t concerned at all about how government policy setup the whole mess in the first place.
During the current recession there are good economic arguments for tax reductions to the lower paid because those with low incomes are more likely to spend any extra money they get. In contrast quantitative easing has had disappointing results because the money has gone into banks which have hoarded it – apart from the money that they are paying in bonuses to the sort of people who bear a heavy responsibility for the crisis in the first place.
You are right, however, to remind people that government policy was also to blame for the crisis.
Roy

Roy, George Soros and the bailout of the financial sector are two different topics. While George Soros is heavily involved in the financial markets, I don’t know if he or any of his companies received bailouts and wasn’t implying he did.
George Soros came up because the self-styled “99%”-ers complain about the money in politics only when it’s the other side getting the campaign contributions. They don’t complain about environmental lobbying groups, only industry lobbying groups. They only complain about bailouts of the banks (BTW, the Treasury Department says we’re making a profit from TARP), but support the subsidies of solar and wind companies. Unions also lobby heavily and spend lavishly on political campaigns. I haven’t heard any of the “99%”-ers complain about that money.
The banks were contractually obligated to pay those bonuses. The bank regulators are also making it hard to loan money. The banks got into hot water by making risky loans, so it makes little sense to complain about them not making risky loans now. Banks also don’t make much money if they don’t make loans.
If you want the economy to recover, just roll-back most of the legislation and regulations passed when the Democrats controlled the White House and both houses of Congress. Repeal Obamacare immediately, as well as Dodd-Frank. Reduce the taxes on capital, allow the repatriation of foreign profits, start flattening, simplifying and broadening the tax base. Stop obsessing over tax rates and start focusing on tax revenues.
Lest you think I’m being too partisan, I’m well aware the Republicans spent too much money, increased federal spending dramatically and continued the housing policies that got us into this mess during the Bush years.

Olen
October 13, 2011 12:54 pm

They have seen too many SYFY movies
.
The idea of major rivers drying up while the oceans are rising is not only ridiculous but their goal of bringing down the US and replacing it with some communist style dictatorship to prevent their imagined disaster sounds not only criminal but stupid to advertise. `
Autonomous human communities are like the ones Genghis Kahn and Attila the Hun overran while looting, raping murdering and burning autonomous human communities until they came up against Western civilizations organized population and armies.
The image of a rich guy like Warren Buffett robbing some poor guy is ridiculous. The image of a poor guy applying for a job from a rich guy is not ridiculous at all nor is the opportunity for personal improvement.

D. J. Hawkins
October 13, 2011 2:03 pm

Gail Combs says:
October 13, 2011 at 12:59 am
RobertL says:
October 12, 2011 at 11:37 pm
My question is: what would it take for atmospheric COs levels to drop? How much cooling would we need, and for how long? Are we likely to see it anytime soon?
Because I’d really love to see the reaction when atmospheric CO2 drops.
___________________________________________________
If I remember correctly the Ice Core data showed a lag of about 800 years so we will not be around long enough to say “I told you so”…. SIGH.
Actually I hope the CO2 goes up to about 500 to 600ppm. The plants would love it. (At 2000ppm is where we start getting into toxicity problems)

Your estimate of onset for CO2 toxicity is off by a factor of 10. You need about 20,000 ppm (2%) of CO2 to see significant effects.
See http://www.inspectapedia.com/hazmat/CO2gashaz.htm for more info.

SteveSadlov
October 13, 2011 6:34 pm

Prior to the 1930s / early 1940s road to perdition, mass movements swept Europe and Asia, and even made some inroads in the US. Deja vu all over again?

Brian H
October 13, 2011 7:38 pm

Patrick Davis says:
October 13, 2011 at 12:20 am
“Mike Bromley the Kurd says:
October 12, 2011 at 11:29 pm”
The main issue here is the reasoning part of the brain isn’t usually fully developed, certainly in the male brain, until their mid-20′s.

True, that. The frontal lobes are hugely overdeveloped but unshaped by the late teens, then learning to use them begins. I believe Twain once said, about the period when he ran off to become a Mississippi river pilot, something like: “I left home at 19; when I returned at 22, I was amazed at how much my papa [? not sure of the phrasing] had learned in just 3 years.”
Heh.

Brian H
October 13, 2011 7:53 pm

wayne says:
October 13, 2011 at 3:16 am

All their woes (increased CO2, ravaged wildernesses, growth of wealth of the super rich etc) – if indeed they are real problems – have a root cause of increasing population. Will they stop squeezing out more little greeno-warming-socialist-revolutionaries? You bet your butt they won’t.

Correction: they POSIT have a root cause of increasing population. It’s hooey on many levels. Here’s one: the always-correct lowest bound of the UN Population Database projection. 8 bn peak before 2040.
From here:
http://overpopulationisamyth.com/overpopulation-the-making-of-a-myth#FAQ1

Darren Parker
October 13, 2011 8:04 pm

I take offense at this – “I think they’ve been occupying a bong too long.”
Medical Marijuans uses are proven and effective and I can testify to that – I don’t beleive all the green-left propaganda so don’t lump Cannabis users in with that crowd – it’s disrepectful and ignorant and you should know better

Douglas Dc
October 13, 2011 8:35 pm

Rule of thumb by an old Cowboy I knew:”Today’s rebel-tomorrow’s stock broker..”

AKR
October 13, 2011 9:39 pm

Perhaps we can ask these people to do away with all the modern gadgets and live like primitive people without cell phones, cars, A.C. homes etc. Then they will be living very sustainbly.
People who preach this nonsense should live their belief.
Cheers.

parentofed
October 14, 2011 12:17 am

They get their politics from slogans, and their news from headlines.

Mike
October 14, 2011 11:11 pm

Big Industry includes the makers of toilet paper does it not ? Imagine what life will be like when those greedy industrialists shutter their facilities…the mind boggles
Hope and change has morphed into occupy and destroy.

1 4 5 6