Possible earthquake early warning signal discovered

From the AGU: An atmospheric precursor to the recent Japan megaquake

Most scientists believe that earthquakes are inherently unpredictable, and reports of various kinds of earthquake precursor signals have been difficult to verify. However, in a new study, Heki reports a possible ionospheric precursor to the devastating 11 March 2011 magnitude 9 Tohoku earthquake in Japan. Analyzing data from the Japanese GPS network, he detects an increase in the total electron content (TEC) in the ionosphere above the focal region of the earthquake beginning about 40 minutes before the quake.

The TEC enhancement reached about 8 percent above the background electron content. The increase in TEC was greatest above the earthquake epicenter and diminished with distance from the epicenter. The researcher also analyzes GPS records from previous earthquakes and finds that similar ionospheric anomalies occurred before the 2010 magnitude 8.8 Chile earthquake, possibly the 2004 Sumatra magnitude 9.2 earthquake, and possibly the 1994 magnitude 8.3 Hokkaido earthquake, but TEC enhancements were not seen before smaller earthquakes.

http://www.agu.org/journals/gl/gl1117/2011GL047908/2011gl047908-op04-tn-350x.jpg
Figure 4 Total Electron Current (TEC) with time of earthquake events

Although previous studies have shown that earthquakes could trigger atmospheric waves that travel upward and disturb the ionosphere, it is unclear how an ionospheric disturbance could occur before an earthquake begins. In addition, the ionosphere is highly variable, and solar storms can trigger large TEC changes, so nonearthquake causes of any TEC enhancement need to be ruled out. The researcher states that, unlike previously suggested earthquake precursors, the TEC enhancement before the Tohoku quake had obvious spatial and temporal correlation between the quake and precursor signal as well as clear magnitude dependence. Further research is needed to verify that TEC enhancements can indeed be a precursor to large earthquakes.

Source: Geophysical Research Letters, doi:10.1029/2011GL047908, 2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047908

Title: Ionospheric electron enhancement preceding the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake

Key Points

  • Positive TEC anomaly appears before M9 class events
  • The anomaly occurs above the epicenter and lasts ~1 hour
  • M9 class earthquakes can be predicted

Kosuke Heki

Department of Natural History Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

Abstract

The 2011 March 11 Tohoku-Oki earthquake (Mw9.0) caused vast damages to the country. Large events beneath dense observation networks could bring breakthroughs to seismology and geodynamics, and here I report one such finding. The Japanese dense network of Global Positioning System (GPS) detected clear precursory positive anomaly of ionospheric total electron content (TEC) around the focal region. It started ∼40 minutes before the earthquake and reached nearly ten percent of the background TEC. It lasted until atmospheric waves arrived at the ionosphere. Similar preseismic TEC anomalies, with amplitudes dependent on magnitudes, were seen in the 2010 Chile earthquake (Mw8.8), and possibly in the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman (Mw9.2) and the 1994 Hokkaido-Toho-Oki (Mw8.3) earthquakes, but not in smaller earthquakes.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
George E. Smith;
October 3, 2011 8:04 pm

“”””” Melinda Romanoff says:
October 3, 2011 at 7:36 pm
Sea water is just a gas at different density, but treats potentialities differently due to its density and soluble impurities. What ever effect that might appear in sea water would need a dense pair of rock salt goggles to even see it n “””””
Nice work Melinda, I think you’ve nailed it.

J.H.
October 3, 2011 8:14 pm

Some people sound derisive and off hand about scientists reporting observations that are curious and of interest to them…..!? These same scientists wish to study the matter further and say that if there is some sort of linkage, it could give potential for predicting large earthquakes. Nothing outlandish in those statements.
….. and everyone spits the dummy at them!
Crikey, where’s yer sense of inquiry and curiosity people?…. are you so crushed by the thoughts of negative opinion that you dare not show interest?…. are you so easily humiliated by the wilfully ignorant or the deliberately perverse?
I think it’s good. Study onward Japanese scientists….. you have my blessing and my interest.

DSW
October 3, 2011 8:18 pm

Very nice explanation Hal, now that neutrinos are FTL 🙂

October 3, 2011 8:21 pm

What a shame earthquake experts are unable to integrate the well corroborated theory and findings of Getino, Ferrandiz and Barkin. This note is from my Blackberry while travelling in a bus in distant parts. A google search will direct you to it. A brief overview in my Journal of Coastal Research. Celestial Mechanics can predict very large earthquakes as thes scientists and mathematicians show in severtal peert reviewed papers.

October 3, 2011 8:26 pm

John Bonfield says on October 3, 2011 at 6:00 pm
To Billy Liar:
Lots of things could be done in 40 minutes. How about an orderly shut down of nuclear power plants,

Won’t get you across the ‘finish line’ in time; you need weeks of operating pumps pumping cooling water through heat exchangers et al for lingering ‘effects’ that continue in that time to produce thermal energy, never mind the continuing cooling requirements for the fuel ‘ponds’ on property.
And know now, too, it was the tsunami ‘wave’ that did-in Fukushima Daiichi, destroying intake seawater pumps and all manor of equipment and offices above (and below) ground at the site.
.

October 3, 2011 8:40 pm

Seems to me this is a classic correlation but that doesn’t mean causation example, but one that bears further investigation regardless.
1. 40 minutes warning is way better than no warning.
2. If there is a link to causation, the technique could very possibly be refined to provide earlier warning and for smaller earthquakes.
3. Refinement of the technique would most likely lead to reduction or elimination of false positives.
Seems to me that continued investigation is warranted.

October 3, 2011 8:46 pm

J.H. says on October 3, 2011 at 8:14 pm
Some people sound derisive and off hand about scientists reporting observations that are curious and of interest to them…..!?

Yes, those of us that have some observed and perhaps gained a little insight into the same ‘mechanism’ these scientists propose to study … we’re here to look at the possible drawing of potentially ‘false’ linkages or correlations. As you aware, “even a stopped clock is right twice a day” and if you accept a +- 5 minute window (call these “error bars”) then that same clock is ‘right’ for 20 minutes each day even though it is stopped (non-functional).
There ought to be some Ionosonde data plots before, during and after the events back in March for Japan, too, indicating the HF propagation conditions. Perhaps a confirmation of higher TEC levels using a different mechanism, and there are a number of Ionospheric Sounders in operation by military, university and civil governments too. Ionosondes can be used in conjunction with single-site DF (direction finders) in order to gauge HF propagation and assist in making estimates on how many ‘hops’ (ionosphere – ground – ionosphere … reflections) an HF signal has taken.
.

thingadonta
October 3, 2011 8:57 pm

Maybe the neutrinos arrive before the earthquake

Jeremy
October 3, 2011 8:58 pm

Usual case of looking for something and finding an anomaly. Pure coincidence and wishful thinking unfortunately.

anna v
October 3, 2011 9:35 pm

George E. Smith; says:
October 3, 2011 at 8:02 pm
So what other geophysical phenomena occurred prior to the quake, and in the vicinity of same.
Just the top ten list would do; like cloud cover; humidity etc ?

Greece is prone to earthquakes. There is a type of cloud cover and color of clouds and “feeling” of weather, like “it is getting ready to rain” that makes some people characterize the weather as “earthquake weather”, weather that bodes. My opinion from observation is that it might be one of the possible precursors, but certainly not usable for predictions.
There are telurian currents ( currents within the crust) correlated with earthquakes and used as precursors by some researchers from weeks to days: the common assessment is that the method is not robust and more or less coincidences are made into a model.
Sometimes animals run away from their lairs, and dogs howl. That can be attributed to sound, from small cracks that precede the main one. There is a large sound just preceding an earthquake.
A friend of mine was over a fault line when the second big one hit (6.3 Richter), which happened to be under a sea lake. She said that the whole lake shone during the quake ( a moonless night), like a flash.

RoHa
October 3, 2011 10:00 pm

In Japan, catfish are tradtionally reputed to be good predictors of earthquakes.

savethesharks
October 3, 2011 10:05 pm

George E. Smith; says:
October 3, 2011 at 8:02 pm
So what other geophysical phenomena occurred prior to the quake, and in the vicinity of same.
==================================
You may want to get some peer-reviewed responses from the other species besides our own. They might be able to help.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/zoo-mystery-how-did-apes-and-birds-know-quake-was-coming/2011/08/24/gIQAZrXQcJ_story.html
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA

Wucash
October 3, 2011 10:07 pm

Hahah nice one Hal.
TBH I’m more sceptical about this than ftl neutrinos.

Mark H.
October 3, 2011 10:28 pm

John Bonfield says:
October 3, 2011 at 6:00 pm
Lots of things could be done in 40 minutes. How about an orderly shut down of nuclear power plants, gas lines, and airports? How about getting people off of elevators, away from glass windows, and out from other dangerous situations, like car mechanics under cars, utility workers off of poles, window washers off of high rises, and just generally people pulled over on roadways? 40 minutes is enough to get hospital workers to local care facilities, cops called and firemen notified.
=====================
It takes more than 40 minutes to shutdown a nuclear (or coal fired) power plant or gas line in an orderly fashion. The airport is also the same.
40 minutes is a very short time. 40 minutes is nothing, it will go by in a flash.
When the 40 minutes expires, the cops, and doctors and nurses that responded to the call will be on their way in when minute 41 arrives.
Believe it or not, most people don’t live within 3 minutes of their job.
A 40 minute warning will still be a disaster.

G. Karst
October 3, 2011 10:39 pm

An international team working below an Italian mountain has detected subatomic particles hanging out beneath the Earth’s surface, where they may very well be affecting things like earthquakes and volcanoes.
Geoneutrinos — which are anti-neutrinos — result from the radioactive decay of uranium, thorium and potassium in the Earth’s crust and mantle. Like their regular-matter counterparts, geoneutrinos are chargeless and tiny, passing through matter almost undisturbed. Regular neutrinos are emitted by the sun and cosmic rays.

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-06/scientists-spot-geoneutrinos-which-might-help-drive-earths-internal-heat
Strange little critters, them neutrinos! GK

October 3, 2011 11:19 pm

Mark H. says:

It takes more than 40 minutes to shutdown a nuclear (or coal fired) power plant or gas line in an orderly fashion. The airport is also the same.
40 minutes is a very short time. 40 minutes is nothing, it will go by in a flash.
When the 40 minutes expires, the cops, and doctors and nurses that responded to the call will be on their way in when minute 41 arrives.
Believe it or not, most people don’t live within 3 minutes of their job.
A 40 minute warning will still be a disaster.

As someone who experienced the Magnitude 9 quake here in Koriyama, Fukushima prefecture, I have to say your pessimism is quite irritating and basically wrong.
We had basically zero warning on March 11th. By the time the seismic waves reached Koriyama, the quake early warning system at my workplace only then started to announce the quake, and by the time the automated system said “Shindo 2” as the predicted seismic intensity, the intensity at that moment had already reached 3 if not 4 and I was saying to my work colleagues “This is way more than shindo 2″.
Shortly after that I was shouting to my workmates that we should get the hell out of the building. I was opening the emergency exit doors (lab was 1 floor up) and then I was carefully going down the external stairway as best I could in – laughably – a full-blown blizzard which was also happening at that time.
By the time I got down the stairs and was running away from the building towards the not very tall trash storage areas (where I could also have some shelter from the wind and snow), the quake was at it’s fullest intensity (Shindo 6+ where I was) and all I could do was gape at how terrible planet Earth can make conditions for the beings who walk and crawl on its surface.
The current early warning system did not give sufficient warning, basically because the seismic sensors which have been laid all around the waters surrounding Japan, were designed for a maximum of a magnitude 8 quake. The system became overloaded and confused by the magnitude 9 mega-quake, and a late and false report was the result.
A 40 minute warning would be fantastic for such quakes. SCRAMing a nuclear reactor 40 minutes before a mega-quake, I guarantee you, is a HELL of a lot better than trying to SCRAM one during such a quake.
A 40 minute warning means more people can evacuate a building to areas which would be safer from falling debris and the likes.
A 40 minute warning would mean evacuations from seafront towns can be orderly and would save more people.
Sure, injury and deaths would still occur – you can’t guarantee 100% of people would be saved, but take it from me, a 40 minute warning on March 11th 2011 seems like an eternity compared to practically zero warning, and might – just might – have averted the nuclear disaster which followed on from it.

SSam
October 4, 2011 1:25 am

John Bonfield says
“Lots of things could be done in 40 minutes. How about an orderly shut down of nuclear power plants”
Unless the plant operators panic at the quick drop in vessel pressure and manually bypass the automatic shutdown system.
Hello Fukishima.

oMan
October 4, 2011 2:00 am

RoHa/10:00 AM – yes, don’t catfish sense electrical field strength with their whiskers? Seems likely that something is happening to EM field due to tectonic stress. The fact that we only feel the quake after it has begun to unload the stress, doesn’t mean that a whole lot of stuff hasn’t already happened through processes at a scale or in modes we can’t detect (yet). Which is not to minimize the problem of false positives even if an underlying physical mechanism can be identified. Fascinating and potentially very important. Me, I’d rather have the warning than not.

John Marshall
October 4, 2011 2:00 am

Interesting but 40 mins. is far too short a time period to do anything to really help.

Alexander L.
October 4, 2011 2:11 am

I see potential for AGW movement here.
Atmospheric disturbances occur prior to earthquake ==> quakes are caused by changes in atmosphere ==> AGW can cause earthquakes.
The theory that those evil deniers have been laughing at for so many years finally received a shocking confirmation!

Geoff Sherrington
October 4, 2011 3:27 am

Come on guys, knock off the speculation a bit. Geophysicists still do not know what causes all earthquakes (especially shallow ones). Fault slip is not the only possibility. Mineral phase change is another. Radon-222 escaping and charging the ionosphere? Nope, there’s too little of it and too much water to dissolve it. Pizeoelectric stress? Was being investigated along San Andreas in 1977 by Sheldon Breiner of GeoMetrics. Animal behavior? Anecdotal. High flux of ionospheric electrons beforehand? Correlation is not causation, especially when it does not correlate well.
Earthquakes are horrible, too common and too unpredictable. Let the experts work on them – and their aftershocks.

October 4, 2011 3:51 am

Feeling somewhat aghast at the “40 minutes too short/useless” comments here.

ggm
October 4, 2011 4:04 am

The answer is incredibly obvious…. just before the big “snap” happens, there will be massive compression/decompression forces on the rocks. That’s where Piezoelectrics generate massive electrical currents throught quartz and other similar Piezoelectric minerals. Turns out some of the whacky Electric Univerise theory turns out to be correct again….. (note, I`m not defending the EU rubbish, just saying what`s fact)

ozspeaksup
October 4, 2011 4:20 am

_Jim says:
October 3, 2011 at 7:07 pm
polistra says on October 3, 2011 at 5:31 pm
I suspect there’s some electromagnetic phenomenon detectable by humans and animals …
If detectable by humans and animals, measurable today using any manor of sensitive, automated EM apparatus; since we’re not seeing/getting any studies, results of EM phenomenon, either a) they aren’t observing anything or b) no one is looking at the phenomenon.
I think a) is operative here; nothing of note has been observed. Between low frequency/static measurement devices like magnetometers, up in frequency to 60 kHz WWVB receivers, and then HF comms circuit (hams, military and some SW broadcast listening) one would think SOMEONE has seen or heard something worthy of further investigation, but they haven’t; that’s my point.
============
the NOT looking is rather likely too.
the barometric drop before a storm is usually reliable, however I find I get ripper headaches before! the barometer rather often. as soon as the storm breaks I get instant relief.
horse get goofy and dogs snappy and silly. in unsettled weather. bees sting more at those times too.
you just need to either take note, or talk to folks who live IN the environment with animals.
a clear sunny morning can’t fool flowers either:-) Gazanias are my favorite, if its likely to rain they stay shut, or shut even in mid day if rains imminent..
I would bet any fish round that ocean area , that could, also did a runner/swimmer:-) beforehand.