From the American Chemical Society, a call for science superheros. I suppose this means the Goreacle is not in the running.
Remedies for science’s shortage of superheroes
DENVER, Aug. 28, 2011 — One of the most serious personnel shortages in the global science and engineering workforce — numbering more than 20 million in the United States alone — involves a scarcity of real-life versions of Superman, Superwoman and other superheroes and superheroines with charm, charisma, people skills and communication skills.
That’s the premise behind an unusual symposium occurring here today at the 242nd National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS), the world largest scientific society. Entitled “Empowering Tomorrow’s Science Super Heroes,” it opens a discussion on how to give scientists a touch of the panache of the stock comic book and Hollywood characters who worked for the public good.
“We are seeking ways to equip scientists to better communicate and connect with the rest of society,” said Donna J. Nelson, Ph.D., an organizer of the session. It is among events at the meeting, which includes more than 7,500 scientific presentations, initiated by Nancy B. Jackson, Ph.D., ACS president. “The well-equipped superhero and superheroine has the communications skills to explain their work and the wonder and importance of science in an understandable way,” Nelson explained. “They have an awareness of public policy, how science connects with societal issues and even the ability to use a bit of humor.”
Nelson, who is with the University of Oklahoma and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), said those skills add up to super-hero-level leaders who can inspire students, build public support for science and engage in key public policy decisions. Three of her models for science superheroes are the late Richard E. Smaley, Ph.D.; Harold Kroto, Ph.D.; and Robert F. Curl, Ph.D., who shared the 2005 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. “All three have been great organizers and leaders with superb social skills and just the kind of people to get kids interested in a career in science,” Nelson said.
Nelson also praised the Ig Nobel Prize, a parody of the Nobel Prizes, presented each year just before the real Nobels, but for 10 unusual or trivial “achievements” in scientific research. The self- proclaimed aim of the prizes is to “first make people laugh, and then make them think.”
In addition to a presentation on the Ig Nobel Prize, the superheroes event will include speakers from NOVA’s public scientific information outreach, science cafes, science festivals and other projects that accomplish the superhero mission.
Presentations in the superheroes symposium with summaries of the presentations include:
- Science outreach: Demonstrating the value of science. Jennifer Larese, NOVA Outreach Coordinator. As individuals, people learn in slightly different manners and at different rates of speed. As informal science educators, scientists have a unique opportunity to use a variety of formats, experiences and media to engage and excite their audiences. Today there are countless new electronic media tools being created, almost daily. This presentation will briefly cover science outreach as a transmedia opportunity to connect with the public.
- Infusing moving media into instruction. Janet English, Instructor, El Toro High School, Mission Viejo, Calif. The main job for movie and TV superheroes is to save the world, and this is why many consider scientists superheroes. There are numerous ways that chemists and other scientists can affect children’s learning and help promote a love of science. The media also can play a pivotal role in students’ learning, and teachers can discuss how the media is used (or not used) in a thought-provoking way in the classroom. Scientists also can contribute to improving the mass media and how they can be role models for children.
- Creative engagement at science cafes. John Cohen., M.D., University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Immunology, Denver. A Café Scientifique brings a scientist to talk directly with the public in pleasant relaxed surroundings. PowerPoint is banned to encourage dialog, rather than a lecture. There is no moderator, so the conversation finds its correct level without imposed dumbing-down. Speakers frequently say that talking at the Café Sci was one of the best experiences of their career. So do audiences and organizers.
- Here come the Science Festivals! Kishore Hari, Director, Bay Area Science Festival. There are many ways that science festivals are raising awareness about a tremendous grassroots movement to celebrate and elevate science. Science festivals hope to rally whole communities to celebrate science as alive and local. Festivals aim to inspire youth to consider science studies and careers, and adults to cultivate a life-long interest in science and technology.
- The Ig Nobel Prize: Never dull, never boring awards in chemistry. Marc Abrahams, Editor, Annals of Improbable Research. The Ig Nobel Prizes honor achievements that first make people laugh, then make them think. Every year since 1991, 10 new prizes have been awarded in chemistry, physics and other fields. The winners journey to Harvard University for the gala ceremony in which genuine Nobel laureates shake their hands and hand them their prizes. The “Igs” have spawned live shows worldwide and video features. They celebrate the unusual, honor the imaginative — and spur people’s interest in science, medicine and technology.
The American Chemical Society is a non-profit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress. With more than 163,000 members, ACS is the world’s largest scientific society and a global leader in providing access to chemistry-related research through its multiple databases, peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. Its main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.
=================================================================
I think Josh’s take on Joe Romm as Super Chicken is a good start. Just put a “S” in a crest on him and you’re done.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

So instead of seeking truth, justice and the scientific way, they’re looking for some dude in red tights and a silly mask? And they dare label such a creature “Superhero”??
That may work for kids 12 and under, but I doubt they’ll find many takers among adults.
Is it just coincidence that a similar story is in Australia’s newspapers today?
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/scientists-must-face-down-criticism/story-e6frea6u-1226124016864
Image building and PR is the last thing climate science needs. The thin veneer of hollywood.
My father has been painted as a Captain Bligh. That is cool by me, because if you look closer at that story, Bligh is really the hero.
Hmph. My “science superheroes” – Richard Feynman, Isaac Asimov, James P. Hogan, Robert A. Heinlein, Michael Crichton, Harry Stubbs (Hal Clement), Charles Sheffield, and Arthur C. Clarke (though I damn his politics) – are all dead.
It’s not the people who do the theoretical and experimental work who are necessarily qualified to be “superheroes” but rather the guys who have the skill and the spark to make the sciences appreciable to people – young and old – who do not work in the disciplines under consideration.
paddylol says: “Gates: why don’t you pack your belongings and move to Beijing where you can keep Maurice Strong company?”
Hey, Gates was right. Do we shoot the messenger here?
RockyRoad says:
“So instead of seeking truth, justice and the scientific way, they’re looking for some dude in red tights and a silly mask? And they dare label such a creature ‘Superhero’??”
For a more in-depth article, see here.
[That has to be the best Onion parody EVAH!!☺]
Theo Goodwin, I’d add Steve McIntyre to your list of scientific heroes.
[snip – over the top, and way off topic, Smokey you too – further discussion of this Vietnam swiftboat issue will be deleted – Anthony]
Annabelle says:
August 28, 2011 at 9:38 pm
“Theo Goodwin, I’d add Steve McIntyre to your list of scientific heroes.”
Thanks, Annabelle. I did not and do not mean that my list is exhaustive. However, I did overlook some super luminaries such as McIntyre, McKitrick, and Anthony Watts. All those folks who are wondering how scientists can better communicate with the public could do no better than study what Anthony Watts does at WUWT. Successful communication requires genius too.
I guess the hope is, since they’re losing the climate science wars, maybe if they had “scientists” they could endow with some super-pseudoscientific powers to better “explain” their Warmist mythology, the common folk would finally “get it”. Good luck with that.
It will take decades before people trust scientists again, thanks to the Warmists. Any “science super heroes” they come up with would be laughed at, and deservedly so.
Well, if you read many scientific papers, the language is so obtuse it’s like they’re trying to get people to not understand what they are saying. And if you dumb it down, the reviewers hammer you for dumbing it down.
I have an evolving hypothesis that the problems exists in elementary school math and are magnified in high school, primarily because high school teachers and elementary school teachers who have no science background, teaching science.
If ACS wants to get out the message about science, they have to coordinate with physics and math and start teaching the tools of science at younger grades. I’m 100% certain that derivatives can be taught in 3rd-4th grade, and the Cartesian coordinate system can be taught in 2nd and 3rd grade as well. What’s so hard about turning Rise/Run into dx/dt? Or finding the area under a curve? Why do we have to wait until college to teach it?
Kids have a better grasp of abstraction than adults do, so teach them the abstract tools while they’re young. Then, as they get older, they’ll have a better appreciation for what scientists do.
The difference in Rudy Baum’s attitude (ASC C&EN Editor) to CAGW and BPA is interesting. He is very keen to examine the evidence and pooh-pooh catastrophising with respect to BisPhenol A, a polycarbonate monomer and plasticiser, but accepts alarmist CAGW uncritically. It demonstrates to me how insincere many of the scientifically educated CAGW shills must be. They can examine the evidence behind alarmism when they have reason to question it and accept uncritically alarmism when they have reason to to accept it.
I read a Yale article from June with an interesting result – scientifically literate people are more likely to be sceptical about climate change alarmism. If you ignored the scientifically literate with a vested interest in alarmism I am sure the result would be even stronger. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1871503&http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1871503
Even the devil occasionally has a good point. Quick, name one LIVING Scientist who you would swear an oath by. Ie: “By Newton’s Apple” (don’t you wish Bill Nye or Mr. Wizard were still on? I just can’t get the basics to my daughter with Mythbusters).
Einstein – Dead
Curie – Dead
Oppenheimer – Dead
Feynman – Dead
Of the Science superstars, Hawking is the only one left The current generation of physicists have been working to finally make the String Hypothesis a theory since before I was born, and we still don’t have sufficient evidence to do so. Biologists, Chemists, and Engineers have done a lot of practical work, but the core of science hasn’t been shaken for nearly 50 years.
Perhaps one reason our educational system is increasingly unable to produce scientific thinkers that are really exceptional is illustrated by this work.
http://www.aei.org/docLib/EduO-2011-08-07-g.pdf
Grade Inflation for Education Majors and Low Standards for Teachers: When Everyone Makes the Grade
The paper shows that university education departments, despite attracting a student demographic that is near the bottom for SAT and ACT scores, hand out grades where nearly everyone gets A or A-. And when they metriculate into the schools, the evaluations they receive are uniformly 10 out of 10 or better. We are entrusting our young skulls full of mush to faculty who have no concept of intellectual rigor or critical thought, although they have been thoroughly indoctrinated with revolutionary consciousness and the evil nature of Western civilization. The prospect of a budding
Feynman emerging from the American education system with his native talents intact, let alone enhanced is incredibly slim.
re: Tucci78 says: August 28, 2011 at 9:09 pm
I’m not sure if you are referring to their very popular sci-fi, or something else… but have to assume you are referring to their sci-fi, for all but Feynman at least. I read out an entire branch library’s sci-fi in my early to mid teens, and have always loved it. The thing is, good sci-fi, while it incorporates science and hypothetical advances, is really all about human nature and people, not the science. That’s true of even the very best hard core “science” sci-fi.
Even so, believe me, while I may not be able to name the names of the scientists and engineers responsible, I have always ‘appreciated’ things like air conditioning/heat pumps/furnaces, refridgerators, computers, TV, telephones, being able to drive my car, space exploration, paper, modern medicine, and so on. All things that clearly we wouldn’t have if it weren’t for science, scientists, those who do the experiemenal work, those who turn the theory into practical applications….
All it took was a bit of common sense, probably parents who instilled some of this into me, decent teachers re basic science issues in public schools no less. No superheroes able to make these things appreciable necessary. Just good solid hard working scientists and engineers who actually are responsible for all of the luxuries of modern life – and a little realistic description of our human history too of course, to have something for comparison.
Retired Engineer says:
August 28, 2011 at 1:43 pm
“I had a good run, but I wouldn’t direct a young person to engineering today. Well, perhaps software, but we called that ‘programming’, not engineering. (full disclosure: I started as a programmer in ’67)”
I had a good run that’s still going. Twenty-five years nose to the grindstone, ten years vacay, then started back at it last year.
Nothing wrong with engineering. Some fields hot, some not. Gotta pick the right one. Preferably something you like and also something in demand. I went into computer hardware/software engineering 35 years ago. Good choice at the time. Very lucrative as well as transformational. I got to do a lot of pioneering work in the transition from industrial age to information age.
If I was just starting out today I’d get into bio-engineering. Synthetic biology I believe is the next transformational technology. It’s the next logical step as information technology is prerequiste to synthetic biology. Way too much biological information had to acquired, catalogued, correlated, modeled, and understood to do it without massive information processing infrastructure and a global network.
My generation got the information phase done. The next phase is for youngsters just stepping up to the plate and quite frankly I’m envious because I think the biosynthetic era will be the most transformational in the history of mankind.
Tucci78 says: August 28, 2011 at 9:09 pm
“My “science superheroes” – Richard Feynman, Isaac Asimov, James P. Hogan, Robert A. Heinlein, Michael Crichton, Harry Stubbs (Hal Clement), Charles Sheffield, and Arthur C. Clarke (though I damn his politics) – are all dead.”
I’m very familiar with all of them but Feynman sticks out like a sore thumb unless I somehow missed his contributions to hard sci-fi.
Asimov is overrated IMO and the list should really include the famous “Three Bs of hard science fiction”: Benford, Bear, and Brin all of whom I believe are alive and well.
Dave S;
Agree on the three B’s;
David B;
Agree about your father. Fearless in speaking truth to power, and is taking the hits for it. His best recommendation is that he is hated by the Weavers, Manns, and Suzukis of the science world.
Methinks the ACS would have terrible trouble with Feynman if he directed his attention at it. Textbook Cargo Cultism: motions and rituals without substance.