Caveat, no, it isn’t about “grass use” in UC Berkeley, and note the press release with the key word, “could” in the title.
From the University of California – Berkeley

Warming climate could give exotic grasses edge over natives
Invasive grasses are better equipped than natives to deal with increasing temperatures
California’s native grasses, already under pressure from invasive exotic grasses, are likely to be pushed aside even more as the climate warms, according to a new analysis from the University of California, Berkeley.
In the study, which has been accepted for publication in the journal Global Change Biology and is now available online, UC Berkeley biologists catalogued the ranges of all 258 native grasses and 177 exotic grasses in the state and estimated how climate change – in particular, increased temperature and decreased rainfall – would change them.
They concluded that many of the traits that now make exotic grasses more successful than many natives also would allow them to adapt better to increased temperature and likely expand their ranges.
“When we looked at current patterns, we found that warmer temperatures favor certain traits, and these are the traits possessed by exotic species,” said coauthor Emily Dangremond, a graduate student in the UC Berkeley Department of Integrative Biology. “This led us to predict that, if the mean temperature increases in all zones in California, there is an increased likelihood of finding exotic species, and an increase in the proportion of species in a zone that are exotic.”
The study was inspired by a 2008 class run by David Ackerly, a UC Berkeley professor of integrative biology, that focused on the role plants play in their ecosystem and how those roles may alter with climate change. This area of study, called functional ecology, is being used more and more by ecologists to predict the consequences of global warming.
“The ‘trait-based’ approach lets us test hypotheses about plant distributions in relation to climate without tying them to the identity of particular species,” Ackerly wrote in an email from South Africa, where he is on sabbatical. “As a consequence, the analyses can be generalized beyond California to other grassland areas.”
With grasses, the increase in exotics could make the state more prone to wildfires, since invasive grasses dry out in the summer more than do native grasses. Some grasses serve as reservoirs for viruses and other pathogens that attack food crops, while others more efficiently suck up water that would normally be used by other grasses and plants,
Dangremond is involved in a study of European beachgrass (Ammophila arenaria), which she has found harbors deer mice that eat endangered lupines. The beachgrass has invaded sand dunes along much of the coast in California, Oregon and Washington, she said.
For the current study, Dangremond and postdoctoral fellow Brody Sandel, now at Aarhus University in Denmark, divided California into 800 zones, and characterized all the grasses in these zones according to 10 distinct traits related to growth, reproductive and light capture strategies. These traits included grasses’ maximum height; plant and leaf lifespan; seed mass; month of first flowering; length of flowering period; specific leaf area, leaf length and width; leaf nitrogen concentration per mass and per area; and the grass’s specific photosynthetic pathway. The data came primarily from the updated “Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California” published by UC Press.
Some zones in the state contained as many as 163 grass species, while others had as few as three. In some zones, two-thirds of all grasses were exotics. The researchers found that, in general, the higher the average temperature in a zone, the greater the proportion of exotic grass species.
Exotics differed significantly from natives on seven of the 10 traits in ways that made them more adaptable to higher temperatures. For example, exotics tended to be taller, have longer and wider leaves, higher specific leaf area, higher nitrogen mass in the leaves and higher seed mass, and were less likely to be perennial. Noxious invasives were even more extremely adapted to warmer temperatures.
These traits account for the success of invasive exotic grasses, Dangremond said. Taller grasses, for example, give exotics more light-capturing ability and the ability to outcompete natives for light. Similarly, the larger seeds of exotic species could give these grasses a competitive advantage at the seedling stage.
“As climate changes in the coming century, which at this point is quite certain, this means we expect the distributions of the grasses to change as well,” Ackerly wrote. “Sadly, what this predicts is that the alien species that already dominate the Central Valley and other hotter regions of the state will become even more widespread in the future.”
“I hate to be a doomsayer, but the problem is getting worse because of humans,” Dangremond said. “Humans promote the spread of invasive species by disturbing areas and letting weedy species come in, and grazing herbivores like cows and elk tend to have a negative effect on native plants anyway. Native species really have a lot to contend with now.”
For more information:
- Climate change and the invasion of California by grasses (Global Change Biology, 7/13/11)
- Climate change puts ecosystems on the run (press release, 12/23/09)
- Climate change could severely impact California’s endemic plants (press release, 6/24/08)
Here’s the issue. Former State Climatologist Jim Goodridge shows that most of the warming since 1900 in California is in the most populated areas.
Unfortunately, these studies don’t seem to take things like this into account, choosing instead, blanket assumptions on temperature.
But when they say “”I hate to be a doomsayer, but the problem is getting worse because of humans,” they are partially correct. As Jim Goodridge shows, UHI driven by human population does in fact create a warming trend in California. I suppose that means weeds in our cities and backyards might get more common than native grasses, but isn’t that the case anyway?
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Its grass. Why should I or anyone else care a whit about it?
Has not California had a cooler than usual Summer?
I notice we are meant to feel ever more guilt for being born as humans!
If you take away the emotional loading of “invasive”, this is simply a tautological statement of basic evolution. A species or variety that moves into an area is doing so because it’s more adaptable to different conditions. (If it wasn’t adaptable, it couldn’t “invade”.)
AGW is good for evil grass, bad for nice grass. Apparently.
How does warming know-heat isn’t this smart, or diabolical-to only help the bad life forms and hurt the good ones? The idea that this is the case, which is the impression one gets reading the various news stories, leaves me, and I hope any sentient individual, incredulous.
If the goal were the genetic purity of North American grass species, I’d say that ship has sailed a long while ago. We have thousands of grass species in Colorado, and hundreds of what the researchers are calling “exotics”. The “invaders” no doubt came in waves: on the moccasins of what we now call natives who crossed the Bering Straits; or on the cloaks of explorers from Europe during the ages of exploration.
One grass we have a lot of in Colorado, and doing fine in this era of soaring greenhouse temperature (/ sarc) — despite being a short grass — is a brome everybody calls “cheatgrass”. Nobody seems to like downy brome because it affords little forage, and turns browns early in the summer. One story of its etymology is interesting to me because it suggests its age. Cheat, comes from the word eschete, which is an old French variant of “fall”. In Medieval times, lands would fall back to the Lord of the Fee, if their designated inheritors failed to be recognized as legitimate. Such property became known as eshete lands, and they often fell into disuse, their crops going to waste, and the less favored grasses moved in: the eschete grasses.
So, FWIW, the invading aliens are already here… living amongst us…
WOW, what a horribly bad study.
We just need more cows, sheep, and goats in California…
Thanks for the historical temperature data sorted by population! Very interesting, and potentially benifical when discussing social justice items with the powers that be in the state.
I can think of lots of interesting ways to sort and evaluate the data further. By chance has Jim Goodridge evaluated the data sets further? Asphalt vs concrete surfaces come to mind as something I’d like to see data on, etc.
It seems that there will be more exotic grass around airports then….
Eco-systems are complicated. I attended a talk about native plant protection recently in the bay area and learned a few things. All these comments are related to populated areas. One: fire protection steps may adversely affect some native grasses. Tall dry grasses are no-no in these parts. They are always mowed down by the start of the dry season. This would benefit shorter species. Two: plants are affected by the insect and wild life population. We have an explosion of deer population. They eat certain plants and won’t others. For example, the star thistle, which is a non-native plant, thrives because deer won’t eat them. These factors alone can select what species will thrive and what will not. They have very little to do with temperatures.
Every drop in CO2 has been hand in hand with a plant evolution…
. one of the biggest drops was when grasses evolved
Of course more CO2 is better for grasses………………..
in the land of fruits and nuts…grass is king (queen?)
Ben D Hillicoss
ps so glad I moved to Maine and out of California
Well darn, I guess that leaves NW California out in the cold. It’s been getting cooler the past 7 years, and those pesky native grasses stay green all year. Especially if you pull up the invasives and nix the expesive herbicides, or stop weed-whacking everything to bare dirt death.
“As climate changes in the coming century, which at this point is quite certain, this means we expect the distributions of the grasses to change as well,” Ackerly wrote. “Sadly, what this predicts is that the alien species……….
================================================================
lmao!!! You mean, sniff, that the earth, the flora sniff…sniff and the fauna isn’t static!!! sniff, sniff, waaahhhh…… waaahhh!!!!
Yes, sadly, very sad.
They should do like Kansas did. Just 10 miles west of here, at the junction of U.S. 169 and U.S. 400, there is a rest area. And, in that rest area, there is a patch of ground that has native prairie grass in it. We’re very proud. We’ve got signs and explanation of the flora. I kid you not. Imagine a traveler, having gone the width and breadth of Kansas, seeing nothing but miles and miles of prairie grass, gets to stop and see…… prairie grass. Preserved for posterity, I suppose. I’m kinda surprised Cali didn’t think of something that insipidly stupid, first. Prolly, someone from Cali that imported to here……
(No offense to the sensible people still left in that state……. both of them.)
Oh come on, Anthony. Everyone knows BC (British California) grass is better than mere California grass; and, if this is true, it will be even better. Or have I missed something 🙂
No matter mankind’s role in the changing climate, 2°C or .1°C, here sounds the clarion call of the midget minds, wanting the safety and security of an unchanging environment. A new plant or a new animal appears on the scene and all that was taken for granted is out the window. It strikes terror in the hearts of those seeking the safety and comfort of the known, the familiar.
Well, guess what … that’s the way the universe works and has worked for over 13 billion years … never ending change.
Here’s the issue. Former State Climatologist Jim Goodridge shows that most of the warming since 1900 in California is in the most populated areas.
———-
Well UHI is a reasonable explanation for this. But it is not an open and shut case because “correlation is not causation”.
An important factor is that cities tend to be coastal. And if coastal conditions cause a greater temperature trend then that could represent an alternative explanation that makes equal sense or is at least a contributing factor.
“For example, exotics tended to be taller, have longer and wider leaves, higher specific leaf area, higher nitrogen mass in the leaves and higher seed mass, and were less likely to be perennial. Noxious invasives were even more extremely adapted to warmer temperatures.”
Since they’re generalizing, let a real physiologist have a go….
1. The most competitive invaders are perennials, not annuals. Fire kills annuals, not perennials. Lack of natural burning favors invasive annuals, native or not. Fire is native, lightning is a natural occurrence. Go figure.
2………taller…..longer…..wider leaves………… higher leaf area……….higher seed (yield) mass
= INCREASED YIELDS. Whoa, did i just write that?
3. Wheat is a non-native grass. Corn is a non-native grass. Oats. Barley. What’s your point. Who cares where it comes from?
4. Different species of rusts, viruses, bugs etc. attack native and non-native grasses. Deal with it.
These folks just don’t like people. We should live like the Indians. Let the populace eat cake. Etc.
Yes, Anthony, always point out caveats in papers and articles. The more times, the better. Draw attention to their fudging uncertainty, while usually letting MSM headlines blare abject certainty.
It is dishonest for the scientists to let such headlines pass.
It IS honest, though, if the caveats are in the titles/headlines. But still, WUWT should point out the iffy-ness for what it is – them saying they don’t really KNOW.
By the way, one of the most efficient grasses known to man is called johnsongrass. It is classified as a noxious weed in most states. Under certain circumstances, it can cause death when eaten by cattle and horses (long dry spells with high soil nitrogen availability). We could save a ton of expelled CO2 on annual plantings if we taught people how to raise it instead of outlawing it. Guess they’re being a bit hypocritical.
If I recall my history correctly, California has already had most of its native grass overrun by the invasive species several decades ago. I doubt it can get worse. Everything seems to be fine so far.
I have just come back from northern California and never in my life have I experienced such massive temperature variation within such short distances. 20F in less than a mile, and that was the case all over – from the Sonoma coast to Big Sur, from the Bay area up to Napa. How anyone can claim an accurate T record for that part of the world is beyond me.
Biologists were the first to become post normal scientists. Anything good for humans is bad for the plants and animals. They are not climate scientists but they are certain that:
““As climate changes in the coming century, which at this point is quite certain…!!!!
Quite? Isn’t this a bit mealy mouthed. Is she pregnant or not? Also, it is not a scientific paper that uses terms like “sadly” “hate to be doomsayer but humans….”
As a geologist and an engineer I never write such stuff: Sadly, the comet impact killed off the dinosaurs. I hate to be a doomsayer but hominids and humans wiped out the wooly mamoth and the latter brought asian plant seeds to North America. I don’t trust a biologist under 150 years old.
MJ says:
July 29, 2011 at 3:59 pm
We just need more cows, sheep, and goats in California…
*****
Wow MJ, I didn’t know you could burn sheep!
Another important question: does a COOLING climate benefit native grasses?
If not, the non-native grasses win EITHER WAY… and the study is entirely moot regardless of warming…