NASA JPL on New Insights on How Solar Minimums Affect Earth

The Sun today, quiet, small spots - click for more
This is the first of what I’m sure will be a series of solar stories related to the stunning (at least to people who have not been following WUWT since 2008) announcement that it appears sunspots are on the wane, and we may be headed to an extended Maunder type minimum.

See: BREAKING – major AAS solar announcement: Sun’s Fading Spots Signal Big Drop in Solar Activity

From NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab website:

Since 1611, humans have recorded the comings and goings of black spots on the sun. The number of these sunspots waxes and wanes over approximately an 11-year cycle — more sunspots generally mean more activity and eruptions on the sun and vice versa. The number of sunspots can change from cycle to cycle, and 2008 saw the longest and weakest solar minimum since scientists have been monitoring the sun with space-based instruments.

Observations have shown, however, that magnetic effects on Earth due to the sun, effects that cause the aurora to appear, did not go down in synch with the cycle of low magnetism on the sun. Now, a paper in Annales Geophysicae that appeared on May 16, 2011 reports that these effects on Earth did in fact reach a minimum — indeed they attained their lowest levels of the century — but some eight months later. The scientists believe that factors in the speed of the solar wind, and the strength and direction of the magnetic fields embedded within it, helped produce this anomalous low.

“Historically, the solar minimum is defined by sunspot number,” says space weather scientist Bruce Tsurutani at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., who is first author on the paper. “Based on that, 2008 was identified as the period of solar minimum. But the geomagnetic effects on Earth reached their minimum quite some time later, in 2009. So we decided to look at what caused the geomagnetic minimum.”

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/sun/20110614/magnetometer-full.jpg
Small magnetometers like these measure magnetic strength on Earth and in the atmosphere to determine how much of the sun's magnetic energy has been transferred to Earth's magnetosphere. In 2009, that energy reached record lows. Images credit: Glassmeier, et al.

Geomagnetic effects basically amount to any magnetic changes on Earth due to the sun, and they’re measured by magnetometer readings on the surface of the Earth. Such effects are usually harmless, with the only obvious sign of their presence being the appearance of auroras near the poles. However, in extreme cases, they can cause power grid failures on Earth or induce dangerous currents in long pipelines, so it is valuable to know how the geomagnetic effects vary with the sun.

Three things help determine how much energy from the sun is transferred to Earth’s magnetosphere from the solar wind: the speed of the solar wind, the strength of the magnetic field outside Earth’s bounds (known as the interplanetary magnetic field) and which direction it is pointing, since a large southward component is necessary to connect successfully to Earth’s magnetosphere and transfer energy. The team — which also included Walter Gonzalez and Ezequiel Echer of the Brazilian National Institute for Space Research in São José dos Campos, Brazil — examined each component in turn.

First, the researchers noted that in 2008 and 2009, the interplanetary magnetic field was the lowest it had been in the history of the space age. This was an obvious contribution to the geomagnetic minimum. But since the geomagnetic effects didn’t drop in 2008, it could not be the only factor.

To examine the speed of the solar wind, they turned to NASA’s Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE), which is in interplanetary space outside the Earth’s magnetosphere, approximately 1 million miles toward the sun. The ACE data showed that the speed of the solar wind stayed high during the sunspot minimum. Only later did it begin a steady decline, correlating to the timing of the decline in geomagnetic effects.

The next step was to understand what caused this decrease. The team found a culprit in something called coronal holes. Coronal holes are darker, colder areas within the sun’s outer atmosphere. Fast solar wind shoots out the center of coronal holes at speeds up to 500 miles per second, but wind flowing out of the sides slows down as it expands into space.

“Usually, at solar minimum, the coronal holes are at the sun’s poles,” says Giuliana de Toma, a solar scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research whose research on this topic helped provide insight for this paper. “Therefore, Earth receives wind from only the edges of these holes, and it’s not very fast. But in 2007 and 2008, the coronal holes were not confined to the poles as normal.”

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/sun/20110614/alfven-waves-full.jpg
The magnetic fields from the center of coronal holes in the sun's atmosphere have large fluctuations known as Alfvén waves, while those from the sides have smaller fluctuations. The side fields do not transfer energy as well from the sun to Earth's magnetosphere. Image credit: NASA/Park

Those coronal holes lingered at low latitudes to the end of 2008. Consequently, the center of the holes stayed firmly pointed towards Earth, sending fast solar wind in Earth’s direction. Only as they finally appeared closer to the poles in 2009 did the speed of the solar wind at Earth begin to slow down. And, of course, the geomagnetic effects and sightings of the aurora along with it.

Coronal holes seem to be responsible for minimizing the southward direction of the interplanetary magnetic field as well. The solar wind’s magnetic fields oscillate on the journey from the sun to Earth. These fluctuations are known as Alfvén waves. The wind coming out of the centers of the coronal holes has large fluctuations, meaning that the southward magnetic component – like that in all the directions — is fairly large. The wind that comes from the edges, however, has smaller fluctuations, and comparably smaller southward components. So, once again, coronal holes at lower latitudes would have a better chance of connecting with Earth’s magnetosphere and causing geomagnetic effects, while mid-latitude holes would be less effective.

Working together, these three factors — low interplanetary magnetic field strength, combined with slower solar wind speed and smaller magnetic fluctuations due to coronal hole placement — create the perfect environment for a geomagnetic minimum.

Knowing what situations cause and suppress intense geomagnetic activity on Earth is a step toward better predicting when such events might happen. To do so well, Tsurutani points out, requires focusing on the tight connection between such effects and the complex physics of the sun. “It’s important to understand all of these features better,” he says. “To understand what causes low interplanetary magnetic fields and what causes coronal holes in general. This is all part of the solar cycle. And all part of what causes effects on Earth.”

Written by Karen C. Fox

NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sean Peake
June 14, 2011 3:57 pm

Hi Bob (why do I feel that I’m being watched? 😉 )
I’m wondering about a possible correlation between solar activity (direct or lagging) and the cycles of the PDO and AMO, or whether it is coincidental, especially when these two oscillations get in sync?

Jim Arndt
June 14, 2011 3:58 pm

Hi,
Leif that statement is a bit misleading.
Leif Svalgaard says:
June 14, 2011 at 3:13 pm
“BTW, shouldn’t the climate now not be like that around 1900 is the sun is a major driver? Or are we still climbing out of the Little Ice Age, and perhaps will continue to do that as long as temperatures go up? :-)”

That is like saying the sun is shining today like one month ago but why is the river higher.
Jim Arndt

Jimbo
June 14, 2011 4:04 pm

We are at a crossroads and something has to give. Warming or cooling – we live in interesting times of climate alarm. ;>)

Jimbo
June 14, 2011 4:16 pm

I do hope that once the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming scare is over it won’t be replaced by the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Cooling scare. I’m serious – see Global Climate Disruption or AGW will cause milder NH winters or colder NH winters.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/20905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013568

June 14, 2011 4:30 pm

“Working together, these three factors — low interplanetary magnetic field strength, combined with slower solar wind speed and smaller magnetic fluctuations due to coronal hole placement — create the perfect environment for a geomagnetic minimum.”
….and cold weather.
And look, it peaked at 963km/s just before that brief heatwave at the start of June.
http://www.solen.info/solar/coronal_holes.html

Steve B
June 14, 2011 4:48 pm

Theodore Landsheidt (who’s name is mud around here) predicted in 2004 a type of Maunder Minimum by about 2030 which would correlate with Solar Cycle 26. Why wasn’t anyone listening?

Dan in California
June 14, 2011 5:36 pm

If the first space-based measurements were on OSO in 1962, was it in high enough orbit to measure the interplanetary effects, or was it inside the Earth’s bow shock?

June 14, 2011 6:04 pm

Jack;
Yes, the various Minimums tie in to cold periods. The cosmic ray hypothesis says that they allow more cosmic rays (energetic particles) through to the atmosphere, increasing cloudiness and albedo resulting in cooling.

Country Ham
June 14, 2011 6:21 pm

It’s all them Priuses

Alcheson
June 14, 2011 7:18 pm

Don’t worry the Greenies and Lefties are busy at work hatching up another plot to make sure the solutions to this possible upcoming cooling are exactly the same as for the AGW scam.

June 14, 2011 8:15 pm

crosspatch says:
June 14, 2011 at 2:52 pm
Does anyone know if a site that provides public access to solar spectral distribution data that can be viewed and tracked over time?
I plot solar EUV from the SEM/SOHO satellite which is updated on a roughly monthly basis. Graph found HERE.
Sean Peake says:
June 14, 2011 at 3:57 pm
Hi Bob (why do I feel that I’m being watched? 😉 )
I’m wondering about a possible correlation between solar activity (direct or lagging) and the cycles of the PDO and AMO, or whether it is coincidental, especially when these two oscillations get in sync?

There may be good reason that cold PDO’s and quiet Suns co exist naturally. What drives them both is the movement and acceleration of the Sun around the SSB. Scaffetta and myself are working on this theory which is simplified in this graphic .
Steve B says:
June 14, 2011 at 4:48 pm
Theodore Landsheidt (who’s name is mud around here) predicted in 2004 a type of Maunder Minimum by about 2030 which would correlate with Solar Cycle 26. Why wasn’t anyone listening?
Theodor’s method is the basis for further research but he actually missed the mark in some areas when predicting solar slowdown. We now have much better data in an associated field of research that can be used to accurately predict solar output and slowdowns.

DCC
June 14, 2011 8:17 pm

who asked: “Did the Maunder Minimum correspond to a cold period?”
Wikipedia is your friend (in this case.)
“The Maunder Minimum coincided with the middle — and coldest part — of the Little Ice Age”

June 14, 2011 9:03 pm

Well I am inspired.. Hello solar telescope

meemoe_uk
June 14, 2011 11:21 pm

>BTW, shouldn’t the climate now not be like that around 1900 is the sun is a major driver? Or are we still climbing out of the Little Ice Age, and perhaps will continue to do that as long as temperatures go up? 🙂
Looking at the weather reports coming in from around the world, including items on wuwt, it’s strikes me we are seeing this return to LIA conditions. We’ve certainly had it in the UK with 3 bad winters. Don’t forget, we are coming into this after the 20th century warm period, while at 1900 they were still in the end of the LIA. i.e. we’ve got 100 years worth of extra heat reserviors such as lakes,seas,oceans working for us.
It took NASA and the AAS long enough to catch up with us on this solar minimum thing. How about Leif lambasting these institutions for being so very slow to catch up with our informal group?

June 15, 2011 12:02 am

meemoe_uk says:
June 14, 2011 at 11:21 pm
Well said….

Hank Hancock
June 15, 2011 12:11 am

Geoff Sharp at June 14, 2011 at 8:15 pm says:
There may be good reason that cold PDO’s and quiet Suns co exist naturally. What drives them both is the movement and acceleration of the Sun around the SSB. Scaffetta and myself are working on this theory which is simplified in this graphic .

In looking at the graphic, I noticed that the PDO appears to be a 3rd order harmonic of the angular momentum curve. Is this coincidental or is there any significance to my observation?

Ian E
June 15, 2011 12:26 am

Of course this is great news for warmistas – they now have the perfect alibi for the increasingly obvious failure of their creed!

tallbloke
June 15, 2011 1:02 am

Geoff Sharp says:
June 14, 2011 at 8:15 pm
Sean Peake says:
June 14, 2011 at 3:57 pm
I’m wondering about a possible correlation between solar activity (direct or lagging) and the cycles of the PDO and AMO, or whether it is coincidental, especially when these two oscillations get in sync?
There may be good reason that cold PDO’s and quiet Suns co exist naturally. What drives them both is the movement and acceleration of the Sun around the SSB.

The correlation I found between solar inertial motion with respect to changes in Earth’s length of day and detrended temperature records supports this view too. Nicola Scafetta has been encouraging me to try to get it published. The time may be right soon.
I blogged it back in 2009 around the same time Ian WIlson was working on LOD too. It meshes with Geoffs work on solar angular momentum nicely.
http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/planetary-solar-climate-connection-found/

Kelvin Vaughan
June 15, 2011 1:52 am

Latitude says:
June 14, 2011 at 2:24 pm
and 2008 saw the longest and weakest solar minimum since scientists have been monitoring the sun with space-based instruments.
===============================================================================
I hate it when people do this…..it’s like they are trying to hide something or fudge something
Why not just say “since 1965″ or something like that?
Does anyone know what time frame they are talking about?
A flash in the pan compared to the age of the sun.

Editor
June 15, 2011 1:55 am

Sean Peake says: “I’m wondering about a possible correlation between solar activity (direct or lagging) and the cycles of the PDO and AMO, or whether it is coincidental, especially when these two oscillations get in sync?”
I’ve seen speculation in the blogosphere, but I’ve never seen a convincing argument. There’s some coincidence between ENSO and the solar cycle for the past three cycles, but it falls apart before then.

June 15, 2011 2:18 am

Hank Hancock says:
June 15, 2011 at 12:11 am
In looking at the graphic, I noticed that the PDO appears to be a 3rd order harmonic of the angular momentum curve. Is this coincidental or is there any significance to my observation?
Going on the theory there is no coincidence. Scafetta produces a graph based on solar velocity that is controlled by Jupiter and Saturn. (there is no doubt on this). The PDO seems to align with this oscillation but a mechanism (ala L&P) is unknown. Solar slowdowns occur when the 4 outer planets align in a certain manner, with Jupiter and Saturn being part of the mix. Both cycles are intertwined but the latter requires the addition of 2 more planets. There is now peer reviewed papers showing the link between solar output caused by planetary movements that control the solar path around the SSB….the tide is turning slowly.

Martin Perry
June 15, 2011 2:58 am

Dont worry,
I predict a rapid rebranding of “carbon” taxes as “conservation” taxes. After all, we will need to preserve all our precious fossil fuels to keep warm. Similarly all the “renewables” will become even more important – Never mind that the windmills wont work on a cooler planet!
Thus, the taxation / world government agenda will trundle on.

Wucash
June 15, 2011 4:01 am

Let’s remember that the little ice age also coincided with heavy volcanic activity. I’m thinking the sun hibernation was only a contributing factor in making it worse than it already was.

Martin Perry
June 15, 2011 4:16 am

Think about it – are we not entering a period of heavy volcanic / seismic activity? (Eritrea, Iceland and Chile all erupting at present) Japanese / New Zealand earthquakes etc
My pet theory is that the reduced magnetic flux from the sun causes global distortion (Iron core etc)
We shall see!

Ken
June 15, 2011 7:05 am

Anthony,
You attribute a quote to ‘From NASA JPL’s website”…to an article attributed to a NASA author from Goddard…and present links that link to other of YOUR blog items.
PROVIDE A LINK TO THE ORIGINAL SOURCE DOCUMENT!!! Its not that I don’t want to take your word for it…I don’t (as anyone can copy/paste & make errors of various types)…but providing accurate attribution is the proper thing to do.
Its really dis-courteous,annoying–and irresponsible–of you to provide info and make it hard for your audience to follow-up.