"All three of these lines of research to point to the familiar sunspot cycle shutting down for a while."

I’ve managed to get a copy of the official press release provided by the Southwest Research Institute Planetary Science Directorate to MSM journalists, for today’s stunning AAS announcement and it is reprinted in full here:

WHAT’S DOWN WITH THE SUN?

MAJOR DROP IN SOLAR ACTIVITY PREDICTED

Latitude-time plots of jet streams under the Sun's surface show the surprising shutdown of the solar cycle mechanism. New jet streams typically form at about 50 degrees latitude (as in 1999 on this plot) and are associated with the following solar cycle 11 years later. New jet streams associated with a future 2018-2020 solar maximum were expected to form by 2008 but are not present even now, indicating a delayed or missing Cycle 25.

A missing jet stream, fading spots, and slower activity near the poles say that our Sun is heading for a rest period even as it is acting up for the first time in years, according to scientists at the National Solar Observatory (NSO) and the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL).

As the current sunspot cycle, Cycle 24, begins to ramp up toward maximum, independent studies of the solar interior, visible surface, and the corona indicate that the next 11-year solar sunspot cycle, Cycle 25, will be greatly reduced or may not happen at all.

The results were announced at the annual meeting of the Solar Physics Division of the American Astronomical Society, which is being held this week at New Mexico State University in Las Cruces:

http://astronomy.nmsu.edu/SPD2011/

“This is highly unusual and unexpected,” Dr. Frank Hill, associate director of the NSO’s Solar Synoptic Network, said of the results. “But the fact that three completely different views of the Sun point in the same direction is a powerful indicator that the sunspot cycle may be going into hibernation.”

Spot numbers and other solar activity rise and fall about every 11 years, which is half of the Sun’s 22-year magnetic interval since the Sun’s magnetic poles reverse with each cycle. An immediate question is whether this slowdown presages a second Maunder Minimum, a 70-year period with virtually no sunspots during 1645-1715.

Hill is the lead author on one of three papers on these results being presented this week. Using data from the Global Oscillation Network Group (GONG) of six observing stations around the world, the team translates surface pulsations caused by sound reverberating through the Sun into models of the internal structure. One of their discoveries is an east-west zonal wind flow inside the Sun, called the torsional oscillation, which starts at

mid-latitudes and migrates towards the equator. The latitude of this wind stream matches the new spot formation in each cycle, and successfully predicted the late onset of the current Cycle 24.

“We expected to see the start of the zonal flow for Cycle 25 by now,” Hill explained, “but we see no sign of it. This indicates that the start of Cycle 25 may be delayed to 2021 or 2022, or may not happen at all.”

In the second paper, Matt Penn and William Livingston see a long-term weakening trend in the strength of sunspots, and predict that by Cycle 25 magnetic fields erupting on the Sun will be so weak that few if any sunspots will be formed. Spots are formed when intense magnetic flux tubes erupt from the interior and keep cooled gas from circulating back to the interior. For typical sunspots this magnetism has a strength of 2,500 to 3,500 gauss

(Earth’s magnetic field is less than 1 gauss at the surface); the field must reach at least 1,500 gauss to form a dark spot.

Average magnetic field strength in sunspot umbras has been steadily declining for over a decade. The trend includes sunspots from Cycles 22, 23, and (the current cycle) 24.

Using more than 13 years of sunspot data collected at the McMath-Pierce Telescope at Kitt Peak in Arizona, Penn and Livingston observed that the average field strength declined about 50 gauss per year during Cycle 23 and now in Cycle 24. They also observed that spot temperatures have risen exactly as expected for such changes in the magnetic field. If the trend continues, the field strength will drop below the 1,500 gauss threshold and

spots will largely disappear as the magnetic field is no longer strong enough to overcome convective forces on the solar surface.

Moving outward, Richard Altrock, manager of the Air Force’s coronal research program at NSO’s Sunspot, NM, facilities has observed a slowing of the “rush to the poles,” the rapid poleward march of magnetic activity observed in the Sun’s faint corona. Altrock used four decades of observations with NSO’s 40-cm (16-inch) coronagraphic telescope at Sunspot.

“A key thing to understand is that those wonderful, delicate coronal features are actually powerful, robust magnetic structures rooted in the interior of the Sun,” Altrock explained. “Changes we see in the corona reflect changes deep inside the Sun.”

Altrock used a photometer to map iron heated to 2 million degrees C (3.6 million F). Stripped of half of its electrons, it is easily concentrated by magnetism rising from the Sun. In a well-known pattern, new solar activity emerges first at about 70 degrees latitude at the start of a cycle, then towards the equator as the cycle ages. At the same time, the new magnetic fields push remnants of the older cycle as far as 85 degrees poleward.

“In cycles 21 through 23, solar maximum occurred when this rush appeared at an average latitude of 76 degrees,” Altrock said. “Cycle 24 started out late and slow and may not be strong enough to create a rush to the poles, indicating we’ll see a very weak solar maximum in 2013, if at all. If the rush to the poles fails to complete, this creates a tremendous dilemma for the theorists, as it would mean that Cycle 23’s magnetic field will not completely disappear from the polar regions (the rush to the poles accomplishes this feat). No one knows what the Sun will do in that case.”

All three of these lines of research to point to the familiar sunspot cycle shutting down for a while.

“If we are right,” Hill concluded, “this could be the last solar maximum we’ll see for a few decades. That would affect everything from space exploration to Earth’s climate.”

# # #

Media teleconference information: This release is the subject of a media

teleconference at the current meeting of the American Astronomical Society’s

Solar Physics Division (AAS/SPD). The telecon will be held at 11 a.m. MDT

(17:00 UTC) on Tuesday, 14 June. Bona fide journalists are invited to attend

the teleconference and should send an e-mail to the AAS/SPD press officer,

Craig DeForest, at deforest@boulder.swri.edu, with the subject heading “SPD:

SOLAR MEDIA TELECON”, before 16:00 UTC. You will receive dial-in information

before the telecon.

These results have been presented at the current meeting of the AAS/SPD.

Citations:

16.10: “Large-Scale Zonal Flows During the Solar Minimum — Where Is Cycle

25?” by Frank Hill, R. Howe, R. Komm, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, T.P. Larson,

J. Schou & M. J. Thompson.

17.21: “A Decade of Diminishing Sunspot Vigor” by W. C. Livingston, M. Penn

& L. Svalgard.

18.04: “Whither Goes Cycle 24? A View from the Fe XIV Corona” by R. C.

Altrock.

Source:

Southwest Research Institute Planetary Science Directorate

http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~deforest/SPD-sunspot-release/SPD_solar_cycle_release.txt

Supplemental images: http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~deforest/SPD-sunspot-release/

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
461 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jimbo
June 14, 2011 5:29 pm

This is of course unprecedented and much worse than we thought. We must shut down our BIG OIL plants to save the world from man-made catastrophic warming. The signs are in the stars.

SteveSadlov
June 14, 2011 5:31 pm

Queue snappy ska beat ….
“It’s the dawning
of a newwww era”

June 14, 2011 5:32 pm

Indeed, and it would seem that some AGW skeptics are nearly frothing at the mouth with excitement over this…which really amounts to pure speculation of what might happen. Meanwhile, in the real world, arctic sea ice extent is at or near record low levels for this date in June.

funny how skepticism about models and predictions all fly out the window

Mark
June 14, 2011 5:32 pm

Here’s the quandary this sets up for the warmists
* If they claim the Sun has no significant impact on Earth’s climate, then as it continues to cool – their models and projections continue to be falsified making it increasingly apparent that CAGW is a falsified hypothesis.
* If they admit the Sun does impact Earth’s climate in substantial ways, they get a small temporary fig leaf to blame for why their projected warming has been delayed, however they are also admitting that the Sun may have been driving most or nearly all of the climate change we’ve seen. They would also be opening the possibility of dramatic solar forced cooling in the future which scares most people far more than warming.
They can’t have it both ways.

Jimbo
June 14, 2011 5:36 pm

This is highly unusual and unexpected,” Dr. Frank Hill, associate director of the NSO’s Solar Synoptic Network, said of the results. “But the fact that three completely different views of the Sun point in the same direction is a powerful indicator that the sunspot cycle may be going into hibernation.”

This is what happens when you get out of group think. This is settled science. Now let’s proceed to re-organise our entire energy infrastructure based on the finings of a few climate scientists whose very livelihoods depends on continued global warming.

ggm
June 14, 2011 5:43 pm

HA ! So the “experts” predicts a big solar minimum.
That means we are 100% guaranteed to have a normal, large-ish cycle.

Theo Goodwin
June 14, 2011 5:47 pm

steven mosher says:
June 14, 2011 at 5:32 pm
“funny how skepticism about models and predictions all fly out the window”
Well, yes and no. If sceptics embrace models of the sun then they must do extra work to justify their rejection of models of climate. At this time, it is not entirely clear to me what part of the claims about the sun are based on models and what part on genuine physical hypotheses.
However, Svensmark’s work is pure science that follows scientific method perfectly. Now, I take it that Svensmark is not one of those who is predicting the sun’s behavior. But the sun’s changed output will provide him with new initial conditions for his universally generalized hypotheses and he can then predict changes in Earth’s climate.
When people show graphics of the sun’s cycles, it is a truly impressive sight. However, if they are simply saying that the existing graph really resembles the graph at the beginning of the Little Ice Age then that is just extrapolation and is not science. However, if time reveals that the graph for this time is identical to that for the Little Ice Age then Svensmark has the data that he needs for his genuine science.

earthdog
June 14, 2011 5:47 pm

Joshua Science says:
June 14, 2011 at 3:51 pm
“If the trend continues…”
A word of caution to global coolers going forward, we’ve all heard that phrase before.

Yes, that.
The fact is, we don’t really know what will happen. We’re dealing with a chaotic system (weather) that may or may not be influenced by the largest thermonuclear explosion in the solar system, that itself may have cycles that complete in time spans much longer than the average human lifespan.
Interesting times, for sure. I do wish it would cool the heck off. It’s hotter than blue blazes here in Houston.

Theo Goodwin
June 14, 2011 5:55 pm

R. Gates,
Don’t you think it is strange that the topic of this forum is the AAS announcement about solar activity and you talk endlessly about sea ice?

Jimbo
June 14, 2011 5:58 pm

steven mosher says:
June 14, 2011 at 5:32 pm
……………………
funny how skepticism about models and predictions all fly out the window

Mr. Mosher,
The new claims of climate change causes and proposed restructuring of our entire energy system is not being made by sceptics but by Warmists. What else do you want us to do? Accept the ‘settled’ science? Go along with program?
Models:
“Modellers have an inbuilt bias towards forced climate change because the causes and effect are clear.”
http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~mann/shared/articles/Schmidtetal-QSR04.pdf
Why Climate Models Lie
http://theresilientearth.com/?q=content/why-climate-models-lie
“The Royal Society’s motto ‘Nullius in verba’ roughly translates as ‘take nobody’s word for it’. It is an expression of the determination of Fellows to withstand the domination of authority and to verify all statements by an appeal to facts determined by experiment. ”
http://royalsociety.org/about-us/history/

Beware of pending new ice age predictions from the past .
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;173/3992/138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(72)90047-6
http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/12/scientists-considered-pouring-soot-over.html
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,944914,00.html
http://old.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2006/fireandice/fireandice.asp

Russell Duke
June 14, 2011 6:01 pm

Living in Houston and having had all of my tropical plants killed by snow the last two winters, I do not like this report.

June 14, 2011 6:02 pm

Mosher
It appears to be a prediction based on observation rather than a model… though it is still just a prediction. We will observe whether or not it comes true. At least no one is trying to change the way we all live based on this prediction…yet…

Anything is possible
June 14, 2011 6:05 pm

steven mosher says:
June 14, 2011 at 5:32 pm
funny how skepticism about models and predictions all fly out the window
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Could it just be that solar scientists are more respected than climate scientists? “Solargate” anyone?
That aside, all true scientists have good reason to hope this pans out. The opportunity to observe a prolonged solar minimum “up close and personal” may help to answer a lot of unresolved questions.

earthdog
June 14, 2011 6:17 pm

Russell Duke says:
June 14, 2011 at 6:01 pm
Living in Houston and having had all of my tropical plants killed by snow the last two winters, I do not like this report.

Yeah, the freeze pretty much kicked my St. Augustine in the cods and it still hasn’t really recovered. But I’m DONE with 100+ highs. I’m afraid for my new SmartMeter — it may get hot and shut me down. Thanks, Reliant!

Jimbo
June 14, 2011 6:18 pm

The reason why I immediately distrust global warming climate scientists is because most of them rely on their livelihoods on continued global warming. What if the world cools for 30 years? What papers can we expect from them?

June 14, 2011 6:18 pm

Now proponents of carbon climate control say that we should not believe reputable scientists when they release well composed and thoroughly reviewed papers. Make up your minds will ya! At least R.Gates has the decency to be transparent in his efforts to obfuscate and change the subject.

anticlimactic
June 14, 2011 6:21 pm

This is sort of being between a rock and a hard place!
On the one hand it [may] stop our governments recklessly spending trillions of OUR money on combatting [almost] non-existent AGW, but on the other we may have extreme global cooling.

Thomas Trevor
June 14, 2011 6:24 pm

R. Gates: “Which really amounts to pure speculation of what might happen. ” At least this speculation is based on something that is happening now and has happened in the past. Which is a heck of a lot more than what AGW models are based on. Increase in CO2 never lead to higher temperatures in the past.

Jimbo
June 14, 2011 6:29 pm

Anything is possible says:
June 14, 2011 at 6:05 pm
………………………………………………..
The opportunity to observe a prolonged solar minimum “up close and personal” may help to answer a lot of unresolved questions.

Observe!!! That is what they don’t want to hear. People all over the world could be freezing their nuts off and they would be told that they are overheating. Amazing stuff!
Perpetual drought in Australia
Declining US snowpack
Sinking coral island atolls
Accelerating rate of sea level rise
Doomed and dead corals………………………………. FAIL.
Arctic spiral death – still waitng despite the long-term trend.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.08.016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045698

Andrew30
June 14, 2011 6:41 pm

Jimbo says: June 14, 2011 at 6:18 pm
[ What if the world cools for 30 years? What papers can we expect from them?]
% ed mypaper
1,$s/warm/cool/g
w
2356234
q
%

Barry L.
June 14, 2011 6:41 pm

Not a peep from RealClimate.
News like this is pretty much a layoff notice.
Why do they have the sun on the top of their webpage anyways?
Just one question for the AGW folks. Is the science still settled?

Don
June 14, 2011 6:43 pm

Well it isn’t on Drudge as of 9.30 pm so it can’t be in the MSM.

rbateman
June 14, 2011 6:48 pm

I have yet to hear of ex VP Joe Cool starring in a movie named “Convenient Lies” scolding the world that unless we burn all the fossil fuels we can lay our hands on very soon, that the Earth will plunge headlong into the Next Ice Age. I don’t hear the Coolistas demanding a tax on Oxygen as the evil poisionous gas that will freeze us all to death, castastrophically falling sea levels that make ports and canals useless, advancing ice sheets and glaciers wiping out billions of people, and summers will become a thing of the past. Don’t hear any Brown cries of “Save the Deserts”.
Nope, not a word.
Not yet, anyway.

tucker
June 14, 2011 6:49 pm

Alvin says:
June 14, 2011 at 3:43 pm
More yankees on their way to South Carolina
************************************************
Too late. I did that in April. Cheers.