SWPC updated their solar cycle progression page…looks like the levels have held since the big uptick in March.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
SWPC updated their solar cycle progression page…looks like the levels have held since the big uptick in March.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Pasting the old formula on the new graph is gross …… Trying to cover it up makes it worse.
It is a new graph because more sunspots were added since 2003, and the old graph didn’t have forward extrapolation.
It was not old formula pasted, but a formula which was riddled with errors, eventually corrected. That was nothing of a kind, just erroneous presentation.
Jupiter, Saturn, 1941, same numbers are there, as before.
I still maintain nothing has changed.
Why bother if you think there is no planetary effect.
Or perhaps you realised it is time to catch up with the real world of astronomy.
If so, here it is have a go and do improve, explain and contribute to the understanding:
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/LFC2.htm
Write a paper, put your name on it, I don’t mind to be demoted to references, or even not mentioned at all.
Or on the other hand you can carry on with your pointless innuendo You done your name huge disservice; had more than 500 hits on:
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/WEB-Page%20attack.htm
many from very prominent scientific institution.
[Vuk – please calm down. You have made your response and it is pointless to keep making it over and over. There are 4 comments from you in the spam bin which I will not post because they repeat your previous comments or start to cross the line from ‘appropriate, measured response’ ~jove, mod]
Thanks Jove. I suppose I have overdone it. It is good that posts with certain words (although they were directed at me, rather than from me) are binned into spam immediately.
Have a nice weekend.