WUWT is a finalist in the 2011 "bloggies" awards

I was very surprised to learn today (almost a week later) that WUWT has been nominated for Best Science Blog in the 2011 Bloggies. This is like the Superbowl for bloggers. This nomination was done by a blind vote of some 200 people that got nomination ballots. I’m up there with HuffPo, Wired and many others in this award contest. Who isn’t on it is equally interesting. Please read on for info on how to cast your votes for WUWT and other bloggers.

Here’s the timeline and where to vote:

===============================================================

Saturday, January 1
Nominations open.
Sunday, January 16

10:00 PM EST (UTC-5)

Nominations close.
Wednesday, January 19
200 randomly selected voters receive an invitation to choose the finalists from a list of the most-nominated weblogs in ten random categories.
Monday, January 24

10:00 PM EST

Finalist voting closes. The five (or six for Weblog of the Year) weblogs with the most votes become finalists. I will solve any ties for fifth place.
Tuesday, February 1
Finalists are announced and voting reopens to all to choose the winners.
Sunday, February 20

10:00 PM EST

Voting closes.
Sunday, February 27

8:00 PM EST

Winners are announced and the Weblog of the Year receives a prize of 2,011 US cents (US$20.11).

===============================================================

This weblog award is a little different than the previous one seen on the sidebar (which closed last year because the organizers couldn’t get the system working right)…recall the Climate Audit/Bad Astronomy horserace from 2007 that continued to get votes after the ballots closed, requiring a tie to be called. In 2008 (voting in 2009) WUWT won, but there were other problems. So they closed shop in 2010.

Voting in this contest requires you to give an email address and complete a captcha, so it may be less prone to ballot stuffing.

The voting method is not obvious at first glance, so I’ve summarized it visually for everyone below:

1. Visit http://2011.bloggi.es/ for the main voting page,

or go direct to the Science category with this link: http://2011.bloggi.es/#science

2. Locate the Science category thumbnails:

3. If you want to vote for WUWT, click on the little grey circle in the lower right, and it turns into a checkbox and greys out the other thumbnails. Note the contest rotates the thumbnails for fairness in placement, so it may not look like the image order above.

4. Scroll up/down. Vote for any other blogs you like in any other categories the same way. You don’t have to vote for other blogs, as the system doesn’t require it, but please do. These other bloggers work very hard to deliver a quality product. Reward them if you feel they deserve it.

5. Scroll all the way to the bottom of the page: (note – don’t use cursor keys, it will change your vote!)

6. Complete the captcha by typing the words displayed in your browser (not the ones above), put in a VALID email address. Press the yellow SUBMIT button. Note- you won’t get spammed by doing so. See the fine print under the email box.

7. Wait for an email in your inbox. That email contains a link to verify your vote. If you don’t get it within a half hour, check your spam filter.

8. Click on the link in your email to verify your vote. It will take you to the verification page on the website and you’ll get a success message.

9. Spread the word! Twitter, Facebook, mailing lists, friends, comments on other blogs, and most importantly, if you run a blog, I’d welcome a posting on this topic.

You know that some others who dislike what we do here will try to create anti-vote campaigns as they have done in the past. Success depends on whether there are more people who view WUWT as a science resource versus those that simply want to haul out the hate, and slap on the “denier” label.

10. Remember, while winning is fun, as I tried to teach my son in the recent pinewood derby we did, the way you play the game is just as important. Don’t cheat. Don’t encourage cheating, and simply let the chips fall where they may.

It’s an honor just to be nominated, especially when some other prominent blogs in our circle of influence were not.

Thanks for your consideration – Anthony

UPDATE: Ah, well, what can I say? The childish hatehate has already started over at BoingBoing in comments.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
270 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David, UK
February 6, 2011 2:55 pm

Consider my ‘X’ duly scrawled.

sHx
February 6, 2011 2:59 pm

I’ve come to expect fun to read posts from WUWT regularly, but this still surprised me. Honestly, I love you, dude. Although there isn’t a shred of humour in it, the reference pages alone ought to earn you an award.

February 6, 2011 3:00 pm

Anthony:
Congratulations on the nomination and put another vote in the WUWT column.

growatt
February 6, 2011 3:01 pm

It’s good to be on the winning side today!
We will overcome!
We will never give up!

Murray Duffin
February 6, 2011 3:02 pm

I’ll vote for the blog for science, but sure wish I could dump on it for politics.

markinaustin
February 6, 2011 3:05 pm

voted!
i don’t think you should hesitate to REALLY promote this. keep it stuck at the top or give updates as often as you want, we won’t be bothered. i would LOVE for Watts to get this!

Stephen Brown
February 6, 2011 3:13 pm

My vote for WUWT cast and verification e-mail received in under 30 seconds here in England at 2300hrs on 06/02/2011.

jeff id
February 6, 2011 3:21 pm

Look at all those little other blogs trying to compete. Maybe you should pull for them instead Anthony – everyone likes an underdog. A couple hard luck stories about accidentally posting on a slightly contentious pro-warming paper or fourth hand smoking which held them back.
Here comes the heat.

AntiAcademia
February 6, 2011 3:21 pm

I voted for WUWT! As I have said several times, WUWT is writing history, WUWT is writing the book on how to DO SCIENCE and defeat the falsehoods and lies from the OLD ACADEMIA. WUWT is THE NEW ACADEMIA, hundreds of times more effective than the OLD ACADEMIA that costed us $trillions and gave us all that PSEUDOSCIENCE. WUWT is DEMOLISHING the Old Academia.
Keynesian pseudoscience is even WORSE than AGW pseudoscience and already took $trillons from people (keynesians says that government “saves” the people from crisis while the truth is government POWER, CONTROL & TRILLIONS in taxes created almost every crisis). Remember keynesian Jeffrey Sachs “slimy” article against WUWT? It is not surprising that keynesians attack WUWT, the demolisher of PSEUDOSCIENCE. In economics the fight is much BIGGER than this fight. The work by WUWT and other similar blogs has been so AWESOME that the co2 demonizing pseudoscience is already near full discredit. CONGRATULATIONS!

sHx
February 6, 2011 3:21 pm

Just checked WUWT’s rival blog… for the first time ever. Not an impressive lot the competition, I must say. Pharyngula, Bad Astronomy and Eruptions would be worthier opponents. And those two microbiologist bloggers who sank overnight NASA’s grand, ‘peer-reviewed’, ‘alien life possible’ announcement.

sceptical me
February 6, 2011 3:23 pm

Voted. Well done so far Anthony – I thought I was the last person on earth not to believe in CAGW until I discovered your site.

Joseph in Florida
February 6, 2011 3:23 pm

Voted. Thanks for the heads up on the awards.

Peter Walsh
February 6, 2011 3:32 pm

Voted for WUWT via Bishop Hill Blog
Best wishes,
Peter Walsh
Dublin
Ireland

Girma
February 6, 2011 3:35 pm

Anthony
I have voted for WUWT.
Your instruction, as always, is excellent.

wayne
February 6, 2011 3:45 pm

“X”ed and verified. If any one deserves it, it is all at WUWT.
And what does that spell? Open debate.

David Jones
February 6, 2011 3:48 pm

Richard Sharpe says:
February 6, 2011 at 1:54 pm
Be careful not to use your cursor keys to scroll. It changes your vote!
For those of us who are not comuter geeks WTF does that mean?

Clarence Causey
February 6, 2011 3:58 pm

“sHx says:
February 6, 2011 at 3:21 pm
Just checked WUWT’s rival blog… for the first time ever. Not an impressive lot the competition, I must say. Pharyngula, Bad Astronomy and Eruptions would be worthier opponents. And those two microbiologist bloggers who sank overnight NASA’s grand, ‘peer-reviewed’, ‘alien life possible’ announcement”
There is simply no comparison between WUWT and Pharyngula. I have never witnessed at WUWT the disgusting things that are a regular occurrence over at Phyrangula.

SSam
February 6, 2011 4:00 pm

Mike Mangan says:
February 6, 2011 at 2:05 pm
“… All five choices for best political blog are left wing? Brilliant nominating process. 200 “randomly selected” voters … ”
And I very nearly passed up this voting session for just that reason. Nothing like the taste of bile to turn you away.
I went back and voted anyway. After verification I then added the site to the filters in my firewall.

xyzlatin
February 6, 2011 4:01 pm

done. annoying site however, it jumped around very jerkily. also using the rolling wheel on the mouse to scroll down changes your vote also. The email confirmation does not confirm who the vote was for, so you have confirmation that you have voted, but not who you voted for.
Unless you go back to the top via using the scrollbar arrows at the right of the screen, before you click confirm, you may actually not have voted for WUWT.
Anthony please alert everyone to this. (I know I know, I am a skeptic.)

Joanie
February 6, 2011 4:18 pm

Voted for WUWT, of course… and also Pioneer Woman. She does food blogging, home schooling blogging, and runs a community recipe site. She’s very funny as well. Hubby is preparing to enjoy her Super Bowl Sunday Sliders and Onion Strings… mmmmmm…
Congrats, Anthony!

Editor
February 6, 2011 4:26 pm

Done, with pleasure. I may need to get more of a life though…. WUWT and the lefty political blogs were the only ones I recognized.

Clarence Causey
February 6, 2011 4:30 pm

Someone upstream mentioned that the political blogs were all left wing. Well, check out the religion blogs, nearly all atheist, apparently no certified theologians allowed. But, it does prove that anyone can blog about anything regardless of their background.

February 6, 2011 4:35 pm

I went.
I saw.
I voterated.

INGSOC
February 6, 2011 4:37 pm

Add my vote to the total. It is amazing that you made it through nominations frankly. I note the absence of many quality blogs that would be there but for their apostasy.
Truth be told, the final result doesn’t matter to me, as I already consider you a winner Anthony. Congratulations on a job well done sir!

Hank Hancock
February 6, 2011 4:48 pm

Voted and verified.