This is a row screencap from this Twitter page: http://twitter.com/scio11
It comes from the January 13-16th, 2011 Science Online conference held in the Research Triangle Park in Durham. Details at these URL’s
You can also follow us on Twitter – either the hashtag #scio11 or our official account @scio11
This is the session under which those words were uttered:
“LESSONS FROM CLIMATEGATE”
“You guys have got to start fighting back” is the message many climatologists are hearing in the wake the slanderous attack on their integrity that has been called Swifthack, or Climategate. But for many scientists, fighting back means publishing a really good paper in a reputable journal. That doesn’t cut it anymore. How should scientists and their communicator allies go about planning a strategy?
Panel:
Tom Peterson, Chief Scientist, NCDC
James Hrynyshyn, journalist, Class M — or Chris Mooney (he’s been invited)
Josh Rosenau, NCSE
(James Hrynyshyn)
– One thing to think about for this panel would be getting someone who has experience organizing successful campaigns. With the GOP promoting the idea of Congressional hearings on the “fraud” of global warming this discussion should involve strategies for countering their smear of climate scientists for political purposes.
==========================================================
Bishop Hill points out that:
The talk of ninjas and knife fights is interesting in the current atmosphere. (Tom Peterson is a scientist at NCDC. Some may know him for his work on urban heat island effect).
I’ll say. It’s far more than Peterson’s UHI papers. For those that don’t know, Dr. Thomas Peterson is the keeper and publisher of the most important surface temperature data set in the world, the Global Historical Climatological Network (GHCN):
Note the references at the bottom. The genesis of GHCN comes from this paper in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:
And in case you don’t know, the GHCN data is the primary component of the NASA GISS GISTEMP surface temperature database, the most cited by media in the world:
from http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/sources/gistemp.html
We have the NASA GISS Chief Scientist, Dr. James Hansen calling for civil disobedience and the Chief Scientist of NCDC and keeper of the worlds most important surface temperature dataset, Dr. Thomas Peterson, saying things like “its a knife fight”. These two people have the most influential roles on climate data on the planet. Their words cause me to question their ability to be unbiased scientists.
Add that to NCAR’s Dr. Kevin Trenberth’s recent diatribe where he calls concerned citizens of the United States “deniers” in a preprint for a public address, while at the same time attempting to reverse the null hypothesis about human induced climate change….and they wonder why the public trust of climate science is going down the toilet?
Two points of advice, fellas:
1. Don’t forget who you work for, the U.S. Taxpayer.
2. You’d all do better to keep your mouths shut, your public utterances are embarrassments.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

“REPLY: No, just how I say Kevin when I have a head cold. Fixed thanks, – Anthony”
re; head cold. Me too. Haven’t had one in a couple of years. Kickass cold/flu season according to my wife who manages an MD practice so gets a good handle on seasonal illnesses. It’s definitely weather related. Colder the winter the worse they are. Or would that be climate related? I’ll defer to your expertise.
You have to realize how serious these folks are!! Most are “true believers,” who have dire images of the earth in the future….and, in some bizarre “Star Wars” sense, they seem to view one another as true champions of the planet!
The worst example I’ve ever found is Hansen’s bullcrap about the “Venus Syndrome,” see his Powerpoint slides here:
http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/2008/AGUBjerknes_20081217.pdf
He says, on Page 22 of 28:
“The Venus syndrome is the greatest threat to the planet, to humanity’s continued existence.”
…these folks have all the trademarks of religious fanatics, and seem to justify anything to “protect Gaia”! Remember the “No Pressure” campaign.
If they didn’t have so much influence, I wouldn’t worry so much. However, they advocate forced re-education of meteorologists, make veiled or open threats of violence against heretics etc. Read their material, visit their blogs & see what I mean.
John Holdren’s lecture to the NAE group in Chicago is another lovely work of art, see: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/jph-chicago-04212010.pdf
So, we have government employees advocating violence as an appropriate response to dissent?
I’m not okay with that.
Let’s face it – this is going to be the cause of World War III. The marxists feel so close to world domination now that they will do anything to push through the last few obstacles. This will cause a massive divide in the world’s populations. Those that cherish freedom on one side and the fascists on the other. That may be a good thing because then we can be justified in wiping them all out. It would be the easiest way – and hippies don’t know how to fight, so should be a cakewalk.
Is this the level to which these folks have devolved? The language of the local gang, gearing up for a gang fight? The mindset of Dr. Stadler seeking the power of Project Xylophone. Didn’t work too well for him.
“We’re in a knife fight”
Hilarious, now they’ve started to fight amongst each other with pen knives that clearly says SCUD what with they keep dropping them on their own feet.
There is no reason to fight any more.
Temps just went under the global mean.
AGW is dead.
http://www.accuweather.com/video/748914366001/global-temps-have-dropped-below-running-means-in-jan.asp?channel=vbbastaj
“1. Don’t forget who you work for, the U.S. Taxpayer.”
==========
It used to be the MSM’s job, to put the fear of god into those who have overstepped their bounds.
Apparently, now it’s our job.
I simply cannot believe the scientific community allows political advocacy and true believer words to come from scientists, ’tis unblieveable! Kinda like watching Fox, you know it ‘aint the truth, or unbiased, but people belive anyway because it fits their world view.
Corrected Rosenau’s name from Jason to Josh:
Dave Springer says:
January 16, 2011 at 1:56 pm
Interesting to note is panel member Josh Rosenau.
This cat is the propoganda minister at the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) a.k.a. National Center for Selling Evolution.
The primary modus operandi for this NGO is preventing public school teachers from speaking critically of left-wing bandwagon science/dogma in the classroom. They’ve also been involved in getting professors in public institutions black-balled for failing to preach the consensus dogma.
This is a new phase in the propoganda war. Watch for disciplinary actions against science teachers in K-12 to begin for any of them that have to audacity to question CAGW tenets in front of their students.
Karl Maki says: January 16, 2011 at 10:02 am
You have to love the attempt to rename Climategate “Swifthack”, an obvious desire to reference a well-orchestrated political attack using the media — the “Swiftboat” campaign — rather than the sloppy inside job that was Watergate. The only hacks here are the ones trying to portray themselves as victims rather than perpetrators.
***************
I believe that the comparison that they are trying to make is valid. “Swiftboating” is defined as holding liberals/Democrats accountable. Liberals/Democrats are violently opposed to that as they feel that it is unfair to remind people of what they have said and done.
Regards,
Steamboat Jack (Jon Jewett’s evil twin)
You very lucky people in the US have the ability to call on some Congressmen to “grow a pair” and demand all that the Government has paid for. Everything. Every last number, computer program, adjustment algorithm etc.
No homogenised, pasteurised, liquidised, sterilised, spindled, folded or mutilated opinions accepted.
Just what has been produced on the tax-payer’s dime (as you ex-Colonialists so aptly term it).
Someone in a Governmental position of authority must be able to demand every last shred of work for which the people of the United States have paid for, surely? NASA, GISS etc. are all paid for by the US tax payer. Can’t the tax payer actually see what they have paid for?
If not, why not?
That is disturbing language.
Men of science reduced to Brooklyn bar room brawling. This is no more a knife fight/nuke fight/sticks and stones fight…earnest and ugly tribalism has supplanted the scientific method. Now they’re getting down to it, the petty mammalian desire to dominate through violence, IS the Green/Red/Blue creed.
I’d hate to see any WUWT commentators join in, the world needs this like it needs another … [ENTER ATROCITY HERE]
Here it is:
I hope that everyone gets the point on the “knife fight” reference.
Max
From the guy who is in charge of the data (all of it that is, including the raw data), it is disturbing to hear this kind of language.
We have to turn the data collection over to a statistical organization which is not composed of indoctrinated scientists (I think Steve McIntyre recommended this originally).
You really cannot even trust the raw data going back, let alone the adjusted data. We only have the satellite data from objective organizations to rely on.
Dave Boulton says:
January 16, 2011 at 1:19 pm
“What use is a knife against Occam’s Razor?”
Nice one Dave!
Dave Springer says:
January 16, 2011 at 1:56 pm
“Interesting to note is panel member Josh Rosenau. This cat is the propoganda minister at the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) a.k.a. National Center for Selling Evolution.”
Yep, you nailed him. The boy is getting on to the big bucks, probably planning to buy furniture.
Our scientists are now politicians?
When did this happen?
Dave Springer
January 16, 2011 at 3:24 pm
Saying it twice doesn’t make evolution any less irrelevant to the discussion.
If someone claims that exposing their own words to public scrutiny (in context that that) constitutes “slander” against them, that should tell you a lot about what kind of people they are.
Also, the people with billions in government funding, a largely compliant and supportive press corps and educational establishment, and an arguable plurarily or majority of powerful political allies in the US and internationally, describe themselves as the disadvantaged party in the debate. Which would be amusing if it weren’t such a tiresome cliche. That claim has been made since the beginning, but it’s never been more ridiculous.
It is very easy for those of a critical disposition to become down hearted by the 100% constant bombardment of warmist propaganda in the Australia media.
But here is clear evidence here that the warmist scientists themsenves feel very threatened.
They fear exposure – that the truth will at last come out.
That the emperor in fact has no clothes.
It’s all very nasty and brutish.
But the weather (both north and south hemi); the US house of reps; the lack of government finance in many countries – are all working together to allow the truth to come out.
Now who was it that said that “you can fool all of the people all of the time and some of the people all of the time but you cannot fool all the people all of the time”?
Time’s nearly up.
Jeff Alberts says:
January 16, 2011 at 6:27 pm
“Saying it twice doesn’t make evolution any less irrelevant to the discussion.”
I quite agree the science is irrelevant and just to be clear I believe the earth is billions of years old and all living things descend from one or perhaps several common ancestors in unbroken cell lineages. I’m far from convinced this chain of events was without external cause or purpose. The probabilities for all we observe being due to serendipity simply beggars belief.
That said there are many parallels between the politics of selling random evolution and selling anthropogenic global warming. Both have greed, ideology, suppression of data, ridicule of skeptics, outright lies, political machinations, lies of omission, subversion of peer review, and a basic blatant failure in philosophy of science to follow the evidence wherever it leads.
My religion is scientism. I worship logic, clear unbiased thinking, and following the evidence wherever it leads. When I see corruption in science it effects me like a devout Catholic finding out his preist has been molesting the choirboys. In this regard there is little difference between evolutionary dogma and AGW dogma. Both are corrupted by ideologies that have no place in the halls of science, engineering, and technology.
“2. You’d all do better to keep your mouths shut, your public utterances are embarrassments.”
Mmmpf. Judging from Climategate and other released emails, even their private utterances are embarrassments. Better to just fire them.
CRS, Dr.P.H. says:
January 16, 2011 at 2:30 pm
“You have to realize how serious these folks are!! Most are “true believers,” who have dire images of the earth in the future….and, in some bizarre “Star Wars” sense, they seem to view one another as true champions of the planet!”
I think the true believers are mostly at the bottom of the food chain. The dancing dimwits in the recent Cancun video for instance. I equate them to the flower children of the 1960’s and don’t really fault them for it i.e. if you’re young and conservative you have no heart but if you’re old and liberal you have no brain. I can’t despise the young people for having a heart in the sure knowledge that most of them will acquire a brain when they grow up and discover the real world outside academia and hopefully not lose their heart in the process – cynics in the making. The people at the top of the food chain see them as useful idiots. The leaders are driven by power and greed and perhaps guilt to some degree for being privileged citizen of a wealthy nation by mere circumstance of birth and knowing that unbridled consumption of fossil fuel is a primary driver in how their nation became rich – victims of their own politics of guilt which is the prime motivator of the liberal left even though most of them are hypocrites who only pay lip service to redressing societal injustice.
Evolutionists are a bit different in that the leaders are driven by a belief that religion is the source of all evil and that if it just went away and was replaced by secular humanism the world would magically transform into some kind of Shangri-la where greed, injustice, strife and warfare no longer exist.
“we’re considering picking up a knife while [the] other side [is] researching nukes”
Always looking for the bright side, I’m at least glad that someone in the Climate Science Play Station Bubble has finally realized that an intentionally unhinged Propaganda Op. might be no match for reason and the Scientific Method, when the battle has to occur within Reality?……..Nah, they know we don’t fight fair and “we’re just out to get them”. It’s flat out amazing what some people can learn from a mirror!