Abandon all hope, ye who read this

Climate change to continue to year 3000 in best case scenarios

New paper in Nature Geoscience examines inertia of carbon dioxide emissions

New research indicates the impact of rising CO2 levels in the Earth’s atmosphere will cause unstoppable effects to the climate for at least the next 1000 years, causing researchers to estimate a collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet by the year 3000, and an eventual rise in the global sea level of at least four metres.

The study, to be published in the Jan. 9 Advanced Online Publication of the journal Nature Geoscience, is the first full climate model simulation to make predictions out to 1000 years from now. It is based on best-case, ‘zero-emissions’ scenarios constructed by a team of researchers from the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (an Environment Canada research lab at the University of Victoria) and the University of Calgary.

“We created ‘what if’ scenarios,” says Dr. Shawn Marshall, Canada Research Chair in Climate Change and University of Calgary geography professor. “What if we completely stopped using fossil fuels and put no more CO2 in the atmosphere? How long would it then take to reverse current climate change trends and will things first become worse?” The research team explored zero-emissions scenarios beginning in 2010 and in 2100.

The Northern Hemisphere fares better than the south in the computer simulations, with patterns of climate change reversing within the 1000-year timeframe in places like Canada. At the same time parts of North Africa experience desertification as land dries out by up to 30 percent, and ocean warming of up to 5°C off of Antarctica is likely to trigger widespread collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet, a region the size of the Canadian prairies.

Researchers hypothesize that one reason for the variability between the North and South is the slow movement of ocean water from the North Atlantic into the South Atlantic. “The global ocean and parts of the Southern Hemisphere have much more inertia, such that change occurs more slowly,” says Marshall. “The inertia in intermediate and deep ocean currents driving into the Southern Atlantic means those oceans are only now beginning to warm as a result of CO2 emissions from the last century. The simulation showed that warming will continue rather than stop or reverse on the 1000-year time scale.”

Wind currents in the Southern Hemisphere may also have an impact. Marshall says that winds in the global south tend to strengthen and stay strong without reversing. “This increases the mixing in the ocean, bringing more heat from the atmosphere down and warming the ocean.”

Researchers will next begin to investigate more deeply the impact of atmosphere temperature on ocean temperature to help determine the rate at which West Antarctica could destabilize and how long it may take to fully collapse into the water.

###

The paper “Ongoing climate change following a complete cessation of carbon dioxide emissions” by Nathan P. Gillett, Vivek K. Arora, Kirsten Zickfeld, Shawn J. Marshall and William J. Merryfield will be available online at http://www.nature.com/ngeo/index.html

============================================================

I really had to laugh at the headline provided with the press release:

Climate change to continue to year 3000 in best case scenarios

Let’s see, did the climate change at all during the last 1000 years?

It depends on who you ask.

The Hockey Team says no:

Others who are not members of the Hockey Teamsters Union of Concerned Scientists say yes:

History tells us the second graph is the more likely truth.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

227 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dacron Mather
January 11, 2011 9:16 pm

Poor Dante- what’s an honest Ghibelline doing in a place like this ?
The scientific climate of WUWT might be less infernal if the late would materialize and command Tony to abandon all hype before he enters here .
Though TV weatherman scarcely count as climatologists, they are still God’s creatures, and it is sad to see one caught in a circle of prevarication so vicious that he is tempted to render Hell as cold as possible by discounting earthly warming.

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
January 12, 2011 2:52 pm

From Dacron Mather on January 11, 2011 at 9:16 pm:

Though TV weatherman scarcely count as climatologists, they are still God’s creatures, and it is sad to see one caught in a circle of prevarication so vicious that he is tempted to render Hell as cold as possible by discounting earthly warming.

And it’s infinitely sadder to see a troll using a fake name (Cotton Mather’s synthetic great-great-great-grandson?) waiting until an article has been deserted before daring to rear its head and “boldly” make its snarky snide comments to an empty room.
Good thing I gave these comments one last look before finally closing this browser tab. It’s rare to see such displays of Proud Brash Decisiveness these days. ☺

1 8 9 10