Longstanding Mystery of Sun's Hot Outer Atmosphere Solved

From the National Science Foundation:

Answer lies in jets of plasma

Images showing narrow jets of material streaking upward from the Sun's surface at high speeds.
Narrow jets of material, called spicules, streak upward from the Sun's surface at high speeds. Credit: NASA - click to enlarge

One of the most enduring mysteries in solar physics is why the Sun’s outer atmosphere, or corona, is millions of degrees hotter than its surface.

Now scientists believe they have discovered a major source of hot gas that replenishes the corona: jets of plasma shooting up from just above the Sun’s surface.

The finding addresses a fundamental question in astrophysics: how energy is moved from the Sun’s interior to create its hot outer atmosphere.

“It’s always been quite a puzzle to figure out why the Sun’s atmosphere is hotter than its surface,” says Scott McIntosh, a solar physicist at the High Altitude Observatory of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo., who was involved in the study.

“By identifying that these jets insert heated plasma into the Sun’s outer atmosphere, we can gain a much greater understanding of that region and possibly improve our knowledge of the Sun’s subtle influence on the Earth’s upper atmosphere.”

The research, results of which are published this week in the journal Science, was conducted by scientists from Lockheed Martin’s Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory (LMSAL), NCAR, and the University of Oslo. It was supported by NASA and the National Science Foundation (NSF), NCAR’s sponsor.

“These observations are a significant step in understanding observed temperatures in the solar corona,” says Rich Behnke of NSF’s Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences, which funded the research.

“They provide new insight about the energy output of the Sun and other stars. The results are also a great example of the power of collaboration among university, private industry and government scientists and organizations.”

The research team focused on jets of plasma known as spicules, which are fountains of plasma propelled upward from near the surface of the Sun into the outer atmosphere.

For decades scientists believed spicules could send heat into the corona. However, following observational research in the 1980s, it was found that spicule plasma did not reach coronal temperatures, and so the theory largely fell out of vogue.

“Heating of spicules to millions of degrees has never been directly observed, so their role in coronal heating had been dismissed as unlikely,” says Bart De Pontieu, the lead researcher and a solar physicist at LMSAL.

Images showing the Sun's outer atmosphere, or corona, and a jet of hot material.
The Sun's outer atmosphere, or corona, is millions of degrees hotter than its surface. Credit: NASA

In 2007, De Pontieu, McIntosh, and their colleagues identified a new class of spicules that moved much faster and were shorter-lived than the traditional spicules.

These “Type II” spicules shoot upward at high speeds, often in excess of 100 kilometers per second, before disappearing.

The rapid disappearance of these jets suggested that the plasma they carried might get very hot, but direct observational evidence of this process was missing.

The researchers used new observations from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly on NASA’s recently launched Solar Dynamics Observatory and NASA’s Focal Plane Package for the Solar Optical Telescope (SOT) on the Japanese Hinode satellite to test their hypothesis.

“The high spatial and temporal resolution of the newer instruments was crucial in revealing this previously hidden coronal mass supply,” says McIntosh.

“Our observations reveal, for the first time, the one-to-one connection between plasma that is heated to millions of degrees and the spicules that insert this plasma into the corona.”

The findings provide an observational challenge to the existing theories of coronal heating.

During the past few decades, scientists proposed a wide variety of theoretical models, but the lack of detailed observation significantly hampered progress.

“One of our biggest challenges is to understand what drives and heats the material in the spicules,” says De Pontieu.

A key step, according to De Pontieu, will be to better understand the interface region between the Sun’s visible surface, or photosphere, and its corona.

Another NASA mission, the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS), is scheduled for launch in 2012 to provide high-fidelity data on the complex processes and enormous contrasts of density, temperature and magnetic field between the photosphere and corona. Researchers hope this will reveal more about the spicule heating and launch mechanism.

The LMSAL is part of the Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, which designs and develops, tests, manufactures and operates a full spectrum of advanced-technology systems for national security and military, civil government and commercial customers.

-NSF-

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

284 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
January 14, 2011 9:35 am

vukcevic says:
January 14, 2011 at 9:05 am
I was only suggesting the possibility that degree of energy exchange between a magnetosphere and the CME’s magnetic field may be limited by the strength of the magnetosphere, i.e. that the Jupiter’s magnetosphere is capable of much more powerful ‘reconnection’ than the Earth’s one.
It intercepts much more because it has a larger cross section. The theory behind all of that is given in the appendix of http://www.leif.org/research/Geomagnetic-Response-to-Solar-Wind.pdf
What is your view?
see link just given.
This is the energy input to the planet, but does not work back on the Sun [usual ‘upstream’ problem with a Mach 11 solar wind].
It is not that the ‘flux ropes’ are a million times ‘more powerful’ [they are independent of the planet], but the planet intercepting much more of the solar wind [which is partly offset by the wind being 30 times weaker].

Floyd
January 14, 2011 10:15 am

I’m a bit confused about this concept of magnetic reconnection. It involves magnetic field lines breaking and reconnecting? But magnetic field lines are not real objects, they are what we draw on paper to represent a magnetic field. Somewhat like lines of latitude and longitude, not real objects, but visual aids.

January 14, 2011 10:33 am

It is not that the ‘flux ropes’ are a million times ‘more powerful’ .
That was not implied anyway. For a possible way of feedback I referred to the link
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/LFC5.htm
where I suggest that fraction of the mass ejected is captured by magnetospheres, the rest returning in diffused form (pulled back by magnetic field and gravity).
If correct ( you strongly disagree) it would mean that the sun’s mass is not depleted at the rate previously rated.

Carla
January 14, 2011 12:39 pm

vukcevic says:
January 14, 2011 at 10:33 am
I suggest that fraction of the mass ejected is captured by magnetospheres, the rest returning in diffused form (pulled back by magnetic field and gravity).
If correct ( you strongly disagree) it would mean that the sun’s mass is not depleted at the rate previously rated.
~
Sounds like gravity getting a booster from some of the HCS reconnection (with itself) during flopping around and piling up that is occurring..
But I’m on break and best shut my trap.
Fireball over Mississipp, had to tell the older bro living down there.

January 14, 2011 1:02 pm

vukcevic says:
January 14, 2011 at 10:33 am
the rest returning in diffused form (pulled back by magnetic field and gravity).
Once the past the escape velocity matter does not return [especially since it has to work its way in against the outflow], unless the magnetic ‘pull’ is strong enough and it isn’t.

January 14, 2011 2:19 pm

So what do you think happens to the SW protons ?
Heliosphere is a closed bubble, they can’t escape, if they were accumulating at heliopause during the last 14 billion years than the Pioneer probe would hit a wall of radiation, but there is no sign of it. They must go somewhere, I suggest they just bounce back and head home for the sun, but because they are diffused and density is very low, returning protons (RP) can easily filter through SW (at 1AU<10/cm2/sec, plasma is layered anyway). At closer proximity to the sun, solar magnetic field is strong enough to pull the RP to higher latitudes, inhibiting solar activity in those regions. In the second half of the cycle there would be greater preponderance of RP (originated by just gone SS peak) pushing solar activity further down to the lower latitudes.

January 14, 2011 3:05 pm

vukcevic says:
January 14, 2011 at 2:19 pm
So what do you think happens to the SW protons ?
Heliosphere is a closed bubble, they can’t escape, if they were accumulating at heliopause during the last 14 billion years than the Pioneer probe would hit a wall of radiation, but there is no sign of it. They must go somewhere

First of all, there are an equal amount of electrons There is no ‘proton current’. The solar wind eventually becomes weaker than the interstellar medium which then sweeps away the solar emanations. You can think of a ‘stellar wind’.

Enneagram
January 15, 2011 6:11 am

vukcevic says:
January 10, 2011 at 2:30 am
The above has been on record for just over 7 years, advances in the solar observations since than have greatly enhanced possibility that the ELECTRO-MAGNETIC events and feedbacks within heliosphere are solution, not the old Newtonian mechanics.
A simple and meaningful ELECTROMAGNETIC “correlation” at 45°(Between SSN & SF):
http://daltonsminima.altervista.org/?p=13050

January 17, 2011 9:25 am

Enneagram says:
January 15, 2011 at 6:11 am
A simple and meaningful ELECTROMAGNETIC “correlation” at 45°(Between SSN & SF)
A solar eclipse is a simple and meaningful ELECTROMAGNETIC correlation as the Moon for some time reduces the ELECTROMAGNETIC radiation reaching the Earth.

1 10 11 12