From the National Science Foundation:
Answer lies in jets of plasma

One of the most enduring mysteries in solar physics is why the Sun’s outer atmosphere, or corona, is millions of degrees hotter than its surface.
Now scientists believe they have discovered a major source of hot gas that replenishes the corona: jets of plasma shooting up from just above the Sun’s surface.
The finding addresses a fundamental question in astrophysics: how energy is moved from the Sun’s interior to create its hot outer atmosphere.
“It’s always been quite a puzzle to figure out why the Sun’s atmosphere is hotter than its surface,” says Scott McIntosh, a solar physicist at the High Altitude Observatory of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo., who was involved in the study.
“By identifying that these jets insert heated plasma into the Sun’s outer atmosphere, we can gain a much greater understanding of that region and possibly improve our knowledge of the Sun’s subtle influence on the Earth’s upper atmosphere.”
The research, results of which are published this week in the journal Science, was conducted by scientists from Lockheed Martin’s Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory (LMSAL), NCAR, and the University of Oslo. It was supported by NASA and the National Science Foundation (NSF), NCAR’s sponsor.
“These observations are a significant step in understanding observed temperatures in the solar corona,” says Rich Behnke of NSF’s Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences, which funded the research.
“They provide new insight about the energy output of the Sun and other stars. The results are also a great example of the power of collaboration among university, private industry and government scientists and organizations.”
The research team focused on jets of plasma known as spicules, which are fountains of plasma propelled upward from near the surface of the Sun into the outer atmosphere.
For decades scientists believed spicules could send heat into the corona. However, following observational research in the 1980s, it was found that spicule plasma did not reach coronal temperatures, and so the theory largely fell out of vogue.
“Heating of spicules to millions of degrees has never been directly observed, so their role in coronal heating had been dismissed as unlikely,” says Bart De Pontieu, the lead researcher and a solar physicist at LMSAL.

In 2007, De Pontieu, McIntosh, and their colleagues identified a new class of spicules that moved much faster and were shorter-lived than the traditional spicules.
These “Type II” spicules shoot upward at high speeds, often in excess of 100 kilometers per second, before disappearing.
The rapid disappearance of these jets suggested that the plasma they carried might get very hot, but direct observational evidence of this process was missing.
The researchers used new observations from the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly on NASA’s recently launched Solar Dynamics Observatory and NASA’s Focal Plane Package for the Solar Optical Telescope (SOT) on the Japanese Hinode satellite to test their hypothesis.
“The high spatial and temporal resolution of the newer instruments was crucial in revealing this previously hidden coronal mass supply,” says McIntosh.
“Our observations reveal, for the first time, the one-to-one connection between plasma that is heated to millions of degrees and the spicules that insert this plasma into the corona.”
The findings provide an observational challenge to the existing theories of coronal heating.
During the past few decades, scientists proposed a wide variety of theoretical models, but the lack of detailed observation significantly hampered progress.
“One of our biggest challenges is to understand what drives and heats the material in the spicules,” says De Pontieu.
A key step, according to De Pontieu, will be to better understand the interface region between the Sun’s visible surface, or photosphere, and its corona.
Another NASA mission, the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS), is scheduled for launch in 2012 to provide high-fidelity data on the complex processes and enormous contrasts of density, temperature and magnetic field between the photosphere and corona. Researchers hope this will reveal more about the spicule heating and launch mechanism.
The LMSAL is part of the Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, which designs and develops, tests, manufactures and operates a full spectrum of advanced-technology systems for national security and military, civil government and commercial customers.
-NSF-
![]()
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Isn’t Solar Science settled?? They need Al Bore’s help.
My favorite part of the article: “we can gain a much greater understanding of that region and possibly improve our knowledge of the Sun’s subtle influence on the Earth’s upper atmosphere .”
The sun only has a subtle affect and that is limited to the upper atmosphere. Right. I guess that fully explains why summer is hotter than winter and day generally warmer than night. Subtle influence indeed. Glad we have the best minds available fully engaged in this research.
Doesn’t sound solved to me. Sounds like conjecture.
Does this mean that blog comments about certain “alternative” theories of how the sun works that get appended to almost every web site in the universe (and I assume banned here) might reduce in frequency?
We can but hope.
Is the first set of images composited? How hot are those white areas? X-Ray, Gamma?
Cool stuff. I love that there is at least some non-political content here. Keep up the good work! I’m a dedicated fan Anthony.
What say the Electric Sun people?
Is it being caused by global warming?
If the suns inhabitants ain’t careful they’ll have floods there and everyfink.
This doesn’t explain the problem at all.
The sun’s surface is about 6000 degrees.
The corona is over a million degrees.
So how does a jet of material from the surface help?
Josh Grella says: (January 7, 2011 at 6:15 am)
“I guess that fully explains why summer is hotter than winter and day generally warmer than night.”
Those differences are due to what is happening on Earth not on the Sun.
Saying the temperture of the corona is millions of degrees is sort of like saying socks in a clothes dryer have an electric charge of 30,000 volts. Sounds scary high but in reality there is so little total electrical energy in those socks it isn’t enough to power a pissant’s Prius halfway around the inside of a Cheerio. Likewise the total energy radiated by the corona is only 0.004% of that radiated by the photosphere. You couldn’t measure its temperature with any kind of actual thermometer – the temperature must be inferred by spectral analysis of the radiation coming from it.
I predict a concatenation of Erl Happenstances.
============
But of course! This also explains how the Earth is heated from it’s surface. There are “Type IIIAGW” spicules that shoot upward at high speeds. Most recently observed at Cancun and at speeches by James Hansen and Michael Mann. Of course there are “Type IVReverse” spicules that are only observed in the vicinity of Al Gore. These suck heat from both the Earth and the atmosphere creating titanic cooling. The formerly mysterious Gore Effect is now fully explained. It was confirmed at Gore’s most recent trip to China and caused over 1200 homes to collapse from snow during one of Gores spittle, uh, spicules filled sermons.
I’m pretty sure temperatures on the sun are controlled by our production of CO2.
Dave Springer says:
January 7, 2011 at 7:30 am
“You couldn’t measure its temperature with any kind of actual thermometer – the temperature must be inferred by spectral analysis of the radiation coming from it.”
We could extrapolate the anomaly from the next thermometer… if it’s within 1200 light years radius.
Josh Grella says: January 7, 2011 at 6:15 am
The sun only has a subtle affect and that is limited to the upper atmosphere…. Glad we have the best minds available fully engaged in this research.
Thank God for the blogosphere. I bet those solar physicists are here right now learning that the sun does more than provide subtle effects in the upper atmosphere. Next week, I’ll tell them that the sun’s gravity doesn’t just influence the tides, but also affects the earth’s orbit.
Why would the corona at millions (poorly quantified) of degrees not be incandescent and obscure the sun’s surface? So these cold spicules shoot up and heat the corona to millions of degrees? Why do the headlines always have an order of magnitude more certainty than the body of the work? For such a major discovery about the corona that has puzzled s. phizz for centuries – there sure seems to be a lot of question marks, even in my comment. I don’t know the existing theories but surely the phenom must involve a quantum (plain Englsh here) jump in particle motion – perhaps some sort of phase change. Are they suggesting that the spicules rush out and swirl the atmospheric particles at enormous speeds – a mechanical phenomenon? Oops another questionmark.
Are they jets of Iron?
(OK, I’ll get my coat!)
Gary Pearse says:
“Why do the headlines always have an order of magnitude more certainty than the body of the work?’
Indeed, a very good question, as are the others in your post. There are still way too many questions for them to act as if the other ideas have been debunked or to even know that they have a good idea at all.
Problem NOT solved, only further conjecture. How can a hot plasma jet exit a cold surface overcoming massive gravity? poorly put I know but several posters here nail the oddities.
Dreaming up a story is not a solution. Sadly modern astronomy is full of dreams very little fact. Where they obtain facts, disproving the theories, the theories tend to be replaced not with new theories better able to depict the observations , but new dragons, new dreams, new mystical forces or matter.
reminds me of globull warming models.
“I’m pretty sure temperatures on the sun are controlled by our production of CO2.”
Obviously true… after all the Sun’s atmosphere is closer to us and our wayward ways than the surface.
If the spicules heat the corona, what heats the spicules? There is no cause and effect shown, only a correlation. Could be equally true that the corona is heating the spicules.
No, it is not likely that science has the best minds, certainly not in the US. Science related job in the US tend to pay only a fraction of what can be earned in finance, investment, law and medicine. As a result, science has become an easy target for political corruption.
Consider political office in the US. It costs tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars to campaign for a job that pays hundreds of thousands. Why would anyone do this unless there was some pay-off. The obvious answer is that political office allows you to direct the taxpayers money in such a way as to recoup the investment in gaining office. You take care of your friends and they will take care of you.
However, to redirect the taxpayers money you need evidence to support this, otherwise it will appear to be corruption. This becomes to the role of science. The low pay of scientists makes them an easy target for manipulation through the control of government grant money.
As a result taxpayer money is not spent wisely. It is spent to justify the large sums spent in gaining political office, using science to avoid the appearance of corruption. What Climategate exposed was the tip of the iceberg. It doesn’t just involve the scientists. It reaches to the highest political offices and their backers. The money and power that finances the politicians and owns the news outlets. Which is why the institutions involved have worked so hard to cover up the problem and absolve those involved of any wrong doing.
Tom in Florida says:
January 7, 2011 at 7:26 am
What say the Electric Sun people?
“Bzzzzzzzt”
Gary Pearse says:
January 7, 2011 at 7:59 am
“Why would the corona at millions (poorly quantified) of degrees not be incandescent and obscure the sun’s surface?”
Because the density is close to zero. Particles in it are so far apart you can see straight through it almost like it wasn’t there at all.
I am a mortal ordinary sceptic.
Any element heated up to about ~2000K shows continues spectrum, above that temperature ionisation starts and discrete spectral lines start appearing. With 100% ionisation, elements as such do not exist, just protons (in case of sun one from H or 2 from He, there are small amounts of other heavier elements) and free electrons, i.e. plasma. At this point it is a bit misleading talking about temperature in degrees K, it is more particles energy in eV.
Very short light wavelengths, as shown in discrete spectral lines, have high energy (in eV) but that does not mean that they have temperatures of millions of degrees K in normal sense of temperature.
Take example of a neon (argon or other gas tube), its light has very short wavelength (lines towards the high end of spectrum), but the gas inside tube is not heated at many 1000s or hundreds of 1000s degrees K.