People send me stuff. Nigel Rios writes in with a great compendium of Time Magazine covers that illustrate the history of that magazine’s global warming coverage from the 1970’s to the present. It’s worth the click.
Full sized suitable for printing: large version 2576×1932 pixels
Of course this is all just fun and satire, but for those who didn’t get the spoof, there’s further reading. Check out this WUWT story on Time’s recent article about the December snows of 2010, where they were dead serious.
Time Magazine blizzard science sets low standard for green journalism
Happy New Year!
If global warming makes it hot enough the whole world will be covered in snow.
When you are HOT
you are COOL!
Here are some search results from Time regarding cooling and ice age.
http://search.time.com/results.html?D=global+cooling+ice+age&sid=12D413317EF9&Ntt=global+cooling+ice+age&Ntk=WithBody2009&Ntx=mode+matchallpartial%2bsnip%2bp_body%3a25&Ns=p_date_range|0&N=0&Nty=1
I enjoyed reading Time 40 years ago, but either my tastes and sensibilities have changed or it has become breathlessly and eagerly sycophantic of the latest non-science.
At least they used the term ‘global warming’, which is a lot more honest than ‘climate change’, which can mean anything.
But in another way it’s sad. Clearly the good people at Time magazine are so taken in by the global warming delusion that they are incapable of realising just how ridiculous that front page looks.
Chris
At least they used the term ‘global warming’, which is a lot more honest than ‘climate change’, which can mean anything.
But in another way it’s pretty sad. Clearly the good people at Time magazine are so obsessed by the global warming delusion that they are incapable of realising how ridiculous that front page looks.
Chris
AGW is the prohibition of our time.
Ah well. Move along, nothing to see here.
The magazine cover for 2010 appears to be a fabrication: there is none of the usual date/publication information running along the top of the page and the “TIME” font seems inconsistent with previous magazine covers.
That said, it can only be a matter of time before something similar graces the front of the magazine.
REPLY: Note the tags, humor, satire. For some people that didn’t get the joke I added a link to our recent article on Time’s coverage of the December Snows, where they were dead serious. – Anthony
So upon seeing this post my first thought was, “Hasn’t Time done the standard cuddly polar bear / dwindling ice thing on the cover?”
Yep:
http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20060403,00.html
And they did a cute little penguin too:
http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20070409,00.html
Thanks for the first chuckle of the Year:-)
the beauty of Hard print is?
such solid evidence of their idiocy.
after all we can’t trust the internet ..can we?
amazing how many quote that, when the same people IE media andso called? scientists also publish to the net, when journos have no idea at all about what they are covering, but they have a job with a named company, immediate absolution of the need to question it seems.
This is unfair on the poor dears.
Anyone can make a mistake, ……like,
Making Adolf the man of the year 1938
And for that matter the dear old uncle Joe man of the year 1939 (and 1942……..only three years after he also invaded Poland, so you see, full rehab is a possibility………..er……
Wow. So, I guess that time and ‘Time’ are both one-dimensional. Who knew?
If you spell Time backwards you get “Emit”.
Dark forces are at work. There is a parallel universe where Time goes backwards. (It started about 1990).
There, cold causes heat and heat causes cold.
Drink pure “Evian” water sold by “Natasha”.
Beware of trivia.
Eat this after your medication. Is it a blue pill night or a red pill night?
Could it be that our honored members of the press, just like our political establishment, our educators, civil servants etc. have been brainwashed?
Times Higher Education – Weather forecasting and climate change …
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=169872§ioncode=26
U.S. journalists in Dominican Republic environment seminar …
http://www.dominicantoday.com/dr/people/2007/3/18/23163/US-journalists-in-Dominican-Republic-environment-seminar
Making Waves (Climate Change Seminar organized by Reuters)
http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/events/archive/past-conferences-and-lectures/media-the-environment-workshop-reporting-climate-change.html
And Met Office of course
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/training/climatechange/empower_201005.pdf
This is only the top of ice berg:
Climate Change seminars are big business, 5,900,000 Google hits
journalist in Google = 735.000 hits
climate Change Seminar Government = 3,610,000 hits
Here is the Met Office web site
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/training/climatechange/
If we want to stop the AGW nonsense, we have to start with the seminar circus.
It’s big business
Time covers are here. http://www.time.com/time/coversearch. I can’t find the 2010 one in this database. Perhaps Nigel can tell us in which week it appeared?
Unless, of course it is a fabrication/mock-up. In which case this should probably be stated to avoid intellectual property/copyright/misrepresentation issues.
I love these reminders of what experts were saying in the past – thanks for the graphic Nigel.
Also thanks to Juraj V for his link to a 1974 article in Time (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,944914,00.html#ixzz0f9xPtGuL) which has a few wonderful phrases in it – I particularly liked:
“global climatic upheaval” which is so much more dynamic than the wimpy “global climate disruption” used today
“During 1972 record rains in parts of the U.S., Pakistan and Japan caused some of the worst flooding in centuries.”
“Areas of Baffin Island in the Canadian Arctic, for example, were once totally free of any snow in summer; now they are covered year round.”
“Man, too, may be somewhat responsible for the cooling trend.” So we should know how to counteract any warming since we have shown we could to it before.”
“Whatever the cause of the cooling trend, its effects could be extremely serious, if not catastrophic.”
“But there is a peril more immediate than the prospect of another ice age.”
It it a wonderful testimony to the predictive powers of scientists.
Also a litttle OT, but in today’s Daily Telegraph, the resident weather forecaster, Philip Eden, has pointed out that 2010 was one of the coldest years in the last century in UK – coldest since 1986 and only 9 colder in the preceding 100 years.
How apt is the scecond picture,globull warming represented by cooking !!!…………
cooking the temp data, sums it up nicely.
Cooling climate change occurred in the 1970’s. Curious how cooling climate change correlates with solar magnetic cycle changes. As cycle 24 appears to be an interruption rather than a slow down of the solar magnetic cycle we will likely have a chance to observe cooling climate change. (There are cycles of these abrupt climate changes periods that correlate with the cosmogenic isotope changes. The cosmogenic isotopes are modulated by changes in GCR (galactic cosmic rays, mostly high speed protons.) GCR is in turn modulated by the strength and extent of the solar heliosphere (The solar heliosphere contains pieces of magnetic flux from the sun that are carried off by the solar wind. The pieces of magnetic flux deflect the GCR particles.) and the strength and orientation of the geomagnetic field. (The geomagnetic field orientation abruptly changes cyclically by roughly 10 to 15% and changes in strength by a factor of 3 to 5 cyclically. The orientation and the strength the geomagnetic field affects the GCR intensity at different latitudes on the planet.)
http://www.utdallas.edu/physics/pdf/Atmos_060302.pdf
“An effect of increased cyclogenesis is to increase the meridional transport of heat and momentum and weaken the prevailing westerly zonal winds, as we see in Figure
7(d) for central western Europe. Thus increased cyclogenesis in the North Atlantic due to greater GCR flux during the Maunder Minimum may have contributed to the
reduced zonal winds and colder winters in Europe at that time [Luterbacher et al., 2001]. The main effect has been attributed by Shindell et al. [2001] to reduced solar UV during the Maunder Minimum. The quantitative study of the dynamical consequences of externally forced cloud and diabatic heating changes has received little attention so far, but the physical theory needed for numerically modeling such effects seems to be reasonably well established. Such models would provide a good test of the general scenario describe …”
Blizzard of 1977
Blizzard of 1978
Interesting that the Newsweek 1974 Cooling World article noted a scientists at the time had observed an increase in planetary cloud cover. High GCR causes both an increase in the area of cloud cover and an increase in the albedo and lifetime of clouds.
http://denisdutton.com/newsweek_coolingworld.pdf
“1974 Newsweek Article Cooling World:
The evidence in support of these predictions has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it. In England, farmers have seen their growing season decline by about two weeks since 1950, with a resultant overall loss in grain production estimated at up to 100,000 tons annually. During the same time, the average temperature around the equator has risen by a fraction of a degree – a fraction that in some areas can mean drought and desolation. Last April, in the most devastating outbreak of tornadoes ever recorded, 148 twisters killed more than 300 people and caused half a billion dollars’ worth of damage in 13 U.S. states.
To scientists, these seemingly disparate incidents represent the advance signs of fundamental changes in the world’s weather. The central fact is that after three quarters of a century of extraordinarily mild conditions, the earth’s climate seems to be cooling down. Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the cooling trend, as well as over its specific impact on local weather conditions. But they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century. If the climatic change is as profound as some of the pessimists fear, the resulting famines could be catastrophic. “A major climatic change would force economic and social adjustments on a worldwide scale,” warns a recent report by the National Academy of Sciences, “because the global patterns of food production and population that have evolved are implicitly dependent on the climate of the present century.”
The seminar circuit is self sustaining.
The journalists who serves the case of climate change best makes a good chance to be invited as a speaker at the next seminar.
That brings honor and serious money.
Richard Black is such an example.
These practices have undermined the journalistic independence of our media for a long time and they are beyond saving.
But when I look at the public comments that are left with warmist publications they are failing.
The general public knows what’s going on and people are a lot smarter than given credit for.
Mother Nature does the rest.
Time magazine is also famous for picking the tops and bottoms of the stock market over the years.
When the cover page shows how high the Dow is; that is the peak.
Also, when the cover shows a chart of the Dow and how low it is; that’s the bottom.
Another observation was that, if a CEO made the cover of time his career was over.
Or as mentioned above for Adolph.
More global warming for the USA
Global warming research stuck in a loop? Its the MSM suffering some major trauma thinking snow is warming, bless em for their efforts hehe.
Happy new year one & all!
Time magazine mood swings.
The difference in spatio temporal continuity between the flagulation of one deceased quadruped and the next…or the previous one.
Ah – I speculate that Mr Rios took this story http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,2039777,00.html and elevated it to a ‘mocked up’ cover story for ‘satirical purposes.
REPLY: Bingo, congrats as you are the first commenter to make this distinction – Anthony