3% of Earth's landmass is now urbanized

This study, from 2005, is not one I’ve covered here before, but I thought it was relevant to have a look at as a logical followup to the recent announcement from NASA at AGU that satellites have identified strong UHI signatures in cities. The vast majority of the world’s surface weather stations used to monitor climate are in urban areas, many in the GHCN for example are at urban airports. h/t to Joe and Pete. – Anthony

From Columbia University Earth Institute: The Growing Urbanization of the World

GRUMP mapping project finds urban areas increasing in surprising ways

mapNew data collection from CIESIN’s Global Rural Urban Mapping Project shows that as much as three percent of the Earth’s land area has already been urbanized, which is double previous estimates. The map above illustrates the extent of some urban areas, with callouts overlayed by ecosystem. click here for larger image 

The majority of the world’s population will soon live in urban rather than rural areas. Adding a spatial dimension to population estimates, a new study finds that as much as three percent of the Earth’s land area has already been urbanized, which is double previous estimates.

This new data collection, known as the Global Rural Urban Mapping Project, or GRUMP, has provided the basis for a number of important insights not previously known. This project is led by the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), part of the Earth Institute.

The following are a few key insights from GRUMP:

  • GRUMP shows that 20% of the world’s urban population live in settlements that have populations below 500,000. This is an important finding considering that the UN Population Division only reports on urban settlements of 500,000 inhabitants or more.
  • GRUMP data indicate that roughly 3% of the Earth’s land surface is occupied by urban areas, an increase of at least 50% over previous estimates that urban areas occupied 1-2% of the Earth’s total land area.
  • Coastal environments have much higher concentrations of urban land area (10%) and urban populations (65%) than other ecosystems.
  • Far fewer Asian and African urban residents live in coastal and cultivated areas than residents of the Americas, Europe and Oceania, however, population densities in coastal cities of Asia and Africa are much greater than those on other continents.
  • GRUMP shows that approximately 7% of the world’s population now resides in the largest mega-cities, whereas experts had previously estimated this number to be around 4%.
  • GRUMP has identified about 75,000 distinct settlements worldwide, but only 24,000 urban areas—the result of many agglomerated urban settlements.
mapGRUMP has identified about 75,000 distinct settlements worldwide, but only 24,000 urban areas—the result of many agglomerated urban settlements. The above populations map highlights clusters of urban areas around the world. click here for a larger interactive version of this map 

“The GRUMP datasets will allow us to rethink trends in urbanization and the relationship between population, ecosystems and land use,” explained Dr. Deborah Balk, a demographer at CIESIN and the principal investigator of GRUMP. “GRUMP shows us that the urban experience is not uniform, that city-size matters, and city distribution matters. Coastal areas are more urban than other ecosystems, for example, and even rural populations in coastal ecosystems are much denser than in other rural areas.”

This study has resulted in the construction of a suite of products constituting the first detailed and systematic data sets on urban population distribution and the extents of human settlements across the globe.

Although population census and satellite data have been available for some time, until now minimal effort had been made to combine these two kinds of information to capture the geographic boundaries of human settlements.

The GRUMP data collection consists of three individual databases that build upon population datasets mostly from national statistical offices, satellite data and other representations of settlements. GRUMP Human Settlements is a global database of cities and towns of 1,000 persons or more, each represented as a point, and includes information on population sizes, longitude and latitude coordinates, and data sources. Populations were estimated for 1990, 1995 and 2000. The GRUMP Urban ExtentMask is the first systematic global-scale attempt to portray the boundaries of urban areas with defined populations of 5,000 and larger. The GRUMP Population Grid represents the distribution of human population across the globe, accounting for urban population concentration more precisely than previous efforts. It allows for inferences about urban versus rural populations, and cities of different sizes, when used in combination with the Urban Extent Mask.

In contrast, prior data sets such as those from the United Nations or the Digital Chart of the World indicated either the population size or extent of urban areas, but not both.

“For us, knowing more about the number and distribution of rural populations is critical,” said Stanley Wood, head of the Spatial Analysis Research Group at the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) that supported and collaborated on GRUMP. “Past spatial population datasets have confounded urban and rural populations, but the better we can distinguish patterns of rural population, farming and use of natural resources, the better placed we are to address the major challenges of rural development and poverty alleviation. GRUMP is an important step in the right direction.”

GRUMP delineates urban boundaries across the planet ranging in size from 1 km2 to the largest of urban extents, Tokyo, which includes more than 500 connected settlements and is the largest urbanized area in the world at 30,000 km2. “The night-time lights satellite, the [primary technology used to detect] urban extents, tends to overestimate the geographic size of highly-electrified cities, but for those cities, we have much more detailed sub-city population data to supplement the extent information,” said Balk. GRUMP has shown that in the year 2000, there were 24,000 urban areas across the globe with 5,000 residents or more. “We know that this is an undercount, because the poorest countries have urban areas that were either hard to detect with the satellite or have weak census-taking. This method is novel and a huge improvement over previous databases. It’s not perfect, but it’s an important achievement,” Balk said.

“Eventually, GRUMP data should revolutionize the way population figures are debated and discussed,” said Dr. Gordon McGranahan, Director of the Human Settlements Programme at the International Institute for Environment and Development.  “The GRUMP presentation of data, particularly if combined with population estimates by location, is so much more amenable to up- and down-scaling and local verification than conventional tables.”

GRUMP data took four years to compile. It drew on years of investment from the Gridded Population of the World (GPW) project in which population counts are converted from irregularly and administratively defined census units to a uniform latitude-longitude grid.

The GRUMP datasets, as well as the newest release (version 3) of GPW, may be accessed through the NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), operated by CIESIN, at http://beta.sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw/

GRUMP and GPW datasets and map collections are distributed free of charge.

GRUMP is a collaborative project with partners from IFPRI, the World Bank and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture. Primary financial support was provided by the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration, IFPRI, and the World Conservation Monitoring Center for the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (www.maweb.org).

The Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), a member of the Earth Institute at Columbia University, works at the intersection of the social, natural, and information sciences. Scientists at CIESIN specialize in online data and information management, spatial data integration and training, and interdisciplinary research related to human interactions in the environment. CIESIN researchers seek to provide data that informs scientific, public and private decision-makers worldwide. For more information, visit www.earth.columbia.edu

The Earth Institute at Columbia University is the world’s leading academic center for the integrated study of Earth, its environment and society. The Earth Institute builds upon excellence in the core disciplines — earth sciences, biological sciences, engineering sciences, social sciences and health sciences — and stresses cross-disciplinary approaches to complex problems. Through research, training and global partnerships, it mobilizes science and technology to advance sustainable development, while placing special emphasis on the needs of the world’s poor. For more information, visit www.earth.columbia.edu.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
55 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sully
December 24, 2010 8:38 am

Steven Mosher,
I can understand why one or a few stations would buck a trend; but just to be clear, are you saying that the majority of clearly rural stations with long records show a positive trend since 1950? When I skimmed around the surfacestations.org site (clicking on the random pick button picture in the lower left hand corner) after seeing the other Steven’s link I found a half dozen in a row that seemed to have no trend at all or a downward trend before I found a couple that had a positive trend. A small sample; but it made me curious.

December 24, 2010 10:14 am

97% not. But the world is overpopulated.
;O)

ge0050
December 24, 2010 4:45 pm

We travelled by small boat through Indonesia 2000-2001. We found all the “uninhabited” islands listed in the Pilot Guides from WWII were in fact now inhabited. Even small sand cays were packed with stilt houses.
Around 1900, about 4% of the earth’s surface was used by humans in total, including agriculture. Now we use 10 times as much, with agricultre at 37% and urban use at 3%.
If there is a AGW effect, land use would be top of my list. Since 1850 CO2 has apparently doubled, with about 1 degree C warming. There is no reason to expect the next doubling of CO2 will have a greater effect.

eadler
December 24, 2010 9:37 pm

Bill DiPuccio says:
December 23, 2010 at 6:35 pm
“For the continental US, the 2004 constructed surface area survey (NOAA) was very thorough (more thorough than the 2007 global survey). Scientists used Landsat data, satellite observed nighttime lights, U.S. Census Bureau road vectors, and high resolution aerial photographs.
However, population density was not considered. So, one cannot assume that a ‘rural’ station is class one. Station classification has to be done one at a time–as Anthony has shown us.”
Using Anthony’s class 1 stations to calculate at the US annual average temperature anomaly trend made no difference, from the trend calculated from all the stations in the US data base.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/images/surface_stations.gif
So while the temperature from these stations is influenced by their improper configuration it turns out that it doesn’t seem to affect the temperature changes over time since 1950. The temperature anomaly trend looks the same for class 1 stations as for the total data base.
[The data they used was preliminary from Mr. Watts, at only 40% surveyed. There were only a handful of class 1 stations. The data was used without his consent, and not yet quality controlled. Like SkepSci, you cite it because it is convenient to what you want to believe. Nobody seems to care if the data was prelim, not QC, or that Mr. Watts hadn’t even done an analysis yet. They were just interested in smacking down the project before Mr. Watts had a chance to publish. Mr. Watts has completed the project and has over 1000 station now, and a peer reviewed paper is in process. I wouldn’t be so quick to jump to conclusions just yet. You really should read up on it here. There are things you obviously know nothing about related to the project, just like skepticalscience. see this: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/27/rumours-of-my-death-have-been-greatly-exaggerated/ -moderator]

Brian H
December 26, 2010 2:12 am

Baa Humbug says:
December 23, 2010 at 8:55 am
Obviously the actual space occupied by humans is minimal. It’s the space required to grow and raise our food that’s the problem.
Conceivably, if power was really really cheap and plentiful, say modular nuclear plants the size of phone booths, we could build multi storey farms right in the cities and towns.
No need for long distance transport, no need for long term refigeration etc etc
Level 5 – tomatoes. Level 7 – green beans lol

No problem
focusfusion.org (5MW from a shipping container, ¼¢/kwh.)
+
http://www.verticalfarm.com/ or
http://weburbanist.com/2008/03/30/5-urban-design-proposals-for-3d-city-farms-sustainable-ecological-and-agricultural-skyscrapers/
Will that do?