Quick, somebody slap a carbon tax on this new planet

NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope Reveals First Carbon-Rich Planet

Signature of a Carbon-Rich Planet This plot of data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope indicates the presence of molecules in the planet WASP-12b -- a super-hot gas giant that orbits tightly around its star. Spitzer measurements suggest this planet's atmosphere has carbon monoxide, excess methane, and not much water vapor. The results demonstrate that WASP-12b is the first known carbon-rich planet. Spitzer made these measurements as the planet circled behind the star, in an event called the secondary eclipse. The telescope collected the infrared light from the star and the planet, then just the star as the planet disappeared behind the star. This allowed astronomers to calculate the amount of infrared light coming solely from the planet. The observations were performed at four different wavelengths of infrared light. These data were then combined with previously reported measurements taken by the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope atop Mauna Kea, Hawaii, at shorter infrared wavelengths to create this plot. The yellow dots show the data, along with the observational uncertainties. The blue curve is a model of the planet's light, or spectrum, showing the fingerprints of chemicals in the atmosphere. The blue dots represent the blue model curve averaged to cover the same wavelengths as the data, as shown by the gray lines at the bottom of the plot. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/CFHT/MIT/Princeton/UCF

PASADENA, Calif. — Astronomers have discovered that a huge, searing-hot planet orbiting another star is loaded with an unusual amount of carbon. The planet, a gas giant named WASP-12b, is the first carbon-rich world ever observed. The discovery was made using NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope, along with previously published ground-based observations.

“This planet reveals the astounding diversity of worlds out there,” said Nikku Madhusudhan of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, lead author of a report in the Dec. 9 issue of the journal Nature. “Carbon-rich planets would be exotic in every way — formation, interiors and atmospheres.”

It’s possible that WASP-12b might harbor graphite, diamond, or even a more exotic form of carbon in its interior, beneath its gaseous layers. Astronomers don’t currently have the technology to observe the cores of exoplanets, or planets orbiting stars beyond our sun, but their theories hint at these intriguing possibilities.

The research also supports theories that carbon-rich rocky planets much less massive than WASP-12b could exist around other stars. Our Earth has rocks like quartz and feldspar, which are made of silicon and oxygen plus other elements. A carbon-rich rocky planet could be a very different place.

“A carbon-dominated terrestrial world could have lots of pure carbon rocks, like diamond or graphite, as well as carbon compounds like tar,” said Joseph Harrington of the University of Central Florida, in Orlando, who is the principal investigator of the research.

Carbon is a common component of planetary systems and a key ingredient of life on Earth. Astronomers often measure carbon-to-oxygen ratios to get an idea of a star’s chemistry. Our sun has a carbon-to-oxygen ratio of about one to two, which means it has about half as much carbon as oxygen. None of the planets in our solar system is known to have more carbon than oxygen, or a ratio of one or greater. However, this ratio is unknown for Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Unlike WASP-12b, these planets harbor water — the main oxygen carrier — deep inside their atmospheres, making it hard to detect.

WASP-12b is the first planet ever to have its carbon-to-oxygen ratio measured at greater than one (the actual ratio is most likely between one and two). This means the planet has excess carbon, some of which is in the form of atmospheric methane.

“When the relative amount of carbon gets that high, it’s as though you flip a switch, and everything changes,” said Marc Kuchner, an astronomer at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md., who helped develop the theory of carbon-rich rocky planets but is not associated with the study. “If something like this had happened on Earth, your expensive engagement ring would be made of glass, which would be rare, and the mountains would all be made of diamonds.”

Madhusudhan, Harrington and colleagues used Spitzer to observe WASP-12b as it slipped behind its star, in a technique known as secondary eclipse, which was pioneered for exoplanets by Spitzer. These data were combined with previously published observations taken from the ground with the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope at Mauna Kea, Hawaii. Madhusudhan used the data to conduct a detailed atmospheric analysis, revealing chemicals such as methane and carbon monoxide in the planet’s atmosphere.

WASP-12b derives its name from the consortium that found it, the Wide Angle Search for Planets. It is 1.4 times as massive as Jupiter and located roughly 1,200 light-years away from Earth. This blistering world whips around its star in a little over a day, with one side always facing the star. It is so close to its star that the star’s gravity stretches the planet into an egg-like shape. What’s more, the star’s gravity is siphoning mass off the planet into a thin disk that orbits around with it.

The Spitzer data also reveal more information about WASP-12b’s temperature. The world was already known to be one of the hottest exoplanets found so far; the new observations indicate that the side that faces the star is 2,600 Kelvin, or 4,200 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s more than hot enough to melt steel.

Other authors of the paper are Kevin Stevenson, Sarah Nymeyer, Christopher Campo, Jasmina Blecic, Ryan Hardy, Nate Lust, Christopher Britt and William Bowman of University of Central Florida, Orlando; Peter Wheatley of the University of Warwick, United Kingdom; Drake Deming of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.; David Anderson, Coel Hellier and Pierre Maxted of Keele University, United Kingdom; Andrew Collier-Cameron of the University of St. Andrews, United Kingdom; Leslie Hebb of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.; Don Pollacco of Queen’s University, United Kingdom; and Richard West of the University of Leicester, United Kingdom.

The Spitzer observations were made before it ran out of its liquid coolant in May 2009 and began its warm mission. NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., manages the Spitzer mission for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, Washington. Science operations are conducted at the Spitzer Science Center at the California Institute of Technology, also in Pasadena. Caltech manages JPL for NASA. For more information about Spitzer, visit http://spitzer.caltech.edu/ and http://www.nasa.gov/spitzer . More information about NASA’s search for exoplanets is at: http://planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/ .

h/t to WUWT reader “Enneagram”

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
38 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James F. Evans
December 10, 2010 10:43 am

Another hydrocarbon rich planet.
Oh, my, what a surprise!

Curiousgeorge
December 10, 2010 10:45 am

Can’t let my wife read this. She’d want to go shopping there. 😉

December 10, 2010 10:46 am

Methane? Seems like there are now lots of planets and moons, with no plant life, that contain oil or oil compounds, which supposedly takes trees and stuff to make fossil oil … hey wait, something isn’t right about all this fossil fuel baloney.
Synthetic oil?

Richard
December 10, 2010 10:48 am

2,600 Kelvin is about 2,200 Celsius.. I think the warmists found there hell for earth.

December 10, 2010 11:02 am

Richard says:
December 10, 2010 at 10:48 am
2,600 Kelvin is about 2,200 Celsius.. I think the warmists found there hell for earth.

No problem, Earth’s thermo-sphere reaches 1,500 Celsius:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermosphere
The problem is that we can only observe that planet’s thermo-sphere only from the outside, we don’t know how it looks at the surface.
As for the methane they are a lot of cows over there 🙂

Douglas DC
December 10, 2010 11:06 am

Actually Hansen used his Home planet -Venus a an example of Hell for Earth…Fortunately, he forgot to bring Gort… Er wait a mintute-Gore?Gort?Hmmm….

Gary Pearse
December 10, 2010 11:13 am

I hope this doesn’t become the poster child for a CAGW future for planet earth – remember they don’t believe the earth’s star is a significant factor in the “warming”.

December 10, 2010 11:22 am

CuriousGeorge – our wives must be related. 😉

Chris Reeve
December 10, 2010 11:34 am

Re: “This blistering world whips around its star in a little over a day, with one side always facing the star. It is so close to its star that the star’s gravity stretches the planet into an egg-like shape. What’s more, the star’s gravity is siphoning mass off the planet into a thin disk that orbits around with it.”
Within the electric universe view, these thin disks which surround stars are instead ejecta, and the planet is likely to have recently been ejected by the host star.
But, of course, the Big Bang’s former competitor — plasma cosmology — is not taught to college physics students, and so none of them would have any idea whether or not the data supports this alternative inference that planets are ejected from stars due to electrical stellar stressing.
And the fact is that most people would just prefer to blindly argue against it than investigate it for themselves.

Richard
December 10, 2010 11:34 am

Venus with 480 C is about 180 milion km from the sun and needs 224 days to circle the sun. WASP-12b cycles its sun in 1.1 days. Or WASP-12b is very close to its sun and therefore hot or it is cycling at incredible speeds around its sun.

Baa Humbug
December 10, 2010 11:35 am

Diamonds sticking out of rocks?
They found supermans place.
But it’s dirty like a coal mine and stinks to high heaven.

Brian S
December 10, 2010 11:41 am

“Our sun has a carbon-to-oxygen ratio of about one to two, which means it has about half as much carbon as oxygen.”
CO2? No wonder it’s so hot!

patrick healy
December 10, 2010 11:43 am

And i believed that the cow(s) jumped over the moon and expelled all that methane.
Also wot is all this about a White Anglo Saxon Protestant planet WASP-12b? are there there no Jewish or Catholic ones out there?
I think we should be told.

DirkH
December 10, 2010 11:55 am

NASA’s playing the race card.

Richard
December 10, 2010 12:23 pm

Chris Reeve : As long as we have no further intel nor on the dimensions of the star , nor the planet , either way is sheer speculation.
Its could be a run off from the star as you proposed. That would , at the high speeds resulting from the time to orbid the star , create a frisbee shaped sattelite disc being trapped into orbid by the gravity of the star. It could be a little star though.
questions, questions.

Stephen Brown
December 10, 2010 12:41 pm

This one-line sentence stood out above all others in the post:
“Carbon is a common component of planetary systems and a key ingredient of life on Earth.</b/"

Stephen Brown
December 10, 2010 12:43 pm

Oh, bolleaux!

Michael J. Dunn
December 10, 2010 1:00 pm

I can see where they can make an argument for low levels of oxygen, but their logic fails to support any statement about the planetary surface. We have an atmosphere of nitrogen, oxygen, and water. Do we then conclude that our planet Earth consists of nitric acid? Of course not.
Otherwise, what they are describing is just another gas giant, like Jupiter. They say Jupiter is different in that it has water—but so deep in its atmosphere, it is hard to detect (…indeed, how then did we detect it?). But if this planet is so close to its sun as described, solar UV can easily break down water in its upper atmosphere—and also carbon dioxide. It may well be that carbon monoxide is the only stable form of gaseous oxygen available in an atmosphere that is rich in carbon and hydrogen, but bathed in UV (remember that Jupiter is remote from our sun). If the surface of the planet is silicate, how would the atmosphere tell us that? It doesn’t tell us that about the Earth.
The nice thing about these bombastic claims, from NASA’s standpoint, is that no one is likely to be able to prove them wrong for several centuries, if not millenia or longer.

peterhodges
December 10, 2010 1:06 pm

one must keep in mind this is all inferred from proxy data
no actual planet has actually been observed.
i am not against the research, maybe some day it can be confirmed.
just don’t take it as gospel

E.M.Smith
Editor
December 10, 2010 1:24 pm

Well, guess that kind of puts the ‘Peak Oil’ thesis to bed… A LOT more to mine out there 😉

December 10, 2010 2:39 pm

peterhodges says:
December 10, 2010 at 1:06 pm
no actual planet has actually been observed.

Actually they have, HR 8799 with at least 3 planets a possible even a fourth one. Fomalhaut has at least one that has been seen, 1RXS J160929.1-210524 with a planet and GJ 758 with at least one planet but perhaps even one more.
But there are more (at least 8) ways to detect exo-planets and we find them in very unusual places, the first ones ever found where orbiting a Pulsar, and that’s now some 18 years ago, we now know of more than 500 of them. The comming decade will we most likely see a ten fold increase in the number of known exo-planets.
I would say that there is a very good chance that Exo-planets are a reality.

Curiousgeorge
December 10, 2010 2:47 pm

PhilJourdan says:
December 10, 2010 at 11:22 am
CuriousGeorge – our wives must be related. 😉
All women are related, at least when it comes to diamonds. I once took her to the Smithsonian, and the only thing she wanted to see ( and possible steal if she could ) was the Canary diamond. I practically had to drag her out of the exhibition. Literally thousands of carats of sparkly rocks. 😉 🙂

Curiousgeorge
December 10, 2010 3:18 pm

Chris Reeve says:
December 10, 2010 at 11:34 am
And the fact is that most people would just prefer to blindly argue against it than investigate it for themselves.

Don’t mean to be snarky, but how would “most people” go about investigating it for themselves? Given the fact that “most people” don’t have the resources, technology, or education to do so. The only recourse is to compare other peoples investigation, is it not?

December 10, 2010 3:51 pm

“You carbon-based life forms just have no sense of fun!”
— Douglas Adams’ robot disco call girls.
Well, honey, lemme tell you, I grew up on a planet hot enough to melt steel, so we danced, all right, but it wasn’t just for fun… Have another drink…

DirkH
December 10, 2010 3:56 pm

Wait. NASA? Discovery?
I’ll wait for the retraction tomorrow. (Think arsenic life forms; think GISS)