OSU's Dr. Lonnie Thompson pushes gloom and doom, still thinks the snows of Kilimanjaro are melting due to global warming

This is an OSU press release, timed to appear in Eurekalert for Cancun’s COP16 on December 8th, and reposted here verbatim, including the all caps headline. Even though the “melting on Kilimanjaro due to global warming” has been fully debunked by a recent peer reviewed paper (see Kilimanjaro’s snow – it’s about land use change, tree cutting) Dr. Thompson continues to push this false information.

For example, this is a photo (at left) of Dr. Thompson standing next to an ice spire on Kilimanjaro. Notice any meltwater pools nearby? You won’t, because they aren’t there. Read this quote from this entry to understand why:

The ice cap on Kilimanjaro consists of ice on the 5,700-meter-high flat summit, some with vertical edges, and several slope glaciers, mostly at altitudes where temperatures stay well below freezing and the major source of energy is solar radiation. Considerable infrared radiation is emitted from the glacier surface into the surrounding air, and the glaciers lose the most mass through sublimation-the direct conversion of ice to water vapor. Observers have seen only a trickle of meltwater.

Dr. Thompson seems not to want to understand the process of sublimation on Kilimanjaro – Anthony

RyanM chimes in:  Tennis great(est) Martina Navratilova, who recently battled breast cancer, participated in a charity climb/hike up Kilimanjaro this week, but sadly had to turn back due to health concerns.  However, an “unexpected blizzard” and really ugly “tropical winter” weather made her climb quite miserable.  “We have sent a message down to our base camp to bring up thicker gloves, hand warmers and more heavy clothing. I was expecting it to be cold and snowy, but not so soon.


CLIMATE SCIENTIST WARNS WORLD OF WIDESPREAD SUFFERING IF FURTHER CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT FORESTALLED.

COLUMBUS, Ohio – One of the world’s foremost experts on climate change is warning that if humans don’t moderate their use of fossil fuels, there is a real possibility that we will face the environmental, societal and economic consequences of climate change faster than we can adapt to them.

Lonnie Thompson, distinguished university professor in the School of Earth Sciences at Ohio State University, posed that possibility in a just-released special climate-change edition of the journal The Behavior Analyst.

He also discussed how the rapid and accelerating retreat of the world’s glaciers and ice sheets dramatically illustrates the nature of the changing climate.

Lonnie Thompson
Photo by Thomas Nash

It is the first time in a published paper that he has recommended specific action to forestall the growing effects of climate change.  During the last three decades, Thompson has led 57 expeditions to some of the world’s most remote high altitude regions to retrieve cores from glaciers and ice caps that preserve a record of ancient climate.

In the past Thompson has let his research data and conclusions speak for him but in this paper, intended for social scientists and behavior experts, he voiced his concern regarding  the risks that ignoring the evidence of climate change may bring.

“Unless large numbers of people take appropriate steps, including supporting governmental regulations aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, our only options will be adaptation and suffering,” he wrote in the concluding paragraph.

“And the longer we delay, the more unpleasant the adaptations and the greater the suffering will be.”

In the paper (available here), Thompson said that virtually all climate researchers “are now convinced that global warming poses a clear and present danger to civilization.”

His opinion isn’t hyperbole, he said, but instead is based on a “very clear pattern in the scientific evidence documenting that the Earth is warming, that the warming is due largely to human activity, that warming is causing important changes to many of the Earth’s support systems, and that rapid and potentially catastrophic changes in the near future are possible.


“Unless large numbers of people take appropriate steps, including supporting governmental regulations aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, our only options will be adaptation and suffering.”


“Such future scenarios,” he says, “emerge not, as is often suggested, simply from computer simulations, but from the weight and balance of the empirical evidence as well.”

Thompson listed three options humanity has for dealing with global warming which, he says, “is here and is already affecting our climate, so prevention is no longer an option.”

“Clearly mitigation is our best option, but so far most societies around the world, including the United States and the other largest emitters of greenhouse gases, have done little more than talk about the importance of mitigation,” he says.

He says that there are currently no technological quick fixes for global warming.

“Our best hope,” he says, “is to change our behavior in ways that significantly slow the rate of global warming, thereby giving engineers and scientists time to devise, develop, and deploy technological solutions where possible.”

Thompson prefaced his advice with examples of the Earth’s diminishing ice cover, examples that constitute some of the strongest supporting evidence of the current threat of global climate change:

— The ice fields atop Mount Kilimanjaro have lost 85 percent of their coverage since 1912;

— The Quelccaya ice cap in southern Peru – the largest tropical ice field on Earth, has retreated 25 percent since 1978;

— Ice fields in the Himalayas that have long shown traces of the radioactive bomb tests in the 1950s and 1960s have since lost that signal as surface melting has removed the upper layers and thereby reduced the thickness of these glaciers;

— All of the glaciers in Alaska’s vast Brooks Range are retreating, as are 98 percent of those in southeastern Alaska.  And 99 percent of glaciers in the Alps, 100 percent of those in Peru and 92 percent in the Andes of Chile are likewise retreating;

— Sea levels are rising and the loss of ice coverage in the North Polar region continues to increase annually.

“Everyone will be affected by global warming,” Thompson wrote.  “But those with the fewest resources for adapting will suffer the most.”

A research scientist with Ohio State’s Byrd Polar Research Center, Thompson is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and a foreign member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.  In 2007, he received the National Medal of Science, the highest honor the United States gives to American scientists.

#

Contact:  Lonnie Thompson, (614) 292-6652: Thompson.3@osu.edu

Written by Earle Holland, (614) 292-8384; Holland.8@osu.edu.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

94 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
December 11, 2010 6:12 am

Bruce Cobb,
Right on. “Consensus” in climate science takes the place of the scientific method, which is routinely ignored. And without following the scientific method, it isn’t science.
As Willis points out, “Despite repeated requests, he has obstinately refused to archive data that he collected on the taxpayer’s dime.”
Like many of his ilk, Thompson is defrauding the taxpayers. There is no excuse for withholding publicly funded weather data.

Allencic
December 11, 2010 6:38 am

As a graduate of Ohio State’s GEOLOGY department (before they went for the politically correct Earth Systems Science nonsense) I’m embarrassed to even have a slight association with a hustler like Lonnie Thompson and his connections to a dunce like Al Gore.

R. de Haan
December 11, 2010 6:41 am

Success at Cancún prepare for man made death and disaster
http://rarereaders.seablogger.com/2010/12/success-at-cancun-prepare-for-death-and-disaster/

R. de Haan
December 11, 2010 6:45 am

They will never give up.
And now the building blocks for a new Kyoto Protocol including a 100 billion dollar financing deal has been signed last night, prepare for a new flood of hubris.

Peter Miller
December 11, 2010 7:08 am

He’s right of course.
The Earth’s climate is static, there is no such thing as climate cycles. Anyone who says otherwise should be burned or stoned.
No ice ages, no medieval warm period, no Little Ice Age and no change in global temperatures from 1850 to today, except that caused by you and I.
Mannian maths is next to godliness. Hansen is the new Prophet. Jones will write the next epistles.
Clearly, Thompson is a man of integrity, not someone addicted to government grants or handouts.
Carbon dioxide is evil, we have no hope until the Earth’s atmosphere is purged of this wicked gas forever.
The cult followers of Real Climate and almost everyone in Cancun’s meeting halls, would believe this stupid obnoxious rant.

Jimbo
December 11, 2010 7:12 am

Thompson prefaced his advice with examples of the Earth’s diminishing ice cover, examples that constitute some of the strongest supporting evidence of the current threat of global climate change:
– The ice fields atop Mount Kilimanjaro have lost 85 percent of their coverage since 1912;…
I would have been more impressed had he said Kilimanjaro had lost 85 percent of their coverage since 1975 (alleged start of the present ‘warming’ period.) What’s interesting about 1912 is that he hints that the ice was already in retreat.
Preliminary Notes on the Glaciology of Kilimanjaro [pdf] – 1959
“…The glaciers and summit remnants are rapidly retreating, the Penck Glacier having retreated 3 m. in 3 months in 1957, and nearly 300 m. since 1912….
Glaciers of Kibo
…When Meyer reached the summit in 1889 the break-up was far advanced….
The Penck Glacier
….A photograph by Oehler (in Klute 1920) indicates that the glacier has retreated about 300 yeard (275 m.) since 1912…..”

Olen
December 11, 2010 7:43 am

Dr Thompson has it backwards, if there is widespread starvation and suffering it will be because of government regulations and interference in the maintenance and advancement of the modern world. And that dead horse he is beating should be buried. Someone call Peta.
Or should it be the vice squad.

R. Shearer
December 11, 2010 7:46 am

Might he be happier if Columbus were under a mile of ice?

monroe
December 11, 2010 7:54 am

We have a similar broken record playing in BC. A natually occuring cycle along with a “snuff every fire” approch by forestry has resulted in a Pine Beetle outbreak. Of course the facts don’t matter and each true believer can point and say, “Look at our beautiful trees dying you see, global warming is having this huge impact.” One can be patient and explain and try to reason but like anyone who is guilty of skipping those critical steps of Logic, it falls on deaf ears.

Jimbo
December 11, 2010 8:09 am

Regarding Kilimanjaro – I thought that the surrounding air in the summer is rarely above freezing. I also thought that most of the retreat occurred before 1953. Am I correct in my thoughts?

Modern glacier retreat on Kilimanjaro as evidence of climate change: observations and facts
The concept considers the peculiarities of the mountain and implies that climatological processes other than air temperature control the ice recession in a direct manner. A drastic drop in atmospheric moisture at the end of the 19th century and the ensuing drier climatic conditions are likely forcing glacier retreat on Kilimanjaro.
International Journal of Climatology – 2004

——–

The Shrinking Glaciers of Kilimanjaro: Can Global Warming Be Blamed?
The Kibo ice cap, a “poster child” of global climate change, is being starved of snowfall and depleted by solar radiation
American Scientist – 2007

Bruce Cobb
December 11, 2010 8:10 am

R. de Haan says:
December 11, 2010 at 6:41 am
Success at Cancún prepare for man made death and disaster
http://rarereaders.seablogger.com/2010/12/success-at-cancun-prepare-for-death-and-disaster/

Score one for eco-fascism. Let them do their little victory dance. Better targets.

Roger Knights
December 11, 2010 8:15 am

savethesharks says:
December 10, 2010 at 11:49 pm
You’ve gotta be kidding me. You snipped that?
It was not that bad.

That’s what I thought too when it happened to me. (The only time.) What made it worse was that three days later someone else posted the same thing!

Mike
December 11, 2010 8:28 am

The degree to which AGW is causing glacier treat on Mt K is an open question.
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1934203,00.html
“Indeed, glacier experts have been waging an intellectual war for years over what’s really causing the ice loss atop Kilimanjaro. The simplest explanation would be that warming temperatures are making the ice melt — and indeed, Thompson believes this is a big part of what’s going on.
But other scientists insist that melting, if it’s occurring at all, has a relatively minor effect. “The fact that you have melting may mean air temperatures have increased, but it doesn’t necessarily,” says Philip Mote, who heads the Oregon Climate Change Research Institute at Oregon State University. “And in fact, the temperature on the summit of Kilimanjaro is essentially always below freezing, which makes it hard to accept warming as the reason [for glacier loss].” ”
REPLY: Sorry, fail. Show the meltwater, and Time magazine, really? – Anthony

Roger Knights
December 11, 2010 8:41 am

Willis Eschenbach says:
December 10, 2010 at 9:44 pm
The man is as far from a scientist as can be imagined, and the fact that he is still feted and given awards is a terrible indictment of climate science in general.

Anent to that, here’s what I posted 13 months ago on the “Kilimanjaro / Rubbish” thread:

Here’s a link to Wikipedia’s entry for prof. Lonnie Thompson: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lonnie_Thompson
Here are extracts from that entry:
Rolling Stone magazine says that there is no person in the world that has spent more time above 18,000 feet than Lonnie Thompson.[4].
His observations of glacier retreat (1970s–2000s) “confirm that glaciers around the world are melting and provide clear evidence that the warming of the last 50 years is now outside the range of climate variability for several millennia, if not longer.”[5] In 2001, he predicted that the famed snows of Africa’s Mount Kilimanjaro would melt within the next 20 years, a victim of climate change across the tropics. Return expeditions to the mountain have shown that changes in the mountain’s ice fields may signal an even quicker melting of its snow fields, which Thompson documented had existed for thousands of years. Thompson and his wife both served as advisers for the Academy Award-winning 2006 documentary An Inconvenient Truth, by Al Gore, Jr., and some of their work was referenced in the movie.
Honors and awards
2001: Thompson was featured among eighteen scientists and researchers as “America’s Best” by CNN and Time Magazine.
2002: Thompson was awarded the Dr A.H. Heineken Prize for Environmental Sciences by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
2002: Thompson was awarded the Vega Medal by the Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography.
2005: Thompson was elected to the National Academy of Science.[2]
November, 2005: Thompson was featured in a “Rolling Stone” article, “The Ice Hunter”.
2005: Thompson was awarded the prestigious Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement, an honor often regarded as the environmental science equivalent to the Nobel Prize. [3]
February, 2007: Mosley-Thompson and Thompson were jointly awarded the Roy Chapman Andrews Society Distinguished Explorer Award at Beloit College, Beloit, WI. [4]
May, 2007: Thompson is named to receive the National Medal of Science. [5] This honor is the highest the United States can bestow upon an American scientist. It was presented to Thompson by President Bush in July 2007 (Award year 2005). [6]
2008: Mosley-Thompson and Thompson share the $1 million Dan David Prize (Future category) with British researcher Geoffrey Eglinton.
2008: Thompson was listed as one of Time Magazine’s Heroes of the Environment.[6]
Lonnie Thompson has been awarded 53 research grants from the NSF, NASA, NOAA and NGS and has published 165 papers.

TomRude
December 11, 2010 8:42 am

I suggest a maddoff treatment…

Werner Brozek
December 11, 2010 8:52 am

“Rational Debate says:
December 11, 2010 at 5:02 am
Soot having a big impact on Himalyan temperature – as much or more than GHG’s”
We may as well kill two birds with one stone. According to NASA, soot (and other aerosols) are largely to blame for the ice melting in the north polar region as well. See
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/warming_aerosols.html

Jim G
December 11, 2010 9:15 am

1. This guy must have just finished watching the pop AGW climate propaganda movie “Day After Tomorrow” when he wrote this drivel.
2. Most of the students who flunked out of my engineering and science undergrad school and wanted to get the job ticket went to OSU where one with adequate intelligence and money to obtain, say a teaching or history degree, could obtain a degree in engineering or the sciences.

Pamela Gray
December 11, 2010 9:16 am

You had me sweating there. I thought “Oregon State University”, that once upon a time bastion of conservative education now turned Cankookish over global warming. We have enough eggheads already in Corvallis. Was REALLY glad this particular egghead was in Ohio!

Frank K.
December 11, 2010 9:22 am

“CLIMATE SCIENTIST WARNS WORLD OF WIDESPREAD SUFFERING IF FURTHER CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT FORESTALLED.”
[yawn] This is yet ANOTHER press release, to advertise (on the taxpayer’s dime) yet ANOTHER inane climate paper, which it is hoped leads to a continued flow of Climate Ca$h for useless (and wasteful) climate research projects. The formula is the same whether we’re talking about GISS, JPL, NOAA, NSIDC, or any of the hundreds of academic groups.
I think the headline should be written as:
“U.S. TAXPAYERS WARN WORLD OF WIDESPREAD DEBT AND SUFFERING IF FURTHER CLIMATE RESEARCH IS NOT FORESTALLED.”

Jim G
December 11, 2010 9:29 am

Before anyone gets upset, no slam intended on teachers or history majors as these fields require DIFFERENT types of intelligence and skills which I readily admit that I do not have. But then I did not try to pass myself off as a history or teaching professional.

LearDog
December 11, 2010 9:33 am

I appreciate the post because it is important to understand the degree to which ‘scientists’ will sacrifice their objectivity for other purposes.
I can’t say that I approve of the personal attacks though. They diminish those posting and at a minimum they’re somewhat redundant. He does it all himself ….
Kind of sad really.

P Walker
December 11, 2010 10:31 am

Seems to me that this paper is merely a synopsis of all the usual alarmist garbage aimed at converting “social scientists and behaviorists” to the new faith . If , as it appears , some in the hard sciences are lapsing into apostasy then new recruits must be found . After all , social scientists and behaviorists have much better access to the hearts and minds of today’s youth , not to mention the means to exploit them to whatever end .

D. King
December 11, 2010 10:49 am

“…our only options will be adaptation and suffering,””
More suffering please!
Where is Judith Curry when you need her?
Hello, Dr. Curry, a little help please.

savethesharks
December 11, 2010 10:59 am

Often psychologists will point to a disorder in individuals.
But what about mass groupthink disorders?
Seems to me that would be a juicy topic for somebody’s PHD or thesis.
It happens many times in groups of intelligent, informed, modern homo sapiens.
I mean, we know this stuff occurs all the time with religious cults, bureaucratic organizations, news media talking heads, shady politicians, nationalist extremism, among many others.
But for the “the elect” of the scientific community to become deceived and caught up in the groupthink…
….where even THEY also become yes-men….nodding their heads to the circular reasoning and….looking the other way when white lies are told….is just nothing short of spectacularly insane!
Christopher Monckton has used this term “global groupthink” recently.
I would propose to expand that idea and codify a new type of mass psychological syndrome that is currently gripping the world:
Global Warming Groupthink Disorder. Or “GWGD”.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA

Douglas DC
December 11, 2010 11:02 am

“Richard deSousa says:
December 11, 2010 at 1:03 am
Thompson has refused to admit the loss of Kilimanjaro’s ice cap is due to the deforestation of the adjacent rain forests. It is the declining precipitation which has caused the famous mountain to lose its snow cap.”
Now here is an idea: why don’t the groups like greenpe$$e and others help the locals
reforest the slopes and gain some development?
Of course that would probably restore the ice, and give some dark skinned
people some hope, so that’s probably not going to happen…