Climategate Anniversary Humor

Well, one year ago this week, a tipping point occurred. The apple cart was upset. Richard A. left this humorous satirical comment which seemed appropriate for today, so I’ve elevated it to a full post.

The Digital Big CRUBox of climate control knobs

Press Relase – CRU East Anglia –

Everything is consistent with Global Warming

The CRU at East Anglia has released a new study which proves conclusively that Global Warming caused Climate Change, which in turn caused Climate Disruption, which in turn is the cause of everything else. Based on previous research by the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster linking global warming with the decrease in the number of pirates over the last few hundred years, and new research showing that the current flat trend in global temperatures correlates with a recent resurgence of piracy, especially in the waters off of Somalia, Phil Jones et al, have submitted a new research paper to the Journal of Unbelievably New Claptrap (JUNC) that proves everything is caused by Global Warming.

“It was really very simple in the end,” said Jones. “Once we went over the Pastafarian research, which was very robust, we realized anything and everything with even the barest correlation to global temperatures could in fact be linked via other correlations to any and every other trend in the universe.” Indeed, the new paper which is currently under review at JUNC has linked Global Warming with trends in the stock market, the orbit of Mars and Jupiter, whale migrations, and turtle droppings. The algorithm used to draw these conclusions has been called “ground breaking” and “robust” by many of Jones’ colleagues.

Said Professor Michael Mann of The Earth System Science Center at Penn State, a coauthor of the paper: “How they have come up with these links is amazing, the cross disciplinary work has been very heartening.” Responding to criticisms from statisticians and engineers that such work is suspect, Mann replied, “Nonsense, they’re obviously being paid millions by ExxonMobile. The work I have done with the zoological community alone in order to get the requisite number of monkeys into one room to come up with the equations is proof enough of the robustness of the work.”

Gavin Schmidt of NASA agreed. “The critics of this paper are obviously being paid off by Big Oil, we know this because they drive cars and have to buy gas occasionally.” Schmidt, a contributor to the space based portion of the paper that found correlations with global warming and the movements of a blueberry muffin launched into orbit last year, declined further comment. When asked about their refusal of requests to release the algorithm in question in order to review the paper, Jones declined saying, “How or why anyone would want to check this kind of work is beyond me, the conclusions are so staggeringly awesome that they don’t need to be reviewed.” The editors and peer reviewers at JUNC agreed.

Said editor Alvin Hicks: “We don’t need to check this kind of work too carefully, and since I’d like to keep my job and would lose it if I dared question anything these guys put out, I’m confident in declaring it sound and worthy of publication.” Al Gore also hailed the paper as a milestone, writing in a press release, “All questions and skepticism should be ended at this point, the proof is in.” Gore declined to comment, aids saying he was too busy selling carbon offsets to himself.

The paper came at a fortuitous time for alarmists, who have been taking a bit of a beating lately due to the Climategate emails and the tendency of the IPCC to cite Leisure magazine and other sources in their reports on the current state of the science of global climate disruption. Jones concluded his remarks with this reporter, “I think we’ve finally got the name right so no one can question cause and effect via that route, now we have the science to back the name up and it’s really beyond criticism or question now that Global Warming is the cause of everything.” When asked about the convenience of having a theory that can’t under any circumstances ever be falsified, Jones shrugged. “Why would I want to falsify it? It’s bringing in tons of dough. The only people who would want to falsify it are Big Oil and their stooges.”

A passerby had been listening to Jones and I speak as Jones fished in the fountain, and asked, “Isn’t it a little paranoid and contradictory to posit this grand conspiracy by Big Oil and then claim their grand plan is to covertly fund a few blogs run by retired statisticians and weathermen?” Jones quickly jumped on the man and proceeded to try and strangle him with a spaghetti strand, and was subsequently arrested for assault with a deadly noodle.

On follow-up in the court Jones blamed Global Warming for his behavior, and was let off with a suspended sentence. Claims that Michael Mann, Kevin Trenberth, and others put pressure on the local government to impeach the judge and that Greenpeace activists harassed the judge by rummaging through his trash and egging his house unless the trial came to ‘the right decision’ were dismissed out of hand.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
104 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kev-in-UK
November 19, 2010 12:47 pm

have been reading the comments of tonyb, smokey and simon. Very good chaps – but I honestly do not understand why you bother? I realise it is good for us all to try and educate the warmist types – but as the saying goes – you can take a horse to water but cannot make him drink – and so it goes with such blogs, which in many instances seem to be some kind of egotistical platform for those who cannot ‘make it’ elsewhere in life (or am I being to harsh?)
But really guys, – its just my own view – but giving such sites any attendance or attention is pointless – let the self prevaricating and procrastinating sites carry on – hopefully, in several years, the site archives will be used to show how shallow these folk are!

Kev-in-UK
November 19, 2010 12:54 pm

Simon Barnett says:
November 19, 2010 at 11:59 am
very well said Simon – though personally I might have taken the school to task!
The majority of kids are bright enough to make logical deductions whenever they are presented with real facts as options instead of a biased view.
My 15 yr old saw through all the MSM promoted BS in a project last year and presented a good showing – without even knowing that I was an active sceptic! Needless to say, I was well proud! LOL

tonyb
Editor
November 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Well its getting quite bizarre over at climate sight not helped by the moderation which means a whole string of posts seem to get released at one time and scatter themselves out of sequence making it diffult to follow who said what when.
I see the cite from Paul M has finally appeared. The fact you referenced Holgate was castigated by Hank.
I am disappointed to say that Kate is now heavily censoring my posts which spoils the narrative and context whilst removing chunks of relevant information.
These are my latest posts, some of which were needed due to this censoring as can be seen.
Post
“Tamino said
“Apparently you tried to claim that data should not be analyzed with the seasonal signal removed, but Kate called your BS, insisting on a cite. You’re wrong again. Data should not be analyzed *without* the seasonal cycle removed. I’m a professional, I specialize in the statistical analysis of time series — I know.”
I said nothing of the sort.
I also agreed with you that four years is FAR too short a time to analyse.
You then said;
“You made claims about the satellite data which were wrong”
I didn’t make the claims, the comments came verbatim from Chapter 5 of AR4 as did the comments about inaccuracy. I don’t blame you particularly for making these completely unwarranted comments-Kate took it upon herself to heavily censor my post and you aren’t a mind reader.
Perhaps she would like to reinstate it so you can see the whole post and in its correct context?
post
Hank
Your posts are suddenly appearing all over the place.This refers to your 11.32
As the sequence of posts has become so disjointed it is difficult to follow why you think I was looking for that cite from Douglas. I wasn’t.
Quite what you think it says and why I will need to rethink my own material has left me bemused. Have you read it? It confirms many of the things I have said here. In particular it confirms the rate of change measured by tide gauges as cited in my 5.20 post which is on the first page-the material came from Nasa. I remarked that satellite and tide gauges show different things and cited the sea level rise shown by both.
So no, I dont need to redo any of the things, thank you.
Mind you, didn’t you find it ironic that after railing against the use of papers by Holgate you then cite the Douglas paper which references several of them? Does that disqualify the Douglas paper?
Now I think we’ve spent quite enough time on what has become a circular argument so I’ll leave the stage for people to comment on Kates paper.
tonyb

Gerald Machnee
November 19, 2010 5:19 pm

tonyb
The citations request is a regular cop out at climatesight when she has no evidence. Then there is outright censoring as in Unreal Climate.
Of course Hank is a regular there so he has also joined in to help Kate.

1 3 4 5