German Vilimelis heard about Spain’s solar gold rush from his brother-in-law in 2007.
Across the plains around Lerida, the northeastern Spanish town where they spent weekends, farmers were turning over their fields to photovoltaic panels to capitalize on government solar- energy subsidies. Vilimelis persuaded his father, Jaume, who made a living growing pears on 5 acres (2 hectares) of land in Lerida, to turn over a portion of his farm for the project, Bloomberg Markets reported in its November issue.
Vilimelis, 35, a procurement manager for a consumer goods company, pooled his family savings and mortgaged his apartment to obtain a loan of more than 400,000 euros ($558,500) to cover the investment. Within nine months, the family’s 80-kilowatt generation unit — 500 solar panels on seven racks angled toward the sun — was feeding power into the national grid.
Solar investors such as Vilimelis were lured by a 2007 law passed by the government of Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero that guaranteed producers a so-called solar tariff of as much as 44 cents per kilowatt-hour for their electricity for 25 years — more than 10 times the 2007 average wholesale price of about 4 cents per kilowatt-hour paid to mainstream energy suppliers.
Thanks to the incentives, the family met the monthly cost of the loan and even earned a small profit. Once the debt was paid off in 2018, Vilimelis looked forward to making even more money during the 15 additional years of subsidies guaranteed under Spanish law.
‘You Feel Cheated’
Now Vilimelis and more than 50,000 other Spanish solar entrepreneurs face financial disaster as the policy makers contemplate cutting the price guarantees that attracted their investment in the first place.
“You feel cheated,” he says. “We put our money in on the basis of a law.”
Zapatero introduced the subsidies three years ago as part of an effort to cut his country’s dependence on fossil fuels. At the time, he promised that the investment in renewable energy would create manufacturing jobs and that Spain could sell its panels to nations seeking to reduce carbon emissions.
Yet by failing to control the program’s cost, Zapatero saddled Spain with at least 126 billion euros of obligations to renewable-energy investors. The spending didn’t achieve the government’s aim of creating green jobs, because Spanish investors imported most of their panels from overseas when domestic manufacturers couldn’t meet short-term demand.
Stark Lesson
Spain stands as a lesson to other aspiring green-energy nations, including China and the U.S., by showing how difficult it is to build an alternative energy industry even with billions of euros in subsidies, says Ramon de la Sota, a private investor in Spanish photovoltaic panels and a former General Electric Co. executive.
“The government totally overshot with the tariff,” de la Sota says. “Now they have a huge bill to pay — but where’s the technology, where’s the know-how, where’s the value?”
U.S. President Barack Obama highlighted solar energy as part of his plan to create green jobs this month with a decision to install photovoltaic panels on the roof of the White House. The government also approved the first large-scale solar-power projects on public land. Dublin-based utility NTR Plc and Chevron Corp. will build plants in California generating enough electricity between them to power about 600,000 homes.
Sun Surplus
At first glance, Spain appears to be the perfect incubator for a solar-energy revolution. Thanks to its location in southern Europe, the country’s land mass receives 900,000 terawatt-hours ofirradiation from the sun each year, according to the European Commission — more than 3,000 times the power used annually by its citizens. In contrast, Germany, Europe’s largest economy, receives less than half that amount of irradiation. (A terawatt-hour streams enough power to run 1 billion washing machines for 60 minutes.)
The challenge for Spain was to transform that free resource into an industry that made economic sense and attracted investors. The first problem lawmakers encountered was price. Solar power, like wind and other renewable-energy sources, can’t yet compete on price against electricity generated from natural gas or coal.
Power from the most-efficient photovoltaic plants costs utilities about $275 per megawatt-hour to produce compared with about $60 for a coal-fired plant, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. The cost of electricity from coal is held down in part by a plentiful supply of the mineral from established mines.
Miscalculation
Spanish policy makers reasoned that generous subsidies would help the country meet its goal of 400 megawatts of installed solar power by 2010 as well as spur the development of a manufacturing industry.
The feed-in tariff proved too successful in luring investors. By the end of 2007, solar installations had exceeded the government’s target, three years early, and the following year, investors pumped 16.4 billion euros into Spain’s solar industry, quintupling power capacity to 3,500 megawatts from 700 megawatts.
“They underestimated the technology — how cheaply panels could be installed and how quickly they could be installed,” says Jenny Chase, Zurich-based chief solar analyst at New Energy Finance. “When you have 40 megawatts of photovoltaic panels, you don’t think that if you get it wrong, you’ll end up with 3,500 megawatts.”
“You feel cheated,” he says. “We put our money in on the basis of a law.”
That sort of sums it up.
Governments can, and will, change their minds on uneconomical technologies.
the country’s land mass receives 900,000 terawatt-hours ofirradiation from the sun each year, according to the European Commission — more than 3,000 times the power used annually by its citizens
=================================================
and you can only achieve that number by making everyone move out and covering every square inch with panels
Lord, I hate it when people say ridiculous numbers like that…………..
I meant cautionary tale .
I’s not necessary for other countries to repeat Span’s mistake, BUT…
whaddaya think the odds are that any US politician is paying attention? A small few are, but the rest are believing their own press releases.
Yup solar subsidies have rapidly become stupid. they were set up base on manufacturing costs several times what they are now
Large scale pv only costs about $2000/kW installed – or about $100/MWh in a sunny place (less than Bloombergs $275). That means that it is about $0.10 per kWh. Not cheap enough to compete with wholesale prices in most places but basically cheap enough to compete with retail prices if you stick it on your roof.
It appears that panel prices are actually being held artificially high by the excess demand created by subsidies – PV modules can be manufactured for as little as $800/kW now (First Solar), but are being sold for an average of $4000/kW at retail.
It is probably good to encourage further growth and price drops in this industry somehow (it’s a useful long term economic contribution to energy production) but it does not need to be much – perhaps allow users to sell electricity back to the grid for the same price they are charged for it. And domestic roofs are the most economic location. Otherwise it is probably time to dump the subsidies and let the industry stand on it’s own feet.
Fools who invest in politician’s promises will has their funds easily picked from their pockets. They should play Eve-online and learn the rules of investing among sharks.
Solar energy is a great way to bankrupt our country, of course it is always “just around the corner competitive”. A solar tax farm is going up near me. I assume it is the latest and the greatest. A simple calculation to amortize the capital costs figure the electricity it produce to be almost 50 cents per kilowatt, and I am sure it is much worse than that.
http://www.nofreewind.com/2010/08/pocono-raceway-solar-project.html
Another ironic Google Ad.
It’s just never a good idea to do things like,
invest your life savings in one thing,
mortgage your dwelling to finance an investment or
depend on a government subsidy to make an unprofitable endeavor profitable.
The words of Johnny Rotten speaks louder everyday:
“Ever get the feeling you’ve been cheated?”
/Carl
Spanish policy makers reasoned that generous subsidies would help the country meet its goal of 400 megawatts of installed solar power by 2010 as well as spur the development of a manufacturing industry….
investors pumped 16.4 billion euros into Spain’s solar industry, quintupling power capacity to 3,500 megawatts from 700 megawatts….
Oops!
Charles S. Opalek, PE says:
October 19, 2010 at 2:54 pm
Solar photovoltaic power has a dirty little secret. It’s Energy Returned on Energy Invested is 0.48. Solar photovoltaic power is unsustainable.
Wind Power is worse at 0.29. First question to ask any proposed wind power project developer is: What’s the EROEI? If they won’t tell you, they have something to hide.
—
You have a link to that? I’d be interested in seeing it and I’m too lazy to go looking for it myself.
R. de Haan says: at 3:37 pm
Seems the link you intended should be: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/science/earth/19fossil.html?_r=1
The story you point to has a photo of folks eating by candle light. It seems this too is a foolish idea if one cares about CO2 rather than romance.
http://enochthered.wordpress.com/2008/03/31/earth-hour-candles-and-carbon/
At first glance, Spain appears to be the perfect incubator for a solar-energy revolution. Thanks to its location in southern Europe, the country’s land mass receives 900,000 terawatt-hours ofirradiation from the sun each year, according to the European Commission — more than 3,000 times the power used annually by its citizens. In contrast, Germany, Europe’s largest economy, receives less than half that amount of irradiation. (A terawatt-hour streams enough power to run 1 billion washing machines for 60 minutes.)
I hate to be al nit picky here but can you please at least get your units correct. A terawatt-hour is NOT power, it is energy.
Same in France, same in Ontario Canada…
The same guys that sold the greens on wind power and reaped tons of tax payer subsidized profits are probably going to make a killing when the time comes to tear all of these wind turbines down from their govt. contracts.
“You feel cheated,” he says. “We put our money in on the basis of a law.”
Yea, laws change.
“Prohibition had a notable effect on the alcohol brewing industry in the United States. When Prohibition ended, only half the breweries that previously existed reopened. ”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_in_the_United_States
H.R Said:
I’s not necessary for other countries to repeat Span’s mistake, BUT…
Unfortunately, for our sakes, Ontario and British Columbia are getting ready to march right down that road. Ooooo, the jobs!!!!!
Pissing our money away is what they are doing.
“Sorry to nitpick, but the in title ‘Founder’ should be ‘Flounder’?
[Reply: Either one works. ~dbs, WUWT spelling gestapo.]”
Ah, but the Flounder will given the proper environment smell like the government boondoggle does 😉 .
” Charles S. Opalek, PE says:
October 19, 2010 at 2:54 pm
Solar photovoltaic power has a dirty little secret. It’s Energy Returned on Energy Invested is 0.48. Solar photovoltaic power is unsustainable.
Wind Power is worse at 0.29. First question to ask any proposed wind power project developer is: What’s the EROEI? If they won’t tell you, they have something to hide.”
Until I see the study that confirms this, I’m gonna go ahead and say this is total BS!
I think you have it just about right. Also, it really doesn’t matter what the enterprise is when the “risks are public and the reward is private” you are gonna have big problems.
vboring says: “Cancel the subsidy and let solar power get paid the bulk market rate. Spain wins. Free lunch investors lose.”
Confidence in government plummets. Chaos. Inflation. Enter the man with the little mustache. War. Everyone loses.
I am flabbergasted how easy people take Government grants on win and solar for granted.
There is a total disconnect.
If coal generated power is 6 dollar cent per Kw and Government offers you a grant and 60 dollar cents per Kw to put a solar panel on your roof you know someone is going to be screwed.
And so it is.
With ten solar panels installed there is suddenly green energy to be sold and the scam takes off.
In Austria a company buys cheap coal generated electricity to pump water into a mountain lake.
When the lake is full they sell Green Hydro Generated poser back to the German Market and make a big big profit.
At WUWT is an article about a diesel powered solar panel so they deliver “Green” power during the night.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/04/13/the-insanity-of-greenery/
If society goes down the drain it is because of plain stupidity among the political establishment and it’s electorate.
John F. Hultquist says:
October 19, 2010 at 6:02 pm
R. de Haan says: at 3:37 pm
Seems the link you intended should be: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/19/science/earth/19fossil.html?_r=1
Yes, you are right John, thanks for the correction.
Dan in California says:
“October 19, 2010 at 2:56 pm
California is actually smarter than someone else – Spain in this case. California offers fixed-dollar rebates to individuals and small businesses to install photovoltaic (PV) power, with a fixed fund. When the fund runs out annually, installations are no longer reviewed for the subsidy. Therefore, the cost can’t go out of control”.
Yes, but they still manage to go bankrupt.
The point is that they spend public money on Green hobbies wit no effect whatsoever.