Open Water At The North Pole

by Steven Goddard,

We have been watching temperatures and webcam images closely at the NOAA North Pole drifting weather station this year. Except for a few days in early July, they have looked like the series of images below – snow, ice and clouds. No open leads and little or no surface meltwater.

June 15 (NOAA 2) more images follow…

June 22 (NOAA 2)

July 6 (NOAA 1) Small ponds covered with ice

July 24 (NOAA 2) Small ponds covered with ice

August 2 (NOAA 2) Small ponds covered with ice

This correlates closely with the record cold temperatures this summer north of 80N

http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/meant80n.uk.php

It hasn’t always been like this. John Daly did an excellent writeup on this topic a few years back. During May of 1987, Navy subs arrived at the North Pole and found lots of open water.

In 1959, the USS Skate surfaced at the North Pole, and reported this :

“the Skate found open water both in the summer and following winter. We surfaced near the North Pole in the winter through thin ice less than 2 feet thick.”

By contrast, the New York Times published this misinformation in 2000 :

The thick ice that has for ages covered the Arctic Ocean at the pole has turned to water, recent visitors there reported yesterday. At least for the time being, an ice-free patch of ocean about a mile wide has opened at the very top of the world, something that has presumably never before been seen by humans and is more evidence that global warming may be real and already affecting climate. The last time scientists can be certain the pole was awash in water was more than 50 million years ago.

This is in sharp contrast to the NYT prediction of an imminent ice free Arctic in 1969

Expert Says Arctic Ocean Will Soon Be an Open Sea”

Almost 200 years ago, the President of the Royal Society wrote this to the admiralty :

“It will without doubt have come to your Lordship’s knowledge that a considerable change of climate, inexplicable at present to us, must have taken place in the Circumpolar Regions, by which the severity of the cold that has for centuries past enclosed the seas in the high northern latitudes in an impenetrable barrier of ice has been during the last two years, greatly abated.

(This) affords ample proof that new sources of warmth have been opened and give us leave to hope that the Arctic Seas may at this time be more accessible than they have been for centuries past, and that discoveries may now be made in them not only interesting to the advancement of science but also to the future intercourse of mankind and the commerce of distant nations.”

The image below from September 1, 1996 shows what summer ice typically looks like in the Arctic. Lots of open water between the ice. That is why places like NSIDC report extent as regions which have more than 15% ice concentration. The location below would be considered ice covered by NSIDC.

Sadly, UIUC seems to have “lost” their archive of ice concentration maps. It has been offline for two weeks now, so we can’t use that valuable resource for the time being. I wonder what’s up with that?

Oops! This link appears to be broken.

Two years ago, this news was famously reported :

(CNN) — The North Pole may be briefly ice-free by September as global warming melts away Arctic sea ice, according to scientists from the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colorado. “We kind of have an informal betting pool going around in our center and that betting pool is ‘does the North Pole melt out this summer?’ and it may well,” said the center’s senior research scientist, Mark Serreze. It’s a 50-50 bet that the thin Arctic sea ice, which was frozen in autumn, will completely melt away at the geographic North Pole, Serreze said.  The ice retreated to a record level in September when the Northwest Passage, the sea route through the Arctic Ocean, opened briefly for the first time in recorded history. “What we’ve seen through the past few decades is the Arctic sea ice cover is becoming thinner and thinner as the system warms up,” Serreze said….Serreze said it’s “just another indicator of the disappearing Arctic sea ice cover” but that it is happening so soon is “just astounding to me.”

Later in the summer, Mark Serreze reported on WUWT

The north pole issue: Back in June, there was some coverage about the possibility of the North Pole being ice free by the end of this summer. This was based on recognition that the area around the north pole was covered by firstyear ice that tends to be rather thin. Thin ice is the most vulnerable to melting our in summer. I gave it a 50/50 chance. Looks like I’ll lose my own bet and Santa Claus will be safe for another year. There was indeed some coverage a some years back of an open north pole (and I was interviewed). This opening, however, was pretty clearly causes by unusual winds breaking up this ice, and not from melting out.

And yet, in 1959 the US Navy reported ice less than two feet thick at the North Pole. North Pole ice is probably 2-3 times as thick now as it was a half century ago. The Navy knows ice and ice thickness – that is why I trust Navy PIPS over academic models like PIOMAS.

Our global warming friends seem to believe that the Arctic data set began with satellites in 1978, and they appear to have difficulty interpreting even that time period in an objective fashion. Satellites (unfortunately) came on line right at the start a period of warming, after 30 years of cooling temperatures and dire forecasts of an impending ice age.

Video of rising temperatures during the satellite era.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
165 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 3, 2010 3:19 pm

Symon
Thanks! That is very helpful.

August 3, 2010 3:21 pm

Ed says: August 3, 2010 at 1:20 pm
At a public meeting about climate change, I told a polar explorer about the open water in the Arctic in the last century, and he dismissed this as a myth. Thank you for these hard facts.

No iPhone myself, but I understand the new “Our Climate” app is for just such occasions. Now would it be possible for iPhone to have a link to lists of top WUWT posts on all the main CAGW issues?

August 3, 2010 3:22 pm

Gail
At the North Pole, there isn’t any time of day. Just a gradual six month progression from solstice to solstice.

August 3, 2010 3:24 pm

PJB says:
August 3, 2010 at 1:39 pm
“Today’s camera 2
http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/latest/noaa2.jpg
Is that ice-covered melt-water or melt-water sitting on ice?”
It is ice-covered melt water sitting on ice, a melt pond that got snowed on and froze over while it was snowing.

Dave Wendt
August 3, 2010 3:30 pm

I hate to get too pedantic , but neither webcam site is that near the Pole at this point. Both have drifted East to about Lat 86
http://psc.apl.washington.edu/northpole/DriftTrackMap.html

kwik
August 3, 2010 3:46 pm

Found a picture of D-25 at 87 deg North;
http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fil:Roald_Amundsen_and_N-25_near_the_North_Pole.jpeg
The text says it landed in a open area, which later closed, so one of the flying boats was lost . You can see water behind the men there.

August 3, 2010 3:51 pm

An Arctic history
Part 1, 9:01 video

August 3, 2010 3:52 pm

An Arctic history
Part 2, 8:56 video

P.F.
August 3, 2010 3:53 pm

Dan in California says: August 3, 2010 at 2:25 pm “Sorry, the photo from solarcycle24.com seems to have been photoshopped.”
Not only Photoshopped, but poorly done at that.

Michael Penny
August 3, 2010 3:53 pm

13.Dan in California says:
August 3, 2010 at 2:11 pm
“Something is very puzzling. I looked at both NOAA cams and all seems to be boring. But a sister website referenced in these margins (solarcycle24.com) has this still photo from NetCam #2 Tue July 27 00:54:08 2010 UTC clearly showing a submarine.”
If you look at the picture with the submarine you can see that the shadow on the sum is on the oposite side at the shadow on the yellow cone. It sure looks photoshoped to my untrained eye.
Michael

August 3, 2010 3:57 pm

stevengoddard says:
August 3, 2010 at 2:33 pm
People who think the ponds aren’t frozen, probably are not very familiar with what frozen ponds look like.
That could be. Or, they are seeing what they want to see.

Alan S. Blue
August 3, 2010 3:59 pm

From Lucy’s comment @3:21
“Now would it be possible for iPhone to have a link to lists of top WUWT posts on all the main CAGW issues?”
That’s an excellent idea.

Robert of Ottawa
August 3, 2010 4:14 pm

Does that sub know it’s on camera? Anyone a clue as to which nation?

ML
August 3, 2010 4:16 pm

pgosselin says:
August 3, 2010 at 2:03 pm
So if global temps are rising, and this year is claimed to be the hottest on record, then why doesn’t the Arctic ice seem to know this? Or do El Ninos lead to warmth at lower and middle latitudes, but cooler near the pole.
=================
It is vacation time. Arctic did not get the memo.

Pofarmer
August 3, 2010 4:16 pm

I have been reading a book titled, “Polar Aviation”, Edited by Lt. Col. C. V. Glines. #629.1309. It’s a compendium of stories in the Explorers own words. It talks extensively about open water within 50 miles of the north Pole in the early 1900’s. Definitely an interesting read.

EthicallyCivil
August 3, 2010 4:19 pm

SteveG — thanks for the ref. While I see the thickening, the animation shows that squeeze against NW Greenland that is thickening that section of the ice is pushing a goodly bulge around and down the E coast of Greenland as well, is it not?

NoMoreGore
August 3, 2010 4:23 pm

Comon! Do we hafta cancel Armageddon? I was planning a party and everything.

ML
August 3, 2010 4:24 pm

Billy Liar says:
August 3, 2010 at 2:28 pm
AndyW says:
August 3, 2010 at 1:39 pm
http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/npole/2007/images/noaa2-2007-0803-064622.jpg
You can see the melt ponds freezing up in that year as well at this time, in fact even more so.
Good cherry pick! Try this one from the day before:
http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/npole/2007/images/noaa3-2007-0802-220048.jpg
– not much freezing going on there.
=======================
What the (self snip)
Why are you arguing about the pictures taken 3 years ago????????????????????????

geo
August 3, 2010 4:24 pm

“Sadly, UIUC seems to have “lost” their archive of ice concentration maps. It has been offline for two weeks now, so we can’t use that valuable resource for the time being. I wonder what’s up with that?”
Yes, by amazing coincidence this sad occurrence followed just a few days after WUWT began posting the 2007/2010 comparo pictures on the new Sea Ice page.
Hmmm. . . .
I have tried writing them in the past at the email addresses they provide –I’ve yet to receive a response (yes, I’m very polite and respectful in my queries).

Jimbo
August 3, 2010 4:25 pm

“Seadragon (SSN-584), foreground, and her sister Skate (SSN-578) during a rendezvous at the North Pole in August 1962. Note the men on the ice beyond the submarines ”
See image 1, image 2

“The Sturgeon (SSN-637) lies in shallow broken ice at the North Pole, 17 April 1989. ”
http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/0863708.jpg

Next time a warmist point at a large patch of open Arctic water show them this.

Polynyas are areas of open water surrounded by sea ice. In the Arctic, polynyas occur in the midst of the thick (>2 m) ice pack that covers the Arctic Ocean and adjacent seas during 9 or 10 of the 12 months of the year. Polynyas can vary in size from less than a few km2 to immense areas such as the North Water that can spread over 50 000 km2 ……
How do polynyas form?
Sensible Heat Polynyas form when deep, relatively warm (~2oC) water is upwelled towards the surface where it melts the ice cover or prevents ice from forming.
Latent Heat Polynyas form in areas where ice is transported away by winds or currents as soon as it is formed, thus preventing a consolidated pack from forming locally.

Theo Barker
August 3, 2010 4:32 pm

Sub picture was photochopped in.
BTW, I downloaded the large time lapse animation from the NOAA site: http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/gallery_np.html
Around May 24, there appears to be at least a crack that allows the buoy in the background to start moving relative to the buoy in the foreground. It appears to be a small lead by May 28, and becomes obvious on Jul 19. On July 24, you can watch a chunk of ice float by on the lead. Toward July 27, the lead appears to narrow.

James Sexton
August 3, 2010 4:33 pm

Robert of Ottawa says:
August 3, 2010 at 4:14 pm
“Does that sub know it’s on camera? Anyone a clue as to which nation?”
I’m thinking photoshop had a hand in that one.

Dan in California
August 3, 2010 4:39 pm

Robert of Ottawa says:
August 3, 2010 at 4:14 pm
Does that sub know it’s on camera? Anyone a clue as to which nation?
The sub isn’t real; it’s a photoshop lie. I offer the following real photo not only of a sub in the ice, but also three cuddly polar bears hoping that it’s edible. Sorry about being fooled myself and passing it on.
http://www.strategypage.com/military_photos/bears_sub1.aspx

August 3, 2010 4:40 pm

One UK sub . Two US subs.

John from CA
August 3, 2010 4:40 pm

Climate Atlas of Arctic Sea Ice Extent and Anomalies, 1953-1984
http://www.geog.mcgill.ca/gec3/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/Report-no.-1987-8.pdf
Charts at the end break down the anomalies by Region.
I was surprised to discover that the data prior to 1900 is largely based on ship observations for the edge of the ice sheet with the assumption that it was solid beyond that point.
Climate models based on satellite observations have been developed to project past ice extent. Data from Iceland appears to be the longest running record; a few hundred years.
So, past data isn’t available and the only running record we have that’s reasonably sound is 30 or so years old.
Based on this, Arctic sea ice observations don’t appear to mean anything.