Well not really, but the headline above is almost as silly as the paper. From the “I can’t stop laughing department”, some “it can’t be anything else but global warming climate change” silliness in Nature. No mention of PDO or other cycles.

In other news, Former Governor Sarah Palin is blamed for starting all this by making it Marmot Day instead of Groundhog Day in Alaska. As everyone knows, marmots can’t forecast a darn thing, but they can model. /sarc From a KU press release:
Climate change causes larger, more plentiful marmots, study shows
Finding by University of Kansas researchers is likely to have implications for many creatures that hibernate
LAWRENCE — This week, one of the world’s foremost scientific journals will publish results of a decades-long research project founded at the University of Kansas showing that mountain rodents called marmots are growing larger, healthier and more plentiful in response to climate change.
The groundbreaking study, published in Nature, is the first to reveal that changes in seasonal timing can increase body weight and population size simultaneously in a species — findings likely to have implications for a host of other creatures, especially those that hibernate.
Established by Kenneth Armitage, KU professor emeritus of ecology and evolutionary biology, the long-standing investigation tracks yellow-bellied marmots in Colorado.
“We started this research in 1962, and every summer we’d record basic demography such as the age of the animals, gender, body mass, who survived and who reproduced,” Armitage said. “At the time we started, we had no idea that climate change was going to be a problem. But we collected that basic demography to use as a foundation for other kinds of study.”

Largely because of the KU researcher, yellow-bellied marmots have proven to be a valuable model organism for understanding larger questions. Armitage said that he first chose to study the marmot because it lives in easy-to-find burrows and is active in the daytime, so it is readily observable.
“I didn’t intend to spend 40 years studying marmots, but new questions kept coming up — physiological, hibernation, genetics and so on,” Armitage said. “It turned out that long-term studies of our kind are quite rare. Yet, it’s precisely the kind of data that you need to determine what climate change is going to do.”
The climate-change findings result from collaboration between a number of international researchers who used fieldwork by Armitage to underpin their analyses. Both Arpat Ozgul, lead author of the study from Imperial College London, and Dan Blumstein, a co-author from the University of California-Los Angeles, previously have worked with Armitage on the marmot project.
Using data collected between 1976 and 2008, the authors conclude that a longer growing season has boosted marmots’ individual size, overall strength and general population. The average weight of fully grown marmots jumped from 6.82 pounds in the early years of the study to 7.56 pounds in the later half of the study.
Additionally, the population growth of marmots increased from 0.56 marmots per year from 1976 to 2001 to 14.2 marmots per year from 2001 to 2008.
“The warming results in earlier snowmelt, which means that plants appear sooner and the marmots come out of hibernation earlier,” said Armitage. “They have more fat left which provides them energy to start foraging. Then they can start reproducing so their young are born earlier and have time to get fat enough to survive hibernation. Most importantly, the reproductive female can survive better. Being able to wean her young earlier, she has a longer season and survival of adult females has increased over the last years.”
Although Armitage is happy to see the yellow-bellied marmot thrive, the KU researcher cautioned that the boom in marmots is temporary; he expects that warming could harm them in the long run because of changes in snow patterns.
“This benefit to marmots is probably short-lived,” he said. “Snow patterns both benefit and harm marmots. Prolonged snow cover in the spring increases mortality and reduces reproduction. But if there’s less snowmelt to nourish plants that marmots forage in the summer, it will severely affect them. In droughts, we’ve had very high mortality.”
I’m seeing tough duty here. Regular trips to Colorado from Kansas. 40 years worth. Still not sure whether we got the danged varmints figured out yet. Have to strap them damn cumbersome planks to our feet and proceed downhill after ’em. They move pretty fast you know. So you got to be quick on your skis, I mean planks. Poles in your hands help but they are fearsome critters. /sarc off
This is all about grant-funded ski trips!
Sigh……KU should stick with medicine and Basketball.
And we’ve got Couch’s Kingbird (Tyrannus couchii) in the Dallas area … normally claimed by all the ‘expert’ textbooks to be resident down near the GoM coast into Mexico and inland some, but nothing this far north.
Video taken just this last month in the county north of Dallas, Texas: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scNmVFNGvek
I saw a nesting pair back in 2007 (a little further south) but could not at that time make an identification as to the species …
.
Jimbo-50 years or so,maybe 60, was the start of a PDO and AMO shift.Hmmm…
We in NE Oregon were worried about planting Barley because that was about all that
would grow in the Grain category. I wish I could locate an old “Oregon Farmer”
periodical that talked about “Canadian Prairie” conditions in the in interior NW….
R Shearer says:
July 21, 2010 at 8:03 pm
I haven’t seen a marmot in about 2) years. I thought climate change killed them all.
__________________________________–
The Mamots are getting bigger because Bret Combs (no relation) is killing all those elk in the Rockies (the Brucellosis Eradication program). There is a major problem with Brucellosis in the wild herds in Canada too.
Well, if the marmots are like people, they froze their a**es off here the last couple of winters and we’re still in that cool trend. I don’t know where this guy got the idea that summer has gotten longer, because we haven’t had much of one the last couple of years, spring or fall either.
Gee, I wonder if the good doctor of marmotology thought about checking out the same critters from Alaska, Yukon, British Columbia and on down to Colorado which corresponds to a profile of warmer temps. He could arrived at the same conclusions all in one year and then used the other 39 years to do something interesting. And why did he need collaboration and co-authors from Imperial College and U of Cal. Couldn’t he weigh animals, turds and measure their girths all by himself? And someone gave all these guys grants for forty yrs! Good Lord save us all. I would have given up before my 3rd wife left me and I found no one inviting me over bbq and good conversation. (Dad? Please don’t come to our class for career day)
Good! my dog will have more fun, she just loves to break their spine.
Could the marmot now be a new temperature proxy?
Gary Pearse says:
July 21, 2010 at 8:58 pm
Gary, I shouldn’t need to tell you this. It was all about the ski trips. And grant-funded at that!
All change is Bad.
All change is caused by Global Warming.
All Global Warming is caused by man.
If it’s hot, it’s Global Warming.
If it’s cold, it’s global warming.
If it’s average, it’s global warming.
A quick look at the paper shows no change from 70’s to 2000 then an abrupt change to earlier weaning and greater abundance around 2000. The coordinates suggest Gunnison is the nearest USHCN station and it show a decline/plateau in mean temperature 1980-2000 but with a definite decline since 2000.
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/broker?id=053662&_PROGRAM=prog.gplot_meanclim_mon_yr2009.sas&_SERVICE=default¶m=TMEAN&minyear=1970&maxyear=2009
So how do they connect global warming?
Looking at the picture: “That’s the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on!”.
But that aside, its not global warming, its called evolution at work, adapation or die, the survival of the fittest. Evolution a term invented by (but not only) Charles Darwin, it did upset (and still does) a lot of believers in the one and only true god.
Times have changed, but the believers are still here… and very upset
Ralph Dwyer july 21 2010 9:10 pm
Skiing on grant money, huh? Where do I sign up?
Hey. Wait just a darn minute. Wasn’t this Climate Change (nee AGW) supposed to be forcing animals out of thier habitats and driving them towards certain extinction?
Another goalpost move, double standard, make it up as they go along song.
Now we know what the exploding Polar Bear population has been eating.
Marmot steaks.
So, did I get the gyst of this right? I think it sais that at least one mammal species is growing bigger and stronger and healthier because of global warming.
I hate marmots. They poop all over the top of anything stacked nice and neat in my barn – hay, boards, sheetrock, whatever. Fortunately they froze their little hineys off these past two years and I haven’t shot any since. Cuz there weren’t none. This year, we haven’t been able to use our usual practice targets – ground squirrels – cuz there weren’t none of them either. Had to paste sticky orange targets on the hillside instead. Worked okay but they don’t stick to rocks very well. Marmots and ground squirrels actually stand up and hold real still jes so we kin shoot em.
So warming results in more plant growth and that results in animals growing bigger and healthier. Wow, who would have thought!?!?
One thing that is commonly ignored is that a little warming is a good thing. The only way global warming becomes a disaster is if it truly spirals out of control. IF that happens it wouldn’t be for a very long time and that means mankind has the time for technology to improve and develop solutions.
In other words, the slight warming that has taken place is a boon for many plants and animals – including man!
A little cooling can be a VERY bad thing on the other hand!
What a sad collection of knee-jerk anti-science comments. Phenology researchers have been observing and recording changes in animal and plant behaviour for decades, and are quite familiar with normal variability, just as climate researchers are familiar with normal climate variability. The effects of human activities on the atmosphere, and therefore on climate, are causing concern. See Walther et al, Ecological responses to recent climate change, Nature 2002.
Jim Steele says:
July 21, 2010 at 9:17 pm
I guess the peer-review process at Nature is still suspicious (or simply non-existant). As long as the results show that global warming is the cause and that results are somehow bad (scary rodents!), no one felt the need to investigate and check temperature trends with population trends. Oh boy!
From the article:
“Although Armitage is happy to see the yellow-bellied marmot thrive, the KU researcher cautioned that the boom in marmots is temporary; he expects that warming could harm them in the long run because of changes in snow patterns. ”
Sounds like they have global warming doom and gloom covered. These guys will say anything. Do they really think al gore is that stupid?
alarmist bells are ringing!
22 July: Guardian: Amelia Hill: UN in fresh bid to salvage international deal on climate change
Campaigners welcome plans to amend the way Kyoto protocol resolutions are passed
Under the plans, countries could be forced to accept decisions made by a majority of members…
If the UN’s suggestions are adopted, decisions will be forced through if four-fifths of the protocol vote in favour, after all efforts to reach agreement by consensus have been exhausted. The amendments would come into force after six months…
In a further attempt to galvanise the climate change body into motion, the UN also suggested that countries could be forced to opt out of any amendments, as opposed to the current arrangement whereby they must explicitly agree to any decisions tabled..
The amendment, which will be presented in Bonn in August, reads: “An amendment would enter into force after a certain period has elapsed following its adoption, except for those parties that have notified the depositary that they cannot accept the amendment.”..
Ed Miliband, the shadow energy secretary, acknowledged that the current deadlock has to be broken. “We know there needs to be reform of the UN process around tackling climate change,” he said. “We saw at Copenhagen how some countries blocked progress and we can’t allow that to happen again.”
The amendment was welcomed by Farhana Yamin, research fellow at the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
“The stalemate in negotiations has gone on for 15 years,” she said. “This consensus arrangement is an extraordinary and ridiculous anomaly in the make up of Kyoto that exists in few other UN organisations.
“This is a positive way of forcing laggard countries who hold out and play their veto hand the whole time, to engage in constructive talks,” she added. “Under this new system, they will realise that unless they are constructive, they will lose their voice altogether.”…
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jul/22/un-bid-international-deal-climate-change
I think it’s possible there’s another root cause:
http://www.google.com/images?q=colorado+wind+farms&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=univ&ei=QM9HTNvBK5S6sQOwsujzCw&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=4&ved=0CDMQsAQwAw&biw=1165&bih=712
Fewer predators.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-01-04-windmills-usat_x.htm
I suspect that it may already be worse than we thought…
http://www.rathergood.com/marmotplane_small.jpg
(I love Google image search)
nico says:
July 21, 2010 at 9:41 pm
Another humorless, warmist troll! How about sequestering some CO2 for the cause. That’d be inhaling without exhaling if you didn’t quite get it.