New results from an investigation into Antarctica’s potential contribution to sea level rise are reported this week (Sunday 20 June) by scientists from the British Antarctic Survey (BAS), Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (LDEO) and the National Oceanography Centre in the journal Nature Geoscience.
Thinning ice in West Antarctica is currently contributing nearly 10 per cent of global sea level rise and scientists have identified Pine Island Glacier (PIG) as a major source. As part of a series of investigations to better understand the impact of melting ice on sea level an exciting new discovery has been made. Using Autosub (an autonomous underwater vehicle) to dive deep and travel far beneath the pine Island Glacier’s floating ice shelf, scientists captured ocean and sea-floor measurements, which revealed a 300m high ridge (mountain) on the sea floor.
Pine Island Glacier was once grounded on (sitting on top of) this underwater ridge, which slowed its flow into the sea. However, in recent decades it has thinned and disconnected from the ridge, allowing the glacier to move ice more rapidly from the land into the sea. This also permitted deep warm ocean water to flow over the ridge and into a widening cavity that now extends to an area of 1000 km2 under the ice shelf. The warm water, trapped under the ice, is causing the bottom of the ice shelf to melt, resulting in continuous thinning and acceleration of the glacier.
Lead author Dr Adrian Jenkins of British Antarctic Survey said, “The discovery of the ridge has raised new questions about whether the current loss of ice from Pine Island Glacier is caused by recent climate change or is a continuation of a longer-term process that began when the glacier disconnected from the ridge.
“We do not know what kick-started the initial retreat from the ridge, but we do know that it started some time prior to 1970. Since detailed observations of Pine Island Glacier only began in the 1990s, we now need to use other techniques such as ice core analysis and computer modelling to look much further into the glacier’s history in order to understand if what we see now is part of a long term trend of ice sheet contraction. This work is vital for evaluating the risk of potential wide-spread collapse of West Antarctic glaciers.”
[UPDATE]
Steven Mosher has graciously allowed me to add my two cents worth here. As you know, I love data, it beats theories every time.
First, data on the location of the Pine Island Glacier:
Figure W1. Pine Island Glacier, Antarctica. The West Antarctic Peninsula is at the top right. Pine Island Glacier is shown by the snowflake. The white box outlines the area for which I show sea surface temperature (SST) below.
Next, data on the ocean surface temperatures. There are a couple of SST datasets that cover this area. Both are available at KNMI, that amazing resource. One is the Hadley HADISST Ice and Sea Surface Dataset. The other is the Reynolds satellite based dataset. Here’s what they say about the sea surface temperatures in the area outlined by the white box:
Figure W2. Change in sea surface temperature (SST) in the ocean off of Pine Island Glacier.
Conclusions? Well, it seems clear that the change in the sea surface temperature is not the reason for the melting of the Pine Island Glacier, SSTs have been dropping there for the last thirty years …
Regards to all,
w.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


jorgekafkazar says: June 21, 2010 at 8:33 pm
No need to, Michael Faraday did it some 200 years ago by his Waterloo bridge (Thames, London) experiment. The river tidal flow contained electric current induced by the GMF, river was an electric current generator!
rbateman says: June 21, 2010 at 3:29 pm
Very nicely presented. Now, what makes the Hudson Bay Field fall and the Siberian Field rise?
re: http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/NFC1.htm
Around 1650 (Maunder Min) the Earth’s and the sun’s magnetic systems suffered a nasty jolt.
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/LFC3.htm
Ever since the GMF is performing a kind of convolution:
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/Global%20Mag%20Anomaly.gif
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/NFC6.htm
Jolt could not have come from the sun and unlikely from the outside of the heliosphere.
I do suspect two or three massive planets J&S&U did the ‘dirty deed’
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/LFC4.htm
vukcevic says:
June 22, 2010 at 10:42 am
Awesome!….you’ll be considered by the Holy Inquisition because of your blasphemous assertions.
i_was_ferret says:
June 21, 2010 at 11:57 am
“Interesting website article on the “new” volcano: http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=100385”
Okay, the scientists say the major contributor to expected sea-level rise is this ice shelf.
The ice shelf comes from ice sliding out to the sea from a clacier….
Other scientists have discovered a vulcano underneath.
So, one natural event; A glacier sliding into the sea, and another natural event, a vulcano, is melting the ice faster than sea-water normally would.
I cant help it, but my conclusion is then that when Al Gore and Stoere was standing there in Copenhagen and warned us about sea level rising…… the reason is …..a vulcano?????
Its worse than we thought!
vukcevic says:
June 22, 2010 at 10:42 am
Around 1650 (Maunder Min) the Earth’s and the sun’s magnetic systems suffered a nasty jolt.
When is it the next jolt expected?
Enneagram says: June 22, 2010 at 12:32 pm
When is it the next jolt expected?
According to my ‘astrology tables’ previous one was 1115-1173, and next one 2186-2232, which was of the opposite sign to the last, so is the next one.
Which according to IPCC (while they were sane) it was beginning of Medieval worm period (Anthony’s archive):
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/10/when-the-ipcc-disappeared-the-medieval-warm-period/
So, it means start of another warming period at 2232; does that mean 220 years of cooling?
I sincerely hope my ‘astrology’ is wrong.
Enneagram says: June 22, 2010 at 12:29 pm
Awesome!….you’ll be considered by the Holy Inquisition because of your blasphemous assertions.
I just about escaped the inquisitor’s ‘bonfire’, shouting Eppur si muove
Fortunately the firewood was rotten, couldn’t catch fire.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/06/17/nasa-warns-solar-flares-from-huge-space-storm-will-cause-devastation/#comment-414039
From here …
rbateman says
Gosh, I just bought a huge bundle of cheap paper towels from Sam’s. Darn, I guess I’ll run back and get some Bounties if I’m not too late!