Omaha schools pull Laurie David's AGW book citing "major factual error" and DiCaprio video "without merit".

Omaha.com reports on the school board that made this decision here. This book has been around since 2007. Since she’s married to Seinfeld producer Larry David, so it fits right in with the rest of the Seinfeld saga. For example, did you know NASA GISS is over “Monks restaurant” from the show? No, really.

An SPPI report on David’s book in 2007 said:

On page 18 of Laurie David’s new children’s global warming book, there is a glaring scientific error. David tells children:

Deep down in the Antarctic ice are atmosphere samples from the past, trapped in tiny air bubbles. These bubbles, formed when snowflakes fell on the ice, are the key to figuring out two things about climate history: what temperatures were in the past and which greenhouse gases were present in the atmosphere at that time. The more the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the higher the temperature climbed. The less carbon dioxide, the more the temperature fell. You can see this relationship for yourself by looking at the graph:

David adds:

What makes this graph so amazing is that by connecting rising CO2 to rising temperature scientists have discovered the link between greenhouse-gas pollution and global warming.

What really makes their graph “amazing” is that it’s dead wrong.

In order to contrive a visual representation for their false central claim that CO2 controls temperature change, David and co-author Cambria Gordon present unsuspecting children with an altered temperature and CO2 graph that falsely reverses the relationship found in the scientific literature.

The actual temperature curve in the chart was switched with the actual CO2 curve. That is, the authors mislabelled the blue curve as temperature and mislabelled the red curve as CO2 concentration. The real data show that the red curve represents the temperature changes over geological time, followed (lagged) by changes in CO2 concentrations represented by the blue curve. Thus, children tracing the properly labelled curves from right to left (from past to present) can easily see the real, science-based relationship (particularly clear in the interval between 500,000 and 150,000 years ago).

The David-Gordon manipulation is critical because the central premise of the book argues that CO2 drives temperature, yet the ice core data clearly reveal temperature increases generally precede increasing CO2 by several hundred to a few thousand years. This fact may have been too inconvenient for David, who instead presented young readers with an astoundingly irresponsible falsehood. Parents and teachers of these children should be concerned.

More here in the SPPI report

============================================

From Omaha.com:

Global warming book withdrawn

By Joe Dejka

WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER

Millard Public Schools will stop using a children’s book about global warming — but only until the district can obtain copies with a factual error corrected.

A review committee, convened after parents complained, concluded that author Laurie David’s book, “The Down-to-Earth Guide to Global Warming,” contained “a major factual error” in a graphic about rising temperatures and carbon dioxide levels.

Mark Feldhausen, associate superintendent for educational services, this week sent a letter to parents who complained, including the wife of U.S. Rep. Lee Terry of Nebraska, outlining the committee’s findings.

Three parents, including Robyn Terry, complained to the district. The Terrys’ 12-year-old son attended Beadle Middle School last year. Mrs. Terry said that the materials used in his class portrayed global warming as fact when scientists disagree.

In the video, DiCaprio attributes global warming to mankind’s “destructive addiction” to oil. He says “big corporations” and politicians gained too much money and power “on our addiction,” making them “dangerously resistant to change.”

Corrected versions will continue to be used in Millard’s sixth-grade language arts curriculum, he wrote.

// //

However, the district will cease to use a companion video about global warming, narrated by actor Leonardo DiCaprio, he wrote.

The committee found the video “without merit” and recommended that it not be used.

More here.

h/t to Dr. Leif Svalgaard

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

90 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 18, 2010 10:55 pm

One would think that the article on the Omaha World-Herald web site could of at least mentioned what the major factual error was.

kwik
June 18, 2010 11:05 pm

Yes, that is FRAUD. Because Callion et.al. in “Science” has been known for a long time. Callion et.al. is from 2003, me thinks.
Here;
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/299/5613/1728

Amino Acids in Meteorites
June 18, 2010 11:31 pm

there’s an oil leak in the Gulf. it’s been like 58 days now. ummm, ya, it’s still happening
i guess it’s just part of life now
ok, back to the topic

Warren
June 18, 2010 11:47 pm

As soon as I saw that graph, I knew it had been around somewhere before, I thought Jonova, but after going through her site, it wasn’t. Has it been in here at some stage? I remember it because the blue and red lines had been mislablelled in the original as well, from 2009 iirc.
Well, the original was correct, but the adjusted/corrected/smoothed published version was as above.
And I haven’t the time available at the moment to go though all the files.

ShrNfr
June 18, 2010 11:53 pm

I am always reminded of Feynman’s role in picking science books to be used in CA. His wife could always tell when he was reviewing them by the large volume of profanity being emitted from his study.

Jimbo
June 19, 2010 12:26 am

Won’t any smart kids question the graph and ask “what caused the co2 rises in the past teacher?” What would the teacher say then? :o)

kwik
June 19, 2010 12:31 am

Callion et.al. in Science magazine was back in 2003.
Telling us CO2 lags temperature in Vostok ice cores by approx 800 years.
Here;
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/299/5613/1728.pdf
So they’ve had a long time fixing it. But didnt.
What does it tell us? What is the motivation?
Money, me thinks.

Peter
June 19, 2010 1:11 am

Well, if their graph is correct then we should expect to see sharply-rising temperatures in about, er… 800 years time 😉

June 19, 2010 1:13 am

After a teaching career of 37 years , mostly in the social sciences, it gave me the greatest pleasure to purge the department of all the CAGW material that had been foisted on us over the years. The lot went into a skip bin. My colleagues cheered. None of us taught it anyway.

June 19, 2010 1:37 am

The book rates an “F” for sure.

henry
June 19, 2010 1:38 am

And the kids could probably see that if you use the red line to show temps, then there have been times in the past that have had higher temps.
Or if you use the blue line to show the CO2, then there have been times in the past when CO2 has been higher than today.
So it doesn’t matter if the red or blue represents temps or CO2 – current values are NOT the highest they’ve been in a million years.
And, looking at the chart, if the blue line represents the CO2 levels, how do they explain that MASSIVE rise of CO2 150,000 years ago (from near zero to max), especially if the CO2 is because of “greenhouse-gas pollution”?
Also, the question should come up about SCALE. For AGW to work, they have to use the doubling of CO2 as it’s centerpiece. This chart lacks the resolution necessary to prove that.
The ONLY thing they found wrong with the chart was a reversing of the labels? Wow.

June 19, 2010 1:40 am

The withdrawal, albeit perhaps temporary, of this shoddy book, and the rejection of the DeCaprio video are both good news.
I suspect that such misleading materials have deeply penetrated various curricula in schools throughout the world. I have recently started blogging on this to encourage more investigation and sharing of information. I hope in particular to help publicise and promote links to rebuttals such as the SPPI report which you mention.
http://climatelessons.blogspot.com/

tallbloke
June 19, 2010 1:41 am

This is crying out for someone to write a spoof episode of ‘Seinfeld’.

June 19, 2010 2:36 am

This may interest some of you:
[snip]
Reply Please post your link on the relevant NASA solar flares thread. RT-Mod

Dave Wendt
June 19, 2010 2:54 am

Peter says:
June 19, 2010 at 1:11 am
Well, if their graph is correct then we should expect to see sharply-rising temperatures in about, er… 800 years time 😉
Or maybe the current rise in CO2 is just the lagged response to the elevated temps of the Medieval Climate Optimum.

Alexander K
June 19, 2010 3:49 am

I have been aware for decades that all sorts of advocacy groups push their dishonest messages in schools. In 1981, while inspecting possible supplemental High School text books available for our school to purchase I discovered a text book for 14-17 yr olds, published by the publishing arm o f one of the top two universities in the UK for a very strident international civil rights organisation. The book stated categorically that the New Zealand government both imprisoned and tortured political dissidents. Neither statement is factual and is quite laughable to anyone who lived in NZ for any length of time. This discovery made me much more critical of the content of whatever supplementary text books were marketed to every school I subsequently taught in. The schools market is huge and advocacy groups are expert at capitalising on it..

Athelstan
June 19, 2010 4:00 am

Al Goracle………..tried this one……..same old ****, Lord Almighty it is so sad, the trouble is these dolts have no clue about geology, climate, geological history or time or process/science/integrity/ but then why allow mere facts to get in the way of the ‘narrative’?
Change the record lads.

groweg
June 19, 2010 4:01 am

Willie Soon of Harvard spotted this error in David’s book as soon as it was published. He notified the publisher and the response was to call in a consultant and basically do nothing. Buried somewhere in this great interview with Soon is his account of the whole frustrating incident:
http://www.itsrainmakingtime.com/_recent/climate_part2.html
The publisher and the author knew about this gross error in the book from shortly after its release date.

Xi Chin
June 19, 2010 5:13 am

There should be criminal charges brought against this author. It seems like outright fraud. Anyone looking into this? I’m not a lawer, so i don’t know what laws have been broken, but if none have – then we need to change the law!

RockyRoad
June 19, 2010 5:25 am

When you have to lie to make your point, then your point is a lie. Or is that too complicated for some of you Warmers?
I tell you unequivocally, regardless of forcings and logic reversals and whatever tripe scientist you want to quote, CO2 is NOT the planet’s temperature driver; never has been, never will be. Own up to the fact you’ve been duped, lied to, and follow liars like Al Gore. And if you still like Gore and believe what he says, you have a major, major problem. Recant.
The End of CAGW.
PS. Isn’t there something else you Warmers can sink you teeth into, such as environmental issues that clean up real pollution (not the CO2 kind, btw), or teaching logic and the scientific method at all levels of school, or just loving thy neighbor as thyself? (What a novel concept!) Just think of what could have been done with all the $billions that have been wasted on the biggest scientific lie of human history. It should make your head spin; it does mine! (Even Spain is coming to its senses.) But in the final analysis, I am not your enemy; rather, someone who wishes to see truth reign supreme, unless, of course, I’m forced into submission and am robbed through taxation based on a lie.

PJB
June 19, 2010 5:27 am

Hot (not globally) from the presses:
http://www.torontosun.com/entertainment/celebrities/2010/06/16/14406891-wenn-story.html
Laurie David “denies” affair with Al Gore……does that mean that she is a “denier”?

Henry chance
June 19, 2010 5:32 am

R Shearer says:
June 18, 2010 at 8:51 pm
Laurie denies accusations of her affair with Al.

So she is a denier?

Pat Heuvel
June 19, 2010 5:36 am

bubbagyro says:
June 18, 2010 at 8:36 pm
Irregardless, the Davids’ positions promoting CAGW shows how much they know.
Irregardless?
That isn’t even a word.
No. It isn’t.

H.R.
June 19, 2010 5:37 am

Steve in SC says:
June 18, 2010 at 7:45 pm
“I greet this news with great joy.
Of course you know that Laurie David was being boinked by algore.”

I would not care to know what was said in their pillow talk. However, Pachy might want transcripts for his next AGW/romance novel.

Dave, UK
June 19, 2010 6:16 am

Is it just me, or are the 2 versions of the graphs in the SPPI report (i.e. the original fraudulent graph, and the corrected one) the wrong way round? As far as I can see when reading the PDF, the apparently original graph shows temperature preceding CO2 changes, and the so-called ‘corrected chart’ has temperature following CO2 – the complete antithesis of the message.

Verified by MonsterInsights