Early Earth haze likely provided ultraviolet shield for planet, says CU-Boulder study. See press release here.
Earth’s thick organic haze 3 billion years ago likely similar to haze hovering over Saturn moon Titan today

A new study shows a thick organic haze that enshrouded early Earth several billion years ago may have been similar to the haze now hovering above Saturn’s largest moon, Titan, and would have protected primordial life on the planet from the damaging effects of ultraviolet radiation.
The University of Colorado at Boulder scientists believe the haze was made up primarily of methane and nitrogen chemical byproducts created by reactions with light, said CU-Boulder doctoral student Eric Wolf, lead study author. Not only would the haze have shielded early Earth from UV light, it would have allowed gases like ammonia to build up, causing greenhouse warming and perhaps helped to prevent the planet from freezing over.
The researchers determined the haze of hydrocarbon aerosols was probably made up of fluffy, microscopic particles shaped somewhat like cottonwood tree seeds that would have blocked UV but allowed visible light through to Earth’s surface, Wolf said.
Prior to the new study, the prevailing scientific view was that the atmosphere of Earth some 3 billion years ago was primarily made up of nitrogen gas with lesser amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, hydrogen and water vapor, said Wolf. “Since climate models show early Earth could not have been warmed by atmospheric carbon dioxide alone because of its low levels, other greenhouse gases must have been involved. We think the most logical explanation is methane, which may have been pumped into the atmosphere by early life that was metabolizing it.”
A paper on the subject by Wolf and CU-Boulder Professor Brian Toon of the atmospheric and oceanic sciences department is being published in the June 4 issue of Science. NASA’s Planetary Atmosphere Program funded the study.
The output of the sun during the Archean period some 3.8 billion to 2.5 billion years ago is thought to have been 20 percent to 30 percent fainter than today, said Wolf. But previous work by other scientists produced geological and biological evidence that indicates Earth’s surface temperatures were as warm or warmer than today.
As part of the early Earth study, Wolf and Toon used a climate model from the National Center for Atmospheric Research and concepts from lab studies by another CU group led by chemistry and biochemistry Professor Margaret Tolbert that help explain the odd haze of Titan, the second largest moon in the solar system and the largest moon of Saturn. Titan came under intense study following the arrival of the Cassini spacecraft at Saturn in 2004, allowing scientists to determine it was the only moon in the solar system with both a dense atmosphere and liquid on its surface.
Previous modeling efforts of early Earth haze by other scientists assumed that aerosol particulates making up the haze were spherical, said Wolf. But the spherical shape does not adequately account for the optical properties of the haze that blanketed the planet.
Lab simulations helped researchers conclude that the Earth haze likely was made up of irregular “chains” of aggregate particles with greater geometrical sizes than spheres, similar to the shape of aerosols believed to populate Titan’s thick atmosphere. Wolf said the aggregate aerosol particulates are believed to be fragmented geometric shapes known as fractals that can be split into parts.
During the Archean period there was no ozone layer in Earth’s atmosphere to protect life on the planet, said Wolf. “The UV shielding methane haze over early Earth we are suggesting not only would have protected Earth’s surface, it would have protected the atmospheric gases below it — including the powerful greenhouse gas, ammonia — that would have played a significant role in keeping the early Earth warm.”
CU-Boulder researchers estimated there were roughly 100 million tons of haze produced annually in the atmosphere of early Earth during the Archean. “If this was the case, an early Earth atmosphere literally would have been dripping organic material into the oceans, providing manna from heaven for the earliest life to sustain itself,” Toon said.
“Methane is the key to make this climate model run, so one of our goals now is to pin down where and how it originated,” said Toon. If Earth’s earliest organisms didn’t produce the methane, it may have been generated by the release of gasses during volcanic eruptions either before or after life first arose — a hypothesis that will requires further study, he said.
The new CU-Boulder study will likely re-ignite interest in a controversial experiment by scientists Stanley Miller and Harold Urey in the 1950s in which methane, ammonia, nitrogen and water were combined in a test tube. After Miller and Urey ran an electrical current through the mixture to simulate the effects of lightning or powerful UV radiation, the result was the creation of a small pool of amino acids — the building blocks of life.
Toon said the theory of early Earth being shrouded by a gaseous blanket containing methane and ammonia first arose in the 1960s and was subsequently discarded by scientists. In the 1970s and 1980s some scientists suggested the early Earth atmosphere was similar to those on Mars and Venus with lots of carbon dioxide, another theory that eventually went by the wayside. Since CO2-rich atmospheres do not produce organic molecules easily, scientists began looking in deep-sea volcanic vents and at wayward asteroids to explain early Earth life.
A 1997 paper by the late Carl Sagan of Cornell University and Christopher Chyba, then at the University of Arizona, proposed that an organic aerosol shield in early Earth’s atmosphere would have protected the ammonia wafting beneath it, allowing heating to occur at Earth’s surface. But the authors proposed the haze particles were spherical rather than irregular aggregate particles Wolf and Toon suggest and did not consider methane to be the driver of the system, eventually sinking that theory.
“We still have a lot of research to do in order to refine our new view of early Earth,” said Wolf. “But we think this paper solves a number of problems associated with the haze that existed over early Earth and likely played a role in triggering or at least supporting the earliest life on the planet.”
From space, early Earth probably looked much like Titan looks today, said Toon. “It would have been shrouded by a reddish haze that would have been difficult to see through, and the ocean probably was a greenish color caused by dissolved iron in the oceans. It wasn’t a blue planet by any means.”
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
All studies of the early atmosphere are speculative and rely on modeling, including modeling of the early solar nebula, Earth’s accretion from planetismals, the Earth/moon impact, etc. Rock samples don’t reveal the atmosphere much before 3 billion years ago.
George H. Shaw submitted a review “Earth’s atmosphere – Hadean to early Proterozoic” available at http://www.sciencedirect.com (pay site). 29 pages $31 bucks unless your work has ScienceDirect. Densely packed. Not an easy read.
If methane did shield the Earth’s surface from UV long ago, it is odd that there are no fossils of land-based bacterial colonies, although there are fossils of ocean bacterial colonies (stromatolites).
Shaw’s review says it would have taken 0.2 atm of CO2 to compensate for the 30% less solar irradiance. Since CO2 reacts with rocks, something had to continually replenish the CO2.
Re: Hoi Polloi
Yes, I see the progression. The purple haze was previously discussed in Hendrix (1967), then the result of its condensation into purple rain was in Prince (1984) and covered extensively since then.
Was there ever any mention about a purple ocean?
To bubbgyro:
The abiogenetic theory for oil origination was championed by the late Dr. Thomas Gold, an astrophysicist who frequently advanced theories that were considered outlandish. However–he had an annoying habit of ending up being proved RIGHT.
See his book, The Deep Hot Biosphere, for more.
This theory is slowly gaining some grudging acceptance from Western geologists and petroleum engineers–as you pointed out, the Russians have used predictions from it to drill some very productive wells in formations that should have had no petroleum at all according to accepted biogenesis theory. Currently, this crowd has been forced admit that a “vanishingly small percentage” of oil is of abiogenetic origin. Check back in 20 years–that precentage may have jumped up by then.
Actually, from what I read T Gold got the idea from a Russian altho I love his work, brilliant. And the W Thornhill info is straight from the 1946 paper of Velikovsky’s Cosmos Without Gravitation which I also think is brilliant. Phlogiston & Scott right.
I am still having trouble with the hot earth for how many billion years, with water yet. I just can’t picture early earth spinning around for billions of years unfrozen with a bad case of bathtub slosh. Which is why loud blare of Water On Early Mars to keep Water On Early Earth company.
So the hot earth had to have a cause, proposed co2 shot down due to lack of, and now methane cotton seeds. Just found out today water drops are hamburger bun shaped.
Encedalus iced all over sounds so warm and fuzzy. Maybe before eyes/heart/arteries fail the theory will swing back to frozen, except for 2 b warm up and 1/2 b warm again because Ice Ball Earth was a frozen world, right? And under the ice was water. The only thing T Gold was wrong about was the depth of moon dust and where did it go?
I think you all have missed the point. Wolf and Toon both make clear that what they propose is a theory — not fact — and if any of you had read the entire article in “Science” (which I doubt anyone here has), you would have read this new theory is the ONLY one proposed thus far that comes close to solving the “Dim Sun Paradox.” Again, Wolf and Toon expound a theory acknowledging and even looking forward to others improving upon it.
It should be noted that Dr. Brian Toon is a preeminent atmospheric scientist who with four others (including his advisor and mentor, Carl Sagan) coined the now familiar term “Nuclear Winter” derived from their modeling of nuclear war’s affects on the atmosphere back in the late 70’s. I don’t know much about Wolf except that he is a student of Toon’s (apparently one of his stars) much like Toon worked under Sagan.
If you received “Science” magazine, you also would have read a highly detailed, long article written by Dr. Chyba of Princeton whose theory Wolf and Toon improved upon. Chyba, like Toon, a preeminent Atmospheric Physicist, gave the Organic Haze, spherical molecule theory Two Thumbs Up and stated that “Wolf and Toon may have gotten this just right.”
So relax all of you naysayers. Read the findings in detail in “Science” magazine, read Chyba’s critique –and most of all, get used to the fact that Wolf and Toon have changed the way we view the early earth. Geez, you guys sound as shrill and hysterical as the Creationist folk.
Dr. Steve J
Atmospheric Sciences
Titan proves that oil is the cheap and sustainable fuel we have been looking for.
The earth is not doomed and life is good. Now if NASA would quit worrying about the CO2 in the atmosphere and actually explore space.