Deep Purple Haze – the orginal sunscreen

Early Earth haze likely provided ultraviolet shield for planet, says CU-Boulder study. See press release here.

Earth’s thick organic haze 3 billion years ago likely similar to haze hovering over Saturn moon Titan today

A new study by CU-Boulder researchers indicates a thick organic haze shrouding Earth several billion years ago was similar to the one now hovering over Saturn’s largest moon, Titan (above)...

A new study shows a thick organic haze that enshrouded early Earth several billion years ago may have been similar to the haze now hovering above Saturn’s largest moon, Titan, and would have protected primordial life on the planet from the damaging effects of ultraviolet radiation.

The University of Colorado at Boulder scientists believe the haze was made up primarily of methane and nitrogen chemical byproducts created by reactions with light, said CU-Boulder doctoral student Eric Wolf, lead study author. Not only would the haze have shielded early Earth from UV light, it would have allowed gases like ammonia to build up, causing greenhouse warming and perhaps helped to prevent the planet from freezing over.

The researchers determined the haze of hydrocarbon aerosols was probably made up of fluffy, microscopic particles shaped somewhat like cottonwood tree seeds that would have blocked UV but allowed visible light through to Earth’s surface, Wolf said.

Prior to the new study, the prevailing scientific view was that the atmosphere of Earth some 3 billion years ago was primarily made up of nitrogen gas with lesser amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, hydrogen and water vapor, said Wolf. “Since climate models show early Earth could not have been warmed by atmospheric carbon dioxide alone because of its low levels, other greenhouse gases must have been involved. We think the most logical explanation is methane, which may have been pumped into the atmosphere by early life that was metabolizing it.”

A paper on the subject by Wolf and CU-Boulder Professor Brian Toon of the atmospheric and oceanic sciences department is being published in the June 4 issue of Science. NASA’s Planetary Atmosphere Program funded the study.

The output of the sun during the Archean period some 3.8 billion to 2.5 billion years ago is thought to have been 20 percent to 30 percent fainter than today, said Wolf. But previous work by other scientists produced geological and biological evidence that indicates Earth’s surface temperatures were as warm or warmer than today.

As part of the early Earth study, Wolf and Toon used a climate model from the National Center for Atmospheric Research and concepts from lab studies by another CU group led by chemistry and biochemistry Professor Margaret Tolbert that help explain the odd haze of Titan, the second largest moon in the solar system and the largest moon of Saturn. Titan came under intense study following the arrival of the Cassini spacecraft at Saturn in 2004, allowing scientists to determine it was the only moon in the solar system with both a dense atmosphere and liquid on its surface.

Previous modeling efforts of early Earth haze by other scientists assumed that aerosol particulates making up the haze were spherical, said Wolf. But the spherical shape does not adequately account for the optical properties of the haze that blanketed the planet.

Lab simulations helped researchers conclude that the Earth haze likely was made up of irregular “chains” of aggregate particles with greater geometrical sizes than spheres, similar to the shape of aerosols believed to populate Titan’s thick atmosphere. Wolf said the aggregate aerosol particulates are believed to be fragmented geometric shapes known as fractals that can be split into parts.

During the Archean period there was no ozone layer in Earth’s atmosphere to protect life on the planet, said Wolf. “The UV shielding methane haze over early Earth we are suggesting not only would have protected Earth’s surface, it would have protected the atmospheric gases below it — including the powerful greenhouse gas, ammonia — that would have played a significant role in keeping the early Earth warm.”

CU-Boulder researchers estimated there were roughly 100 million tons of haze produced annually in the atmosphere of early Earth during the Archean. “If this was the case, an early Earth atmosphere literally would have been dripping organic material into the oceans, providing manna from heaven for the earliest life to sustain itself,” Toon said.

“Methane is the key to make this climate model run, so one of our goals now is to pin down where and how it originated,” said Toon. If Earth’s earliest organisms didn’t produce the methane, it may have been generated by the release of gasses during volcanic eruptions either before or after life first arose — a hypothesis that will requires further study, he said.

The new CU-Boulder study will likely re-ignite interest in a controversial experiment by scientists Stanley Miller and Harold Urey in the 1950s in which methane, ammonia, nitrogen and water were combined in a test tube. After Miller and Urey ran an electrical current through the mixture to simulate the effects of lightning or powerful UV radiation, the result was the creation of a small pool of amino acids — the building blocks of life.

Toon said the theory of early Earth being shrouded by a gaseous blanket containing methane and ammonia first arose in the 1960s and was subsequently discarded by scientists. In the 1970s and 1980s some scientists suggested the early Earth atmosphere was similar to those on Mars and Venus with lots of carbon dioxide, another theory that eventually went by the wayside. Since CO2-rich atmospheres do not produce organic molecules easily, scientists began looking in deep-sea volcanic vents and at wayward asteroids to explain early Earth life.

A 1997 paper by the late Carl Sagan of Cornell University and Christopher Chyba, then at the University of Arizona, proposed that an organic aerosol shield in early Earth’s atmosphere would have protected the ammonia wafting beneath it, allowing heating to occur at Earth’s surface. But the authors proposed the haze particles were spherical rather than irregular aggregate particles Wolf and Toon suggest and did not consider methane to be the driver of the system, eventually sinking that theory.

“We still have a lot of research to do in order to refine our new view of early Earth,” said Wolf. “But we think this paper solves a number of problems associated with the haze that existed over early Earth and likely played a role in triggering or at least supporting the earliest life on the planet.”

From space, early Earth probably looked much like Titan looks today, said Toon. “It would have been shrouded by a reddish haze that would have been difficult to see through, and the ocean probably was a greenish color caused by dissolved iron in the oceans. It wasn’t a blue planet by any means.”

###
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kwik
June 4, 2010 12:31 am

“Since climate models show early Earth could not have been warmed by atmospheric carbon dioxide alone because of its low levels, other greenhouse gases must have been involved.”
Okay, here is 2 possibilities;
1) Dr. Wolf knows in detail the formulaes inside the climate models, and therefore is convinced they are right.
2) Dr. Wolf assumes the climate models are correct.
Which is it, I wonder.
I have a feeling its 2), and therefore his statement is false.

Archonix
June 4, 2010 12:53 am

Red atmosphere and green oceans? Sounds damn alien…
Am I surprised to see that a model filled with assumptions doesn’t stand up to reality? Okay it’s easy to grant that this particular assumption was a pretty fair one to make, without better information to hand. Spheres are a good starting point when you’re trying to model objects with unknown dimensions. The universe is very good at spheres…
Question for those in the know: has Titan ever demonstrated any form of lightning?

Stephen Wilde
June 4, 2010 1:04 am

How could they leave the hydrological cycle out of all that ?
It would have had a key role in affecting the constituents of the atmosphere as well as the temperature of the atmosphere.

Espen
June 4, 2010 1:21 am

Prior to the new study, the prevailing scientific view was that the atmosphere of Earth some 3 billion years ago was primarily made up of nitrogen gas with lesser amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, hydrogen and water vapor, said Wolf. “Since climate models show early Earth could not have been warmed by atmospheric carbon dioxide alone because of its low levels, other greenhouse gases must have been involved.
Interesting article, but as usual they don’t say much about the role of water vapor as a GHG – at least not in this press release.

June 4, 2010 1:46 am

“Since climate models show early Earth could not have been warmed by atmospheric carbon dioxide alone because of its low levels, other greenhouse gases must have been involved. …
“Methane is the key to make this climate model run …

Is someone possibly either
a) totally blind to any climate drivers except greenhouse gases
b) desperately trying to justify climate models that demonise CO2
c) desperately trying to get more funding
d) any two or all of the above?

Baa Humbug
June 4, 2010 1:49 am

The young sun also spun faster around it’s axis, meaning a faster solar wind, hence less cloud cover on earth, partially compensating for the low TSI.
If life did begin in the atmosphere, it would explain alot.

sandyinderby
June 4, 2010 1:56 am

“Prior to the new study, the prevailing scientific view was that the atmosphere of Earth some 3 billion years ago was primarily made up of nitrogen gas with lesser amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, hydrogen and water vapor, said Wolf. “Since climate models show early Earth could not have been warmed by atmospheric carbon dioxide alone because of its low levels, other greenhouse gases must have been involved.”
Does anyone know how these low levels of CO2 compare with the dangerously high life threatening levels we have now?

Ryan
June 4, 2010 2:08 am

Headline: “Scientists come up with wild unproveable theories of earth’s early days”
In other news: “Scientists fail to find cure for common cold”

June 4, 2010 2:34 am

Shock horror probe: global warming 3.8 billion years ago was not anthropogenic!

Jenne
June 4, 2010 2:48 am

How does this study relate to last month’s study in Nature about the faint-early sun paradox by Danish scientists who concluded that early earth had a smaller albedo (“darker”) and less clouds, leading to more absorption of sunlight compared to current conditions?
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7289/abs/nature08955.html
Abstract: Environmental niches in which life first emerged and later evolved
on the Earth have undergone dramatic changes in response to
evolving tectonic/geochemical cycles and to biologic interventions,
as well as increases in the Sun’s luminosity of about 25 to 30 per cent
over the Earth’s history. It has been inferred that the greenhouse
effect of atmospheric CO2 and/or CH4 compensated for the lower
solar luminosity and dictated an Archaean climate in which liquid
water was stable in the hydrosphere. Here we demonstrate,
however, that the mineralogy of Archaean sediments, particularly
the ubiquitous presence of mixed-valence Fe(II–III) oxides (mag-
netite) in banded iron formations9 is inconsistent with such high
concentrations of greenhouse gases and the metabolic constraints
of extant methanogens. Prompted by this, and the absence of geologic
evidence for very high greenhouse-gas concentrations10–13, we hypo-
thesize that a lower albedo on the Earth, owing to considerably less
continental area and to the lack of biologically induced cloud con-
densation nuclei, made an important contribution to moderating
surface temperature in the Archaean eon. Our model calculations
suggest that the lower albedo of the early Earth provided environ-
mental conditions above the freezing point of water, thus alleviating
the need for extreme greenhouse-gas concentrations to satisfy the
faint early Sun paradox.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/328/5983/1266
Abstract: The Archean Earth (3.8 to 2.5 billion years ago) was probably enshrouded by a photochemical haze composed of fractal aggregate hydrocarbon aerosols. The fractal structure of the aerosols would have had a strong effect on the radiative properties of the haze. In this study, a fractal aggregate haze was found to be optically thick in the ultraviolet wavelengths while remaining relatively transparent in the mid-visible wavelengths. At an annual production rate of 10^14 grams per year and an average monomer radius of 50 nanometers, the haze would have provided a strong shield against ultraviolet light while causing only minimal antigreenhouse cooling.

Dr A Burns
June 4, 2010 2:57 am

The authors seem unaware that early CO2 levels were much higher than currently:
http://www.paulmacrae.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/co2-levels-over-time.jpg
… or perhaps CO2 levels 20 times higher than currently are a tad embarrassing when you’re looking for research grants ?
They also seem unaware that greenhouse gases are not required for a warm planet. Any form of atmosphere will do. An excellent WUWT article recently explained this in detail.

June 4, 2010 3:15 am

I got the drop on you so schtick ’em up! Hand over the greens? Or we wont tell you what your ancestral cells ate for breakfast….
For the most aggressive AGW proponents maybe this study will be the holy grail, for haven’t the “gaia” warmed ever since the first of our ancestral cells got created? :()

pkatt
June 4, 2010 3:22 am

Well but Earth had quite a bit of volcanic activity, Titan does not have the same, according to this study http://astronomynow.com/081218IcyvolcanismlikelyonTitan.html
Earth and Titan have very little in common. I love the guessing tho. I remember having to memorize the rings of Saturn back when they thought they were made up of specific rings of minerals.. Someday we will do a close hi rez fly by .. and it will all change:) hehe

old construction worker
June 4, 2010 3:32 am

And still we don’t completely understand cloud formation.

David, UK
June 4, 2010 3:33 am

These model things are awesome, aren’t they? Veritable time machines. They can tell us what the future holds for our climate, and furthermore they can look billions of years into the past and tell us the cause of global temps at any given time. And the only requirement is the input of a few assumptions by the programmer.
Just amazing.

BillD
June 4, 2010 3:34 am

Dr. B.
The paper was talking about 3 billion years ago, before photosynthesis by cyanobacteria created an oxygenated atmosphere. The graph that you show is < 1 billion years ago, when earth's atmosphere was supporting a diversity of life, not just anaerobic microbes. It would certainly be interesting to know the estimate of CO2 for 3 billion years ago.

Mike Davis
June 4, 2010 3:40 am

It was Cannabis smoke that blocked the light from reaching the bulb! DIM BULB science!

Joe Lalonde
June 4, 2010 3:51 am

NASA’s Stance: If it sounds plausible to society, print it.
Of course, it will need further study, so more funding.
This thing is pure theory and could have been said for any planet or moon.
Again…Models made to work by any substace replacement.

June 4, 2010 4:20 am

Archonix says:June 4, 2010 at 12:53 am
. . . Question for those in the know: has Titan ever demonstrated any form of lightning?

Obviously not, otherwise it would have ignited all that methane and blown the planet up. 😉
It’s nice that scientists can send their papers here for review. WUWT has an impressive depth of competence in just about every discipline a climate or weather paper might touch upon, a much more comprehensive understanding than any single PhD peer-reviewer could possibly have. A researcher may find out in a matter of days where he’s full of baloney his weak points are.
The learned journals ought to require a pass through WUWT before submission for review.

Joe Lalonde
June 4, 2010 4:26 am

Every planet is an individual and should not be looked at as how this planet was formed. Changing substances of gases and mass, speed of rotation, past history with collisions, distance of sun, magnetics, other influencing planets, etc.
Once science totally understands the mechanics of this planet( which they do not), then they can have a general idea of possible theories to other planets formation and past.

Steve in SC
June 4, 2010 4:28 am

Based on what I read so far, I don’t believe I would give that boy his phd.

June 4, 2010 4:33 am

Dr A Burns
Reading your comment, I think you may have slightly misinterpreted my Venus article. Without a minimal amount of greenhouse gases, Venus would be cold. My point was that it makes little difference if the atmosphere of Venus is 10% CO2, or 99% CO2.
The first bit of greenhouse gas is very important for warming the planet. After that, most of the surface temperature is attributable to adiabatic heating.

rbateman
June 4, 2010 4:37 am

Where is the sample of Earth’s primordial atmosphere to ground these studies?

Steveta_uk
June 4, 2010 5:00 am

Since free O2 cannot exist in any appreciable quantity without life, and we are currently at around 20% O2, how much of this was bound up as CO2 around 3 billion years back?

Robert of Ottawa
June 4, 2010 5:03 am

If the Earth’s atmosphere was hydrocarbon-like, as is Titan’s, then does this lend credence to geophysical origins of some hydrocarbons?

1 2 3 4