"Catastrophic" retreat of glaciers in Spitsbergen

I’ve been given a report on glaciers and sea ice in the Arctic that I want to share with readers. There’s some compelling evidence of glacier melting and open water in the Arctic sea in this report that I haven’t seen before.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/04/21/article-0-045A7F52000005DC-33_634x422_popup.jpg
The lake at Borebukta on the Norwegian island of Spitzbergen emerged after a glacier melted. Image: Daily Mail

There are also worrisome reports of significant temperature increases, with anomalies of several degrees. Also in the report is the mention of ice free open sea of almost 2 million square kilometers, which is termed as “unprecendented in the history of the Arctic”.

It is shocking to read. I urge readers to have a look at some of the excerpts I’ve posted.

First a map. Spitsbergen is part of Svalbard, which is part of Norway.

http://en.academic.ru/pictures/enwiki/83/Spitsbergen.png

From the page 471 above, except for the date, this language seems familiar:

Well, we all know what a warm year 1934 was.

Here’s a mention of some strong temperature anomalies, as much as 10 degrees.

Here we see some significant reduction in Arctic sea ice across broad areas:

Wind seems to be a factor in flushing out the Arctic basin.

Signs that the “warming is not terminating”. Oh, that has to be bad.

Here’s the book:

All of these reports about sea ice and melt seems familiar, except the date, which is 1943.

There’s also a fascinating discussion about linkages between sunspots and precipitation on pages starting on page 460.

You can view the entire book here at archive.org

Oh and here’s that mention of “unprecendented in the history of the Arctic” open water from page 470:

The more things change, the more they stay the same. It seems from history that the Arctic ice is always going up or down. We can’t assume that our recent 2007 record sea ice minimum is something unique in the history of the Arctic ice.

And of course we’ve heard historical reports of a melting Arctic before, such as this one:

November 2nd, 1922. Arctic Ocean Getting Warm; Seals Vanish and Icebergs Melt.

Big hat tip to Richard North of the E.U. Referendum, who alerted me to this book.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

153 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
May 6, 2010 4:27 am

Paul Vaughan says:
May 5, 2010 at 3:40 pm
With deterministic short term temperature forecasts, we can prepare for, or mitigate our own circumstances in terms of agriculture, water supply, energy needs, and natural disasters such as floods or volcanoes. The likelyhood of damaging solar storms is also a very important issue with our current dependance on grid based power transmission, and satellite sysems for our communication, we need to know when these events will occur. I for one would not like to see any collapse of modern civilisation, not even one continent. As for the ecological impact of drought or cold, I would have thought that is largely in the hands of nature (leaving aside the impact of pollutants), we cannot do much about that unless we control the Sun.

Paul Vaughan
May 6, 2010 11:33 am

Ulric Lyons wrote: “[…] we cannot do much about that […]”
Studying & understanding nature is tremendously interesting. (Engineering it is not necessarily the goal! Nonetheless, if we pave the whole planet and wreck patch-connectivity, we do impact [sometimes fatally] dispersal & migration, which are necessary for survival during sustained climate change, whether natural or not.)

May 7, 2010 5:34 pm

Paul Vaughan says:
May 6, 2010 at 11:33 am
Give it x00yrs, we`ll control the solar wind input at Earth, decide when we want it rain, what kind of summer or winter we want, even if we want a tropical cyclone,
and source all our power from the ionospheric current generators!
Sorry about all the engineering, its my upbringing!

1 5 6 7
Verified by MonsterInsights