No mention of missing “M’s” here in this press release from University of Melbourne

Melting sea ice has been shown to be a major cause of warming in the Arctic according to a University of Melbourne study.
Findings published in Nature today reveal the rapid melting of sea ice has dramatically increased the levels of warming in the region in the last two decades.
Lead author Dr James Screen of the School of Earth Sciences at the University of Melbourne says the increased Arctic warming was due to a positive feedback between sea ice melting and atmospheric warming.
“The sea ice acts like a shiny lid on the Arctic Ocean. When it is heated, it reflects most of the incoming sunlight back into space. When the sea ice melts, more heat is absorbed by the water. The warmer water then heats the atmosphere above it.”
“What we found is this feedback system has warmed the atmosphere at a faster rate than it would otherwise,” he says.
Using the latest observational data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting, Dr Screen was able to uncover a distinctive pattern of warming, highly consistent with the loss of sea ice.
“In the study, we investigated at what level in the atmosphere the warming was occurring. What stood out was how highly concentrated the warming was in the lower atmosphere than anywhere else. I was then able to make the link between the warming pattern and the melting of the sea ice.”
The findings question previous thought that warmer air transported from lower latitudes toward the pole, or changes in cloud cover, are the primary causes of enhanced Arctic warming.
Dr Screen says prior to this latest data set being available there was a lot of contrasting information and inconclusive data.
“This current data has provided a fuller picture of what is happening in the region,” he says.
Over the past 20 years the Arctic has experienced the fastest warming of any region on the planet. Researchers around the globe have been trying to find out why.
Researchers say warming has been partly caused by increasing human greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, the Arctic sea ice has been declining dramatically. In summer 2007 the Arctic had the lowest sea ice cover on record. Since then levels have recovered a little but the long-term trend is still one of decreasing ice.
Professor Ian Simmonds, of the University’s School of Earth Sciences and coauthor on the paper says the findings are significant.
“It was previously thought that loss of sea ice could cause further warming. Now we have confirmation this is already happening.”
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
20,000 years ago, Chicago and New York were a mile deep in ice. Then the Neanderthals invented the Hummer, and all that beautiful ice started melting – forming the Great Lakes. This proves that the long-term trend is downwards.
55 million years ago, the Arctic was normally ice free. This proves that the long term trend is upwards.
Both trends can be correctly blamed on ancient soccer moms.
Ice needs an intake of calories to change from solid to liquid. With much ice floating around there isn’t going to be much atmospheric warming regardless of the source of those calories. If the ice melts or flushes out of the Arctic Ocean then the available calories can begin to change the temperature of the water and the overlying air.
Other than this, the report seems to be about 3 years behind the data.
So what caused the expansion of the ice sheet in the past? When it gets warmer ice melts. Ok. But that seems only half the story: what caused the ice to expand since 2007?
Uh-oh, that means that the increasing sea ice will cause cooling! That may reduce crop output, as well as other problems. It’s worse than we thought!
Is this even worth blogging about?
😉
Could this help explain the repeated observation that the sea ice grows in the winter and shrinks in the summer?
“In the study, we investigated at what level in the atmosphere the warming was occurring. What stood out was how highly concentrated the warming was in the lower atmosphere than anywhere else. I was then able to make the link between the warming pattern and the melting of the sea ice.”
Woaw it was the melting ice that warmed the lower atmosphere… Of course.
If soot is the major cause of ice melting, or A major cause, soot scrubbers on coal plants in China would be the quickest way to deal with this problem.
The full paper is here;
http://sciences.blogs.liberation.fr/files/arctique-ann%C3%A9es-2000-tures.pdf
An alarmist delight!
Circular reasoning in the Arctic Circle comes full circle.
The study is no more advanced in knowledge than similar efforts 50 years ago.
Totally clueless about what the triggering event/conditions are.
More ice makes more ice, less ice makes less ice.
Congratulations: The black hole of climate has been modeled.
Simply tip either way, and the result is either Pluto or Venus from here to eternity.
Martini anyone? lots of ice
Typical…what it shows is that the science is wrong and that the effect of GHG emissions was overstated…but the punchline, as always, is that our worst fears are being realized.
So arctic warming is caused in large part due to black carbon (50% over the past 120 years according to the paper referenced here http://news.mongabay.com/2009/0405-hance_blackcarbon.html) and the melting due to the black carbon induced melting (which would correspondingly account to 50% of the feedback)…but no mention of black carbon.
I covered much of the reason for the Arctic warming here.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/29/diverging-views/
What the paper doesn’t realize is that much of the warming they describe is a result of shore station extrapolation and shore station exposure to open sea water.
Ice melts at 0.01C and remains at that temperature untill ALL the ice has melted.
That is….this is….. …do they not understand………damn it …..we’re capsizing!!!!!!
I do not believe a word of the conclusion. If true the Arctic would not exists. This is pure BS. Parsing minuscule information to make dramatic conclusions.
Does the fact we have more ice now than before bother this finding? Or are we really tipping over and going to capsize???
That’s an “extent” point, right? Volume makes no difference except to the degree it impacts extant.
Can this be in the next IPCC report?? Does this concrete the belief we should all trust the scientist???
there all mad down there ask anybody that comes from sydney
Heh, I didn’t realize, but I was RIGHT!!!!! It is bad ice!!!!! Yes, we have more, but it is the bad kind!!!!!
“soccer moms” and ” sea ice acts like a shiny lid” – Tupperware.
Did these “scientists” sleep through their middle school science classes? Melting ice absorbs heat, thus chilling the surrounding water and air.
Sheesh!
Nature continues to embarrass itself. Used to be a respectable journal!
Steve: what happened to your “negative feedback” hypothesis? Oops.
Steve Goddard says:
March 31, 2010 at 10:54 pm
Open water at the poles means more heat loss to the atmosphere – i.e. cooling. That is a negative feedback.