New Theme for WUWT

Don’t worry readers, I’m trying an experiment. WUWT has looked the same for about 3 years, so I’m giving it a makeover. I’ve activated a newly designed theme for WUWT. This one has advantages over the old one in that it does a better job of supporting newer hi-res monitors such as the 20-24″ LCD/HDTV models that are becoming popular.

It also provides for larger text and images, better visibility of links, plus a few other features including a custom background which I’ll get to later.

In the meantime, let me know what you think in the poll below.

Sadly, no I still can’t offer an edit feature. wordpress.com hosting doesn’t support it.

UPDATE: Some readers say they can’t see links on the right side. They are there, try the horizontal scrollbar or set your monitor to a higher resolution. Also, wordpress during the upgrade nuked all my widgets on the right hand side, working to restore them -A

UPDATE: all the sidebar widgets are now restored. -A

UPDATE from CTM: Firefox users should  install the CA assistant and greasemonkey.

http://climateaudit.org/ca-assistant/

This gives you full previews and some preview and formatting buttons.

Make sure to set your installation settings to not hide old comments or much will disappear.

Comment Tab:

  • “Old” and “New” comments are defined by age in hours.
  • You can hide all old comments (default: 48 hours). Hiding older comments is a great way to simplify your view of more intense discussions. (On Lucia and RomanM’s sites, the content of old contents disappears, but Author/Date remain. Nice!)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

440 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 27, 2010 9:00 am

Much better, larger text a definite bonus.

Larey
April 27, 2010 9:02 am

Nothing basically wrong with the new theme but I would prefer a format that is a little more dense, more words packed into a smaller space? I found the old format font size and column width to be a little more readable. I mainly read on laptops so perhaps I just need some new monitors.

Leon Brozyna
April 27, 2010 9:02 am

Cleaner, crisper … way cool. So far, so good.

April 27, 2010 9:02 am

I’m missing the links down the side
REPLY: They are there, try the horizontal scrollbar or set your monitor to a higher resolution -A

vigilantfish
April 27, 2010 9:03 am

Hope the links on the right side of the page get put back. I think the new format is easier on the eyes. Nice!
REPLY: They are there, try the horizontal scrollbar or set your monitor to a higher resolution -A

Timothy Smith
April 27, 2010 9:04 am

I really do like the new look. Very crisp and clean.

April 27, 2010 9:04 am

Geez … and I had just submitted a post and got this strange-looking WUWT screen coming back at me – persistent after several refreshes even!!
.
.

LeoR
April 27, 2010 9:06 am

I miss the quick links to recent stories, and the other related links that were usually located on the right hand side of the page.

Phineas Fahrquar
April 27, 2010 9:06 am

It’s less crowded, which is good.

vigilantfish
April 27, 2010 9:07 am

Hi Anthony,
There is no horizontal scroll bar, which I assume should appear at the bottom of the page. I like the inclusion of HTML information below the text box; this will tempt tech illiterates like me to try to improve our formatting.
REPLY: Running a Mac or an ancient PC or some off-brand browser or all the above? -A

Bernie
April 27, 2010 9:07 am

A:
I see no links on the LHS except to the Archive. New look is OK.
B

David Snyder
April 27, 2010 9:07 am

Like the layout but miss the “home” blog summaries.

Dr.P
April 27, 2010 9:08 am

Like the look.
Will the usual quick links at the right hand side be available again, as they made checking things really quick.
Mark

LeoR
April 27, 2010 9:08 am

They are there, try the horizontal scrollbar or set your monitor to a higher resolution -A
I still don’t see the links to the right side of the page, There is no horzontal scrollbar, just the vertical one, is it just me?

LeoR
April 27, 2010 9:12 am

I am running Windows 7, using Google Chrome. My Win 7 settings are : DPI set to default “medium”, desktop resolution at 1920 x 1080. I don’t use the zoom feature of Google Chrome.

Erik
April 27, 2010 9:13 am

“supporting newer hi-res monitors such as the 20-24″ models”
Big Al will be very pleased I’m sure, the picture on his blog show him in front of 3 very big carbon footprinting monitors [rollseyes] – well, don’t do as I do, do as…

wws
April 27, 2010 9:14 am

I am running a new PC, and I see no horizontal scrollbar and no links to the side either. And this is a desktop system with a good sized rectangular screen – very mainstream viewing platform.

Matthew Edin
April 27, 2010 9:15 am

Looks too much like realclimate across the top!

vigilantfish
April 27, 2010 9:15 am

Hi Anthony,
I do use a two month-old Macbook Pro to look at your website. But I see that you’ve identified a problem. Thanks!

Paul Linsay
April 27, 2010 9:15 am

Don’t see a thing along the right side except the archive list. No scroll bars, bubkis. I’m using Safari on an iMac with OS X 10.5.8.

wws
April 27, 2010 9:16 am

additional – this is an IBM compatible platorm, not a mac, using Explorer.
I do see a link to archives on the side, but nothing else. No links to any of the sites, that was such a useful feature of the old format.

John from CA
April 27, 2010 9:17 am

Very Clean and the larger text is great but a bit to large. A majority of monitors are now landscape which could give you more space to play with.

Urederra
April 27, 2010 9:19 am

where is the Arctic ice extension graph?
And the spotless sun?
🙁

TJA
April 27, 2010 9:21 am

Ironically RealClimate’s logo has an image of the Sun, which they deny is an actor in the climate, and yours does not. I like the look overall, but I am running Vista on a spanking new laptop with 16X9 screen.

simon
April 27, 2010 9:22 am

it would be better with a lot less space between the main article heading and the article

1 2 3 18