Reposted from Climate Audit:
A savage article in the Times today by Ben Webster about the UEA submission to the UK Parliamentary Inquiry – the letter in which they tried to “trick” the Committee about the contents of the letter from the Information Commissioner. (A “trick”, according to Gavin Schmidt and the Penn State Inquiry, is a “good way” to solve a problem.)
The article – worth reading in full – re-caps correspondence discussed in yesterday’s post on the topic.
The UEA has now posted up all its correspondence.
Webster provides an interesting new statement from Dr Evan Harris, Liberal Democrat member of the Science and Technology Committee:
“It seems unwise, at best, for the University of East Anglia to attempt to portray a letter from the Information Commissioner’s Office in a good light, in evidence to the select committee, because it is inevitable that the Committee will find that letter, and notice any discrepancy.
“It would be a wiser course for the university not to provide any suspicion that they might be seeking to enable the wrong impression to be gained.”
Yup.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Why don’t the UEA just tell the Information Commissioner that they are just an evil sceptic and should be prosecuted for their belief.
Everytime I think: “that’s it, it can’t get any worse … now things will settle down as everyone absorbs the information so far”.
It does get worse!
Statistically, most scares fizzle out in a sea of forgetfulness and distration with other issues. Statistically, climategate should be quietly forgotten as the press find something “really” scary to scare us about.