Colliding Auroras Produce an Explosion of Light

From NASA
Colliding Auroras Produce an Explosion of Light
12.17.09

This three frame animation of THEMIS/ASI images shows auroras colliding on Feb. 29, 2008This three frame animation of THEMIS/ASI images shows auroras colliding on Feb. 29, 2008.

Credit: Toshi Nishimura/UCLA

› Larger Image

› View Animation

A network of cameras deployed around the Arctic in support of NASA’s THEMIS mission has made a startling discovery about the Northern Lights. Sometimes, vast curtains of aurora borealis collide, producing spectacular outbursts of light. Movies of the phenomenon were unveiled at the Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union today in San Francisco.

“Our jaws dropped when we saw the movies for the first time,” said space scientist Larry Lyons of the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), a member of the team that made the discovery. “These outbursts are telling us something very fundamental about the nature of auroras.”

The collisions occur on such a vast scale that isolated observers on Earth — with limited fields of view — had never noticed them before. It took a network of sensitive cameras spread across thousands of miles to get the big picture.

NASA and the Canadian Space Agency created such a network for THEMIS, short for “Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms.” THEMIS consists of five identical probes launched in 2006 to solve a long-standing mystery: Why do auroras occasionally erupt in an explosion of light called a substorm?

Twenty all-sky imagers (ASIs) were deployed across the Alaskan and Canadian Arctic to photograph auroras from below while the spacecraft sampled charged particles and electromagnetic fields from above. Together, the on-ground cameras and spacecraft would see the action from both sides and be able to piece together cause and effect-or so researchers hoped. It seems to have worked.

The breakthrough came earlier this year when UCLA researcher Toshi Nishimura assembled continent-wide movies from the individual ASI cameras. “It can be a little tricky,” Nishimura said. “Each camera has its own local weather and lighting conditions, and the auroras are different distances from each camera. I’ve got to account for these factors for six or more cameras simultaneously to make a coherent, large-scale movie.”

The first movie he showed Lyons was a pair of auroras crashing together in Dec. 2007. “It was like nothing I had seen before,” Lyons recalled. “Over the next several days, we surveyed more events. Our excitement mounted as we became convinced that the collisions were happening over and over.”

Locations and field of view map of the twenty all-sky imagers used in support of the THEMIS mission. Twenty all-sky imagers (ASIs) were deployed by researchers from the University of California Berkeley, the University of Calgary, and the University of Alaska in support of the THEMIS mission. This map shows their locations and field of view.

Credit: THEMIS/UC Berkeley.

› Larger Image The explosions of light, they believe, are a sign of something dramatic happening in the space around Earth-specifically, in Earth’s “plasma tail.” Millions of kilometers long and pointed away from the sun, the plasma tail is made of charged particles captured mainly from the solar wind. Sometimes called the “plasma sheet,” the tail is held together by Earth’s magnetic field.

The same magnetic field that holds the tail together also connects it to Earth’s polar regions. Because of this connection, watching the dance of Northern Lights can reveal much about what’s happening in the plasma tail.

THEMIS project scientist Dave Sibeck of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. said, “By putting together data from ground-based cameras, ground-based radar, and the THEMIS spacecraft, we now have a nearly complete picture of what causes explosive auroral substorms.”

Lyons and Nishimura have identified a common sequence of events. It begins with a broad curtain of slow-moving auroras and a smaller knot of fast-moving auroras, initially far apart. The slow curtain quietly hangs in place, almost immobile, when the speedy knot rushes in from the north. The auroras collide and an eruption of light ensues.

How does this sequence connect to events in the plasma tail? Lyons believes the fast-moving knot is associated with a stream of relatively lightweight plasma jetting through the tail. The stream gets started in the outer regions of the plasma tail and moves rapidly inward toward Earth. The fast knot of auroras moves in synch with this stream.

Artist rendering of the THEMIS satellite circling Earth The five spacecraft of THEMIS were built to answer fundamental questions about auroras.Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Conceptual Image Lab

› Larger Image Meanwhile, the broad curtain of auroras is connected to the stationary inner boundary of the plasma tail and fueled by plasma instabilities there. When the lightweight stream reaches the inner boundary of the plasma tail, there is an eruption of plasma waves and instabilities. This collision of plasma is mirrored by a collision of auroras over the poles.

National Science Foundation-funded radars located in Poker Flat, Alaska, and Sondrestrom, Greenland, confirm this basic picture. They have detected echoes of material rushing through Earth’s upper atmosphere just before the auroras collide and erupt. The five THEMIS spacecraft also agree. Last winter, they were able to fly through the plasma tail and confirm the existence of lightweight flows rushing toward Earth.

Dr. Tony Phillips

Heliosphysics News Team

Original Story Here.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

83 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James F. Evans
January 11, 2010 5:31 pm

anna v (22:06:35) wrote: “When the results of the mathematical solution are falsified, the theory is falsified. That is the scientific method in our days.”
The mathematical solution was falsified.
But “dark matter” was invented.
Of course, once the empirical scientific method is deviated from and “stuff” gets invented, to excuse such is to lead down a slippery slope to dogma and ultimately ignorance — but what’s worse, an ignorance we aren’t even conscious of — which makes it harder to overcome.
anna v: Let me ask a question: Do you have an experiment that would falsify “dark matter”?
Karl Popper stated if the theory can’t be falsified, it isn’t good science (because there is no way to prove it’s wrong).
How do you falsify “dark matter”?

Editor
Reply to  James F. Evans
January 11, 2010 5:34 pm

James F. Evans: “How do you falsify “dark matter”?”
You do the two experiments I’d previously linked to and which you ignored.

davesmith1au
January 11, 2010 6:00 pm

My advice to those wishing to discuss EU on this site, would be to stick to the topic of discussion, in this case the auroras and how “colliding” ones may cause “explosions of light” (?!).
It is not fair to Anthony Watts or to the other regular participants to be dragged into discussions of dark matter and such on this particular thread, or even on this forum except where brought up by the regulars here for some reason, and even then it’s best to avoid being sucked into such discussions if they’re not the topic of the originating article.
Please respect the hosts of the discussion, as we would ask them to respect the rules of our own fora.
In the interests of healthy and productive discussion, Dave Smith.

James F. Evans
January 11, 2010 6:20 pm

Mikelorrey, apparently not on this thread. I checked.
If you could refer me to where you linked, I’d be happy to take a look at them.
Anyway, my question was for anna v.

Carla
January 11, 2010 7:00 pm

James F. Evans (10:35:20) :
Example: It was discovered by observation & measurement that the edge of spiral galaxies and the core moved at the same speed.
This FALSIFIED the “theory” that gravity controlled spiral galaxy motion because if gravity controlled spiral galaxy motion the edge would move slower than the core.
But what was the response of mainstream astronomers & astrophysicists to this primary FALSIFICATION of their theory?
Admit that the theory was wrong?
Come up with a different theory?
No.
Instead, the “community” invented “dark matter” without ANY observation & measurement at all (other than the falsification of their model), and then plugged in the supposed “dark matter’s” gravity wherever they needed it to make the “gravity” only model work.
But for the falsification of the “gravity” only model of spiral galaxy rotation, “dark matter” would never have been thought of (since it has never been observed & measured).
>>>
You are serious. Yes .. you are serious about this.
There’s some Don Henley, Dirty Laundry in here somewhere.

anna v
January 11, 2010 10:54 pm

mharratsc
No need to apologize. It is an open forum and a free for all, as far as the mods allow:)
I will have a look at the links you give, but this will be my last on this thread.
James F. Evans
if you look at my precis above, anna v (12:24:31) , you will see that dark matter arose as a possibility from particle physics studies. That is how the neutrino was discovered and is living.
Dark matter abounds in the string theories that I was touching upon above. There are many more dimensions than the four, and the force that lives in the other dimensions is gravity. Particles that react only with gravity will be dark matter for the world.
If the coming experiments at CERN do not find traces of string theory inspired particles and behavior, the probability of string theories being the correct mathematical format for the TOE recedes and so does dark matter that is supported by them. This will force an upheaval in the pecking order for TOE and one would have to see what the better theory predicts while fitting existing data.
But yes, dark matter can be falsified in experiments in the lab.
Again, this is my last on the subject here.

Carla
January 12, 2010 5:02 am

this is my last on the subject here.
I think this article compliments the original subject, so ..
New Finding Shows Super-Huge Space Tornados Power the Auroras
April 23rd, 2009
..A new finding by a cluster of five space probes – the THEMIS, or Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms show that electrical funnels which span a volume as large as Earth produce electrical currents exceeding 100,000 amperes. THEMIS recorded the extent and power of these electrical funnels as the probes passed through them during their orbit of Earth. Ground measurements showed that the space tornadoes channel the electrical current into the ionosphere to spark bright and colorful auroras on Earth.
..Space tornadoes are rotating plasmas of hot, ionized gas flowing at speeds of more than a million miles per hour, far faster than the 200 m.p.h. winds of terrestrial tornadoes, according to Andreas Keiling, a research space physicist at the University of California, Berkeley’s Space Sciences Laboratory.
..Both terrestrial and space tornadoes consist of funnel-shaped structures. Space tornadoes, however, generate huge amounts of electrical currents inside the funnel. These currents flow along twisted magnetic field lines from space into the ionosphere where they power several processes, most notably bright auroras such as the Northern Lights, Keiling said.
..The THEMIS spacecraft observed these tornadoes, or “flow vortices,” at a distance of about 40,000 miles from Earth. Simultaneous measurements by THEMIS ground observatories confirmed the tornadoes’ connection to the ionosphere.
Keiling’s colleagues include Karl-Heinz Glassmeier of the Institute for Geophysics and Extraterrestrial Physics (IGEP, TU) in Braunschweig, Germany, and Olaf Amm of the Finnish Meteorological Institute.
The findings were presented today at the general assembly of the European Geosciences Union (EGU) in Vienna, Austria.
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/04/23/new-finding-shows-super-huge-space-tornados-power-the-auroras/

James F. Evans
January 12, 2010 8:49 am

Carla (05:02:14) :
Carla, you are on the right track — my apology to Mr. Watts and readers for my part in taking the thread off-topic.