This was the scene yesterday in Copenhagen. As you can see the scene is rather agitated with lots of police action, including use of billy clubs. As of this writing, no pictures or video is available of Lord Monckton’s account below. Hopefully somebody in the crowd will post some. I wish him well. I’ll also be glad when this conference is over. It has shown government at its worst.
From The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley in Copenhagen at the SPPI blog:
Today the gloves came off and the true purpose of the “global warming” scare became nakedly visible. Hugo Chavez, the Socialist president of Venezuela, blamed “global warming” on capitalism – and received a standing ovation from very nearly all of the delegates, lamentably including those from those of the capitalist nations of the West that are on the far Left – and that means too many of them.
Previously Robert Mugabe, dictator of Rhodesia, who had refused to leave office when he had been soundly defeated in a recent election, had also won plaudits at the conference for saying that the West ought to pay him plenty of money in reparation of our supposed “climate debt”.
Inside the conference center, “world leader” after “world leader” got up and postured about the need to Save The Planet, the imperative to do a deal, the necessity to save the small island nations from drowning, etc., etc., etc.
Outside, in the real world, it was snowing, and a foretaste of the Brave New World being cooked up by “world leaders” in their fantasy-land was already evident. Some 20,000 observers from non-governmental organizations – nearly all of them true-believing Green groups funded by taxpayers – had been accredited to the conference.
However, without warning the UN had capriciously decided that all but 300 of them were to be excluded from the conference today, and all but 90 would be excluded on the final day.
Of course, this being the inept UN, no one had bothered to notify those of the NGOs that were not true-believers in the UN’s camp. So Senator Steve Fielding of Australia and I turned up with a few dozen other delegates, to be left standing in the cold for a couple of hours while the UN laboriously worked out what to do with us.
In the end, they decided to turn us away, which they did with an ill grace and in a bad-tempered manner. As soon as the decision was final, the Danish police moved in. One of them began the now familiar technique of manhandling me, in the same fashion as one of his colleagues had done the previous day.
Once again, conscious that a police helicopter with a high-resolution camera was hovering overhead, I thrust my hands into my pockets in accordance with the St. John Ambulance crowd-control training, looked my assailant in the eye and told him, quietly but firmly, to take his hands off me.
He complied, but then decided to have another go. I told him a second time, and he let go a second time. I turned to go and, after I had turned my back, he gave me a mighty shove that flung me to the ground and knocked me out.
I came to some time later (not sure exactly how long), to find my head being cradled by my friends, some of whom were doing their best to keep the police thugs at bay while the volunteer ambulance-men attended to me.
I was picked up and dusted me off. I could not remember where I had left my telephone, which had been in my hand at the time when I was assaulted. I rather fuzzily asked where it was, and one of the police goons shouted, “He alleges he had a mobile phone.”
In fact, the phone was in my coat pocket, where my hand had been at the time of the assault. The ambulance crew led me away and laid me down under a blanket for 20 minutes to get warm, plying me with water and keeping me amused with some colorfully colloquial English that they had learned.
I thanked them for their kindness, left them a donation for their splendid service, and rejoined my friends. A very senior police officer then came up and asked if I was all right. Yes, I said, but no thanks to one of his officers, who had pushed me hard from behind when my back was turned and had sent me flying.
The police chief said that none of his officers would have done such a thing. I said that several witnesses had seen the incident, which I intended to report. I said I had hoped to receive an apology but had not received one, and would include that in my report. The policeman went off looking glum, and with good reason.
To assault an accredited representative of a conference your nation is hosting, and to do it while your own police cameramen are filming from above, and to do it without any provocation except my polite, non-threatening request that I should not be manhandled, is not a career-enhancing move, as that police chief is about to discover to his cost.
Nor does this incident, and far too many like it, reflect the slightest credit on Denmark. We must make reasonable allowance for the fact that the unspeakable security service of the UN, which is universally detested by those at this conference, was ordering the Danish police about. The tension between the alien force and the indigenous men on the ground had grown throughout the conference.
However, the Danish police were far too free with their hands when pushing us around, and that is not acceptable in a free society. But then, Europe is no longer a free society. It is, in effect, a tyranny ruled by the unelected Kommissars of the European Union. That is perhaps one reason why police forces throughout Europe, including that in the UK, have become far more brutal than was once acceptable in their treatment of the citizens they are sworn to serve.
It is exactly this species of tyranny that the UN would like to impose upon the entire planet, in the name of saving us from ourselves – or, as Ugo Chavez would put it, saving us from Western capitalist democracy.
A few weeks ago, at a major conference in New York, I spoke about this tendency towards tyranny with Dr. Vaclav Klaus, the distinguished economist and doughty fighter for freedom and democracy who is President of the Czech Republic.
While we still have one or two statesmen of his caliber, there is hope for Europe and the world. Unfortunately, he refused to come to Copenhagen, telling me that there was no point, now that the lunatics were firmly in control of the asylum.
However, I asked him whether the draft Copenhagen Treaty’s proposal for what amounted to a communistic world government reminded him of the Communism under which he and his country had suffered for so long.
He thought for a moment – as statesmen always do before answering an unusual question – and said, “Maybe it is not brutal. But in all other respects, what it proposes is far too close to Communism for comfort.”
Today, as I lay in the snow with a cut knee, a bruised back, a banged head, a ruined suit, and a written-off coat, I wondered whether the brutality of the New World Order was moving closer than President Klaus – or any of us – had realized.
Sponsored IT training links:
Did passing 70-620 was so easier like this? Subscribe for 642-654 products and guarantee pass JK0-016 on first attempt.
Thanks to the internet, “The whole world is watching.”
Lord Monckton has the guts of a hundred ordinary men. God bless him.
Monckton knew what to expect, however I’m quite certain the “greenies” did not expect they would be left out in the cold. Hopefully some of them will wake up to the fact that they have been used; a day comes when “useful idiots” are useful no longer, and to their own shock and dismay find themselves “purged.”
I know spelling is not the strong point of many on this blog, but I do wonder about the quality of an institution that grants a PhD to someone who can’t spell “anonymiser”.
Here is the last stanza from a light-verse poem, “Look What You Did,” Christopher, by Ogden Nash, in the book, The Ogden Nash Pocket Book (1945):
The American people,
With grins jocose,
Always survive the fatal dose.
And though our systems are slightly wobbly,
We’ll fool the doctor this time, probly.
oops — place the closing quote-mark after “Christopher”
(The reference in Nash’s poem was to Columbus.)
Don’t forget that the very first goal of the UN is to be funded independently. This circus will give them that funding. Can’t imagine what is top of the UN priority list, but I will lay odds that it will be armed to the teeth.
Robert Mugabe can pry “reparations” from my cold dead hand. In the UK at least, Brown will not be in office long enough to open the account.
The UN – taking climate crime to a whole new level.
Lord Monkton, hope you are non the worse for your ordeal. keep up the good work.
PLEASE LEAVE JACKSON ALONE, WE ARE HAVING SO MUCH FUN IN THE UK WITH HIS/HER COMMENTS
I congratulate Lord Monckton on his stand – and his work in presenting reasoned arguments which highlight how the initially poor and likely locally imperfect science of Mann, Hansen, Jones, Briffa and others in the CRU and at The Pennsylvania State University has so distorted perceptions of real processes opearating in our modern climate, and its response to the anthropogenic carbon dioxide load. Lord Monckton has a very strong platform to argue from – he is helping to expose fraudulent science, and, especially its implications for our future well being, in particualar noting that such likely fraudulent science is now the raison de etre for a serious proposal aimed at massive wealth redistribution between nations. Thus, Lord Monckton, why not argue with politeness and firmness, knowing you have fact on your side, instead of denigrating people, such as calling them liars and the like? This is just not necessary in my view – it polarises opinion – and makes your extraordinarily worthwhile message harder to get across.
So please continue with your efforts to expose the truth, but be POLITE and just present the facts, especially the corrected time-mean global temperature plots, including those which commence with the Egyptian Warm Period (3200 years BP, +2.8 C above current global mean surface temperatures) , and which conclude in 2008 with the missing data from Briffa, Mann and others properly included!
I agree that the reference to Rhodesia was a bit of a blooper. He should e-mail his drafts to a friendly editor / vetter before posting.
Here’s a comeback he could offer: “We still call it Burma, even though its dictators have renamed it Myanmar. Mutatis mutandis …”
Jackson – you are obviously a very intelligent person, able to look at arguments in a balanced way and come to a rational conclusion.
So let’s take it one step at a time – was it warmer in the Medieval warm period than it is now?
Evan said:
[REPLY – We don’t delete a whole lot of posts. Not sure what your posts involved. Were they badly off-topic? Religion and unrelated politics are discouraged. We are not here to discuss “creation” or the “truth” about 911 or whatever, UFOs, alleged government “conspiracies” etc., etc. There are plenty of other places for all that. ~ Evan]
No, they weren’t “badly off-topic” at all, and I’m not a troll.
But why are you suddenly charging that my posts were regarding “”creation” or the “truth” about 911 or whatever, UFOs, alleged government “conspiracies” etc.” BECAUSE THEY WEREN’T (shouting intended). Indeed, look at my past posts and consider the relevance of content.
Could be that your system is faulty.
[REPLY – I am not charging anything. I was merely stating our guidelines. As I said, I do not know what your posts involved. I was not the one who deleted them. ~ Evan]
Re: Monty (21:14:25) :
Hey…. we owe the Lords for the Magna Carta Libertatum, and don’t forget Lord Acton. I would gladly trade my rights as “Citizen Monty” for the original rights of Englishmen.
—
As an Englishman, so would I. Unfortunately those rights have been eroded as part of our government’s modernisation plans. This includes our Lords, where our upper house is busily being stacked by party loyalists to ensure legislation passes without challenge. Or in a few months, will get blocked. Democracy just isn’t what it used to be.
But I’d like to thank Lord Monckton for his courage and determination in exposing the myths and lies behind the consensus, and hope he encounters no more ‘robust’ treatment.
The way COP15 has been managed highlights just how shambolic the UN can be. Why allow so many delegates with so few spaces? It helps the PR circus I suppose, but I pity the people of Copenhagen if the mob doesn’t get it’s way by the time the conference closes.
[Oops! Forgot that I wasn’t quoting anyone. Corrected post:]
‘Jackson’ is a troll, an agent provocateur, a classic tool of the far left. His aim is to throw bombs into the public square, or less literally, to kick the ants’ nest of public discourse, as on blogs like this, in order to sow confusion and discord, thereby distracting citizens from their public duties, and the discussion at hand.
They turn up from time to time, and can contaminate and dominate threads to the point where they become mired in nasty back-and-forth and essentially unreadable. I’ve no fear that will happen here, as the moderators keep watch, but heed the basic maxim of the blogsphere: “Don’t Feed the Trolls.”
/Mr Lynn
@Martin Judge (01:53:59) “I am sorry but Monckton’s use of the old colonial name of Zimbabwe ruined another wise excellent account”
I think Monckton was being more subtle than you give him credit for. When Zimbabwe was Rhodesia, it was called the “breadbasket” of southern Africa. Now its people starve. Monckton was using barbed “code” to remind Mugabe – and anyone else who remembers their history lessons – of that.
Martin Judge (01:53:59)
I think you are being too precious. It is certainly bold language but to make the point that Mugabe now has no more legitimacy than Smith (and had done a great deal more damage) is not unreasonable.
The Con-munists have, once again, gone to their old “Stalinist” playbook.
Lord Monckton knocked out cold by police?
We are not amused.
Jackson?
We are very amused :o)
Aelfrith (23:17:17)
The weather change Stasi, climate stasi, or the global warming police. The good weather force, the heat wave squad.
*enter Barbarella*
Haha, Jackson’s Ph.D. in physics (and general knowledge) sounds like it’s really just Wikipedia open in another tab.
It’s not all doom and gloom.
George Monbiot was also locked out at Copenhagen.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/audio/2009/dec/17/copenhagen-elections-2009
My Lord, I would not particularly assign your assault to Communism, more to thuggery.
I was assaulted in a bar in Manchester for doing no worse than clapping at Arsenal scoring a goal on a big screen. The sports bar owners, far from wishing to sideline the thug and call the police, did the exact opposite.
Unfortunately for them, I found the time to raise the matter at suitable levels, implying that ‘in a CIVILISED society, such actions would lead to the removal of a license to sell intoxicating liquor…’, with a clear indication that the suitably ennobled CEO of the City Council might like to take decisive action….
I was gratified on a subsequent return to Manchester, which I left in disgust to work in Leeds, to note that the establishment had been taken over by new management…..
What we ARE witnessing, however, is the appeasement of young ‘idealistic’ thugs. WTO talks in Seattle led to violence. Nothing to do with politics. Thuggery. Ditto in the City of London.
The problem with these folks is that they are not sufficiently mature, not sufficiently discerning and not sufficiently open-minded to understand that there are two sides to every argument.
If there is a lesson for true leaders, it is the need to empower all with real information, rather than tolerating the distortion of argument with pseudo-facts which are fed to sheep.
A time for leadership to return to more mature, reflective folks, or must we reevaluate how to allow our young adults to establish their own generational mores and independence, which is a necessary prelude to raising their own families?
[Troll elsewhere. ~dbstealey, mod.]
tallbloke (00:27:34)
“When I go to a demo that I know the cops will try to turn into a riot,…” So the cops turn it into a riot and, of course, you and your buddies didn’t provoke the cops.
“I do as they do: Wear padding, a helmet, stout boots and take along my best kick-ass attitude.” No provoking on your part.
“To date, I’m in profit”. And you had no incentive not provoke the cops.
Folks, what’s wrong with this picture.
Dear Moderator. Have I been banned? If so, I respectfully ask that you un-ban me.
My “Troll” was not meant to be offensive in any manner. I was merely lampooning the likes of “Jackson.”
I’ve been reading some of Jackson’s posts, and I must admit; Wow!
Ph.D in his case does mean Permanent Head Damage.
But then again, fairly amusing stuff, so keep it coming.