The EPA CO2 regulation – Dec 7th 2009, a day we will not soon forget

EPA’ s Lisa Jackson panders to Copenhagen on opening day. Planned for months of course, with public comment ignored. It is now the people -vs- the EPA, coming to a courtroom near you.

click for the video at EPA

From the EPA press release:

EPA: Greenhouse Gases Threaten Public Health and the Environment

Science overwhelmingly shows greenhouse gas concentrations at unprecedented levels due to human activity

WASHINGTON – After a thorough examination of the scientific evidence and careful consideration of public comments, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that greenhouse gases (GHGs) threaten the public health and welfare of the American people. EPA also finds that GHG emissions from on-road vehicles contribute to that threat.

GHGs are the primary driver of climate change, which can lead to hotter, longer heat waves that threaten the health of the sick, poor or elderly; increases in ground-level ozone pollution linked to asthma and other respiratory illnesses; as well as other threats to the health and welfare of Americans.

“These long-overdue findings cement 2009’s place in history as the year when the United States Government began addressing the challenge of greenhouse-gas pollution and seizing the opportunity of clean-energy reform,” said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. “Business leaders, security experts, government officials, concerned citizens and the United States Supreme Court have called for enduring, pragmatic solutions to reduce the greenhouse gas pollution that is causing climate change. This continues our work towards clean energy reform that will cut GHGs and reduce the dependence on foreign oil that threatens our national security and our economy.”

EPA’s final findings respond to the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that GHGs fit within the Clean Air Act definition of air pollutants. The findings do not in and of themselves impose any emission reduction requirements but rather allow EPA to finalize the GHG standards proposed earlier this year for new light-duty vehicles as part of the joint rulemaking with the Department of Transportation.

On-road vehicles contribute more than 23 percent of total U.S. GHG emissions. EPA’s proposed GHG standards for light-duty vehicles, a subset of on-road vehicles, would reduce GHG emissions by nearly 950 million metric tons and conserve 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of model year 2012-2016 vehicles.

EPA’s endangerment finding covers emissions of six key greenhouse gases – carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride – that have been the subject of scrutiny and intense analysis for decades by scientists in the United States and around the world.

Scientific consensus shows that as a result of human activities, GHG concentrations in the atmosphere are at record high levels and data shows that the Earth has been warming over the past 100 years, with the steepest increase in warming in recent decades. The evidence of human-induced climate change goes beyond observed increases in average surface temperatures; it includes melting ice in the Arctic, melting glaciers around the world, increasing ocean temperatures, rising sea levels, acidification of the oceans due to excess carbon dioxide, changing precipitation patterns, and changing patterns of ecosystems and wildlife.

President Obama and Administrator Jackson have publicly stated that they support a legislative solution to the problem of climate change and Congress’ efforts to pass comprehensive climate legislation. However, climate change is threatening public health and welfare, and it is critical that EPA fulfill its obligation to respond to the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that determined that greenhouse gases fit within the Clean Air Act definition of air pollutants.

EPA issued the proposed findings in April 2009 and held a 60-day public comment period. The agency received more than 380,000 comments, which were carefully reviewed and considered during the development of the final findings.

Information on EPA’s findings: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/endangerment.html

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

308 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ron de Haan
December 7, 2009 5:43 pm
Michael
December 7, 2009 5:43 pm

Glenn Beck Climategate Warning CG Slaughtered Polar Bears Part 1 12-06-09

juanslayton
December 7, 2009 5:44 pm

My bad. Of course, it’s McIntyre

ShrNfr
December 7, 2009 5:44 pm

Smoot-Hawley 2009.

Frank K.
December 7, 2009 5:45 pm

None of this surprises me…and it will get worse before it gets better. People are actually waking up to what kind of ultra-progressive administration they (well, not me actually) elected last year. 2010 looks to be the year we can fight back at the ballot box. Until then…
And by the way – to those who think they can win the day in the courts, what kind of judges do you think the Obama administration is nominating?

David
December 7, 2009 5:46 pm

“It would depend on the person’s size and how active they are. Find the CO2 rates for an hour during sleep and being awake, multiply them by whatever you need and you’ll figure out an annual estimate.
However, a rough estimate (curtesy of “The Earth Blog”) assuming 12 breaths per minute (resting breath rate) is 500kg
The number is easy to estimate: breaths per minute x CO2 per breath x minutes per year
From Wiki – the breath rate is 12 to 25 per minute. Size of breath is 500 mL. Percent CO2 exhaled is 4% so CO2 per breath is approx 0.04g ( 2g/L x .04 x .5l).
CO2 Per year= 12 x 0.04 x 525600 (minutes per year) = 252kg/yr
CO2 (25 breaths) = 525 Kg/yr.
So – pick a number between 252 Kg/yr and 525Kg/yr
1000 lbs/year is a good figure of merit.”
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_CO2_is_exhaled_by_the_average_human_each_year
OK, so if the average human exhales 1000 lbs/yr and there are 6,000,000,000 humans we can assume that the combination of average human exhalation is 6,000,000,000,000 lbs/yr which works out to 3,000,000,000 tons/yr. Seems that fossil fuels aren’t the only major source of carbon, someone should definitely get regulating this problem immediately!! Thank you Lisa Jackson!!

AdderW
December 7, 2009 5:50 pm

If the law has passed, how will the US delegates be able to enter US soil, the airplanes must stop at the border no? and what about driving, is that banned? what are the penalties for exhaling?

Ron de Haan
December 7, 2009 5:50 pm

It’s like December, 7th 1941, only this time the enemy attacks us from within.
Hawai play’s a role too and Obama is very popular in Japan.

David
December 7, 2009 5:51 pm

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_CO2_is_exhaled_by_the_average_human_each_year
“It would depend on the person’s size and how active they are. Find the CO2 rates for an hour during sleep and being awake, multiply them by whatever you need and you’ll figure out an annual estimate.
However, a rough estimate (curtesy of “The Earth Blog”) assuming 12 breaths per minute (resting breath rate) is 500kg
The number is easy to estimate: breaths per minute x CO2 per breath x minutes per year
From Wiki – the breath rate is 12 to 25 per minute. Size of breath is 500 mL. Percent CO2 exhaled is 4% so CO2 per breath is approx 0.04g ( 2g/L x .04 x .5l).
CO2 Per year= 12 x 0.04 x 525600 (minutes per year) = 252kg/yr
CO2 (25 breaths) = 525 Kg/yr.
So – pick a number between 252 Kg/yr and 525Kg/yr
1000 lbs/year is a good figure of merit.”
Well, if 1000 lbs/yr is a figure of good merit and there are 6,000,000,000 (rounded down) people on Earth then human exhalation causes 6,000,000,000,000lbs/yr of emissions which works out to 3,000,000,000 tons/yr of CO2 emitted. Someone should do something about this.
Also, if people add 3,000,000,000 tons per year, then there math is off on how much fossil fuels add.

Ron de Haan
December 7, 2009 5:53 pm

Polar bears and BBQ sauce (17:09:32) :
And of course we have new psycho climate porn to boot:
These people are crazy and should be locked up. Really!

Robert of Ottawa
December 7, 2009 5:53 pm

Insane? Insane!
All your breath are belong to our deer leader.
How will the EPA regulate volcanoes?

David
December 7, 2009 5:53 pm

Oh crap, sorry about the double. It did not show up the first time.

Scott of Melb Australia
December 7, 2009 5:53 pm

Just imagine, the olympics will become outlawed due to exercise causing excessive CO2 production.
Runners will be shot
and sex will be strictly limited to once a year

David
December 7, 2009 5:57 pm

Oh geez. Sorry mods to make more work for ya. They did not even show up as awaiting moderation, which made me think I got eaten by the spam filter because of the link.
Reply: Patience is a quality possessed by some, desired in all. ~ ctm

December 7, 2009 5:57 pm

[I understand the cries of censorship will ring out, but you have lots of other places to post these smears. I don’t feel Anthony needs to offer you a venue. (well funded…that’s a laugh. we are all volunteers). ~ charles the moderator]

Robert of Ottawa
December 7, 2009 5:57 pm

Mike from Canmore, Bruce,
The USA gets the most (or second most) oil froim teh oil sands; Mexico is the other source. They would have to be insane to embargo their own major source of oil … oh, wait a minute.
I’m forgetting these people are communist ideologues and members of the Socialist Internationale.

December 7, 2009 5:58 pm

For all our careless talk we are going to do forced labour in geological CO2 storage facilities until the end of our lives.

Graeme From Melbourne
December 7, 2009 5:58 pm

That first sentance appears to be missing some words.
After a thorough examination of the scientific evidence as developed, packaged and published by the UN IPCC and careful consideration of public comments, before hitting the delete button… the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today
Now fixed.

December 7, 2009 5:58 pm

Watch now for the Surgeon General to declare a health hazard and let the regulations begin again!

Doug Arthur
December 7, 2009 5:59 pm

I have never felt so proud to be Canadian. Canada has won the “Fossil of the Day” award at Copenhagen. Go for a shut-out, Mr. Harper!

P Wilson
December 7, 2009 5:59 pm

David (17:51:16)
Not to mention adding the c02 breathed by all other species..
So what is the conclusion? Lovelock is right. Life is a stain and curse. Misanthropy is good, since if we can’t punish all life, we can at least fill ourselves with rather unecessary dogmatic misanthropy, brimstone and doom.

R Dunn
December 7, 2009 6:00 pm

Obligatory quote –
“In a democracy, the people get the government they deserve.”
Alexis de Tocqueville

photon without a Higgs
December 7, 2009 6:00 pm

Ron de Haan (17:03:19) :
Watch how Markey blinks–eyes of a liar.

Michael
December 7, 2009 6:01 pm

Bret Baier Best Climategate Discussion 12-06-09

Pamela Gray
December 7, 2009 6:04 pm

Sad to say, but both the Republicans and Democrats are to blame for this one. I am intent of belonging to a 3rd party without religious affiliation and that is dedicated to personal freedoms and responsibility. Neither party will get my vote “just because” ever again.