Ed Begley Jr. goes ballistic on Fox News. We saw something similarly unhinged with Center for American Progress Dan Wiess, also interviewed by Stuart Varney on Fox News.
From the YouTube description: Ed gets into a shoutfest and can’t stop pointing his finger at Stuart Varney of Fox News: “You’re spewing your nonsense again …” says Begley. We’re talking about Climategate..the recent discovery of e-mails by global warming ‘scientists’ that suggest a cover up..thousands of e-mails and documents (verified by the New York Times) have been released showing scientists trying to cover up the recent decline in temperatures and ‘trick’ the public.
By Ed’s reasoning, excluding everyone who is “not a degreed climate scientist” that rather puts Dr. James Hansen out of the picture, and many others, including Al Gore.
Watch the video below. Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Pathetic! Both!
Only take climate change advice from degreed climatologists. But your choice of light bulb is clearly a topic for Hollywood B-list actors.
The more hysterics the better.
I’m loving it.
Hey Ed:
The peer reviewed studies are colluded!
Yeah, I watched it ‘live’. Begley was yelling and screaming about ‘peer-review’. LOL but Varney didn’t seem to have the knowledge yet to knock peer-review down. Doesn’t matter, Begley being unhinged was sooooo delicious to watch.
(BTW, Begley was on Foxnews a couple weeks ago-forget if it was Hannity or what–and we learned his wife doesn’t believe any of it and thinks it’s all silly.)
And, believe it or not I saw pigs fly. MSNBC had a bit on ClimateGate (though they didn’t call it that). The NBC reporter was playing it down giving excuses for Jones et al, but the host (filling in for David Shuster) asked some pointed questions that made her say, yeah.
Tameron Hall (sp?) had her lips squeezed so tight you could barely tell she had a mouth. If looks could kill.
Wow!
Talk about getting red in the face and very pointy as well.
If Ed wants to live the way he does,that is fine,but he should be more diligent on what is happening in the world of climate research.Just making noises about who is qualified is not a convincing argument to build on.
It is a common failing when people fail to separate rational environmentalism activities from alarmist AGW propaganda,that pushes people to make the wrong decision on dealing with the dynamic climate processes we live under.
The question should be asked is why do people like ED be so gosh darn DEFENSIVE over the exposure of unethical and possibly criminal activities,as per the released e-mails.
“Peer Reviewed” is the magic word, if it’s not peer reviewed, forget all about it!
well that exchange certainly helped move the debate forward!
Is it a film or real life?
They’re getting desperate….
How many “climatologist” are on IPCC? NASA?
Let’s not behave like Varney.
Search the emails for Holdren and Obama … LOL, there they are!
Mantra, peer reviewed, peer reviewed.
History is not going to be kind to the pro-global warming crowd.
Greenhouse effect – fiction.
See: http://sites.google.com/site/earthquakepredictionbyjac/Home/greenhouse-effect/SUN-EARTH.Energy.Greenhouseeffect-fiction.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1
Peer Reviewed, Peer Reviewed that’s all you need to know folks. Even if it’s peer reviewed by a lying manipulating cheat and his lying cheating mates then that’s fine too.
You can see why they refused to debate the subject up until now, they are all a bunch of no nothing tree hugging loons. We need a lot more of this type of interview and the world will get to see the types they have put in charge of their future.
I Know!
“Peer review”… yes, he keeps mentioning that phrase as if that should be the sole criteria of climate “Truth”.
Most people who have not read the “Crutape Letters” do not realize that the peer review process has been taken over by the “Warmists”.
Only the inner circle gets to judge and jury of the entire peer review process. It has become a sham.
Peer-reviewed, my dear… I thought that this term is effectively dead.
Completely off topic but check this out. I might be wrong but it appears that Mann is suggesting a natural negative feedback??
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8381317.stm
“A key thing the team discovered was that, in the past, when the planet has been warmed by natural factors it has responded with another feedback mechanism known as the La Nina effect.
This can be thought of as the opposite of El Nino – a sort of “colder phase” of El Nino phenomenon. ”
“”If the response of the Earth in the past is analogous to the temperature increase caused by greenhouse gases… it could lend credence to this counterintuitive notion of a La Nina response to global warming,” said Professor Mann. “
[snip – understand your feelings – but let’s not go there -A] This video makes me so angry.
And I thought this post was going to be about Erectile Dysfunction.
I listened to this on the Sirius/XM Fox simulcast (Wed 11/15) and could barely understand them talking over each other.
This is precisely what make me think this is crap. What is it the lawyers say? “If the facts are on your side argue the facts; if the law is on your side argue the law. If neither is on your side bang the table.