You won’t want to miss Lord Christopher Monckton (Former advisor to UK Prime Minister Thatcher) on Glenn Beck – Today Friday, October 30th!
Monckton as many WUWT readers know, is a prominent skeptic and has been making presentations around the USA at college campuses, similar to what Al Gore does. Monckton recently criticized the Copenhagen Treaty and the potential for President Obama to sign it as possibly ceding US sovereignty to the UN on the issue.
Times below:
Monckton will be on Fox News Glenn Beck Show, with former UN Ambassador John Bolton, for the full hour. The topic will be all aspects of the Global Warming Scare and the push for a “new world order” to “deal” with it.
Expect fireworks!
FOX cable news Glenn Beck Show
Time: 5:00pm Eastern time zone
For viewers that don’t have Fox News, check this page afterwards and we’ll put up links to the recoreded video when it is available.
For now, this video of his recent presentation can be seen here
UPDATE:
Video of the interview is now available here
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Ron de Haan (00:27:17) :
Lord Monckton with Rayner
Ron-
That was great, thanks for the link.
Dave
4 billion (04:43:58) :
Decreasing LW flux in the H2O band shows that atmospheric water vapour has increased, contrary to what some say.
Atmospheric gases that create greenhouse effect,
* water vapor, which contributes 36–72%
* carbon dioxide, which contributes 9–26%
* methane, which contributes 4–9%
* ozone, which contributes 3–7%
People are proposing that it is the increase in CO2 has increased the GH effect, not that CO2 has become the primary driver.
One of the papers I referenced in my previous comment was Evans & Puckrin 2006 “Measurements of the Radiative Surface Forcing of Climate”
http://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2006/techprogram/paper_100737.htm
As a work of science I’ll admit I find little to recommend it, but the measurements of downward LW flux to the surface that they gathered do provide some intriguing insights. They claim to have determined an increase of 3.5 W/m2 in the downward LW flux of nonH2O GHGs in their observed data versus their modeled projections of pre-industrial levels and this is somewhat justified by their experimental observations. But, if you look at their included charts a more interesting story develops. The total flux for all the nonH2O GHGs for both measured values and modeled data, both contemporaneous and preindustrial, varies from about 16W/m2 in the summer to about 40W/m2 in the winter. The summer value is a dead match for their modeled preindustrial number, which seems to indicate that most all of the 3.5W/m2 in increased GHG flux they found occurred in the winter. Given that I’m in Minnesota and this study was conducted in my near neighbor Canada, I’d have to say that would be an unambiguously beneficial development.
More interesting is the data for Downward LW flux to the surface from H2O. The winter values range from 94W/m2 to 125W/m2 in winter and from 178W/m2 to 256W/m2 in summer. Given the limited scope of the study in both temporal[2 years] and geographic scales it’s hard to extrapolate any global significance from it, but it does seem to me to support the often offered statement that the top four GHGs are H2O, H2O, H2O, and H2O, and that any contribution of CO2 to the “greenhouse effect” is likely to be buried in random variation in H2O.
American right wing politics is poison outside a small section of the USA population.
It was large enough to elect the contract-with-America congress. And, if energized, it will be large enough to stop cap-and-trade and Copenhagen. The MSM and other moderates have fallen down on the job, so there’s no one else left.
gtrip (22:43:24) :
Why doesn’t the U.S. have an “English” accent but the blokes in Australia do? Think about it and read about it.
I’ve read that some people in southern Appalachia have accents that are a relic of English in the days before the current English accent evolved to what it is.