UPDATE: Related, a Pew Poll says fewer respondents also see global warming as a very serious problem; 35% say that today, down from 44% in April 2008.
From a press release by the Harris Poll sponsored by the Financial Times
Fewer Americans than people in 5 largest European countries give “green” responses in 6-nation Financial Times/Harris Poll on climate change
New York, NY — October 22, 2009 — A new Financial Times/Harris Poll in the United States and the five largest European countries finds that Americans under 65 are less likely than Europeans to see climate change as a major threat, to see the need for a new international agreement on climate change as a top priority or to favor increased aid to developing countries to help them deal with climate change. However, most people in all six countries agree, when asked, that signing a new treaty on climate change should be one of our top priorities.
These are some of the findings of a Financial Times/Harris Poll conducted online by Harris Interactive among 6,463 adults aged less than 65 in France, Germany, Britain, Spain, Italy and the United States between September 30 and October 7, 2009.
While there are a few exceptions, smaller proportions of Americans than of Europeans under 65 seem to be worried about climate change or to support policies to address it.
For example:
• While large majorities of people over 65 in all six countries see climate change as posing a threat to the world, fewer Americans (27%), than people in Britain (31%), France (46%), Italy (49%) or Spain (35%) see it as a “large threat.”
• In Europe, between 60% (in Britain) and 89% (in Italy) believe that, when governments meet in Copenhagen, “signing a new treaty . . . on climate change” should be one of the top priorities. In the United States, a lower 53% feel this way.
• Majorities of working people in France (67%), Spain (67%), and Italy (57%) believe that their employers “should be doing more” to “reduce their environmental impact.” Slightly less than half of workers in the United States (45%), Britain (44%) and Germany (48%) feel this way.
• Not many people under 65 in any of the six countries say they would be willing to pay more taxes to cut greenhouse gas emissions, and on this question the United States (21%) is in the middle of the pack, below Spain (29%), and Italy (23%) but above Britain (16%) France (15%) and Germany (15%).
• Far fewer people under 65 in the United States (12%) and in Britain (12%) than in Spain (36%), France (30%), Italy (26%) and Germany (20%) would like the products they buy to have labels showing “the amount of carbon emitted in the course of their production.”
• Americans (20%) are also much less likely than the Italians (54%), Spaniards (53%), French (52%) or Germans (51%) to support additional aid to developing countries to help them deal with climate change. The British (31%) are somewhat closer to Americans on this issue.
• Majorities in all five European countries, 51% in Britain and more than 60% in France, Italy, Spain and Germany believe that the world will be in a worse position “if there is no agreement at the Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December.” In the United States, a lower 45% believe this.
There is one related issue, however, on which Americans are more likely to feel strongly. Fully 83% of Americans under 65 believe the United States needs to reduce oil and gas imports from other countries. Those who feel this way in the other five countries vary from 50% in France to 71% in Italy.
So what?
In the early days of the environmental movement, following the publication of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, Americans were probably more concerned about the environment than people in most, possibly all, other countries. This poll shows that this is no longer the case. This is important because democratically elected governments are responsive to public opinion, even if they do not always do what majorities would like them to do.
Having said that, it is important to note that majorities, mostly large majorities, in all six countries including the United States, believe that signing a new climate change treaty should be “one of the top priorities.”
Note: The full questions asked can be seen here
Methodology
This FT/Harris Poll was conducted online by Harris Interactive among a total of 6,463 adults aged 16-64 within France (1,151), Germany (1,033), Great Britain (1,126), Spain (1,076) and the United States (1,017), and adults aged 18-64 in Italy (1,060) between September 30 and October 7, 2009. Figures for age, sex, education, region and Internet usage were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online.
All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most often not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments. Therefore, Harris Interactive avoids the words “margin of error” as they are misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible sampling errors with different probabilities for pure, unweighted, random samples with 100% response rates. These are only theoretical because no published polls come close to this ideal.
Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been weighted to reflect the composition of the adult populations of the respective countries. Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be calculated.
These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls and of the British Polling Council.

“This is the best you can come up with?” Leif
No, not at all. But I told you that I gave my final word on the subject. You can’t let it drop, it seems. So I wondered about your ankle.
Back2Bat (16:36:49) :
So I wondered about your ankle.
why would you worry about my ankle? Below that is the foot that crushed you. But it is good that you will not rear this subject again. This was my goal in the first place.
So the special relationship still exists. From the pole, it seems that the Brits and the Americans have a greater convergence of opinion on the subject of global warming than with other European countries. Long live the special relationship and common sense. Perhaps WUWT is a unifying influence.
We are an emotional species. Therefore in many cases, belief trumps data. Philosophy trumps data, religion trumps data, questionable IQ trumps data, hurt feelings trumps data. Just about anything trumps data. Massaged data trumps data. Statistics trumps data. Advertisement trumps data. I could go on but I think I am done.
“This was my goal in the first place.” Leif
Well, my point about your conceit stands proven. But I will continue to spread the word just not here.
As to whether you crushed me, you have not. You did not refute my last word but you seem to have misunderstood it. Go back and read it again, I suggest. I’ll keep my word.
“Therefore in many cases, belief trumps data. Philosophy trumps data, religion trumps data, questionable IQ trumps data, hurt feelings trumps data. Just about anything trumps data. Massaged data trumps data.” Pam
I’m looking forward to cold hard reality in the form of cold hard weather trumping it all. Then I am looking forward to red faces and not just from the cold.
Science will take a beating but it has grown arrogant and tyrannical. Perhaps it will police itself better in the future and not mix soft science with hard.
“Tim Clark (09:12:40) :
In Europe, between 60% (in Britain) and 89% (in Italy) believe that, when governments meet in Copenhagen, “signing a new treaty . . . on climate change” should be one of the top priorities. In the United States, a lower 53% feel this way.”
I’d hazard a guess the reason why there is 89% support in italy is that there are more people drawing some form of state funded benefit than there are working and contributing to the tax base. An alternate income is required.
This just in: A higher % of Americans than any other first world country don’t believe in the Theory of Evolution. They must know something that the scientists don’t….
Back2Bat (17:54:41) :
But I will continue to spread the word just not here.
That’s all that is needed. Good riddance.
ginckgo (19:06:01) :
This just in: A higher % of Americans than any other first world country don’t believe in the Theory of Evolution. They must know something that the scientists don’t….
Just shows why America will not remain a first world country much longer, as her science illiteracy deepens.
“Just shows why America will not remain a first world country much longer, as her science illiteracy deepens.” Leif
America could easily become tops in the world if it simple abolished the government school system. You see Leif, truth prevails on a level playing field;
it does not need help from tyrants.
“Good riddance.” Leif
You wish. I see you are full of logical fallacies that await my pinprick.
Back2Bat (18:05:44) :
“Therefore in many cases, belief trumps data. Philosophy trumps data, religion trumps data, questionable IQ trumps data, hurt feelings trumps data. Just about anything trumps data. Massaged data trumps data.” Pam
I’m looking forward to cold hard reality in the form of cold hard weather trumping it all. Then I am looking forward to red faces and not just from the cold.
Science will take a beating but it has grown arrogant and tyrannical. Perhaps it will police itself better in the future and not mix soft science with hard.
Well said, B2B.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA
Back2Bat (17:54:41) :
But I will continue to spread the word just not here.
Leif Svalgaard (19:51:02) :
That’s all that is needed. Good riddance.
You are shooting yourself in the foot, Leif.
You want THIS guy….on YOUR side.
Stop the emotive outbursts. I
t really is unbecoming of Science and the Scientific Method.
It REALLY is….
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA
CORRECTION: “It really is unbecoming of Science…”
Leif Svalgaard (19:53:19) :
ginckgo (19:06:01) :
This just in: A higher % of Americans than any other first world country don’t believe in the Theory of Evolution. They must know something that the scientists don’t….
Just shows why America will not remain a first world country much longer, as her science illiteracy deepens.
Your “science illiteracy” argument gets really REALLY old.
YOU ARE BROAD-BRUSHING (yes I am in caps) just like the “science illiterate” evolution-believers.
Leif…do you not see your error here….or are you immune to it?
Stop the broad-brush generalizations.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA
And the shining city on the scientific literacy hill is….?
Back2bat and others that say the cold is coming. Me thinks two sides of the mouth are talking. The AGW’s are accused of not being able to predict a chaotic system. But you can. Okay. I’ll bite. Are you saying that this winter will be bitterly cold? Where? And what weather/oceanic/atmospheric system do you think has substantially changed for this plunge to happen? You talk as if you are expected multiple degrees below average. Or are you saying that it will, someday in the future, be bitterly cold? If that is the case, what would be the cause then? I ask because you seem quite sure.
What study are you using to base your statement on regarding public schools? Are you saying they are not producing literate youth? In which area? Are private schools doing better when compared directly with public schools in each of these areas? Are public Universities also part of the problem in your mind? Show me the data.
The public school spanking boy gets really really old too. Back it up. Debate it.
savethesharks (20:33:55) :
You want THIS guy….on YOUR side.
If you mean THAT guy, absolutely not !
Your “science illiteracy” argument gets really REALLY old.
Perhaps, but steadily confirmed.
Pamela Gray (20:44:42) Grrrrr….what are you saying Pamela….or not saying?
And what weather/oceanic/atmospheric system do you think has substantially changed for this plunge to happen?
OK Pamela….what is your forecast?? Mild to warm PAC NW and stormy southern US….pretty normal for a fading moderate El Nino.
Shouldn’t you add the word “solar”? LOL
Oh….right….the entity that gives the world most of its heat and light….has no say in this equation.
Oh….riiiiiiiight.
I get it now. Thanks.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA
While this study does not include science, it demonstrates that conservative private schools may need to wake up and smell the coffee. When apples are compared with apples, the results are mixed. Except for those conservative school. Maybe someone should suggest that these conservative private schools invite some public school teachers in to get these classroom teachers up to snuff.
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard//pubs/studies/2006461.asp
And I should have paid attention in typing class back in high school.
Pam,
I can’t predict the future since I don’t own it. I hope it gets cold enough for long enough to reset a lot of nonsense. Frankly, I am very tired of a lot of pseudo-science (and pseudo-economics) ruining my world.
I’d like to predict the future
but surely if I do,
the One who owns the future
might pull a switcheroo.
I ask because you seem quite sure. Pam
It is a very strong hope since I know it would humble many and allow the world to go on a little longer. I don’t want it to end on my watch without my trying.