Obama's disconnect with America on the climate issue

Here’s the latest poll from Bloomberg on most important issues facing the country:

Bloomberg_poll_092209

Climate change ranks dead last in importance. Source: PollingReport.com

Now compare what the American People think to what Obama thinks in his UN speech today.

The following is the text of Obama’s speech as prepared for delivery today at the UN:

Good morning. I want to thank the Secretary-General for organizing this summit, and all the leaders who are participating. That so many of us are here today is a recognition that the threat from climate change is serious, it is urgent, and it is growing. Our generation’s response to this challenge will be judged by history, for if we fail to meet it — boldly, swiftly, and together — we risk consigning future generations to an irreversible catastrophe.

No nation, however large or small, wealthy or poor, can escape the impact of climate change. Rising sea levels threaten every coastline. More powerful storms and floods threaten every continent. More frequent drought and crop failures breed hunger and conflict in places where hunger and conflict already thrive. On shrinking islands, families are already being forced to flee their homes as climate refugees.

The security and stability of each nation and all peoples — our prosperity, our health, our safety — are in jeopardy. And the time we have to reverse this tide is running out.

And yet, we can reverse it. John F. Kennedy once observed that “Our problems are man-made, therefore they may be solved by man.” It is true that for too many years, mankind has been slow to respond to or even recognize the magnitude of the climate threat. It is true of my own country as well. We recognize that. But this is a new day. It is a new era. And I am proud to say that the United States has done more to promote clean energy and reduce carbon pollution in the last eight months than at any other time in our history.

We’re making our government’s largest ever investment in renewable energy — an investment aimed at doubling the generating capacity from wind and other renewable resources in three years. Across America, entrepreneurs are constructing wind turbines and solar panels and batteries for hybrid cars with the help of loan guarantees and tax credits — projects that are creating new jobs and new industries. We’re investing billions to cut energy waste in our homes, buildings, and appliances — helping American families save money on energy bills in the process. We’ve proposed the very first national policy aimed at both increasing fuel economy and reducing greenhouse gas pollution for all new cars and trucks — a standard that will also save consumers money and our nation oil. We’re moving forward with our nation’s first offshore wind energy projects. We’re investing billions to capture carbon pollution so that we can clean up our coal plants. Just this week, we announced that for the first time ever, we’ll begin tracking how much greenhouse gas pollution is being emitted throughout the country. Later this week, I will work with my colleagues at the G20 to phase out fossil fuel subsidies so that we can better address our climate challenge. And already, we know that the recent drop in overall U.S. emissions is due in part to steps that promote greater efficiency and greater use of renewable energy.

Most importantly, the House of Representatives passed an energy and climate bill in June that would finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy for American businesses and dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions. One committee has already acted on this bill in the Senate and I look forward to engaging with others as we move forward.

Because no one nation can meet this challenge alone, the United States has also engaged more allies and partners in finding a solution than ever before. In April, we convened the first of what have now been six meetings of the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate here in the United States. In Trinidad, I proposed an Energy and Climate Partnership for the Americas. We’ve worked through the World Bank to promote renewable energy projects and technologies in the developing world. And we have put climate at the top of our diplomatic agenda when it comes to our relationships with countries from China to Brazil; India to Mexico; Africa to Europe.

Taken together, these steps represent an historic recognition on behalf of the American people and their government. We understand the gravity of the climate threat.

We are determined to act. And we will meet our responsibility to future generations.

But though many of our nations have taken bold actions and share in this determination, we did not come here today to celebrate progress. We came because there is so much more progress to be made. We came because there is so much more work to be done.

It is work that will not be easy. As we head towards Copenhagen, there should be no illusions that the hardest part of our journey is in front of us. We seek sweeping but necessary change in the midst of a global recession, where every nation’s most immediate priority is reviving their economy and putting their people back to work. And so all of us will face doubts and difficulties in our own capitals as we try to reach a lasting solution to the climate challenge.

But difficulty is no excuse for complacency. Unease is no excuse for inaction. And we must not allow the perfect to become the enemy of progress. Each of us must do what we can when we can to grow our economies without endangering our planet — and we must all do it together. We must seize the opportunity to make Copenhagen a significant step forward in the global fight against climate change.

We also cannot allow the old divisions that have characterized the climate debate for so many years to block our progress. Yes, the developed nations that caused much of the damage to our climate over the last century still have a responsibility to lead. And we will continue to do so by investing in renewable energy, promoting greater efficiency, and slashing our emissions to reach the targets we set for 2020 and our long-term goal for 2050.

But those rapidly-growing developing nations that will produce nearly all the growth in global carbon emissions in the decades ahead must do their part as well. Some of these nations have already made great strides with the development and deployment of clean energy. Still, they will need to commit to strong measures at home and agree to stand behind those commitments just as the developed nations must stand behind their own. We cannot meet this challenge unless all the largest emitters of greenhouse gas pollution act together.

There is no other way.

We must also energize our efforts to put other developing nations — especially the poorest and most vulnerable on a path to sustainable growth. These nations do not have the same resources to combat climate change as countries like the United States or China do, but they have the most immediate stake in a solution. For these are the nations that are already living with the unfolding effects of a warming planet — famine and drought; disappearing coastal villages and the conflict that arises from scarce resources. Their future is no longer a choice between a growing economy and a cleaner planet, because their survival depends on both. It will do little good to alleviate poverty if you can no longer harvest your crops or find drinkable water.

That is why we have a responsibility to provide the financial and technical assistance needed to help these nations adapt to the impacts of climate change and pursue low-carbon development.

What we are seeking, after all, is not simply an agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions. We seek an agreement that will allow all nations to grow and raise living standards without endangering the planet. By developing and disseminating clean technology and sharing our know-how, we can help developing nations leap-frog dirty energy technologies and reduce dangerous emissions.

As we meet here today, the good news is that after too many years of inaction and denial, there is finally widespread recognition of the urgency of the challenge before us. We know what needs to be done. We know that our planet’s future depends on a global commitment to permanently reduce greenhouse gas pollution. We know that if we put the right rules and incentives in place, we will unleash the creative power of our best scientists, engineers, and entrepreneurs to build a better world. And so many nations have already taken the first steps on the journey towards that goal.

But the journey is long. The journey is hard. And we don’t have much time left to make it. It is a journey that will require each of us to persevere through setback, and fight for every inch of progress, even when it comes in fits and starts. So let us begin. For if we are flexible and pragmatic; if we can resolve to work tirelessly in common effort, then we will achieve our common purpose: a world that is safer, cleaner, and healthier than the one we found; and a future that is worthy of our children. Thank you.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
196 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John W.
September 22, 2009 1:52 pm

This issue has never been about the climate or protecting “Mother Earth.” From the start, this has been about establishing totalitarian governance on a global scale.

rbateman
September 22, 2009 1:54 pm

There is no other way.
That spells “Cap & Trade” and “we must act quickly”.
Maybe he is telling the UN what it wants to hear. Maybe not.
Maybe he is telling us what we think.
The disconnect is huge, either way it’s sliced.

September 22, 2009 1:56 pm

Failure for the green left propaganda machine.

Thomas J. Arnold.
September 22, 2009 1:56 pm

Leaders across the western world are upping the ante, Copenhagen is around the corner blah blah.
Obama is a little off, on the street Americans of all political persuasions are more concerned with matters closer to home ie jobs/health, this worries the Democrats and Obama particularly, he has staked a lot of political capital on his climate bill.
The weather/climate is the last thing on peoples minds in the States seemingly and I don’t blame them, some things are more important and immediately pressing. Much to the chagrin of Obama. Good on yer – ole uncle sam -where the people are showing climate sanity!

D. King
September 22, 2009 1:57 pm

MartinGAtkins (13:22:45) :
Earth to Obama….. It’s the economy stupid.
And from the originator of that quote.
This is from Jan 2008
Clairvoyant Clinton
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/01/bill-we-just-ha.html

September 22, 2009 2:00 pm

“a world that is safer, cleaner, and healthier than the one we found; and a future that is worthy of our children.”
Do it for those ±30.000 childeren below the age of 5 that will DIE TODAY because they lack that safer, cleaner, and healthier world. So how much time do we have left, 2 years, 5 years or perhaps 10 years? In 10 years time of doing nothing about those problems another 110 million kids under the age 5 will have died because they have no future at all.
How many people will have died of causes directly related to global warming in 10 years time?

Cassandra King
September 22, 2009 2:05 pm

Its a nice speech isnt it? But there are a few incorrect assertions in the presidents speech, he makes the basic error of confusing actual reality with a constructed artificial reality, its the departure from reality which is a little disturbing, more so when you consider this isnt me or you engaging in a flight from reality like buying a lotto ticket, it is the most powerful man in the world under the illusion that the words he speaks are true.
There is no sea level rise to speak of, there are no refugees fleeing some kind of anthropogenic global warming catastrophe because there are no effects from global warming.
There is no increase in violent storms/typhoons/hurricanes, the polar ice caps are stable, there is no tipping point on the horizon, no death spiral or irreversible catastrophe looming, there is no global warming because the planet is cooling and its as simple as that.
Obamas speech claims to present actual events whereas in fact he was talking about events yet to happen based soley on computer models of what may happen if the computer models are correct.
In effect the president is lying to us all, the leader of the western world telling lies before the UN.
What have we as a civilisation come to when the most powerful man in the world with instant access to the finest scientists and scientific institutions the planet has to offer and he cannot tell actual reality from a computer model prediction, has he not been told that the events in his speech have not actually happened yet and there is no real evidence they ever will happen?
The president talks about “carbon pollution” yet atmospheric CO2 is the key to life, a gas essential to all life on earth isnt a pollutant in any sense, when you cut to the chase its that simple, CO2 is life and it means life, it is no more a pollutant than O2.
I was left with the feeling that unless reality comes a knockin on the whitehouse door soon then we are all screwed.

GW
September 22, 2009 2:06 pm

This nonsens is mindnumbing !
I feel like Jack Nicholson’s character in One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest !

crosspatch
September 22, 2009 2:09 pm

“Do it for those ±30.000 childeren below the age of 5 that will DIE TODAY because they lack that safer, cleaner, and healthier world.”
We could save something closer to 5 million children under 5 who die of diarrhea every year, spend a lot less money, save a lot more lives and do much less damage to the economy.

Leon Brozyna
September 22, 2009 2:10 pm

Obooboo talks…
Joe Wilson answers…
Meanwhile, the climate proceeds at will, barely noticing mankind’s presence. And on the solar front, after taking a month long break, we’re getting a couple of quickly growing spots. Much more interessting than all that hot air at the UN.

September 22, 2009 2:11 pm

I think I need to [snip].

Evan Jones
Editor
September 22, 2009 2:14 pm

Overstatement from an understatesman.

Don B
September 22, 2009 2:15 pm

Court OKs global warming suits against power utilities.
http://www.denverpost.com/headlines/ci_13389821
Obama’s support of AGW will only encourage more of this.

Claude Harvey
September 22, 2009 2:27 pm

Our President intends to funnel massive additional revenue into the federal till one way or another. If he can’t do it through legislation, he has served notice he will do it from the Executive Branch through EPA rule-making. Unfortunately for us all, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way with their ruling that CO2 is subject to regulation by the EPA.
I’ll give heavy odds that the postulated EPA “rules” will translate into “revenue” lifted from your pockets and placed in the federal coffers. The President is on film record saying that he did not intend to ban coal-fired power plants in the U.S., but only to make it so expensive to operate they would go broke trying.

beng
September 22, 2009 2:28 pm

Sorry, I don’t have the stomach to read the Obaminator’s speech. About the same as trying to read Realclimate.

savethesharks
September 22, 2009 2:29 pm

It is ASTOUNDING that the president can say all of that with a straight face. He truly must believe it. It is really bizarre how politicized science has highjacked the world.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA

Dave Andrews
September 22, 2009 2:36 pm

Robert
“Do it for those ±30.000 childeren below the age of 5 that will DIE TODAY because they lack that safer, cleaner, and healthier world”
Precisely! There are so many areas in which we could improve the world, but the obsession with climate change means that money that could achieve the former will probably largely be wasted on attempts at mitigation of the latter.
I believe an old saying was “adapt and survive”.

Ack
September 22, 2009 2:36 pm

A near record corn crop this year in the US. Yep hard times for the ag industry.

Ron de Haan
September 22, 2009 2:36 pm
Philip_B
September 22, 2009 2:40 pm

Joel Shore, the survey questions from your link.
1. When compared with pre-1800s
levels, do you think that mean global temperatures
have generally risen, fallen, or
remained relatively constant?
2. Do you think human activity is a significant
contributing factor in changing
mean global temperatures?
With 3146 individuals completing

I’d answer ‘risen’ and ‘yes’ to these questions and I am most definitely a sceptic.
The fact of the matter is we don’t even know how many of the scientists who participated in the IPCC agreed with its published conclusions. And the IPCC participants would have been far from a random (ie representative) sample of scientists.
The scientific consensus claim is wholey political and has scientific validity at all.
The IPCC could easily have conducted a scientific survey of participants. I can only conclude they haven’t because they won’t like the results.

MDM
September 22, 2009 2:41 pm

Anthony, are you implying that Obama (or anyone else) should use polls to dictate climate policy? How is that any different from the “concensus science” Al Gore promotes? Should we also take a vote on whether or not to teach creationism in schools? That’s a scary proposition in my part of the country. Policy-makers have to rely on “expert” advice, flawed as it may be. It is dogmatic science that needs to be exposed and scrutinized.
REPLY: I’m simply pointing out that the vast majority of public opinion doesn’t agree with the President’s position on climate. Anything you read into it is your own conclusion. – A

savethesharks
September 22, 2009 2:44 pm

“More powerful storms will threaten every continent.”
Perhaps the President should take a look at Ryan Maue’s Accumulated Cyclone Energy chart and the nosedive it is taking before he opens his mouth too quickly on this issue.
Oh but that’s weather and not climate I forgot silly me.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA

Bill P
September 22, 2009 2:47 pm

Lost: One crisis. Hairy. Black and White. Lost since February.
Where, oh where, oh WHERE is our little pet crisis??
Please contact Rahm Emanuel, co the White House at the end of the block.

Kevin Kilty
September 22, 2009 2:50 pm

To say that the “United States has done more in the last eight months…” is just a way to give the Democrats credit for something, I am unsure what, without appearing blatantly partisan. By the way, what are these concrete things being done, other than a recession being underway which reduces demand for energy anyway? Politics is exactly the antithesis of science.

Jerry Lee Davis
September 22, 2009 2:50 pm

I’m fairly old now, and have seen several Presidents come and go. I can recall that many times I felt confused about which way America should go regarding some issue or the other. But no more!
Now, all I have to do is figure out what Mr. Obama says America must do (easy in this case, tougher in most other policy areas). Then, knowing what Mr. Obama thinks, I can be fully confident that the truth lies in the exactly opposite direction.